Ontology and circulation: towards an eco-economy of persons

References

• Allard, O. (2003). De l’os, de l’ennemi et du divin. Réflexions sur quelques pratiques funéraires Tupi-Guarani. Journal de la Société des Américanistes, 89(2), 149–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4000/jsa.1543
   Google Scholar
• Argyrou, V. (2005). The logic of environmentalism: Anthropology, ecology and postcoloniality. Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Arnould, E. J., & Cayla, J. (2015). Consumer fetish: Commercial ethnography and the sovereign consumer. Organization Studies, 36(October), 1361–1386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615580012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnould, E. J., & Rose, A. S. (2016). Mutuality: Critique and substitute for Belk’s “sharing”. Marketing Theory, 16(1), 75–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593115572669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åsberg, C., & Braidotti, R. (2018). Feminist posthumanities: An introduction. In C. Åsberg & R. Braidotti (Eds.), A feminist companion to the posthumanities (pp. 1–22). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Atanasova, A. (2021). Re-examining utopia in contemporary consumption: Conceptualization and implications for marketing. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 11, 23-29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-021-00193-0
   Google Scholar
• Atran, S., & Medin, D. (2008). The native mind and the cultural construction of nature. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P. (1978). Marketing as exchange A theory of transactions in the marketplace. The American Behavioral Scientist, 21(March/April), 535–557. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427802100406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartiaux, F. (2008). Does environmental information overcome practice compartmentalisation and change consumers’ behaviours? Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(11), 1170–1180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bataille, G. (1991). The accursed share: An essay on general economy. Zone Books. (Original work published 1967).
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. (2019). For a critique of the political economy of the sign. Verso. ( Original work published 1972).
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(September), 139–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/209154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(August), 1595–1600. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W., Ger, G., & Askegaard, S. (2003). The fire of desire: A multisited inquiry into consumer passion. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(December), 326–351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/378613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belz, F.-M., & Peattie, K. (2010). Sustainability marketing: An innovative conception of marketing. Marketing Review St. Gallen, 27(5), 8–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11621-010-0085-7
   Google Scholar
• Bhuian, S. N., Amyx, D. A., & Shamma, H. M. (2014). An extension of consumer environmental behavior research among expatriates. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 24(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCoMA-01-2012-0005
   Google Scholar
• Bienenstock, S. (2018). Consumer bias. In A. Marciano, and G. Ramello (Eds.), Encyclopedia of law and economics (pp. 350-354). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_655-1
   Google Scholar
• Bird-David, N. (2006). Animistic epistemology: Why do some hunter-gatherers not depict animals? Ethnos, 71, 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840600603152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blowfield, M. E., & Dolan, C. S. (2008). Stewards of virtue? The ethical dilemma of CSR in African agriculture. Development and Change, 39(January), 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2008.00465.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhme, G. (1989). Für eine ökologische Naturästhetik. Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Borel-Saladin, J. M., & Turok, I. N. (2013). The green economy: Incremental change or transformation? Environmental Policy and Governance, 23(July–August), 209–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borland, H., & Lindgreen, A. (2013). Sustainability, epistemology, ecocentric business, and marketing strategy: Ideology, reality, and vision. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(September), 173–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1519-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabec de Mori, B. (2016). What makes natives unique? Overview of knowledge systems among the world’s indigenous people. In Past-Future-2016: Proceedings of the seminar on the protection of aboriginal wisdom creation (pp. 78–85). National Dong Hwa University.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, A., & Zwick, D. (2016). The field of business sustainability and the death drive: A radical intervention. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(June), 267–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2443-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briassoulis, H. (2002). Sustainable tourism and the question of the commons. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(4), 1065–1085. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(02)00021-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinberg, D., & Wood, R. (1983). A resource exchange theory analysis of consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(December), 330–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/208972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brombin, A. (2015). Faces of sustainability in Italian ecovillages: Food as 'contact zone'. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(September), 468–477. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (Eds). (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cahen-Fourot, L. (2020). Contemporary capitalisms and their social relation to the environment. Ecological Economics, 172(June), 106634. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, C. (2018). The romantic ethic and the spirit of modern consumerism (New extended ed.). Springer. ( Original work published 1987).
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, N., O’Driscoll, A., & Saren, M. (2013). Reconceptualizing resources: A critique of service-dominant logic. Journal of Macromarketing, 33(4), 306–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146713497755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, K., Lichrou, M., & O’Malley, L. (2020). Prefiguring sustainable living: An ecovillage story. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(17–18), 1658–1679. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2020.1801800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherrier, H., Szuba, M., & Özçağlar-Toulouse, N. (2012). Barriers to downward carbon emission: Exploring sustainable consumption in the face of the glass floor. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3–4), 397–419. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2012.658835
   Google Scholar
• Clark, W. W., II, & Bonato, D. (2020). Circular economy: The strategies to global business economics. In A. Sabban (Ed.), Innovation in global green technologies (pp. 123-132). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88617
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. (n.d.). Marx and the market [Unpublished manuscript]. University of Warwick.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R. (1990). Market dynamics as the engine of historical change. Sociological Theory, 8(2), 111–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/202200
   Google Scholar
• Cong, Y., Freedman, M., & Park, J. D. (2020). Mandated greenhouse gas emissions and required SEC climate change disclosures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247(February), 119111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conklin, B. A. (1995). Thus are our bodies, thus was our custom: Mortuary cannibalism in an Amazonian society. American Ethnologist, 22(February), 75–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1995.22.1.02a00040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, J., & Prothero, A. (2003). Sustainable consumption: Consumption, consumers and the commodity discourse. Consumption, Markets & Culture, 6(December), 275–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1025386032000168311
   Google Scholar
• Costa, L., & Fausto, C. (2010). The return of the animists: Recent studies of Amazonian ontologies. Religion and Society: Advances in Research, 1(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3167/arrs.2010.010107
   Google Scholar
• Cova, B., Dalli, D., & Zwick, D. (2011). Critical perspectives on consumers’ role as ‘producers’: Broadening the debate on value co-creation in marketing processes. Marketing Theory, 11(September), 231–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593111408171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane, A. (2000). Marketing and the natural environment: What role for morality? Journal of Macromarketing, 20(2), 144–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146700202004
   Google Scholar
• De Sabata, G. (1995). The false myth of unlimited economic growth. Environmental Conservation, 22(Autumn), 199–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900010584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia ( Brian Massumi, Trans.). The Athlone Press. ( Original work published 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Descola, P. (2012). Beyond nature and culture. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ditlevsen, K., Sandøe, P., & Lassen, J. (2019). Healthy food is nutritious, but organic food is healthy because it is pure: The negotiation of healthy food choices by Danish consumers of organic food. Food Quality and Preference, 71(January), 46–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, A. M., Clarke, B., & Brown, S. (1998). Romancing the market. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Drollinger, T. (2010). A theoretical examination of giving and volunteering utilizing resource exchange theory. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 22(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10495140903190416
   Google Scholar
• Eckhardt, G. M., Belk, R. W. & Wilson, J. A. J. (2015), The rise of inconspicuous consumption. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(7–8), 807–826. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2014.989890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckhardt, G. M., Houston, M. B., Jiang, B., Lamberton, C., Rindfleisch, A., & Zervas, G. (2019). Marketing in the sharing economy. Journal of Marketing, 83(September), 5–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919861929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engels, F. (1996). Outlines of a critique of political economy ( Martin Milligan, Trans.). ( Original work published 1843). https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/df-jahrbucher/outlines.htm
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. (2008). Territories of difference : Place, movements, life, redes. New ecologies for the twenty-first century. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. (2011, May 16). Reflections on “l’écologie des autres. L’anthropologie et la question de la nature” by Philippe Descola (Editions Quae). Revue du MAUSS. http://www.journaldumauss.net/spip.php?article810
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, L., Cavaliere, A., De Marchi, E., & Banterle, A. (2019). Can nudging improve the environmental impact of food supply chain? A systematic review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 91(September), 184–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, B., & Scaraboto, D. (2016). The systemic creation of value through circulation in collaborative consumer networks. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2020). Sustainability, feminist posts.humanism and the unusual capacities of (post) humans. Environmental Sociology, 6(2), 121–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2019.1704480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giesler, M. (2006). Consumer gift systems. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(September), 283–290. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/506309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesler, M. (2008). Conflict and compromise: Drama in marketplace evolution. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(April), 739–753. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/522098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesler, M., & Veresiu, E. (2014). Creating the responsible consumer: Moralistic governance regimes and consumer subjectivity. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(June), 840–857. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/677842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girod, B., Mayer, S., & Nägele, F. (2017). Economic versus belief-based models: Shedding light on the adoption of novel green technologies. Energy Policy, 101(February), 415–426. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, M. (Ed.). (1997). Privatizing nature. Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. (2011). Debt: The first 5000 years. Melville House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Guattari, F. (1989). The three ecologies ( I. Pindar and P. Sutton). Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halbmayer, E. (2012). Debating animism, perspectivism and the construction of ontologies. Indiana, 29( 03418642), 9–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18441/ind.v29i0.9-23
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (2007). When species meet. University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Hards, S. K. (2013). Status, stigma and energy practices in the home. Local Environment, 18(April), 438–454. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2012.748731
   Google Scholar
• Hebets, E. A., Barron, A. B., Balakrishnan, C. N., Hauber, M. E., Mason, P. H., & Hoke, K. L. (2016). A systems approach to animal communication. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Series B, 283, 20152889. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hietanen, J., Andéhn, M., & Bradshaw, A. (2018). Against the implicit politics of service-dominant logic. Marketing Theory, 18(March), 101–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593117692023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, E. (2011). Animals as agents: Hunting ritual and relational ontologies in prehistoric Alaska and Chukotka. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 21(3), 407–426. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774311000448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, D. B. (2012). Constructing sustainable consumption: From ethical values to the cultural transformation of unsustainable markets. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 236–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212453260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S., & Vicdan, H. (2016). Re-imagining the utopian: Transformation of a sustainable lifestyle in ecovillages. Journal of Business Research, 69(January), 120–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. (2008). Reification: A new look at an old idea. Oxford Scholarship Online.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M. (1947). Eclipse of reason. Seabury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, J. Q. (2017). The ambiguous figures of social enterprise: Gendered flexibility and relational work among the iAgents of Bangladesh. American Ethnologist, 44(November), 603–616. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubert, H., & Mauss, M. (1964). Sacrifice: Its nature and functions ( W. D. Halls, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hult, G., & Tomas, M. (2011). Market-focused sustainability: Market orientation plus! Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(February), 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0223–4
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, A. (2010). Megamarketing: The creation of markets as a social process. Journal of Marketing, 74(March), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.74.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. D. (1976). The nature and scope of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 40(July), 17–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297604000304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingenbleek, P. T. M., Meulenberg, M. T. G., & Van Trijp, H. C. M. (2015). Buyer social responsibility: A general concept and its implications for marketing management. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(13–14), 1428–1448. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1058848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2006). Rethinking the animate: Re-animating thought. Ethnos, 71(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840600603111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallbekken, S., & Sælen, H. (2013). ‘Nudging’ hotel guests to reduce food waste as a win–win environmental measure. Economics Letters, 19(June), 325–327. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatani, K. (2014). The structure of world history: From modes of production to modes of exchange. Duke University Press. ( Original work published 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Kempera, J. A., & Ballantine, P. W. (2019). What do we mean by sustainability marketing? Journal of Marketing Management, 35(3–4), 277–309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1573845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilbourne, W., McDonagh, P., & Prothero, A. (1997). Sustainable consumption and the quality of life: A macromarketing challenge to the dominant social paradigm. Journal of Macromarketing, 17(1), 4–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/027614679701700103
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, E. (2013). How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koistinen, A.-K., & Karkulehto, S. (2018). Feminism. Critical Posthumanism. https://criticalposthumanism.net/feminism/#_ftnref7
   Google Scholar
• Kolk, A., & Van Tulder, R. (2010). International business, corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. International Business Review, 19(2), 119–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopytoff, I. (1986). The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as process. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective (pp. 64–92). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, J. M. (2021). From predator to parasite: On private property and our ecological disaster. Journal of Economic Issues, 55(June), 416–422. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2021.1908804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laczniak, G. R., & Murphy, P. E. (2006). Normative perspectives for ethical and socially responsible marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 26(2), 154–177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146706290924
   Google Scholar
• Lagoarde-Segot, T., & Paranque, B. (2018). Finance and sustainability: From ideology to utopia. International Review of Financial Analysis, 55(January), 80–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2017.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambe, C. J., Wittmann, M., & Spekman, R. E. (2001). Social exchange theory and research on business-to-business relational exchange. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 8(3), 1–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1300/J033v08n03_01
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, A. (2019). Psychotic, acritical and precarious? A Lacanian exploration of the neoliberal consumer subject. Marketing Theory, 19(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593118796704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layton, R. A., & Grossbart, S. (2006). Macromarketing: Past, present, and possible future. Journal of Macromarketing, 26(2), 193–213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146706294026
   Google Scholar
• Levis, C., Costa, F. R. C., Bongers, F., Peña-Claros, M., Clement, C. R., Junqueira, A. B., Neves, E. G., Tamanaha, E. K., Figueiredo, F. O. G., Salomão, R. P., Castilho, C. V., Magnusson, W. E., Phillips, O. L., Guevara, J. E., Sabatier, D., Molino, J.-F., López, D. C., Mendoza, A. M., Pitman, N. C. A., Duque, A., & Ter Steege, H. (2017). Persistent effects of pre-Columbian plant domestication on Amazonian forest composition. Science, 355(6328), 925–931. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal0157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, E. K., & Uncles, M. D. (2007). Consumer savvy: Conceptualisation and measurement. Journal of Marketing Management, 23(5–6), 497–517. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1362/026725707X212793
   Google Scholar
• Malik, C., Singhal, N., & Tiwari, S. (2017). Antecedents of consumer environmental attitude and intention to purchase green products: Moderating role of perceived product necessity. International Journal of Environmental Technology & Management, 20(5/6), 259–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/IJETM.2017.091290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (2011). Capital, v. 1: A critique of political economy. Dover Publications. ( Original work published 1867).
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. (1990). The gift: Essay on the form and function of exchange. Routledge. ( Original work published 1924).
   Google Scholar
• McDonagh, P., & Prothero, A. (2014). Sustainability marketing research: Past, present and future. Journal of Marketing Management, 30(11–12), 1186–1219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2014.943263
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, S. J. (2019). Thinking nature: An essay in negative ecology. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Migliano, A. B., Battiston, F., Viguier, S., Page, A. E., Dyble, M., Schlaepfer, R., Smith, D., Astete, L., Ngales, M., Gomez-Gardenes, J., Latora, V., & Vinicius, L. (2020). Hunter-gatherer multilevel sociality accelerates cumulative cultural evolution. Science Advances, 6(9), eaax5913. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax5913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2002). Turning Callon the right way up. Economy and Society, 31(May), 218–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140220123135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittelstaedt, J. D., Shultz, C. J., Kilbourne, W. E., & Peterson, M. (2014). Sustainability as megatrend: Two schools of macromarketing thought. Journal of Macromarketing, 34(3), 253–264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146713520551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraca, B. (2016). Re-appropriating the ecosystem services concept for a decolonization of ‘nature’. In B. E. Bannon (Ed.), Nature and experience - phenomenology and the environment (pp. 143–156). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, R. (1967). Wilderness and the American mind. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naylor, R., Lamberton, C. P., & West, P. M. (2012). Beyond the “like” button: The impact of mere virtual presence on brand evaluations and purchase intentions in social media settings. Journal of Marketing, 76(November), 105–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil, D., et al. (2018, September 16). The EU needs a stability and wellbeing pact, not more growth. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/sep/16/the-eu-needs-a-stability-and-wellbeing-pact-not-more-growth
   Google Scholar
• Ölander, F., & Thøgersen, J. (2014). Informing versus nudging in environmental policy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37(September), 341–356. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-014-9256-2
   Google Scholar
• Pandya, A., & Dholakia, N. (1992). An institutional theory of exchange in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 26(12), 19–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569210022489
   Google Scholar
• Pashalidou, F. G., Lambert, H., Peybernes, T., Mescher, M. C., & De Moraes, C. M. (2020). Bumble bees damage plant leaves and accelerate flower production when pollen is scarce. Science, 368(6493), 881–884. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay0496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peattie, K., & Crane, A. (2005), Green marketing: Legend, myth, farce or prophesy? Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(4), 357–370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750510619733
   Google Scholar
• Peattie, K. (2001). Towards sustainability: The third age of green marketing. The Marketing Review, 2(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1362/1469347012569869
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, N. (1993). Demand sharing: Reciprocity and the pressure for generosity among foragers. American Anthropologist, 95(4), 860–874. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1993.95.4.02a00050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Books. (Original work published 1947)
   Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C. K. & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers. Harvard Business School Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Press, M., & Arnould, E. J. (2009). Constraints on sustainable energy consumption: Market system and public policy challenges and opportunities. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 28(1), 102–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.28.1.102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Press, M., & Arnould, E. (2011). American pastoralism: Linking post-war suburbia and community supported agriculture. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(2), 168–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540511402450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Press, M., & Arnould, E. J. (2014). Narrative transparency. Journal of Marketing Management, 30(13–14), 1353–1376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2014.925958
   Google Scholar
• Press, M., Arnould, E. J., Murray, J. B., & Strand, K. (2014). Ideological challenges to changing strategic orientation in commodity agriculture. Journal of Marketing, 78(November), 103–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.13.0280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prothero, A., Dobscha, S., Freund, J., Kilbourne, W. E., Luchs, M. G., Ozanne, L. K., & Thøgersen, J. (2011). Sustainable consumption: Opportunities for consumer research and public policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.30.1.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rival, L. (2012). The materiality of life: Revisiting the anthropology of nature in Amazonia. Indiana, 29( 03418642), 127–143. https://www.iai.spk-berlin.de/fileadmin/dokumentenbibliothek/Indiana/Indiana_29/IND_29_2012_127-143_Rival.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rival, L. (2015). Review article Que donne la nature, A. Caille, P. Chanial, & F. Filpo (Eds). 2013 Paris: La Découverte. Natures, Sciences, Sociétés, 23(2), 201–203.
   Google Scholar
• Rival, L. (2011). Animism and the meanings of life: Reflections from Amazonia. In M. Brightman, V. E. Grotti, & O. Ulturgasheva (Eds.), Animism in rainforest and tundra: Personhood, animals, plants and things in contemporary Amazonia and Siberia (pp. 69–81). Bergahnn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, T. D., & Arnould, E. J. (2020). Disembedded security: Portable technology and multi-domain energy practices. Marketing Theory, 20(March), 3–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593119870226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safari, A., & Albaum, G. (2019). Transactional or relational exchange theory in B2C marketing: An agenda for a different type of relational exchange theory. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 18(Summer), 87–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1362/147539219X15633616548579
   Google Scholar
• Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone age economics. Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlins, M. (1976). Practical reason. Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlins, M. (1996). The sadness of sweetness: The native anthropology of Western cosmology. Current Anthropology, 37(June), 395–428. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/204503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2003). Nature and technology in history. History and Theory, 42(December), 82–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2303.2003.00259.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schau, H. J., Muñiz, A. M., Jr., & Arnould, E. J. (2009). How brand community practices create value. Journal of Marketing, 73(September), 30–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.5.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheurenbrand, K., Parsons, E., Cappellini, B., & Patterson, A. (2018). Cycling into headwinds: Analyzing practices that inhibit sustainability. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 37(2), 227–244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915618810440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, C. J., & Holbrook, M. B. (1999). Marketing and the tragedy of the commons: A synthesis, commentary, and analysis for action. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 18(2), 218–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569901800208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2003a). Converging conventions of comfort, cleanliness, and convenience. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26(December), 395–418. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026362829781
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2003b). Users, technologies and expectations of comfort, cleanliness, and convenience. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 16(June), 193–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610304521
   Google Scholar
• Sierra, J. J., & McQuitty, S. (2005). Service providers and customers: Social exchange theory and service loyalty. Journal of Services Marketing, 19(6), 392–400. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040510620166
   Google Scholar
• Simard, S. (2021). Finding the mother tree. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, D., & Tonkiss, F. (2001). Market society: Markets and modern social theory. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2003). (An inquiry into the nature and causes of) the wealth of nations. Bantam Books. ( Original work published 1776).
   Google Scholar
• Sprenger, G. (2017). Communicated into being: Systems theory and the shifting of ontological status. Anthropological Theory, 17(1), 108–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499617699330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprenger, G. (forthcoming). Can animism save the world? In E. Halbmayer & E. Dürr (Eds.), Toward an anthropology of life in the anthropocene.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, L., Kearney, M., & Maclaran, P. (2013). Uddering the other: Androcentrism, ecofeminism, and the dark side of anthropomorphic marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(1–2), 158–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2013.764348 .
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. (2015). Globalization and its discontents. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Stoner, A. M. (2021). Things are getting worse on our way to catastrophe: Neoliberal environmentalism, repressive desublimation, and the autonomous ecoconsumer. Critical Sociology, 47(May), 491–506. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920520958099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathern, A., & Stewart, P. J. (1998). Seeking personhood: Anthropological accounts and local concepts in Mount Hagen, Papua, New Guinea. Oceania, 68(March), 170–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1834-4461.1998.tb02664.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. (1988). The gender of the gift: Problems with women and problems with society in Melanesia. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stronza, A. L. (2009). Commons management and ecotourism: Ethnographic evidence from the Amazon. International Journal of the Commons, 4(1), 56–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.137
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S. (2009). Ecosystem service commodities - a new imperial ecology? Implications for animist immanent ecologies, with Deleuze and Guattari. New Formations, 69(6), 111–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3898/NEWF.69.06.2010
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. (2000). Afterword: The role of the market in Max Weber's work. Theory and Society, 29(June), 373–384. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/1007056722175
   Google Scholar
• Tarfaoui, D., & Salah Zkim, S. (2017). Ecological attitude-behavior gap: A theoretical analysis. International Journal of Economics & Strategic Management of Business Process (ESMB), 8(1), 33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (2002). Modern social imaginaries. Public Culture, 14(1), 91–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-14-1-91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temesgen, A., Storsletten, V., & Jakobsen, O. (2021). Circular economy – reducing symptoms or radical change? Philosophy of Management, 20(March), 37–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-019-00112-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thal, A. (2020). The desire for social status and economic conservatism among affluent Americans. American Political Science Review, 114(May), 426–442. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, N. J. R. (2018). Sustainability marketing. The need for a realistic whole systems approach. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(17–18), 1530–1556. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1547782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traphagan, J. W. (2008). Embodiment, ritual incorporation, and cannibalism among the Iroquoians after 1300 C.E. Journal of Ritual Studies, 22(2), 1–12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44368787
   Google Scholar
• Trujillo, M. L. N. (2021). Notes for a critical and ecological view of patriarchal capitalism in the web of life. Capital & Class, 45(March), 21–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816820929115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., & Bruinsma, F. R. (2008). Managing the transition to renewable energy: Theory and practice from local, regional, and macro perspectives. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(January), 5–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veblen, T. (2009). The theory of the leisure class. Oxford University Press. ( Original work published 1899).
   Google Scholar
• Viveiros De Castro, E. (2007). The crystal forest: Notes on the ontology of Amazonian spirits. Inner Asia, 9(2), 153–172. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23614989
   Google Scholar
• Viveiros de Castro, E. (1998). Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4(September), 469–488. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3034157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace-Wells, D. (2019). The uninhabitable earth: Life after warming. Tim Duggan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, X., Lo, C .K. Y., Jung, S., & Choi, T. -M. (2021). From co-consumption to co-production: A systematic review and research synthesis of collaborative consumption practices. Journal of Business Research, 129(May), 282–294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhite, H., Shove, E., Lutzenhiser, L., & Kempton, W. (2000). The legacy of twenty years of energy demand management: We know more about individual behaviour but next to nothing about demand. In E. Jochem, J. A. Sathaye, & D. Bouille (Eds.), Behaviour, and climate change mitigation (pp. 109–126). Springer-Science+Business.
   Google Scholar
• Wilk, R. R., & Wilhite, H. L. (1985). Why don’t people weatherize their homes? An ethnographic solution. Energy, 10(May), 621–629. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(85)90093-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilk, R. R. (2010). Consumption embedded in culture and language: Implications for finding sustainability. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 6(2), 38–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2010.11908048
   Google Scholar
• Willerslev, R. (2013). Taking animism seriously, but perhaps not too seriously? Religion and Society, 4(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3167/arrs.2013.040103
   Google Scholar
• Woodburn, J. (1998). Sharing is not a form of reciprocity: An analysis of property-sharing in immediate-return hunter-gatherer societies. In C. M. Hann (Ed.), Property relations: Renewing the anthropological traditions (pp. 48–63). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wymer, W., & Polonsky, M. J. (2015). The limitations and potentialities of green marketing. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 27(3), 239–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2015.1053341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yngfalk, C. (2019). Subverting sustainability: Market maintenance work and the reproduction of corporate irresponsibility. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(17–18), 1563–1583. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1682031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, X., Radford, S., & Mourali, M. (2017). Antecedents and consequences of environmental beliefs: A meta-analysis. In AMA Marketing & Public Policy Academic Conference Proceedings (Vol. 27, pp. 55–56). American Marketing Association.
   Google Scholar