The changing shape of provision for rough sleepers: from conditionality to care

References

• Abrams, L. (2010) Sampling ‘hard to reach’ populations in qualitative research: the case of incarcerated youth, Qualitative Social Work, 9(4), pp.536–550.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. (2011) Abandoning care? A critical perspective on personalisation from an ethic of care. Ethics and Social Welfare, 5(2):153–167.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, E. (2013) Learning and soft outcomes: evidence from intensive intervention projects, Social Policy and Society, 13(3), pp.357–369
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. (2011) Governance and governmentality after neoliberalism, Policy and Politics, 39(4), pp.457–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackender, L. & Prestidge J. (2014) Pan London personalised budgets for rough sleepers, Journal of Integrated Care, 22(1), pp.23–26
   Google Scholar
• Bowpitt, G., Dwyer, P., Sundine, E. & Weinstein, M., (2014) Places of sanctuary for ‘the undeserving’? Homeless people’s day centres and the problem of conditionality, British Journal of Social Work, 44(5), pp.1251–1267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P. (2013) Right Time, Right Place? An Evaluation of the Individual Budget Approach to Tackling Rough Sleeping in Wales. (Salford: University of Salford).
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P. (2016) Right time, right place? The experiences of rough sleepers and practitioners in the receipt and delivery of personalised budgets, in: M. Fenger, J. Hudson & C. Needham (Eds) Social Policy Review, pp.191–210 (Bristol: Policy Press).
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. (2005) New labour’s citizens: activated, empowered, responsibilized, abandoned? Critical Social Policy, 25(4), pp.447–463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloke, P., May, J. & Johnsen, S. (2010) Swept Up Lives? Re-envisioning the Homeless City (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell).
   Google Scholar
• Conradson, D. (2003) Spaces of care in the city: the place of a community drop-in centre, Social and Cultural Geography, 4(4), pp.507–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornes, M., Manthorpe, J., Whiteford, M., Clark, M. & Mathie, H. (2016) The care act, personalisation and the new eligibility regulations: implications for homeless people Research, Policy and Planning, 31(3), pp.211–223.
   Google Scholar
• Cornes, M., Whiteford, M. & Manthorpe, J. (2015) Fulfilling Lives Islington and Camden: A Realist Review of Programme Theory (London: KCL).
   Google Scholar
• Cromarty, H. (2018) Rough Sleepers: Access to Support and Services (England), Briefing Paper Number 07698, 9 March (London: House of Commons).
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, M. & McKenzie, H. (2006). The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research, Social Science Information, 45 (4), pp.483–499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DCLG (2012) Working with Troubled Families: A Guide to the Evidence and Good Practice. (London, DCLG).
   Google Scholar
• DCLG (2015) Addressing Complex Needs: Improving Services for Vulnerable Homeless People (London: DCLG).
   Google Scholar
• DeVerteuil, G (2014) Does the punitive need the supportive? A sympathetic critique of current grammars of urban injustice, Antipode, 46(4), pp.874–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson, R. (2011) Conditionality and homelessness services; ‘practice realities’ in a drop-in centre. Social Policy and Society, 10(4), pp.547–557
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, R. & McNeill, J. (2011) Review article: homelessness and housing support services: rationales and policies under new labour, Social Policy and Society, 10(4), pp.581–589.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, P. J., Bowpitt, G., Sundin, E. & Weinstein, M. (2015), Rights, responsibilities and refusals: homelessness policy and the exclusion of single homeless people with complex needs, Critical Social Policy, 35(1), pp.3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. (2011) Exploring the (bio)political dimensions of voluntarism and care in the city: The case of a ‘low barrier’ emergency shelter, Health & Place, 17, pp.24–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. (2012) Supportive measures, enabling restraint: governing homeless ‘street drinkers’ in Hamilton, Canada, Social and Cultural Geography, 13(2), pp.185–200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, S. & Jones, A. (2005), Pursuing social justice or social cohesion?: Coercion in street homelessness policies in England, Journal of Social Policy, 34(3), pp.389–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, S. & Pawson, H. (2016) Fifty years since Cathy come home: critical reflections on the UK homelessness safety net, International Journal of Housing Policy, 16(4), pp.543–555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, S. Bramley, G. & Johnsen, S. (2013), Pathways into multiple exclusion homelessness in seven UK cities, Urban Studies, 50(1), pp.148–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, S., Johnsen, S. & White, M. (2011) Multiple exclusion homelessness in the UK: key patterns and intersections, Social Policy and Society, 10(4), pp.501–512.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, D. (2015) Workfare—a blast from the past? Contemporary work conditionality for the unemployed in historical perspective, Social Policy and Society, 14(3), pp.329–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, D. & Flint, J. (2018) Welfare conditionality and social marginality: the folly of the tutelary state? Critical Social Policy, 38(4), pp.771–791 doi: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018317753088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennigan, B. & Speer, J. (2018) Compassionate revanchism: The blurry geography of homelessness in the USA, Urban Studies. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018762012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homeless Link (2015) ‘Housing First’ or ‘Housing Led’? The current picture of Housing First in England (London: Homeless Link).
   Google Scholar
• Hough, J. & Rice, B. (2010) Providing Personalised Support to Rough Sleepers (York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation).
   Google Scholar
• Hunter C. (2017) Caring for the homeless: Westminster city council and anti-homeless bye-laws, in: R. Harding, R. Fletcher, & C. Beasley (Eds), Revaluing Care in Theory, Law and Policy: Cycles and Connections, pp.48–64 (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, S., & Fitzpatrick, S. (2010). Revanchist sanitisation or coercive care? The use of enforcement to combat begging, street drinking and rough sleeping in England. Urban Studies, 47(8), pp. 1703–1723.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, S., Fitzpatrick, S. & Watts, B. (2014) Conditionality Briefing: Homelessness and ‘Street Culture', Welfare Conditionality study briefing papers (New York: University of York).
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, S., Fitzpatrick, S. & Watts, B. (2016). First Wave Findings: Homelessness, Welfare Conditionality study briefing papers (New York: University of York).
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, S., Fitzpatrick, S. & Watts, B (2018) Homelessness and social control: a typology, Housing Studies, 33(7), pp. 1106-1126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. & Pleace, N. (2016) How do we measure success in homelessness services? Critically assessing the rise of the homelessness outcomes star, European Journal of Homelessness, 1(10), pp.31–51.
   Google Scholar
• Lancione, M., Stefanizzi, A. & Gaboardi, M. (2018). Passive adaptation or active engagement? The challenges of housing first internationally and in the Italian case, Housing Studies, 33( 1), pp.40–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemma, A. (2010) The power of relationship: a study of key working as an intervention with traumatised young people, Journal of Social Work Practice: Psychotherapeutic Approaches in Health, Welfare and the Community, 24(4), pp.409–427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, J. & Cloke, P. (2014) Modes of attentiveness: reading for difference in geographies of homelessness, Antipode, 46(4), pp.894–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgley, J. (2016) Perspectives on responsibility in practice as revealed through food provisioning offers for rough sleepers, Critical Social Policy, 36(4), pp.610–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. (1997) The annihilation of space by law: the roots and implications of anti-homeless laws in the United States, Antipode, 29(3), pp.303–336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. (2001). Postmodern geographical praxis? The postmodern impulse and the war against homeless people in the ‘post-justice’ city. in: C. Minca (Ed) Postmodern geography: Theory and praxis. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Moreton, R., Robinson, S., Howe, P., Corley, A., Welford, J., & Roberts, J. (2018) Fulfilling Lives: Supporting People with Multiple Needs, Annual Report 2017 (Leicester: CFE).
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, D., Duggan, M. & Joseph, S. (2013) Relationship-based social work and its compatibility with the person-centred approach: principled versus instrumental perspectives, British Journal of Social Work, 43(4), pp.703–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nixon, J., Hunter, C., Parr, S., Myers, S., Whittle, S. & Sanderson, D. (2006) Anti-Social Behaviour Intensive Family Support Projects: An evaluation of six pioneering projects. (London: ODPM).
   Google Scholar
• Parr, S. (2015) Conceptualising ‘the relationship’ in intensive key worker support as a therapeutic medium. Social Work Practice, 30 (1), pp.25–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsell, C. & Marston, G. (2016) Supportive housing: justifiable paternalism? Housing, Theory and Society, 33(2), pp.1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsell, C. & Watts, B. (2017) Charity and justice: a reflection on new forms of homelessness provision in Australia. European Journal of Homelessness, 11(2), pp.65–76.
   Google Scholar
• Parsell, C. Fitzpatrick, S. & Busch-Geertsema, V. (2014) Common ground in Australia: an object lesson in evidence hierarchies and policy transfer. Housing Studies, 29(1), pp.69–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleace, P. (2000) The new consensus, the old consensus and the provision of services for people sleeping rough, Housing Studies, 15(4), pp.581–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, A. & Hall, E. (2017) Placing care in time of austerity, Social and Cultural Geography, 19(3), pp.303–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, K., Batty, E., Casey, R. & Green, S. (2009). The Homelessness Journeys of Homeless People with Complex Needs in Stoke-on-Trent (Sheffield: CRESR).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N (1996) The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Trevithick, P. (2003) Effective relationship-based practice: a theoretical exploration, Journal of Social Work Practice, 17(2), pp.163–176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, B., Fitzpatrick, S. & Johnsen, S. (2017) Controlling homeless people? power, interventionism and legitimacy, Journal of Social Policy,47(2), pp. 235-252.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, B., Fitzpatrick, S., Bramley, G. & Watkins, D. (2014) Welfare Sanctions and Conditionality in the UK (York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation).
   Google Scholar
• Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E. et al. (2011). Theorising from case studies: towards a pluralist future for international business research, Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), pp.740–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, C., Warrener, M., Reeves, A. & LaValle, I. (2008) Family Intervention Projects: An Evaluation of Their Design, Set-up and Early Outcomes (London: Department for Children, Schools & Families).
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, M. (2010) Hot tea, dry toast and the responsibilisation of homeless people, Social Policy and Society, 9(2), pp.193–205.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, M. (2013) New labour, street homelessness and social exclusion: a defaulted promissory note? Housing Studies, 28(1), pp.10–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, P. (2000) Unconditional positive regard reconsidered, British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 28(1), pp.23–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A., Cloke, P., May, J. & Goodwin, M. (2016) Contested space: the contradictory political dynamics of food banking in the UK, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 48(11), pp.2291–2316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (2016) Conceptualising the active welfare subject: welfare reform in discourse, policy and lived experience. Policy and Politics, 44(2), pp.235–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar