‘Home’ as an essentially contested concept and why this matters

References

• Alexander, C., Bruun, M. & Koch, I. (2018) Political economy comes home: On the moral economies of housing, Critique of Anthropology, 38, pp. 121–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, C. (2009) The fallacy of “housing studies”: Philosophical problems of knowledge and understanding in housing research, Housing, Theory and Society, 26, pp. 53–79.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, C. (2011) A welcome critique: Some comments on Flint’s response to the fallacy paper, Housing, Theory and Society, 28, pp. 92–99.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. & Jacobs, K. (2016) House, Home and Society (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, R. & Brickell, K. (2014) For home unmaking, Home Cultures, 11, pp. 133–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, B. (2015) Challenging “home” as a concept in modern property law: Lessons from the Supreme Court Post Stack and Jones, in: W. Barr (Ed) Modern Studies in Property Law – Volume 8, pp. 195–214 (London: Hart).
   Google Scholar
• Blandy, S. & Hunter, C. (2009) A review of “Conceptualising home: Theories, laws and policies”, European Journal of Housing Policy, 9, pp. 480–482.
   Google Scholar
• Blunt, A. & Dowling, R. (2006) Home: Key Ideas in Geography (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Boccagni, P. (2017) Migration and the Search for Home (New York: Palgrave MacMillan).
   Google Scholar
• Boromisza-Habashi, D. (2010) How are political concepts “essentially” contested?, Language & Communication, 30, pp. 276–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickell, K. (2012) “Mapping” and “doing” critical geographies of home, Progress in Human Geography, 36, pp. 225–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, K. (2007) Citizen participation: Models and methods, International Journal of Public Administration, 30, pp. 1179–1196.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, H., Edgeworth, B. & Hunter, C. (2018) Introducing precarisation: Contemporary understandings of law and the insecure home, in: H. Carr, B. Edgeworth, & C. Hunter (Eds) Law and the Precarious Home: Socio-Legal Perspectives on the Home in Insecure Times, pp. 1–22 (London: Hart).
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, D. (1955) The Home and Social Status (Oxon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Clapham, D. (2019) Remaking Housing Policy: An International Study (Oxon: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, P. (2016) A common sense of property?, Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 17, pp. 78–93.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, D., Daniel Hidalgo, F. & Olivia Maciuceanu, A. (2006) Essentially contested concepts: Debates and applications, Journal of Political Ideologies, 11, pp. 211–246.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, S. (2007) Mapping sustainable development as a contested concept, Local Environment, 12, pp. 259–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coolen, H. & Meesters, J. (2012) Editorial special issue: House, home and dwelling, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 27, pp. 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darke, J. (1994) Women and the meaning of home, in: R. Gilroy & R. Woods (Eds) Housing women (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Day, D. (1997) Citizen participation in the planning process: An essentially contested concept?, Journal of Planning Literature, 11, pp. 421–434.
   Google Scholar
• Després, C. (1991) The meaning of home: Literature review and directions for future research and development, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 8, pp. 96–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dow, D. (2015) Working with concepts: Challenging the language-reality dichotomy, in: D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds) Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Duyvendak, J. (2011) The Politics of Home: Belonging and Nostalgia in Europe and the United States (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Duyvendak, J. & Verplanke, L. (2013) Struggling to belong: Social movements and the fight to feel at home, in: B. Miller, W. Nicholls, & J. Beaumont (Eds) Spaces of Contention: Spatialities and Social Movements (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Easthope, H. (2004) A place called home, Housing, Theory & Society, 21, pp. 128–138.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, K. (2011) Law is not (best considered) an essentially contested concept, International Journal of Law in Context, 7, pp. 209–232.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, F. (1970) The Housing Question (London: Progress Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Evnine, S. (2014) Essentially contested concepts and semantic externalism, Journal of the Philosophy of History, 8, pp. 118–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. (2004) Citizens without Shelter: Homelessness, Democracy, and Political Exclusion (New York: Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Finchett-Maddock, L. (2016) Time’s up –Resisting private limitations on rights to housing and protest, in: M. Vols & M. Kiehl (Eds) Regulating the City: Contemporary Urban Housing Law (London: Eleven International).
   Google Scholar
• Flint, J. (2011) Housing studies, social class and being towards dwelling, Housing, Theory and Society, 28, pp. 75–91.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, L. (2002) The meaning of home: A chimerical concept or a legal challenge?, Journal of Law and Society, 29, pp. 580–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, L. (2007) Conceptualising Home: Theories, Laws and Policies (London: Hart).
   Google Scholar
• Fox, L. (2008) Re-possessing “home”: A re-analysis of gender, homeownership and debtor default for feminist legal theory, William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice, 14, pp. 423–494.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, L. & Sweeney, J. (2016) The idea of home in law: Displacement and dispossession, in: L. Fox & J. Sweeney (Eds) The Idea of Home in Law: Displacement and Dispossession (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Gallie, W. (1955) Essentially contested concepts, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, pp. 167–198.
   Google Scholar
• Garver, E. (1990) Essentially contested concepts: The ethics and tactics of argument, Philosophy & Rhetoric, 23, pp. 251–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilman, C.P. (1903) The Home, Its Work and Influence (New York: Philips McClure).
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (1977) On the contestability of social and political concepts, Political Theory, 5, pp. 331–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurney, C. (1990) The Meaning of Home in the Decade of Owner Occupation: Towards an Experiential Research Agenda. University of Bristol, School for Advanced Urban Studies Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Gurney, C. (1997) “… Half of me was satisfied”: Making sense of home through episodic ethnographies, Women's Studies International Forum, 20, pp. 373–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurney, C. (2020) Out of Harm’s Way? Critical Remarks on Harm and the Meaning of Home during the 2020 COVID-19 Social Distancing Measures (Glasgow: University of Glasgow, CaCHE).
   Google Scholar
• Hamzah, H. & Adnan, N. (2016) The meaning of home and its implications on alternative tenures: A Malaysian perspective, Housing, Theory and Society, 33, pp. 305–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, E., Brickell, K. & Nowicki, M. (2020) Door locks, wall stickers, fireplaces: Assemblage theory and home (un)making in Lewisham’s temporary accommodation, Antipode, 52, pp. 1286–1309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heywood, F. (2005) Adaptation: Altering the house to restore the home, Housing Studies, 20, pp. 531–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohmann, J. (2013) The Right to Housing: Law, Concepts, Possibilities (London: Hart).
   Google Scholar
• Hooks, B. (2015) Homeplace (a site of resistance), in: B. Hooks (Ed) Yearning: Race, Gender, and Cultural Politics, pp. 41–49 (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Hoolachan, J. (2016) Ethnography and homelessness research, International Journal of Housing Policy, 16, pp. 31–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoolachan, J. (2020) Making home? Permitted and prohibited placemaking in youth homeless accommodation, Housing Studies. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2020.1836329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. & Manzi, T. (2000) Evaluating the social constructionist paradigm in housing research, Housing, Theory and Society, 17, pp. 35–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (2014) A home with dignity: Domestic violence and property rights, Brigham Young University Law Review, 1, pp. 1–54.
   Google Scholar
• Kemeny, J. (1992) Housing and Social Theory (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Kreiczer-Levy, S. (2014) Intergenerational relations and the family home, The Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 8, pp. 131–160.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, R. (1987) What makes a house a home?, Environment and Behavior, 19, pp. 154–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, F.A. (2001) The meaning of home among elderly immigrants: Directions for future research and theoretical development, Housing Studies, 16, pp. 353–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallett, S. (2004) Understanding home: A critical review of the literature, The Sociological Review, 52, pp. 62–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markoff, J. (2016) Essential contestants, essential contests, in: B. Wejnert & P. Parigi (Eds) On the Cross Road of Polity, Political Elites and Mobilization, Research in Political Sociology, pp. 121–154 (London: Emerald).
   Google Scholar
• Marotta, V. (2011) Home, mobility and the encounter with otherness, in: M. Lobo & F. Mansouri (Eds) Migration, Citizenship and Intercultural Relations: Looking Through the Lens (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Merrett, S. & Gray, F. (1982) Owner-Occupation in Britain (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. (1948) ‘The sociology of housing’, in: W. Dennis (Ed) Current Trends in Social Psychology, pp. 163–217 (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).
   Google Scholar
• Moffatt, S., Lawson, S., Patterson, R., Holding, E., Dennison, A., Sowden, S. & Brown, J. (2016) A qualitative study of the impact of the UK “bedroom tax”, Journal of Public Health, 38, pp. 197–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. (2000) Placing home in context, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, pp. 207–217.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, M. & Madigan, R. (1993) Privacy in the private sphere, Housing Studies, 8, pp. 29–45.
   Google Scholar
• Nowicki, M. (2014) Rethinking domicide: Towards an expanded critical geography of home, Geography Compass, 8, pp. 785–795.
   Google Scholar
• Nowicki, M. (2017) A Britain that everyone is proud to call home? The bedroom tax, political rhetoric and home unmaking in UK housing policy, Social & Cultural Geography, 8, pp. 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Parsell, C. (2012) Home is where the house is: The meaning of home for people sleeping rough, Housing Studies, 27, pp. 159–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polikoff, B. (1969) Whose meaning of home?, Transactions of the Bartlett Society, 8, pp. 89–106.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, A. (1985) Thinking about home environments: A conceptual framework, in: I. Altman & C. Werner (Eds) Home Environments (London: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, A. (1995) A critical look at the concept of home, in: D. Benjamin & D. Stea (Eds) The Home: Words, Interpretations, Meanings, and Environments (London: Avebury).
   Google Scholar
• Riemer, S. (1943) Sociological theory of home adjustment, American Sociological Review, 8, pp. 272.
   Google Scholar
• Rohe, W., et al. (2012) The social benefits and costs of homeownership: A critical assessment of the research, in: E Mueller & R. Tighe (Eds) The Affordable Housing Reader (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, R. & Medeiros, K. (2005) Home, self, and identity, in: G. Rowles & H. Chaudhury (Eds) Home and Identity in Late Life: International Perspectives (London: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, P. (1989) The meaning of ‘home’ in contemporary English culture, Housing Studies, 4, pp. 177–192.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, P. (1990) A Nation of Home Owners (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, P & Williams, P. (1988) The constitution of the home: Towards a research agenda, Housing Studies, 3, pp. 81–93.
   Google Scholar
• Schuetz, A. (1945) The homecomer, American Journal of Sociology, 50, pp. 369–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somerville, P. (1992) Homelessness and the meaning of home: Rooflessness or rootlessness?, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16, pp. 529–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somerville, P. (1997) The social construction of home, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 14, pp. 226–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spicer, M. (2019) What do we mean by democracy? Reflections on an essentially contested concept and its relationship to politics and public administration, Administration & Society, 51, pp. 724–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, S. (2009) Residential protectionism and the legal mythology of home, Michigan Law Review, 107, pp. 1093–1144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock, F. (2017) Home and Migrant Identity in Dialogical Life Stories of Moroccan and Turkish Dutch (Leiden: Brill).
   Google Scholar
• Suk, J. (2011) At Home in the Law: How the Domestic Violence Revolution Is Transforming Privacy (New Haven: Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, H. (2015) Refugees and the Meaning of Home: Cypriot Narratives of Loss, Longing and Daily Life in London, Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Tomas, A. & Dittmar, H. (1995) The experience of homeless women: An exploration of housing histories and the meaning of home, Housing Studies, 10, pp. 493–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Burg, W. (2017) Law as a second-order essentially contested concept, Jurisprudence, 8, pp. 230–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veness, A. (1993) Neither homed nor homeless: Contested definitions and the personal worlds of the poor, Political Geography, 12, pp. 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, A. (2004) The Nature of Political Theory (New York: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (1990) The Right to Private Property (New York: Clarendon Press).
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (2002) Is the rule of law an essentially contested concept (in Florida)?, Law and Philosophy, 21, pp. 137–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, P. & Jacobs, K. (2000) Discourses of social exclusion: An analysis of bringing Britain together: A national strategy for neighbourhood renewal, Housing, Theory and Society, 17, pp. 14–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeffert, H. (2017) Home and International Law (PhD Thesis, London of School of Economics).
   Google Scholar