Transhumanism in speculative fiction

References

• Adams, C., & Thompson, T. (2016). Researching a posthuman world: Interviews with digital objects. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ammi, K. (2019). Transhuman Hollywood: From normative fiction to predictive programming. No End Books. truefreethinker.com
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, S. (2008). Once upon a time: Myths, fairy tales, and legends in Margaret Attwood’s writings. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Asma, S. (2009). On monsters: An unnatural history of our greatest fears. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atwood, M. (2003). Oryx and Crake. McClelland and Stewart.
   Google Scholar
• Atwood, M. (2005). Moving targets: Writing with intent, 1982-2004. House of Anansi Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atwood, M. (2011). Other worlds: SF and the human imagination. Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, L. (2005). The enchantments of technology. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R. (2018), Victor Frankenstein is the real monster. Reason, April.  https://reason.com/2018/03/04/victor-frankenstein-is-the-rea/.
   Google Scholar
• Barrat, J. (2015). Our final invention: Artificial intelligence and the end of the human era. Thomas Dunne Books.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (1987). A modest proposal for creating verisimilitude in consumer information processing models and some suggestions for establishing a discipline to study consumer behavior. In A. F. Firat, N. Dholakia, & R. P. Bagozzi (Eds.), Philosophical and radical thought in marketing (pp. 361–372). Lexington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/209154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (1990). Me and thee versus mine and thine: How perceptions of the body influence organ donation and transplantation. In J. Shanteau & R. J. Harris (Eds.), Organ donation and transplantation: Psychological and behavioral factors (pp. 139–149). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2013). Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(October), 477–500. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/671052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2017). Consumers in an age of autonomous and semi-autonomous machines. In J. Sherry Jr. & E. Fischer (Eds.), Currents in consumer culture theory (pp. 5–32). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2018). Robots, cyborgs, and consumption. In A. Lewis (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of psychology and economic behaviour (pp. 741–758). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R., & Tumbat, G. (2005, March). The cult of Macintosh. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 8(3), 205–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10253860500160403
   Google Scholar
• Benko, S., & Hruby, A. (2015). Critical transhumanism as a religious ethic of otherness. In C. Mercer & T. Trothen (Eds.), Religion and transhumanism: The unknown future of human enhancement (pp. 255–270). Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergthaller, H. (2010). Housebreaking the human animal: Humanism and the problem of sustainability in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood. English Studies, 91(7), 228–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2010.518042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya, A., & Kedzior, R. (2012). Consuming the cyborg. Advances in Consumer Research, 40, 960–961. https://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/1012579/volumes/v40/NA-40
   Google Scholar
• Biles, J. (2013). Monstrous technologies and the telepathology of everyday life. In M. Levina & D.-M. T. Bui (Eds.), Monster culture in the 21st century: A reader (pp. 147–162). London.
   Google Scholar
• Bing, S. (2017). Immortal life (A soon to be true story). Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Bogost, I. (2012). Alien phenomenology, or what it’s like to be a thing. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Brautigan, R. (1967). All watched over by machines of loving grace. The Communication Company.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan-Oliver, M., & Cruz, A. (2016). The spectre of posthumanism in technology consumption: The death of the human? In S. Dobscha (Ed.), Death in a consumer culture (pp. 276–291). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burston, D. (2014). Cyborgs, zombies, and planetary death alienation in the 21st century. The Humanist Psychologist, 42(3), 283–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08873267.2014.928175
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. (1991). The Power of Myth. Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, N., & Saran, M. (2010). The primitive, technology, and horror: A posthuman biology. Ephemera, 10(2), 152–176. http://www.ephemerajournal.org/contribution/primitive-technology-and-horror-posthuman-biology
   Google Scholar
• Carney, S. (2011). The red market: On the trail of the world’s organ brokers, bone thieves, blood farmers, and child traffickers. William Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Cave, S. (2012). Immortality: The quest to live forever and how it drives civilization. Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, T. (2014). Human purpose and transhuman potential: A cosmic vision for our future evolution. Origin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, S. (1995). How to live forever: Science fiction and philosophy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (ed.) (2012). Animal, vegetable, mineral: Ethics and objects. Oliphaunt Books.
   Google Scholar
• Consalvo, M. (2004). Borgs, babes, drones, and the collective: Reading gender and the body in Star Trek. Women’s Studies in Communication, 27(2), 177–203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2004.10162472
   Google Scholar
• Cox, D., & Levine, M. (2016). ’I am not living next door to no zombie’: Posthumans and prejudice. Critical Philosophy of Race, 4(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5325/critphilrace.4.1.0074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daston, L., & Park, K. (1998). Wonders and the order of nature: 1150-1750. Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• DiMarco, D. (2005). Paradice lost, paradise regained: Homo Faber and the makings of a new beginning in Oryx and Crake. Papers on Language and Literature, 41, 170–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinello, D. (2005). Technophobia! Science fiction views of posthuman technology. University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M. (2017). Brain-to-brain interfaces and the role of language in distributing agency. In N. J. Enfield & P. Kockelman (Eds.), Distributed agency (pp. 59–66). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Disch, T. (1998). The dreams our stuff is made of: How science fiction conquered the world. New World: Touchstone.
   Google Scholar
• Donn, K. (2019). Neoliberal breakdowns: The biopolitics of the monstrous. Alluvium, 7(4).
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Farman, A. (2020). On not dying: Secular immortality in the age of technoscience. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1966/1989). The order of things. Routledge Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Franssen, T. (2014). Prometheus. In R. Ranisch & S. Sorgner (Eds.), Post- and transhumanism: An introduction (pp. 73–82). Peter Lang Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, B. (1987). ’Frankenstein’ with Kant: A theory of monstrosity, or the monstrosity of theory. SubStance, 16(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3685382
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (2004). Transhumanism. Foreign Policy, 144(144), 42–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/4152980
   Google Scholar
• Geraci, R. (2008). Apocalyptic AI: Religion and the promise of artificial intelligence. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 76(January), 138–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfm101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraci, R. (2010a). Apocalyptic AI: Visions of heaven in robotics, artificial intelligence, and virtual reality. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geraci, R. (2010b). The popular appeal of apocalyptic AI. Zygon, 45(April), 1003–1020. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01146.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraci, R. (2012). Cyborgs, robots, and eternal avatars: Transhumanist salvation at the interface of brains and machines. In J. Haag, G. Peterson, & M. Spezio (Eds.), The Routledge companion to religion and science (pp. 578–590). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glut, D. (1984). The Frankenstein catalogue. McFarland Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, E. (2002). Representations of the post/human: Monsters, aliens and others in popular culture. Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grantham, M. (2015). The transhuman antihero: Paradoxical protagonists of speculative fiction from Mary Shelly to Richard Morgan. McFarland & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Grech, V. (2014). The pinocchio syndrome and the prosthetic impulse. In R. Blackford & D. Broderick (Eds.), Intelligence unbound: The future of uploaded and machine minds (pp. 263–278). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1985). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the late twentieth century. Socialist Review, 15(February), 65–107.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, I. (1977). Prometheus as performer: Toward a posthumanist culture? A university masque in five scenes. Georgia Review, 31(4), 830–850. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41397536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, D., & Novak, T. (2018). Consumer and object experience in the internet of things: An assemblage theory approach. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(June), 1178–1204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. (2005). Archaeologies of the future: The desire called Utopia and other science fictions. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G. (2011). The universe of things. In G. Jones (Ed.), The universe of things (pp. 48–61). Aqueduct Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1968). The critique of the judgement (J. H. Bernard, Trans.). Hafner. (Original work published 1755)
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, R. (2003). Strangers, gods and monsters. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, R. (1999). The age of spiritual machines: When computers exceed human intelligence. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, A.-L. (2012). Cyborg as commodity: Exploring conceptions of self-identity, body and citizenship within the context of emerging transplant technologies. Advances in Consumer Research, 40, 386–394. https://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/1011658/volumes/v40/NA-40
   Google Scholar
• Lévi-Strauss, C. (1961). A world on the wane ( John Russell, Trans.). Hutchinson. (Original work published 1955)
   Google Scholar
• Lévi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural anthropology ( Claire Jacobson and Brook Shoepf, Trans.). Basic Books. (Original work published 1958)
   Google Scholar
• Marie, A. (2014, April 23). Frankenstein: The true monster. Owlcation. https://owlcation.com/humanities/Frankenstein-Invention-vs-Inventor.
   Google Scholar
• Markoff, J. (2015). Machines of loving grace: The quest for common ground between humans and robots. HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. (ed.) (2011). Religion and science fiction. Pickwick Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Moers, E. (1979). Female gothic. In G. Levine & U. C. Knoepflmacher (Eds.), The endurance of “Frankenstein”: Essays on Mary Shelley’s novel (pp. 77–87). University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulkay, M. (1996). Frankenstein and the debate over embryo research. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 21(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399602100202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novas, C. (2001, June 21-22). The political economy of hope: Patients’ organisations, science and bio-valve [Paper presentation]. The Postgraduate Forum on Genetics and Society, Nottingham University, Nottingham, UK [ as cited in Rose (2007)].
   Google Scholar
• O’Mathúna, D. (2014). Movies. In R. Ranisch & S. Sorgner (Eds.), Post- and transhumanism: An introduction (pp. 287–297). Peter Lang Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Pastourmatzi, D. (2014). Science fiction literature. In R. Ranisch & S. Sorgner (Eds.), Post- and transhumanism: An introduction (pp. 271–285). Peter Lang Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Pepperell, R. (2003). The posthuman condition: Consciousness beyond the brain. Intellect Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pilsch, A. (2017). Transhumanism, evolutionary futurism and the human technologies of Utopia. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasskin-Gutman, D. (2009). Chess metaphors: Artificial intelligence and the human mind. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, E. (1997). From soul to mind: The emergence of psychology from Erasmus Darwin to William James. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reef, C. (2018). The strange true tale of Frankenstein’s creator Mary Shelley. Clarion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rockoff, M. (2014). Literature. In R. Ranisch & S. Sorgner (Eds.), Post- and transhumanism: An introduction (pp. 251–270). Peter Lang Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Rollin, B. (1995). The Frankenstein syndrome: Ethical and social issues in the genetic engineering of animals. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A. (1991). Getting out of the Gernsback continuum. Critical Inquiry, 17(2), 411–433. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/448589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, F. (2018). In search of Mary Shelley: The girl who wrote Frankenstein. Pegasus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Savelescu, J. (2009). The human prejudice and the moral status of enhanced beings: What do we owe the gods? In J. Savelescu & N. Bostrom (Eds.), Human enhancement (pp. 211–247). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, H. (1986). The technological Utopians. In J. Corn (Ed.), Imagining tomorrow: History, technology, and the American future (pp. 119–36). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, L. (2006). Strange harvest: Organ transplants, denatured bodies, and the transformed self. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaviro, S. (2014). The universe of things: On speculative realism. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shelley, M. (2003). Frankenstein; or, the modern prometheus. Penguin Books. (Original work published 1818)
   Google Scholar
• Shelley, M., & Shelley, P. (1817). History of a six weeks’ tour through a part of France, Switzerland, Germany, and Holland. T. Hookham, Jr. and C. and J. Ollier.
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick, M. (2002). Embodying the monster: Encounters with the vulnerable self. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, P. (2009). Rules for the human zoo: A response to the Letter on Humanism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/dst3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford, A. (2016, February 11). Immanuel Kant on Benjamin Franklin. CIRCE Institute. https://www.circeinstitute.org/blog/immanuel-kant-benjamin-franklin.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, W. (1999). God and the chip: Religion and the culture of technology. Wilfrid Laurier Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tirosh-Samuelson, H. (2011). Engaging transhumanism. In G. Hansell & W. Glassie (Eds.), H^±: Transhumanism and its critics (pp. 19–52). Metanexus.
   Google Scholar
• Tirosh-Samuelson, H. (2012). Science and the betterment of humanity: Three British prophets of transhumanism. In H. Tirosh-Samuelson & K. Mossman (Eds.), Building better humans: Refocusing the debate on transhumanism (pp. 55–82). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, Z. (2018, December 5). Five of the most interesting movies about transhumanism. Interesting Engineering Publishing. https://interestingengineering.com/5-of-the-most-interesting-movies-about-transhumanism.
   Google Scholar
• Townshend, D. (2014). Terror and wonder: The Gothic imagination. The British Library.
   Google Scholar
• Vint, S. (2007). Bodies of tomorrow: Technology, science fiction, subjectivity. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vint, S. (2014). Science fiction: A guide for the perplexed. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. (2012). Godwired: Religion, ritual and virtual reality. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, M. (2019). On replacement body parts. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 16(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9889-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, A., Chiang, A., & Einsiedel, E. (2016). Climate change imaginaries. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 36(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467615622845.
   Google Scholar
• Yampolsky, R. (2016). Artificial intelligence: A futuristic approach. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar