Philanthropy scandals and regular donations: the role of email marketing communications

References

• Aaker, J., Fournier, S., & Brasel, S. A. (2004). When good brands do bad. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1086/383419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1447–1458. https://doi.org/10.1086/261662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archambeault, D. S., & Webber, S. (2018). Fraud survival in nonprofit organisations: Empirical evidence. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 29(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archambeault, D. S., Webber, S., & Greenlee, J. (2015). Fraud and corruption in US nonprofit entities: A summary of press reports 2008-2011. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(6), 1194–1224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014555987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnett, D. B., German, S. D., & Hunt, S. D. (2003). The identity salience model of relationship marketing success: The case of nonprofit marketing. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.2.89.18614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashley, C., Noble, S. M., Donthu, N., & Lemon, K. N. (2011). Why customers won’t relate: Obstacles to relationship marketing engagement. Journal of Business Research, 64(7), 749–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atlas, S. A., & Bartels, D. M. (2018). Periodic pricing and perceived contract benefits. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(2), 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D., & Shaw, L. L. (1991). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0202_1
   Google Scholar
• Becker, A. (2018). An experimental study of voluntary nonprofit accountability and effects on public trust, reputation, perceived quality, and donation behavior. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(3), 562–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018756200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckers, S. F., Van Doorn, J., & Verhoef, P. C. (2018). Good, better, engaged? The effect of company-initiated customer engagement behavior on shareholder value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(3), 366–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0539-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekkers, R. H. F. P., & Wiepking, P. (2011). Testing mechanisms for philanthropic behaviour. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 16(4), 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.428
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R., & Ali‐Choudhury, R. (2009). Second‐gift behaviour of first‐time donors to charity: An empirical study. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 14(3), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.347
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R., & Barkensjo, A. (2005). Causes and consequences of donor perceptions of the quality of the relationship marketing activities of charitable organisations. Journal of Targeting Measurement & Analysis for Marketing, 13(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jt.5740138
   Google Scholar
• Blouin, M. C., Lee, R. L., & Erickson, G. S. (2018). The impact of online financial disclosure and donations in nonprofits. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 30(3), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2018.1452819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boenigk, S., & Becker, A. (2016). Toward the importance of nonprofit brand equity: Results from a study of German nonprofit organisations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 27(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottan, N. L., & Perez-Truglia, R. (2015). Losing my religion: The effects of religious scandals on religious participation and charitable giving. Journal of Public Economics, 129, 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno van Vijfeijken, T. (2019, December). “Culture is what you see when compliance is not in the room”: Organizational culture as an explanatory factor in analyzing recent INGO scandals. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 10(4), 20190031. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2019-0031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, C. M., Hornsey, M. J., & Gillespie, N. (2021). No global crisis of trust: A longitudinal and multinational examination of public trust in nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 50(2), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020962221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, C. M., Hornsey, M. J., Gillespie, N., & Lockey, S. (2023). Nonprofit scandals: A systematic Review and conceptual framework. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(S1), 278S–312S. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221129541
   Google Scholar
• Drollinger, T. (2018). Using active empathetic listening to build relationships with major-gift donors. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 30(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2017.1326336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar, J. (2001). Don’t cut spending on communications. The Chronicle of Philanthropy, 13(13), 43–44.
   Google Scholar
• Elsner, R., Krafft, M., & Huchzermeier, A. (2004). Optimizing Rhenania’s direct marketing business through dynamic multilevel modeling (DMLM) in a multicatalog-brand environment. Marketing Science, 23(2), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1040.0063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, D., Fombelle, P. W., & Bolton, R. N. (2021). Member retention and donations in nonprofit service organisations: The balance between peer and organizational identification. Journal of Service Research, 24(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670520933676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farwell, M. M., Shier, M. L., & Handy, F. (2019). Explaining trust in Canadian charities: The influence of public perceptions of accountability, transparency, familiarity and institutional trust. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(4), 768–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-00046-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furneaux, C., & Wymer, W. (2015). Public trust in Australian charities: Accounting for cause and effect. Third Sector Review, 21(2), 99–127.
   Google Scholar
• Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, N., Dietz, G., & Lockey, S. (2014). Organizational reintegration and trust repair after an integrity violation: A case study. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(3), 371–410. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq2014437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruen, T. W., Summers, J. O., & Acito, F. (2000). Relationship marketing activities, commitment, and membership behaviors in professional associations. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.64.3.34.18030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Guardian. (2018). Charities need to stop slide in public trust warns regulator. Retrieved March 2, 2023, from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/oct/03/charities-need-stop-slide-public-trust-warns-regulator
   Google Scholar
• Hind, A. (2017). Fundraising in UK charities: Stepping back from the abyss. Public Money & Management, 37(3), 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2017.1282238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, M. T., & Otoole, T. (2004). Affirming communication’s primary role in a manufacturer-retailer context. Journal of Marketing Management, 20(9–10), 1047–1073. https://doi.org/10.1362/0267257042405259
   Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J., Chapman, C. M., Mangan, H., La Macchia, S., & Gillespie, N. (2021). The moral disillusionment model of organizational transgressions: Ethical transgressions trigger more negative reactions from consumers when committed by nonprofits. Journal of Business Ethics, 172(4), 653–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04492-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, J., Zhang, C., & King, R. A. (2017). Understanding the dynamics of the individual donor’s trust damage in the philanthropic sector. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(2), 648–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9681-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, S. F., & Shank, M. D. (2008). Assessing the impact of NCAA scandals: An exploratory analysis. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 3(1–2), 78–99. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMM.2008.015962
   Google Scholar
• Hungerman, D. M. (2013). Substitution and stigma: Evidence on religious markets from the catholic sex abuse scandal. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(3), 227–253. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.5.3.227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyndman, N., & McConville, D. (2018). Trust and accountability in UK charities: Exploring the virtuous circle. The British Accounting Review, 50(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Fundraising. (2020). The status of UK fundraising: 2020 benchmark report. Retrieved March 2, 2023 from https://www.blackbaud.co.uk/industry-insights/resources/ebook-the-status-of-uk-fundraising-2020-benchmark-report
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. R., Matear, M., & Thomson, M. (2011). A coal in the heart: Self-relevance as a post-exit predictor of consumer anti-brand actions. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1086/657924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, V. C., & Thrandardottir, E. (2017). NGOs, trust, and the accountability agenda. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(1), 134–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148116682655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodakarami, F., Petersen, J. A., & Venkatesan, R. (2015). Developing donor relationships: The role of the breadth of giving. Journal of Marketing, 79(4), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.14.0351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, P. H., Ferrin, D. L., Cooper, C. D., & Dirks, K. T. (2004). Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Gupta, S., & Lee, C. (2021). Managing members, donors, and member-donors for effective nonprofit fundraising. Journal of Marketing, 85(3), 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242921994587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A. (2021). An empirical examination of the effects of design elements of email newsletters on consumers’ email responses and their purchase. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58, 102349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, N. (1996). The power of trust in manufacturer-retailer relationships. Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 92–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., Bezawada, R., Rishika, R., Janakiraman, R., & Kannan, P. K. (2016). From social to sale: The effects of firm-generated content in social media on customer behavior. Journal of Marketing, 80(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.14.0249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeClair, M. S. (2019). Reported instances of nonprofit corruption: Do donors respond to scandals in the charitable sector? Corporate Reputation Review, 22(2), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-018-0056-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefaix-Durand, A., & Kozak, R. (2009). Integrating transactional and relational exchange into the study of exchange orientation in customer relationships. Journal of Marketing Management, 25(9–10), 1003–1025. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725709X479345
   Google Scholar
• Lesscher, L., Lobschat, L., & Verhoef, P. C. (2021). Do offline and online go hand in hand? cross-channel and synergy effects of direct mailing and display advertising. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 38(3), 678–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. (2007). The long-term impact of loyalty programs on consumer purchase behavior and loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 71(4), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.4.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, X. (2002). Trust production and privacy concerns on the Internet: A framework based on relationship marketing and social exchange theory. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00182-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell, D., & Rutherford, A. C. (2018). The determinants of charity misconduct. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(1), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764017728367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, W., & Youxin, W. (2020). Trust crisis and charity donation: An empirical study based on the provincial data in 2002—2016. Management Review, 32(8), 244–253.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment–trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni, N., & Zhan, X. (2017). Embedded government control and nonprofit revenue growth. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 730–742. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmatier, R. W. (2008). Interfirm relational drivers of customer value. Journal of Marketing, 72(4), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.4.076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, A., & Huo, Q. (2013). A study of trust over time within a social network mediated environment. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(15–16), 1816–1833. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2013.803143
   Google Scholar
• Pfarrer, M. D., Decelles, K. A., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2008). After the fall: Reintegrating the corrupt organisation. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 730–749. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.32465757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rifkin, J. R., Du, K. M., & Berger, J. (2021). Penny for your preferences: Leveraging self-expression to encourage small prosocial gifts. Journal of Marketing, 85(3), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920928064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahni, N. S., Wheeler, S. C., & Chintagunta, P. (2018). Personalization in email marketing: The role of noninformative advertising content. Marketing Science, 37(2), 236–258. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2017.1066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant, A., Hudson, J., & West, D. C. (2008). Conceptualizing brand values in the charity sector: The relationship between sector, cause and organisation. The Service Industries Journal, 28(5), 615–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060801988142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant, A., & Lee, S. (2002). Individual and contextual antecedents of donor trust in the voluntary sector. Journal of Marketing Management, 18(7–8), 779–802. https://doi.org/10.1362/0267257022780679
   Google Scholar
• Sargeant, A., & Lee, S. (2004). Trust and relationship commitment in the United Kingdom voluntary sector: Determinants of donor behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 21(8), 613–635. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant, A., West, D. C., & Jay, E. (2007). The relational determinants of nonprofit web site fundraising effectiveness: An exploratory study. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.178
   Google Scholar
• Sargeant, A., & Woodliffe, L. (2007). Building donor loyalty: The antecedents and role of commitment in the context of charity giving. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 18(2), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1300/J054v18n02_03
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, M., Mitchell, S., & Gray, B. H. (2004). Restoring public legitimacy to the nonprofit sector: A survey experiment using descriptions of nonprofit ownership. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(4), 673–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764004269431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S., & Eisend, M. (2015). Advertising repetition: A meta-analysis on effective frequency in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 44(4), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2015.1018460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoemaker, P. J. (1982). The expected utility model: Its variants, purposes, evidence and limitations. Journal of Economic Literature, 20(2), 529–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweidel, D. A., & Knox, G. (2013). Incorporating direct marketing activity into latent attrition models. Marketing Science, 32(3), 471–487. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2013.0781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scurlock, R., Dolsak, N., & Prakash, A. (2020). Recovering from scandals: Twitter coverage of Oxfam and save the children scandals. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00148-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, A., & Tsai, C. Y. (2010). Are single‐gift committed donors different from their multiple‐gift counterparts? International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 15(3), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.387
   Google Scholar
• Sherry, J. F., Jr. (1983). Gift giving in anthropological perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1086/208956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, B., Irwin, K., & Lawrence, P. (2006). Does a “norm of self-interest” discourage prosocial behavior? Rationality and quid pro quo in charitable giving. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(3), 296–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250606900306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2007). Instrumental variables regression. In A. W. Pearson (Ed.), Introduction to econometrics (2nd ed., pp. 421–467). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.4.3.199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Third Sector. (2019). Rebecca Cooney: One year on from the Oxfam scandal. Retrieved March 1, 2023, from https://www.thirdsector.co.uk/rebecca-cooney-one-year-oxfam-scandal/management/article/1525382
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. S., Chen, C., & Iacobucci, D. (2022). Email marketing as a tool for strategic persuasion. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 57(3), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968221095552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, G. A., & Strutton, D. (2020). Comparing email and SNS users: Investigating e-servicescape, customer reviews, trust, loyalty and E-WOM. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Diepen, M., Donkers, B., & Franses, P. H. (2009). Dynamic and competitive effects of direct mailings: A charitable giving application. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(1), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.46.1.120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, M., Van Herk, H., & Prins, R. (2019). Choosing your charity: The importance of value congruence in two-stage donation choices. Journal of Business Research, 105, 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venable, B. T., Rose, G. M., Bush, V. D., & Gilbert, F. W. (2005). The role of brand personality in charitable giving: An assessment and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(3), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305276147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Sikorski, C. (2018). Political scandals as a democratic challenge| the aftermath of political scandals: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Communication, 12(2018), 3109–3133.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, R. D. (2008). Applying relationship management theory to the fundraising process for individual donors. Journal of Communication Management, 12(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632540810854244
   Google Scholar
• Waters, R. D. (2011). Increasing fundraising efficiency through evaluation: Applying communication theory to the nonprofit organisation—donor relationship. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(3), 458–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009354322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. T., & Mummalaneni, V. (1986). Bonding and commitment in buyer-seller relationships: A preliminary conceptualisation. Industrial Marketing and Purchasing, 1(3), 44–58.
   Google Scholar
• Wymer, W., Becker, A., & Boenigk, S. (2021). The antecedents of charity trust and its influence on charity supportive behavior. Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing, 26(2), e1690. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1690
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., & Peng, S. (2009). How to repair customer trust after negative publicity: The roles of competence, integrity, benevolence, and forgiveness. Psychology & Marketing, 26(7), 572–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Kumar, V., & Cosguner, K. (2017). Dynamically managing a profitable email marketing program. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(6), 851–866. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.16.0210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, Z. J., & Lin, S. (2018). The antecedents and consequences of charitable donation heterogeneity on social media. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 23(1), e1585. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, G., Xue, K., Yu, M., & Zhou, N. (2020). The effects of perceived deceptiveness and pressure on consumer donation: A mixed-methods study. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-05-2018-0114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zogaj, A., Tscheulin, D. K., Lindenmeier, J., & Olk, S. (2021). Linking actual self-congruence, ideal self-congruence, and functional congruence to donor loyalty: The moderating role of issue involvement. Journal of Business Economics, 91(3), 379–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-020-01006-9
   Google Scholar