‘You really are a great big sister’ – parasocial relationships, credibility, and the moderating role of audience comments in influencer marketing

References

• Abidin, C. (2016). “Aren’t these just young, rich women doing vain things online?”: Influencer selfies as subversive frivolity. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, J. (2019, March 7). YouTube’s family vloggers worry about their future amid comment section crackdown. The Verge. Retrieved from http://www.theverge.com
   Google Scholar
• Archer, C., & Harrigan, P. (2016). Show me the money: How bloggers as stakeholders are challenging theories of relationship building in public relations. Media International Australia, 160(1), 67–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantine, P. W., & Martin, B. A. S. (2005). Forming parasocial relationships in online communities. Advances in Consumer Research, 32(1), 197–201. Retrieved from https://www.acrwebsite.org/web/conferences/proceedings.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Berryman, R., & Kavka, M. (2017). ‘I guess a lot of people see me as a big sister or a friend’: The role of intimacy in the celebrification of beauty vloggers. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(3), 307–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, M. (2019, February 28). YouTube will now disable comments on all videos featuring children. Mashable. Retrieved from http://www.mashable.com
   Google Scholar
• Brown, E. (2019, February 19). Instagram influencer marketing is exploding in popularity - but watch out for fraud. ZDNet. Retrieved from https://www.zdnet.com
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. J. (2015). Examining four processes of audience involvement with media personae: Transportation, parasocial interaction, identification, and worship. Communication Theory, 25(3), 259–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canel, M.-J., & Luoma-aho, V. (2019). Public sector communication: Closing gaps between citizens and public sector organizations. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, S. C., & Kamal, S. (2008). The effect of perceived blogger credibility and argument quality on message elaboration and brand attitudes. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 2(8), 26–37.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, S., & Cho, H. (2017). Fostering parasocial relationships with celebrities on social media: Implications for celebrity endorsement. Psychology & Marketing, 34(4), 481–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colliander, J., & Dahlén, M. (2011). Following the fashionable friend: The power of social media. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(1), 313–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colliander, J., & Erlandsson, S. (2015). The blog and the bountiful: Exploring the effects of disguised product placement on blogs that are revealed by a third party. Journal of Marketing Communications, 21(2), 110–124.
   Google Scholar
• Constine, J. (2019, September 2). Now Facebook says it may remove like counts. TechCrunch. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com
   Google Scholar
• Dervitsiotis, K. N. (2003). Beyond stakeholder satisfaction: Aiming for a new frontier of sustainable stakeholder trust. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 14(5), 515–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhanesh, G. S., & Duthler, G. (2019). Relationship management through social media influencers: Effects of followers’ awareness of paid endorsement. Public Relations Review, 45(3), 101765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibble, J. L., Hartmann, T., & Rosaen, S. F. (2016). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 21–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C. (2017). Exploring the credibility of online celebrities’ Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ember, S. (2015, August 2). Cool influencers with big followings get picky about their endorsements. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
   Google Scholar
• Enke, N., & Borchers, N. S. (2019). Social media influencers in strategic communication: A conceptual framework for strategic social media influencer communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 261–277.
   Google Scholar
• European Association for the Study of Obesity. (2019, April 29). Study scrutinizes credibility of weight management blogs by most. Retrieved from https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases
   Google Scholar
• Ferchaud, A., Grzeslo, J., Orme, S., & LaGroue, J. (2018). Parasocial attributes and YouTube personalities: Exploring content trends across the most subscribed YouTube channels. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 88–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, M. (2019, July 18). Instagram starts test to hide numbers of likes posts receive for users in 7 countries. Time. Retrieved from http://www.time.com
   Google Scholar
• Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. S. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(Suppl), 298–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K., & Freberg, L. (2011). Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 90–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, E. L., Choong, H. L., Clavio, G., & Walsh, P. (2012). Why we follow: An examination of parasocial interaction and fan motivations for following athlete archetypes on Twitter. International Journal of Sport Communication, 5(4), 481–502.
   Google Scholar
• Frobenius, M. (2011). Beginning a monologue: The opening sequence of video blogs. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3), 814–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge, J., & Gretzel, U. (2018). Emoji rhetoric: A social media influencer perspective. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(15–16), 1272–1295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Mediapsychology, 4(3), 279–305.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, R. E., Lafferty, B. A., & Newell, S. J. (2000). The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements and brands. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 43–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, M. (2019, July 21). As Instagram tests its ‘like’ ban, influencers will have to shift tactics to make money. CNBC. Retrieved from http://www.cnbc.com
   Google Scholar
• Habibi, M. R., Lariche, M., & Richard, M. O. (2014). The roles of brand community and community engagement in building brand trust on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 152–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., & Goldhoorn, C. (2011). Horton and Wohl revisited: Exploring viewers’ experience of parasocial interaction. Journal of Communication, 61, 1104–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, R. A., & Carr, C. T. (2015). Does being social matter? Effects of enabled commenting on credibility and brand attitude in social media. Journal of Promotion Management, 21(3), 371–390.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, A., & Schoenhoff, S. (2016). From celebrity to influencer: Tracing the diffusion of celebrity value across the data stream. In P. D. Marshall & S. Redmond (Eds.), A companion to celebrity (pp. 194–211). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observation on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19, 185–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L. (2015). Trust in product review blogs: The influence of self-disclosure and popularity. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(1), 33–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, K., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Influence of parasocial relationship between digital celebrities and their followers on followers’ purchase and electronic word-of-mouth intentions, and persuasion knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 155–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, Y., & Jeong, S. H. (2016). “This is a sponsored blog post, but all opinions are my own”: The effects of sponsorship disclosure on responses to sponsored blog posts. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 528–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• InfluencerDB. (2019, January 14). State of the industry – influencer marketing in 2019. InfluencerDB. Retrieved from https://blog.influencerdb.com
   Google Scholar
• Jin, S. A. A. (2011). Leveraging avatars in 3D virtual environments (Second life) for interactive learning: The moderating role of the behavioral activation system vs. behavioral inhibition system and the mediating role of enjoyment. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(5), 467–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, S. V., Muqaddam, A., & Ryu, E. (2019). Instafamous and social media influencer marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 37(5), 567–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapitan, S., & Silvera, D. H. (2016). From digital media influencers to celebrity endorsers: Attributions drive endorser effectiveness. Marketing Letters, 27(3), 553–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Zhang, X. A., & Zhang, B. W. (2016). Self-mocking crisis strategy on social media: Focusing on Alibaba chairman Jack Ma in China. Public Relations Review, 42(5), 903–912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyewski, E., Szczuka, J. M., & Krämer, N. C. (2016). The protagonist, my Facebook friend: How cross-media extensions are changing the concept of parasocial interaction. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 17(5), 355–374.
   Google Scholar
• Labrecque, L. I. (2014). Fostering consumer-brand relationships in social media environments: The role of parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2), 134–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lay-Hwa Bowden, J., Conduit, J., Hollebeek, L., Luoma-aho, V., & Apenes Solem, B. (2017). Engagement valence duality and spillover effects in online brand communities. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 27(4), 877–897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Kim, J., & Chan-Olmsted, S. M. (2011). Branded product information search on the web: The role of brand trust and credibility of online information sources. Journal of Marketing Communications, 17(5), 355–374.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. E., & Watkins, B. (2016). YouTube vloggers’ influence on consumer luxury brand perceptions and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5753–5760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liljander, V., Gummerus, J., & Söderlund, M. (2015). Young consumers’ responses to suspected covert and overt blog marketing. Internet Research, 25(4), 610–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., Lee, M. K. O., Liu, R., & Chen, J. (2018). Trust transfer in social media brand communities: The role of consumer engagement. International Journal of Information Management, 41, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lueck, J. A. (2015). Friend-zone with benefits: The parasocial advertising of Kim Kardashian. Journal of Marketing Communications, 21(2), 91–109.
   Google Scholar
• Luoma-aho, V. (2018). On Putnam: Bowling together – applying Robert Putnam’s theories of community and social capital to public relations. In O. Ihlen & M. Fredriksson (Eds.), Public relations and social theory: Key figures, concepts, and developments (pp. 195–214). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Luoma-aho, V., Pirttimäki, T., Maity, D., Munnukka, J., & Reinikainen, H. (2019). Primed authenticity: How do vlog audiences view the authenticity of influencers and sponsoring brands? International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 352–365.
   Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, E. F., Miller, J., & Phillips, B. J. (2013). The megaphone effect: Taste and audience in fashion blogging. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(1), 136–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mediakix. (2018). The influencer marketing industry global ad spend: A $5–$10 billion market by 2020. Retrieved from http://www.mediakix.com
   Google Scholar
• Men, L. R., & Tsai, W. S. (2013). Beyond liking or following: Understanding public engagement on social networking sites in China. Public Relations Review, 39(1), 13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morimoto, M., & La Ferle, C. (2008). Examining the influence of culture on perceived source credibility of Asian-Americans & the mediating role of similarity. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 30(1), 49–60.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M., & Anderson, E. (2015). “Charlie is so cool like”: Authenticity, popularity and inclusive masculinity on YouTube. Sociology, 49(6), 1200–1217.
   Google Scholar
• Munnukka, J., Maity, D., Reinikainen, H., & Luoma-aho, V. (2019). “Thanks for watching”. The effectiveness of YouTube vlog endorsements. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 226–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munnukka, J., Uusitalo, O., & Toivonen, T. (2016). Credibility of a peer endorser and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(3), 182–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ping, R. A., Jr. (2004). On assuring valid measures for theoretical models using survey data. Journal of Business Research, 57(2), 125–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöyry, E., Pelkonen, M., Naumanen, E., & Laaksonen, S.-M. (2019). A call for authenticity: Audience responses to social media influencer endorsements in strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 336–351.
   Google Scholar
• Pressrove, G., & Pardun, C. J. (2016). Relationship between personal technology use and the donor/volunteer: A parasocial approach. Journal of Promotion Management, 22(1), 137–150.
   Google Scholar
• Priporas, C.-V., Stylos, N., & Fotiadis, A. K. (2017). Generation Z consumers’ expectations of interactions in smart retailing: A future agenda. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 374–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quandt, T. (2012). What’s left of trust in a network society? An evolutionary model and critical discussion of trust and societal communication. European Journal of Communication, 27(1), 7–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintero Johnson, J. M., & Patnoe-Woodley, P. (2016). Exploring the influence of parasocial relationships and experiences on radio listeners’ consumer behaviors. Communication Research Reports, 33(1), 40–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rihl, A., & Wegener, C. (2019). YouTube celebrities and parasocial interaction: Using feedback channels in mediatized relationships. Convergence: the International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 25(3), 554–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. M., Perse, E., & Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12(2), 155–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson, J. (2009). “You are all loved so much”. Exploring relational maintenance within the context of parasocial relationships. Journal of Media Psychology, 21(4), 171–182.
   Google Scholar
• Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2019). Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soni, N., & Verghese, M. (2018). Analyzing the impact of online brand trust on sales promotion and online buying decision. IUP Journal of Marketing Management, 17(3), 7–24. Retrieved from https://www.questia.com/library/p439507/iup-journal-of-marketing-management
   Google Scholar
• Sood, S., & Rogers, E. M. (2000). Dimensions of parasocial interaction by letter-writers to a popular entertainment-education soap opera in India. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 15(3), 386–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southgate, D. (2017). The emergence of generation Z and its impact in advertising: Long-term implications for media planning and creative development. Journal of Advertising Research, 57(2), 227–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, K. J. (2003). Trust transfer on the World Wide Web. Organization Science, 14(1), 5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, Q., & Hoffner, C. A. (2010). Parasocial interaction with liked, neutral, and disliked characters on a popular TV series. Mass Communication & Society, 13(3), 250–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolson, A. (2010). A new authenticity? Communicative practices on YouTube. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(4), 277–289.
   Google Scholar
• Tsiotsou, R. H. (2015). The role of social and parasocial relationships on social networking sites loyalty. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 401–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukachinsky, R. (2010). Para-romantic love and para-friendships: Development and assessment of a multiple-parasocial relationships scale. American Journal of Media Psychology, 3(1/2), 73–94. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/comm_articles/19
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A. (2015). Generation Z: Technology and social interest. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 71(2), 103–113.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, G. (2010). Ordinary people and the media: The demotic turn. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Uzunoğlu, E., & Misci Kip, S. (2014). Brand communication through digital influencers: Leveraging blogger engagement. International Journal of Information Management, 34(5), 592–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakefield, J. (2019, August 27). ‘Dangerous’ AI offers to write fake news. The BBC. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Hamel, L. M., & Shulman, H. C. (2009). Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: A test of warranting theory using Facebook. Communication Research, 36(2), 229–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang, L., Zheng, X., Lee, M. K. O., & Zhao, D. (2016). Exploring consumers’ impulse buying behavior on social commerce platform: The role of parasocial interaction. International Journal of Information Management, 36(3), 333–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yannopoulou, N., Koronis, E., & Elliott, R. (2011). Media amplification of a brand crisis and its affect on brand trust. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(5–6), 530–546.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, H., Kwon, O., & Lee, N. (2016). Human likeness: Cognitive and affective factors affecting adoption of robot-assisted learning systems. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 22(3), 169–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. (2018). Evoking presence in vlogging: A case study of U. K. beauty blogger Zoe Sugg. First Monday, 23, 1.
   Google Scholar