Gender categorisation in representational market practice

References

• Atkinson, L. (2014). Green moms: The social construction of a green mothering identity via environmental advertising appeals. Consumption Markets & Culture, 17(6), 553–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azimont, F., & Araujo, L. (2007). Category reviews as market-shaping events. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(7), 849–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azimont, F., & Araujo, L. (2010). The making of a petrol station and the ”on-the-move consumer”: Classification devices and the shaping of markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(6), 1010–1018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettany, S., Dobscha, S., O’Malley, L., & Prothero, A. (2010). Moving beyond binary opposition: Exploring the tapestry of gender in consumer research and marketing. Marketing Theory, 10(1), 3–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchet, V. (2016). ‘We make markets’: Le rôle du salon ethical fashion show dans la catégorisation de la mode éthique [‘We make markets’: The role of the ethical fashion show in categorising the ethical fashion]. Recherche et Applications En Marketing (French Edition), 32(2), 27–47.
   Google Scholar
• Bobel, C. (2010). New blood: Third-wave feminism and the politics of menstruation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brace-Govan, J. (2010). Representations of women’s active embodiment and men’s ritualized visibility in sport. Marketing Theory, 10(4), 369–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clued In. (2015, October 12). The science of your cycle: Evidence-based app design. Retrieved from https://medium.com/clued-in/the-science-of-your-cycle-evidence-based-app-design-1969eab3fbcb
   Google Scholar
• Clued In. (2016, June 22). Accessibility and gendered language at Clue. Retrieved from https://medium.com/clued-in/accessibility-and-gendered-language-at-clue-4b79a1dfc033#.aq4qjowog
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, A. M. (2008). Gender in the making of commercial worlds: Creativity, vitalism and the practices of marketing. Feminist Theory, 9(3), 293–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, J., & Slater, D. (2014). Reassembling the cultural: Fashion models, brands and the meaning of ‘culture’ after ANT. Journal of Cultural Economy, 7(2), 161–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, J., & Harrison, R. (2010). Is advertising a barrier to male movement toward gender change? Marketing Theory, 10(1), 74–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurrieri, L., Previte, J., & Brace-Govan, J. (2012). Women’s bodies as sites of control: Inadvertent stigma and exclusion in social marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 33(2), 128–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagberg, J., & Kjellberg, H. (2014). How much is it? Price representation practices in retail markets. Marketing Theory, 15(2), 179–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, D., & Kjellberg, H. (2010). Segmenting a market in the making: Industrial market segmentation as construction. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(5), 784–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hello from Clue. (2016, May 10). Clue rated top menstrual tracking app. Retrieved from https://hello-clue.tumblr.com/post/144146003306/clue-rated-top-menstrual-tracking-app
   Google Scholar
• Hello from Clue (2016, October 20). Meet the clue medical board. Retrieved from https://hello-clue.tumblr.com/post/152066523401/meet-the-clue-medical-board
   Google Scholar
• Hello from Clue (2016, September 15). The rise of a new category: Femtech. Retrieved from https://hello-clue.tumblr.com/post/150446304286/the-rise-of-a-new-category-femtech
   Google Scholar
• Jacobi, E. S., Freund, J., & Araujo, L. (2015). Is there a gap in the market, and is there a market in the gap?’ How advertising planning performs markets. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(1/2), 37–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, S. J., & McKenna, W. (1978). Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kissling, E. A. (2006). Capitalizing on the curse: The business of menstruation. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kjellberg, H., & Helgesson, C.-F. (2007). On the nature of markets and their practices. Marketing Theory, 7(2), 137–162.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge (pp. 264–280). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LaVigne, M. (2014, February). Why app creators need to rethink their approach to designing “for women”. Fast Company. Retrieved from https://www.fastcompany.com/
   Google Scholar
• LaVigne, M. (2015, February 25). Why using a period tracking app doesn’t have to be a terrible experience. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@mikelavigne_/why-using-a-perisod-tracking-app-doesn-t-have-to-be-a-terrible-experience-6e9b6ae723c1
   Google Scholar
• Malefyt, T. W., & McCabe, M. (2016). Women’s bodies, menstruation and marketing ”protection:” interpreting a paradox of gendered discourses in consumer practices and advertising campaigns. Consumption Markets & Culture, 19(6), 555–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, E. (2001). The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKeage, K., Crosby, E., & Rittenburg, T. (2018). Living in a gender-binary world: Implications for a revised model of consumer vulnerability. Journal of Macromarketing, 38(1), 73–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostberg, J. (2010). Thou shalt sport a banana in thy pocket: Gendered body size ideals in advertising and popular culture. Marketing Theory, 10(1), 45–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ourahmoune, N., Binninger, A.-S., & Robert, I. (2014). Brand narratives, sustainability, and gender: A socio-semiotic approach. Journal of Macromarketing, 34(3), 313–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, M., & Elliott, R. (2002). Negotiating masculinities: Advertising and the inversion of the male gaze. Consumption Markets & Culture, 5(3), 231–249.
   Google Scholar
• Rinallo, D., & Golfetto, F. (2006). Representing markets: The shaping of fashion trends by French and Italian fabric companies. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(7), 856–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, C. (2007). Messengers of sex: Hormones, biomedicine and feminism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, C. (2013). Early puberty, ’sexualization’ and feminism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 20(2), 138–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, J., & Thedvall, R. (2017). Introduction: Exploring the boring. In J. Sandler & R. Thedvall (Eds.), Meeting ethnography: Meetings as key technologies of contemporary governance, development, and resistance (pp. 1–23). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, J. E., & Borgerson, J. L. (1998). Marketing images of gender: A visual analysis. Consumption Markets & Culture, 2(2), 161–201.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, J. E., & Zwick, D. (2004). Mirrors of masculinity: Representation and identity in advertising images. Consumption Markets & Culture, 7(1), 21–52.
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, V. (1995). Networking constructions of gender and constructing gender networks: Considering definitions of women in the British cervical screening programme. In K. Grint & R. Gill (Eds.), The gender-technology relation: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 146–173). London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Sjögren, E., & Helgesson, C.-F. (2007). The Q(u)ALYfying hand: Health economics and medicine in the shaping of Swedish markets for subsidized pharmaceuticals. The Sociological Review, 55(2), 215–240.
   Google Scholar
• Sobande, F., Mimoun, L., & Trujillo Torres, L. (2019). Soldiers and superheroes needed! Masculine archetypes and constrained bodily commodification in the sperm donation market. Marketing Theory. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1470593119847250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderland, P. L., & Denny, R. M. (2011). Consumer segmentation in practice: An ethnographic account of slippage. In D. Zwick & J. Cayla (Eds.), Inside marketing: Practices, ideologies, devices (pp. 137–161). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Takhar, J., & Pemberton, K. (2019). Reproducing “rhetrickery” in online fertility marketing: Harnessing the “rhetoric of the possible”. Consumption Markets & Culture, 22(4), 314–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oost, E. (2003). Materialized gender: How shavers configure the users’ femininity and masculinity. In N. Oudshoorn & T. Pinch (Eds.), How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies (pp. 193–208). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbrook, L., & Schilt, K. (2014). Doing gender, determining gender: Transgender people, gender panics, and the maintenance of the sex/gender/sexuality system. Gender & Society, 28(1), 32–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zayer, L. T., & Coleman, C. A. (2015). Advertising professionals’ perceptions of the impact of gender portrayals on men and women: A question of ethics? Journal of Advertising, 44(3), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwick, D., & Cayla, J. (2011). Inside marketing: Practices, ideologies, devices. In D. Zwick & J. Cayla (Eds.), Inside marketing: Practices, ideologies, devices (pp. 3–19). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar