481
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The contexts of residential preferences. An experimental examination of contextual influences in housing decisions

ORCID Icon
Pages 1973-1997 | Received 19 Oct 2020, Accepted 29 Nov 2021, Published online: 15 Dec 2021

References

  • Aldén, L., Hammarstedt, M., & Neuman, E. (2015) Ethnic segregation, tipping behavior, and native residential mobility, International Migration Review, 49, pp. 36–69.
  • Auspurg, K. & Hinz, T. (2015) Factorial Survey Experiments, Quantitative Applications in the Social Science 175 (Thousand Oaks: Sage).
  • Auspurg, K., Hinz, T., & Schmid, L. (2017) Contexts and conditions of ethnic discrimination: Evidence from a field experiment in a German housing market, Journal of Housing Economics, 35, pp. 26–36.
  • Bowles, S. (1998) Endogenous preferences: The cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions, Journal of Economic Literature, 36, pp. 75–111.
  • Brown, L. A. & Chung, S.-Y. (2006) Spatial segregation, segregation indices and the geographical perspective, Population, Space and Place, 12, pp. 125–143.
  • Bruch, E. E. & Feinberg, F. (2017) Decision-making processes in social contexts, Annual Review of Sociology, 43, pp. 207–227.
  • Clark, W. A. V. (2002) Ethnic preferences and ethnic perceptions in multi-ethnic settings, Urban Geography, 23, pp. 237–256.
  • Clark, W. A. V. (2009) Changing residential preferences across income, education, and age: Findings from the multi-city study of urban inequality, Urban Affairs Review, 44, pp. 334–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087408321497.
  • Clark, W. A. V. (2012) Do women delay family formation in expensive housing markets? Demographic Research, 27, pp. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2012.27.1.
  • Clark, W. A. V., Deurloo, M., & Dieleman, F. (2006) Residential mobility and neighbourhood outcomes, Housing Studies, 21, pp. 323–342.
  • Clark, W. A. V. & Fossett, M. (2008) Understanding the social context of the Schelling segregation model, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, pp. 4109–4114.
  • Clark, W. A. V. & Lisowski, W. (2017a) Decisions to move and decisions to stay: Life course events and mobility outcomes, Housing Studies, 32, pp. 547–565.
  • Clark, W. A. V. & Lisowski, W. (2017b) Prospect theory and the decision to move or stay, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, pp. E7432–40. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708505114.
  • Cosacov, N. (2019) Residential choices, in: A. M Orum (Ed) The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies, pp. 1–5 (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley).
  • DeLuca, S., Duncan, G. J., Keels, M., & Mendenhall, R. (2012) The notable and the null: Using mixed methods to understand the diverse impacts of residential mobility programs, in: M. V. Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds) Neighbourhood Effects Research: New Perspectives, pp. 195–223 (New York: Springer).
  • Dessemontet, P., Kaufmann, V., & Jemelin, C. (2010) Switzerland as a single metropolitan area? A study of its commuting network, Urban Studies, 47, pp. 2785–2802.
  • Earnhart, D. (2002) Combining revealed and stated data to examine housing decisions using discrete choice analysis, Journal of Urban Economics, 51, pp. 143–169.
  • Emerson, M. O., Chai, K. J., & Yancey, G. (2001) Does race matter in residential segregation? Exploring the preferences of white Americans, American Sociological Review, 66, pp. 922–935.
  • Federal Statistical Office. (2019a) Wohnverhältnisse Nach Bewohnertyp Für Die 10 Grössten Städte 2015–2017 Kumuliert. Available at https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/catalogues-databases/tables.assetdetail.7346349.html.
  • Federal Statistical Office. (2019b) Leer Stehende Wohnungen Am 1. Juni, in Den Gemeinden Mit Mehr Als 5000 Einwohnern. Available at https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/catalogues-databases/tables.assetdetail.9366187.html.
  • Flage, A. (2018) Ethnic and gender discrimination in the rental housing market: Evidence from a meta-analysis of correspondence tests, 2006–2017, Journal of Housing Economics, 41, pp. 251–273.
  • Galster, G., Marcotte, D. E., Mandell, M., Wolman, H., & Augustine, N. (2007) The influence of neighborhood poverty during childhood on fertility, education, and earnings outcomes, Housing Studies, 22, pp. 723–751.
  • Galster, G. & Turner, L. M. (2019) Status aversion, attraction and discrepancy as drivers of neighborhood selection, City & Community, 18, pp. 937–964.
  • Goux, D. & Maurin, E. (2007) Close neighbours matter: Neighbourhood effects on early performance at school, The Economic Journal, 117, pp. 1193–1215.
  • Van Ham, M. & Clark, W. A. V. (2009) Neighbourhood mobility in context: Household moves and changing neighbourhoods in The Netherlands, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41, pp. 1442–1459.
  • Hole, A. R. (2007) A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures, Health Economics, 16, pp. 827–840.
  • Ibraimovic, T. & Hess, S. (2018) A latent class model of residential choice behaviour and ethnic segregation preferences, Housing Studies, 33, pp. 544–564.
  • Iceland, J. & Hernandez, E. (2017) Understanding trends in concentrated poverty: 1980–2014, Social Science Research, 62, pp. 75–95.
  • Ioannides, Y. M. & Kan, K. (2006) Structural estimation of residential mobility and housing tenure choice, Journal of Regional Science, 36, pp. 335–363.
  • Jansen, S. J. T., Coolen, H. C. C. H., & Goetgeluk, R. W. (Eds). (2011) The Measurement and Analysis of Housing Preference and Choice (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8894-9.
  • Kim, J. H., Pagliara, F., & Preston, J. (2005) The intention to move and residential location choice behaviour, Urban Studies, 42, pp. 1621–1636.
  • Krackhardt, D. (1998) Endeogenous preference: A structural approach, in: J. Halpern & R. N. Stern (Eds) Debating Rationality: Non-Rational Aspects of Organizational Decision Making, pp. 239–47 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
  • Kuhfeld, W. F. (2010) Marketing Research Methods in SAS (Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc). http://support.sas.com/techsup/technote/mr2010.pdf.
  • Lee, B. A., Oropesa, R. S., & Kanan, J. W. (1994) Neighborhood context and residential mobility, Demography, 31, pp. 249–270.
  • Lévy-Garboua, L., Meidinger, C., & Rapoport, B. (2006) The formation of social preferences: Some lessons from psychology and biology, in: S.-C. Kolm & J. M. Ythier (Eds) Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity, Vol. 1, pp. 545–613 (Oxford: Elsevier).
  • Lindenberg, S. & Frey, B. S. (1993) Alternatives, frames, and relative prices: A broader view of rational choice theory, Acta Sociologica, 36, pp. 191–205.
  • Louviere, J. J., Street, D., Burgess, L., Wasi, N., Islam, T., & Marley, A. A. J. (2008) Modeling the choices of individual decision-makers by combining efficient choice experiment designs with extra preference information, Journal of Choice Modelling, 1, pp. 128–164.
  • Manley, D. (2014) Scale, aggregation, and the modifiable areal unit problem, in: M. M. Fischer & P. Nijkamp (Eds) Handbook of Regional Science, pp. 1157–71 (Berlin: Springer).
  • McFadden, D. (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior, in P. Zarembka (Ed) Frontiers in Econometrics, 105–42 (New York: Academic Press).
  • Meyerhoffer, C. A. & Kenty-Drane, J. (2019) Principles of racial integration vs. perceptions of non-white neighborhoods: Comparing hypothetical and real neighborhood choice, Journal of Urban Affairs, 41, pp. 853–868.
  • Morrison, P. & Clark, W. A. V. (2016) Loss aversion and duration of residence, Demographic Research, 35, pp. 1079–1100.
  • Petrin, A. & Train, K. (2010) A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models, Journal of Marketing Research, 47, pp. 3–13.
  • Petrović, A., van Ham, M., & Manley, D. (2018) Multiscale measures of population: Within- and between-city variation in exposure to the sociospatial context, Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108, pp. 1057–1074.
  • Preece, J., Crawford, J., McKee, K., Flint, J., & Robinson, D. (2020) Understanding changing housing aspirations: A review of the evidence, Housing Studies, 35, pp. 87–106.
  • van de Rijt, A., Siegel, D., & Macy, M. (2009) Neighborhood chance and neighborhood change: A comment on Bruch and Mare, American Journal of Sociology, 114, pp. 1166–1180.
  • Schaerer, C. & Baranzini, A. (2009) Where and how do swiss and foreigners live? Segregation in the Geneva and Zurich housing markets, Swiss Journal of Sociology, 35, pp. 571–592.
  • Schelling, T. C. (1971) Dynamic models of segregation, The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, pp. 143–186.
  • Skifter Andersen, H. (2015) Explanations for special neighbourhood preferences among ethnic minorities, Housing, Theory and Society, 32, pp. 196–217.
  • Skrondal, A. & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2003) Multilevel logistic regression for polytomous data and rankings, Psychometrika, 68, pp. 267–287.
  • Thomas, M. J., Stillwell, J. C. H., & Gould, M. I. (2016) Modelling the duration of residence and plans for future residential relocation: A multilevel analysis, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41, pp. 297–312.
  • Timmermans, H. J. P., Molin, E., & Noortwijk, L. (1994) Housing choice processes: Stated versus revealed modelling approaches, Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 9, pp. 215–227.
  • Train, K. E. (2009) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Tversky, A. & Simonson, I. (1993) Context-dependent preferences, Management Science, 39, pp. 1179–1189.
  • Van Kempen, R. & Wissink, B. (2014) Between places and flows: Towards a new agenda for neighbourhood research in an age of mobility, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 96, pp. 95–108.
  • Voigt, K., Murawski, C., & Bode, S. (2017) Endogenous formation of preferences: Choices systematically change willingness-to-pay for goods, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, pp. 1872–1882.
  • Vuijst, E. D. & van Ham, M. (2019) Parents and peers: Parental neighbourhood- and school-level variation in individual neighbourhood outcomes later in life, European Sociological Review, 35, pp. 15–28.
  • Wang, D. & Li, S.-M. (2006) Socio-economic differentials and stated housing preferences in Guangzhou, China, Habitat International, 30, pp. 305–326.
  • Yates, J. & Mackay, D. F. (2006) Discrete choice modelling of urban housing markets: A critical review and an application, Urban Studies, 43, pp. 559–581.
  • Zangger, C. (2019) Making a place for space: Using spatial econometrics to model neighborhood effects, Journal of Urban Affairs, 41, pp. 1055–1080.
  • Zangger, C. & Becker, R. (2019) Experiments in the sociology of education: Causal inference and estimating causal effects in sociological research on education, in: R. Becker (Ed)Research Handbook on the Sociology of Education, Research Handbooks in Sociology, pp. 153–71 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.