More than words can say: a multimodal approach to understanding meaning and sentiment in social media

References

• Abburi, H., Prasath, R., Shrivastava, M., & Gangashetty, S. V. (2017). Multimodal sentiment analysis using deep neural networks. Vol. 10089 LNAI. 4th International Conference on Mining Intelligence and Knowledge Exploration, MIKE 2016, Hyderabad, India (pp. 58–65). Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Abousnnouga, G., & Machin, D. (2011). The changing spaces of war commemoration: A multimodal analysis of the discourses of British monuments. Social Semiotics, 21(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2011.548640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adjei, M., Noble, S., & Noble, C. (2010). The influence of C2C communications in online brand communities on customer purchase behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(5), 634–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0178-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amalia, E. M., & Giana, M. E. (2007). Just friends, good acquaintances or soul mates? an exploration of web site connectedness. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 10(3), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750710754281
   Google Scholar
• Amorim, G., Franco, R., Moraes, R., Figueiredo, B., Miranda, J., Dobrões, J., Afonso, R., & Meiguins, B. (2014). SocialMood: An information visualization tool to measure the mood of the people in social networks. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, San Francisco, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Anido, F. N. (2014). When luxury advertising adds the identitary values of luxury: A semiotic analysis. Journal of Business Research, 67(12), 2666–2675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Areni, C. (2019). Ontological security as an unconscious motive of social media users. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(1–2), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1580306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baecchi, C., Uricchio, T., Bertini, M., & Del Bimbo, A. (2016). A multimodal feature learning approach for sentiment analysis of social network multimedia. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 75(5), 2507–2525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2646-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bail, C. A. (2016). Combining natural language processing and network analysis to examine how advocacy organizations stimulate conversation on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(42), 11823–11828. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607151113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2016). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Borras-Morell, J. E. (2015). Data mining for pulsing the emotion on the web. In J. Walker (Ed.), Methods in molecular biology (Vol. 1246, pp. 123–130). Humana Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, J. (2016). The Todd Carney “bubbling” social media scandal. Popular Communication, 14(4), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2016.1173216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broth, M., & Mondada, L. (2013). Walking away: The embodied achievement of activity closings in mobile interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 47(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambria, E., Poria, S., Gelbukh, A., & Thelwall, M. (2017). Sentiment analysis is a big suitcase. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 32(6), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2017.4531228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113500475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canhoto, A. I., & Padmanabhan, Y. (2015). ‘We (don’t) know how you feel’ – a comparative study of automated vs. manual analysis of social media conversations. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(9–10), 1141–1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1047466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capriello, A., Mason, P. R., Davis, B., & Crotts, J. C. (2013). Farm tourism experiences in travel reviews: A cross-comparison of three alternative methods for data analysis. Journal of Business Research, 66(6), 778–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chervachidze, S., Costello, J., & Wheaton, W. (2009). The secular and cyclic determinants of capitalization rates: The role of property fundamentals, macroeconomic factors, and “structural changes”. Journal of Portfolio Management, 35(5), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.3905/JPM.2009.35.5.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christodoulides, G., Jevons, C., & Bonhomme, J. (2012). Memo to marketers: Quantitative evidence for change: How user-generated content really affects brands. Journal of Advertising Research, 52(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-52-1-053-064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, T.-L.-D., Anaza, N. A., Park, J., & Hall-Phillips, A. (2016). Who’s behind the screen? Segmenting social venture consumers through social media usage. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 28(January), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn, M. A., Mehl, M. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2004). Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding September 11, 2001. Psychological Science, 15(10), 687–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00741.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft, R. (2013). Blessed are the geeks: An ethnographic study of consumer networks in social media, 2006–2012. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(5–6), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2013.787113
   Google Scholar
• Croucher, S. M. (2009). French-Muslim reactions to the law banning religious symbols in schools: A mixed methods analysis. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513050802567031
   Google Scholar
• Crystal, D. (2011). Internet linguistics: A student guide. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Danesi, M. (2016). The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dashtipour, K., Hussain, A., Zhou, Q., Gelbukh, A., Hawalah, A. Y. A., & Cambria, E. (2016). PerSent: A freely available Persian sentiment lexicon. Vol. 10023 LNAI. 8th International Conference on Brain Inspired Cognitive Systems, BICS 2016, Beijing, China (pp. 310–320). Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. J., & O’Flaherty, S. (2012). Assesing the accuracy of automated twitter sentiment coding. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 16(Special issue), 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• de La Ville, V.-I., & Krupicka, A. (2016). The child “in absentia” in furniture retail catalogues. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 44(10), 1064–1080. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-05-2016-0088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, G. R. (1980). Information content in U. S. and Australian television advertising. Journal of Marketing, 44(4), 34–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to systemic functional linguistics. A&C black
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (2003). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. Ishk
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 3(2), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002004
   Google Scholar
• Farzindar, A., & Inkpen, D. (2015). Natural language processing for social media. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, 8(2), 1–166.
   Google Scholar
• Felix, R. (2012). Brand communities for mainstream brands: The example of the Yamaha R1 brand community. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(3), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761211221756
   Google Scholar
• Felix, R., Rauschnabel, P. A., & Hinsch, C. (2017). Elements of strategic social media marketing: A holistic framework. Journal of Business Research, 70(January), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge, J., & Gretzel, U. (2018). Emoji rhetoric: A social media influencer perspective. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(15/16), 1272–1295. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1483960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, J., Oestreicher-Singer, G., & Reichman, S. (2012). The quest for content: How user-generated links can facilitate online exploration. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(4), 452–468. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.11.0091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopaldas, A. (2014). Marketplace sentiments. The Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 995–1014. https://doi.org/10.1086/678034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, B. L., & Sheth, J. N. (1989). Time-Oriented Advertising: A content analysis of United States magazine advertising, 1890-1988. Journal of Marketing, 53(4), 76–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. (1982). Linguistics in teacher education. In R. Carter (Ed.), Linguistics and the Teacher (Vol. 112, pp. 16–30). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. Hodder Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, B. J., & Ostberg, J. (2013). Authenticating by re-enchantment: The discursive making of craft production. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(7–8), 882–911. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2012.732596
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, J., Huppertz, J., Schamp, C., & Heitmann, M. (2019). Comparing automated text classification methods. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 36(1), 20–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood, T., & Garry, T. (2010). ‘It’s Mine!’ - participation and ownership within virtual co-creation environments. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(3/4), 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/02672570903566292
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, T., & Garry, T. (2015). An investigation into gamification as a customer engagement experience environment. Journal of Services Marketing, 29(6/7), 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2015-0045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinze, A., Fletcher, G., Rashid, T., & Cruz, A. (2017). Digital and social media marketing: a results-driven approach. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hive, F. (2017). About us. Retrieved February 9, from https://www.honeyflow.com.au/collections/all
   Google Scholar
• Hollebeek, L. D., Glynn, M. S., & Brodie, R. J. (2014). Consumer brand engagement in social media: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, M., & Liu, B. (2004). Mining and summarizing customer reviews. Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, Seattle, WA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (2015). Multimodal analysis. In A. Geogakopoulou & T. Spilitoti (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication (pp. 69–84). Taylor and Francis Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315694344
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O’Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing multimodality. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, S., Mulcahy, R., & Parkinson, J. (2020). When less is more: The impact of macro and micro social media influencers’ disclosure. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(3/4), 248–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2020.1718740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoo, C., Nourbakhsh, A., & Na, J. C. (2012). Sentiment analysis of online news text: A case study of appraisal theory. Online Information Review, 36(6), 858–878. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521211287936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killian, G., & McManus, K. (2015). A marketing communications approach for the digital era: Managerial guidelines for social media integration. Business Horizons, 58(5), 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2015.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitto, S. C., Chesters, J., & Grbich, C. (2008). Quality in qualitative research. The Medical Journal of Australia, 188(4), 243–246. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01595.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klostermann, J., Plumeyer, A., Böger, D., & Decker, R. (2018). Extracting brand information from social networks: Integrating image, text, and social tagging data. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 35(4), 538–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (1998). On netnography: Initial reflections on consumer research investigations of cyberculture. Advances in Consumer Research, 25(1), 366–371.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2006). Netnography 2.0. In Handbook of qualitative research methods in marketing (pp. 129–142). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847204127.00018
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. International Journal of Advertising, 29(2), 328–330. https://doi.org/10.2501/S026504871020118X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography. Wiley Online Library.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2016). Amazonian forests and trees: Multiplicity and objectivity in studies of online consumer-generated ratings and reviews, a commentary on de Langhe, Fernbach, and Lichtenstein. The Journal of Consumer Research, 42(6), 834–839. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V., Scaraboto, D., & Parmentier, M.-A. (2018). Evolving netnography: How brand auto-netnography, a netnographic sensibility, and more-than-human netnography can transform your research. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(3/4), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1446488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2012). Thinking about the notion of ‘cross-cultural’ from a social semiotic perspective. Language and Intercultural Communication, 12(4), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2012.722102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual images. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kretz, G. (2010). “Pixelize me!”: A semiotic approach of self-digitalization in fashion blogs. In M. Campbell, J. Imman, & R. Pieters (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 37, pp. 393–399). Duluth, MN, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kretz, G. (2012). Consuming branded stories: A netnography of fashion and luxury blog consumption. In Z. Gürhan-Canli, C. Otnes, & R. Zhu (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 40, pp. 1057–1058). Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuruoglu, A. P., & Guzel, G. T. (2016). Taste competitions in an online community: The case of yeni gelin evleri in Turkey. In P. Moreau, & S. Puntoni (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 44, p. 745). Duluth, MN, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, A., Keeling, D., & Newholm, T. (2011). Virtual communities come of age: Parallel service, value, and propositions offered in communal online space. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(3–4), 291–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2011.545679
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (2002). Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication, 1(3), 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/147035720200100303
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., Kerr, G., & Burgess, L. (2019). Positioning a destination as fashionable: The destination fashion conditioning framework. Tourism Management, 72(June), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Shi, M., & Wang, X. (2019). Video mining: Measuring visual information using automatic methods. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 36(2), 216–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2019.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Burns, A. C., & Hou, Y. (2017). An investigation of brand-related user-generated content on Twitter. Journal of Advertising, 46(2), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1297273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, E., & Ginanti, A. (2013). Online environmental citizenship: Blogs, green marketing and consumer sentiment in the 21st century. Electronic Green Journal, 1(35), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.5070/G313512901
   Google Scholar
• Marcoux, J.-S. (2017). Souvenirs to forget. The Journal of Consumer Research, 43(6), 950–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2007). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. (2014). Evolving systemic functional linguistics: Beyond the clause. Functional Linguistics, 1(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-419X-1-3
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. (2016). Meaning matters: A short history of systemic functional linguistics. Word, 62(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2016.1141939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinec, R., & Salway, A. (2005). A system for image–text relations in new (and old) media. Visual Communication, 4(3), 337–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357205055928
   Google Scholar
• Mehmet, M. I., & Clarke, R. J. (2016). B2B social media semantics: Analysing multimodal online meanings in marketing conversations. Industrial Marketing Management, 54(April), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mick, D. G., Burroughs, J. E., Hetzel, P., & Brannen, M. Y. (2004). Pursuing the meaning of meaning in the commercial world: An international review of marketing and consumer research founded on semiotics. Semiotica, 2004(152–1/4), 1–74. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2004.2004.152-1-4.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minowa, Y., & Belk, R. W. (2017). Ad hoc Japonisme: How national identity rhetorics work in Japanese advertising. Consumption Markets & Culture, 20(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2016.1239085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misopoulos, F., Mitic, M., Kapoulas, A., & Karapiperis, C. (2014). Uncovering customer service experiences with twitter: The case of airline industry. Management Decision, 52(4), 705–723. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2012-0235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraes, C., Michaelidou, N., & Meneses, R. W. (2014). The use of Facebook to promote drinking among young consumers. Journal of Marketing Management, 30(13–14), 1377–1401. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2014.909512
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., Pham, D.-S., Bateman, J., & Vande Moere, A. (2018). A digital mixed methods research design: Integrating multimodal analysis with data mining and information visualization for big data analytics. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816651015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omincore. (2019). Instagram by the numbers: Stats, demographics & fun facts. Retrieved January, from https://www.omnicoreagency.com/instagram-statistics/
   Google Scholar
• Özbölük, T., & Dursun, Y. (2017). Online brand communities as heterogeneous gatherings: A netnographic exploration of apple users. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 26(4), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-10-2015-1018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., & Francis, F. E. (2015). Linguistic inquiry and word count 2015: LIWC2015. Pennebaker Conglomerates, Inc. https://liwc.wpengine.com/
   Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC 2015. University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Frazee, J., Lavergne, G. M., & Beaver, D. I. (2015). When small words foretell academic success: The case of college admissions essays. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e115844. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennell, G. E. (1994). Babes in Toyland: Learning an ideology of gender. Advances in Consumer Research, 21(1), 359–364.
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, L. F., Opoku, R., Hultman, M., Abratt, R., & Spyropoulou, S. (2007). What I say about myself: Communication of brand personality by African countries. Tourism Management, 28(3), 835–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poria, S., Cambria, E., Bajpai, R., & Hussain, A. (2017). A review of affective computing: From unimodal analysis to multimodal fusion. Information Fusion, 37(September), 98–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall, D., & Randewich, N. (2017, August 30). Tesla surges as Wall Street bets on Model 3. Retrieved May 8 from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tesla-results/tesla-surges-as-wall-street-bets-on-model-3-idUSKBN1AJ1TV
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, S. K., Holak, S. L., & Bhat, S. (1994). To extend or not to extend: Success determinants of line extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379403100208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, E., & Duffy, K. (2018). A netnographic sensibility: Developing the netnographic/social listening boundaries. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(3–4), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1450282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1981). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (Vol. 71, pp. 71–93). Georgetown University.
   Google Scholar
• Schembri, S., Merrilees, B., & Kristiansen, S. (2010). Brand consumption and narrative of the self. Psychology & Marketing, 27(6), 623–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweidel, D. A., & Moe, W. W. (2014). Listening in on social media: A joint model of sentiment and venue format choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(4), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.12.0424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silhouette Dercourt, V., & de Lassus, C. (2016). Shopping for kids’ luxury brands: Young mothers’ identity quest in retail spaces. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 44(11), 1084–1099. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-08-2015-0133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, F., & Tossan, V. (2018). Does brand-consumer social sharing matter? a relational framework of customer engagement to brand-hosted social media. Journal of Business Research, 85(April), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smaliukiene, R., Chi-Shiun, L., & Sizovaite, I. (2015). Consumer value co-creation in online business: The case of global travel services. Journal of Business Economics & Management, 16(2), 325–339.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. N., Fischer, E., & Yongjian, C. (2012). How does brand-related user-generated content differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snelson, C. L. (2016). Qualitative and mixed methods social media research: A review of the literature. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(January–December), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A., & Drennan, J. (2017). Understanding value-creating practices in social media-based brand communities. The Services Industries Journal, 37(15/16), 986–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2017.1373098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, L., & Crawford, K. (2015). The conservatism of emoji: Work, affect, and communication. Social Media and Society, 1(2), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudhir, K. (2016). Editorial—the exploration-exploitation tradeoff and efficiency in knowledge production. Marketing Science, 35(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2015.0974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syrjälä, H., Luomala, H. T., & Autio, M. (2017). Fluidity of places in everyday food consumption: Introducing snackscapes. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(6), 761–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tafesse, W., & Wien, A. (2018). Implementing social media marketing strategically: An empirical assessment. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(9/10), 732–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1482365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, S., O’Halloran, K. L., & Wignell, P. (2016). Multimodal research: Addressing the complexity of multimodal environments and the challenges for CALL. ReCall, 28(3), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344016000124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, S., O’Halloran, K., Wignell, P., Chai, K., & Lange, R. (2018). A multimodal mixed methods approach for examining recontextualisation patterns of violent extremist images in online media. Discourse, Context and Media, 21(March), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2009). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09351676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H. (2009). A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organization Science, 20(6), 941–957. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuten, T. L., & Solomon, M. R. (2017). Social media marketing. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, L. (2006). Towards a metalanguage for multiliteracies education: Describing the meaning-making resources of language-image interaction. English Teaching, 5(1), 55.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeer, S. A. M., Araujo, T., Bernritter, S. F., & van Noort, G. (2019). Seeing the wood for the trees: How machine learning can help firms in identifying relevant electronic word-of-mouth in social media. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 36(3), 492–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2019.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viera, A. J., & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37(5), 360–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villarroel Ordenes, F., Ludwig, S., De Ruyter, K. O., Grewal, D., & Wetzels, M. (2017). Unveiling what is written in the stars: Analyzing explicit, implicit, and discourse patterns of sentiment in social media. The Journal of Consumer Research, 43(6), 875–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villarroel Ordenes, F., & Zhang, S. (2019). From words to pixels: Text and image mining methods for service research. Journal of Service Management, 30(5), 593–620. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-08-2019-0254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg, B. D., de Ruyter, K., Dellarocas, C., Buck, M., & Keeling, D. I. (2013). Destination social business: Exploring an organization’s journey with social media, collaborative community and expressive individuality. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(4), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitelaw, C., Garg, N., & Argamon, S. (2005). Using appraisal groups for sentiment analysis. Proccedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Bremen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Wignell, P., O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., Lange, R., & Chai, K. (2018). Image and text relations in ISIS materials and the new relations established through recontextualisation in online media. Discourse & Communication, 12(5), 533–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318766938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, D. M., & Ball, K. (2013). Brandscapes of control? Surveillance, marketing and the co-construction of subjectivity and space in neo-liberal capitalism. Marketing Theory, 13(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593112467264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin, Z., & Belk, R. W. (2008). Politicizing consumer culture: Advertising’s appropriation of political ideology in China’s social transition. The Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1086/588747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H. (2013). Market mavens in social media: Examining young Chinese consumers’ viral marketing attitude, eWOM motive, and behavior. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 14(2), 154–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/10599231.2013.756337
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4 ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Zappavigna, M. (2011). Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society, 13(5), 788–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zappavigna, M. (2015). Searchable talk: The linguistic functions of hashtags. Social Semiotics, 25(3), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2014.996948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zappavigna, M. (2016). Social media photography: Construing subjectivity in Instagram images. Visual Communication, 15(3), 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357216643220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar