Being innovative, fun, and green? Hedonic and environmental motivations in the use of green innovations

References

• Abduljabbar, R. L., Liyanage, S., & Dia, H. (2021). The role of micro-mobility in shaping sustainable cities: A systematic literature review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 92, 102734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allem, J.-P., & Majmundar, A. (2019). Are electric scooters promoted on social media with safety in mind? A case study on Bird’s Instagram. Preventive Medicine Reports, 13, 62–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.11.013
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Altarawneh, L., Mackee, J., & Gajendran, T. (2018). The influence of cognitive and affective risk perceptions on flood preparedness intentions: A dual-process approach. Procedia Engineering, 212, 1203–1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.155
   Google Scholar
• Aroean, L., & Michaelidou, N. (2014). Are innovative consumers emotional and prestigiously sensitive to price? Journal of Marketing Management, 30(3–4), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2013.811094
   Google Scholar
• Arruda Filho, E. J. M., Simões, J. D. S., & De Muylder, C. F. (2020). The low effect of perceived risk in the relation between hedonic values and purchase intention. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(1–2), 128–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1697725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P. (1997). Goal-Directed behaviors in marketing: The role of emotion, volition, and motivation. Psychology & Marketing, 14(4), 309–313. h ttps://d oi.o rg/1 0.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199707)14:4309:AID-MAR13.0.C.O.;2-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
   Google Scholar
• Bang, H.-K., Ellinger, A. E., Hadjimarcou, J., & Traichal, P. A. (2000). Consumer concern, knowledge, belief, and attitude toward renewable energy: An application of the reasoned action theory. Psychology & Marketing, 17(6), 449–468. h ttps://d oi.o rg/1 0.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200006)17:6<449:AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbarossa, C., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2016). Positive and negative antecedents of purchasing eco-friendly products: A comparison between green and non-green consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(2), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2425-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. The Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.1086/209154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J., & Heath, C. (2007). Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. The Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1086/519142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliege Bird, R., & Smith, E. A. (2005). Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital. Current Anthropology, 46(2), 221–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/427115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borowski, E., Chen, Y., & Mahmassani, H. (2020). Social media effects on sustainable mobility opinion diffusion: Model framework and implications for behavior change. Travel Behaviour and Society, 19, 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouman, T., Steg, L., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2018). Measuring values in environmental research: A test of an environmental portrait value questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, A., Aboulnasr, K., & Ligas, M. (2010). Emotional responses on initial exposure to a hedonic or utilitarian description of a radical innovation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 18(4), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679180403
   Google Scholar
• Chernev, A., & Blair, S. (2021). When sustainability is not a liability: The Halo effect of marketplace morality. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(3), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiew, K. S., & Braver, T. S. (2011). Positive affect versus reward: Emotional and motivational influences on cognitive control. Frontiers in Psychology, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, D., & Johnson, K. K. P. (2019). Influences of environmental and hedonic motivations on intention to purchase green products: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 18, 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. N., Sung, S. Y., Lee, K., & Cho, D.-S. (2011). Balancing cognition and emotion: Innovation implementation as a function of cognitive appraisal and emotional reactions toward innovation: Cognition, emotions, and innovation implementation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Confente, I., Scarpi, D., & Russo, I. (2020). Marketing a new generation of bio-plastics products for a circular economy: The role of green self-identity, self-congruity, and perceived value. Journal of Business Research, 112, 431–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contzen, N., Perlaviciute, G., Sadat-Razavi, P., & Steg, L. (2021). Emotions toward sustainable innovations: A matter of value congruence. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 661314. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2010). Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demerath, L. (1993). Knowledge-Based affect: Cognitive origins of “Good” and “Bad”. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56(2), 136–147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dermody, J., Hanmer-Lloyd, S., Koenig Lewis, N., & Zhao, A. L. (2015). Advancing sustainable consumption in the U.K. and China: The mediating effect of pro-environmental self-identity. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(13–14), 1472–1502. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1061039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2012). Self-Signaling and the costs and benefits of temptation in consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, R. J. (2002). Emotion, cognition, and behavior. Science, 298(5596), 1191–1194. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1076358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enrique Bigné, J., Mattila, A. S., & Andreu, L. (2008). The impact of experiential consumption cognitions and emotions on behavioral intentions. Journal of Services Marketing, 22(4), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040810881704
   Google Scholar
• Escalas, J. (2013). Self-Identity and consumer behavior. The Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), xv–xviii. https://doi.org/10.1086/669165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearnley, N. (2020). Micromobility – Regulatory challenges and opportunities. In A. Paulsson and C. H. Sørensen (Eds.), Shaping smart mobility futures: Governance and policy instruments in times of sustainability transitions (pp. 169–186). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83982-650-420201010
   Google Scholar
• Fitzmaurice, J. (2005). Incorporating consumers’ motivations into the theory of reasoned action. Psychology & Marketing, 22(11), 911–929. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, P. J., & Jansson, J. (2021). The role of consumer innovativeness and green perceptions on green innovation use: The case of shared e-bikes and e-scooters. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(6), 1466–1479. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, B., Enkawa, T., Schvaneveldt, S. J., & Torrico, B. H. (2015). Antecedents and consequences of innate willingness to pay for innovations: Understanding motivations and consumer preferences of prospective early adopters. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 99, 252–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.06.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, B., Herbas Torrico, B., Enkawa, T., & Schvaneveldt, S. J. (2014). Affect versus cognition in the Chain from perceived quality to customer loyalty: The roles of product beliefs and experience. Journal of Retailing, 90(4), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2014.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, B., & Abraham, C. (2010). Going green? Modeling the impact of environmental concerns and perceptions of transportation alternatives on decisions to drive. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(4), 831–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00600.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, R. E., Freiden, J. B., & Eastman, J. K. (1995). The generality/specificity issue in consumer innovativeness research. Technovation, 15(10), 601–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(95)99328-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gössling, S. (2020). Integrating e-scooters in urban transportation: Problems, policies, and the prospect of system change. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 79, 102230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory-Smith, D., Smith, A., & Winklhofer, H. (2013). Emotions and dissonance in ‘ethical’ consumption choices. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(11–12), 1201–1223. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2013.796320
   Google Scholar
• Grewal, R., Mehta, R., & Kardes, F. R. (2000). The role of the social-identity function of attitudes in consumer innovativeness and opinion leadership. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21(3), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(00)00003-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidon, S., Becker, H., Dediu, H., & Axhausen, K. W. (2019). Electric bicycle-sharing: A new competitor in the urban transportation market? An empirical analysis of transaction data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2673(4), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119836762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurtner, S., & Soyez, K. (2016). How to catch the generation Y: Identifying consumers of ecological innovations among youngsters. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 106, 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahnel, U. J. J., Gölz, S., & Spada, H. (2014). How does green suit me? Consumers mentally match perceived product attributes with their domain-specific motives when making green purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13(5), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, S. L., & Fitch, D. T. (2022). Can an e-bike share system increase awareness and consideration of e-bikes as a commute mode? Results from a natural experiment. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 16(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1847370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haws, K. L., Winterich, K. P., & Naylor, R. W. (2014). Seeing the world through GREEN-tinted glasses: Green consumption values and responses to environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), 336–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidenreich, S., Spieth, P., & Petschnig, M. (2017). Ready, steady, green: Examining the effectiveness of external policies to enhance the adoption of eco-friendly innovations: enhancing the adoption of eco-friendly innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(3), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heineke, K., Kloss, B., Scurtu, D., & Weig, F. (2019, January 29). Sizing the micro mobility market | McKinsey. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/micromobilitys-15000-mile-checkup
   Google Scholar
• Hill, G., Heidrich, O., Creutzig, F., & Blythe, P. (2019). The role of electric vehicles in near-term mitigation pathways and achieving the U.K.’s carbon budget. Applied Energy, 251, 113111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, J., Copeland, B., & Johnson, J. X. (2019). Are e-scooters polluters? the environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters. Environmental Research Letters, 14(8), 084031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2da8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homburg, C., Koschate, N., & Hoyer, W. D. (2006). The role of cognition and affect in the formation of customer satisfaction: A dynamic perspective. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.3.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, J., & Griffiths, M. A. (2017). Share more, drive less: Millennials value perception and behavioral intent in using collaborative consumption services. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34(2), 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-10-2015-1560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, J., Kim, J. J., & Lee, K.-W. (2021). Investigating consumer innovativeness in the context of drone food delivery services: Its impact on attitude and behavioral intentions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2021). Summary for Policymakers—Global Warming of 1.5°C. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/spm/
   Google Scholar
• Jaini, A., Quoquab, F., Mohammad, J., & Hussin, N. (2019). Antecedents of green purchase behavior of cosmetics products: An empirical investigation among Malaysian consumers. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 36(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-11-2018-0170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiswal, D., & Kant, R. (2018). Green purchasing behaviour: A conceptual framework and empirical investigation of Indian consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 41, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansson, J., Marell, A., & Nordlund, A. (2011). Exploring consumer adoption of a high involvement eco-innovation using value-belief-norm theory. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, Y., & Fu, H. (2019). Association between innovative dockless bicycle sharing programs and adopting cycling in commuting and non-commuting trips. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 121, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. J., Njite, D., & Hancer, M. (2013). Anticipated emotion in consumers’ intentions to select eco-friendly restaurants: Augmenting the theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 34, 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig Lewis, N., Palmer, A., Dermody, J., & Urbye, A. (2014). Consumers’ evaluations of ecological packaging – Rational and emotional approaches. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, Y., & Zhang, L. (2014). When does green advertising work? the moderating role of product type. Journal of Marketing Communications, 20(3), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2012.672335
   Google Scholar
• Kopplin, C. S., Brand, B. M., & Reichenberger, Y. (2021). Consumer acceptance of shared e-scooters for urban and short-distance mobility. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 91, 102680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwortnik, R. J., & Ross, W. T. (2007). The role of positive emotions in experiential decisions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(4), 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert-Pandraud, R., & Laurent, G. (2010). Why do older consumers buy older brands? The role of attachment and declining innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.5.104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Ha, S., & Widdows, R. (2011). Consumer responses to high-technology products: Product attributes, cognition, and emotions. Journal of Business Research, 64(11), 1195–1200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.06.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H.-J., & Yun, Z.-S. (2015). Consumers’ perceptions of organic food attributes and cognitive and affective attitudes as determinants of their purchase intentions toward organic food. Food Quality and Preference, 39, 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leicht, T., Chtourou, A., & Ben Youssef, K. (2018). Consumer innovativeness and intentioned autonomous car adoption. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 29(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2018.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Leonidou, L. C., Leonidou, C. N., & Kvasova, O. (2010). Antecedents and outcomes of consumer environmentally friendly attitudes and behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(13–14), 1319–1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2010.523710
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., Wang, Z., Li, Y., & Liao, A. (2021). Impacts of consumer innovativeness on the intention to purchase sustainable products. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 774–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, G., Zhang, R., & Wang, C. (2015). The role of product originality, usefulness and motivated consumer innovativeness in new product adoption intentions: Originality and usefulness in new product adoption. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(2), 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2007). Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior. The Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00499.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The role of affect in decision making. In R. Davidson, H. Goldsmith, & K. Scherer (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 619–642). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, S. M., Weber, E. U., Orlove, B. S., Leiserowitz, A., Krantz, D. H., Roncoli, C., & Phillips, J. (2007). Communication and mental processes: Experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information. Global Environmental Change, 17(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, N. D., & Tormala, Z. L. (2010). “Think” versus “Feel” framing effects in persuasion. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(4), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210362981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., Oates, C. J., Thyne, M., Timmis, A. J., & Carlile, C. (2015). Flying in the face of environmental concern: Why green consumers continue to fly. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(13–14), 1503–1528. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1059352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgley, D. F., & Dowling, G. R. (1978). Innovativeness: The concept and its measurement. The Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4), 229. https://doi.org/10.1086/208701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller, T. H., Simlett, J., & Mugnier, E. (2020, March 16). Micromobility: Moving cities into a sustainable future. https://www.voiscooters.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/20200316_EY_Micromobility_Moving_Cities_into_a_Sustainable_Future.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moons, I., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2012). Emotions as determinants of electric car usage intention. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3–4), 195–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2012.659007
   Google Scholar
• Moshood, T. D., Nawanir, G., Mahmud, F., Mohamad, F., Ahmad, M. H., & AbdulGhani, A. (2022). Why do consumers purchase biodegradable plastic? The impact of hedonics and environmental motivations on switching intention from synthetic to biodegradable plastic among the young consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 64, 102807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, J. D., Tsarenko, Y., Ferraro, C., & Sands, S. (2015). Environmental concern and environmental purchase intentions: The mediating role of learning strategy. Journal of Business Research, 68(9), 1974–1981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noppers, E. H., Keizer, K., Bockarjova, M., & Steg, L. (2015). The adoption of sustainable innovations: The role of instrumental, environmental, and symbolic attributes for earlier and later adopters. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paparoidamis, N. G., & Tran, H. T. T. (2019). Making the world a better place by making better products: Eco-friendly consumer innovativeness and the adoption of eco-innovations. European Journal of Marketing, 53(8), 1546–1584. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-11-2017-0888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paparoidamis, N. G., Tran, T. T. H., Leonidou, L. C., & Zeriti, A. (2019). Being innovative while being green: An experimental inquiry into how consumers respond to eco‐innovative product designs. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(6), 824–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, J., Modi, A., & Patel, J. (2016). Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 29, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett‐Baker, J., & Ozaki, R. (2008). Pro‐environmental products: Marketing influence on consumer purchase decision. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(5), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760810890516
   Google Scholar
• Pooley, J. A., & O’Connor, M. (2000). Environmental education and attitudes: Emotions and beliefs are what is needed. Environment and Behavior, 32(5), 711–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potoglou, D., Whittle, C., Tsouros, I., & Whitmarsh, L. (2020). Consumer intentions for alternative fuelled and autonomous vehicles: A segmentation analysis across six countries. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 79, 102243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reck, D. J., Haitao, H., Guidon, S., & Axhausen, K. W. (2021). Explaining shared micromobility usage, competition and mode choice by modelling empirical data from Zurich, Switzerland. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 124, 102947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezvani, Z., Jansson, J., & Bengtsson, M. (2017). Cause I’ll Feel Good! An investigation into the effects of anticipated emotions and personal moral norms on consumer pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Promotion Management, 23(1), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2016.1267681
   Google Scholar
• Rezvani, Z., Jansson, J., & Bengtsson, M. (2018). Consumer motivations for sustainable consumption: The interaction of gain, normative and hedonic motivations on electric vehicle adoption. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1272–1283. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ríos-Bedoya, C. F., Pomerleau, C. S., Neuman, R. J., & Pomerleau, O. F. (2009). Using MIMIC models to examine the relationship between current smoking and early smoking experiences. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 11(9), 1035–1041. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntp093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, H. (2020, October 6). Cars, planes, trains: Where do CO2 emissions from transport come from? Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions-from-transport
   Google Scholar
• Roehrich, G. (2004). Consumer innovativeness. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 671–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00311-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saari, U. A., Damberg, S., Frömbling, L., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention. Ecological Economics, 189, 107155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. R., Zaval, L., & Markowitz, E. M. (2021). Positive emotions and climate change. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N. (2013). The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (2000). Emotion, cognition, and decision making. Cognition & Emotion, 14(4), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300402745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seebauer, S. (2015). Why early adopters engage in interpersonal diffusion of technological innovations: An empirical study on electric bicycles and electric scooters. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 78, 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaheen, S. A., Guzman, S., & Zhang, H. (2010). Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: Past, present, and future. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2143(1), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.3141/2143-20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (1999). Heart and mind in conflict: The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. The Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1086/209563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simsekoglu, Ö., & Klöckner, C. A. (2019). The role of psychological and socio-demographical factors for electric bike use in Norway. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 13(5), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1466221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-Concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. The Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 287. https://doi.org/10.1086/208924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg, L. (2005). Car use: Lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2–3), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2004.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thøgersen, J., Haugaard, P., & Olesen, A. (2010). Consumer responses to ecolabels. European Journal of Marketing, 44(11/12), 1787–1810. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561011079882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, C., & Sood, S. (2012). Self-affirmation through the choice of highly aesthetic products. The Journal of Consumer Research, 39(2), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1086/663775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong, Y. (2013). A cross-country study of consumer innovativeness and technological service innovation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(1), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.10.014
   Google Scholar
• Vaish, E. (2019, July 8). E-Scooters put Swedish start-up on road to positive cashflow. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/cbusiness-us-europe-electric-scooters-idCAKCN1U31Z9-OCABS
   Google Scholar
• Valor, C., Antonetti, P., & Carrero, I. (2018). Stressful sustainability: A hermeneutic analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 52(3/4), 550–574. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2016-0712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S. (2014). On the relationship between personal experience, affect and risk perception: The case of climate change: Personal experience, affect and risk perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(5), 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S. (2018). Warm glow is associated with low- but not high-cost sustainable behaviour. Nature Sustainability, 1(1), 28–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-017-0001-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2013). The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega-Zamora, M., Torres-Ruiz, F. J., Murgado-Armenteros, E. M., & Parras-Rosa, M. (2014). Organic as a heuristic cue: What Spanish consumers mean by organic foods. Psychology & Marketing, 31(5), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venhoeven, L. A., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2020). Why going green feels good. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Speier, C., & Morris, M. G. (2002). User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: Toward an integrated model. Decision Sciences, 33(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2002.tb01646.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.40.3.310.19238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachunas, J. (2019, July 5). Lime Launches E-Scooters In Oslo And Helsinki AsNordic Cities Pass 1,000,000 Rides. https://www.li.me/second-street/lime-launches-e-scooters-oslo-helsinki-nordic-cities-pass-1000000-rides
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Wang, S., Wang, J., Wei, J., & Wang, C. (2020). An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: Using an extended technology acceptance model. Transportation, 47(1), 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9893-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, L., & Spence, M. T. (2007). Causes and consequences of emotions on consumer behaviour: A review and integrative cognitive appraisal theory. European Journal of Marketing, 41(5/6), 487–511. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560710737570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2019). How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: A literature review and guiding framework. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919825649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, L. V., & Sintov, N. D. (2017). You are what you drive: Environmentalist and social innovator symbolism drives electric vehicle adoption intentions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 99, 94–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh, L., & O’Neill, S. (2010). Green identity, green living? the role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S. L., & Moreau, C. P. (2006). From fear to loathing? How emotion influences the evaluation and early use of innovations. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.3.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarif, R., Kelman, B., & Pankratz, D. (2019, April 15). Small is beautiful. Making micromobility work for citizens, cities, and service providers. Deloitte. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/future-of-mobility/micro-mobility-is-the-future-of-urban-transportation.html
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, F., Sun, S., Liu, C., & Chang, V. (2020). Consumer innovativeness, product innovation and smart toys. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 41, 100974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.100974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziedan, A., Darling, W., Brakewood, C., Erhardt, G., & Watkins, K. (2021). The impacts of shared e-scooters on bus ridership. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 153, 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar