Approach to housing justice from a capability perspective: bridging the gap between ideals and policy practices

References

• Alkire, S., Kanagaratnam, U. & Suppa, N. (2020) The global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI): 2020 revision, OPHI MPI Methodological Note 49 (Oxford: Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative, University of Oxford).
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. S. (2010) Justifying the capability approach to justice, in: H. Brighouse & I. Robeyns (Eds) Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities, pp. 81–100 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Anonymized (REF). (n.d.).
   Google Scholar
• Batterham, D. (2019) Homelessness as capability deprivation: A conceptual model, Housing, Theory and Society, 36, pp. 274–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batterham, D. (2020) The promise and problems of applying the capability approach to housing policy and research, Housing, Theory, and Society, 37, pp. 305–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B. (1995) Politics and housing markets—Four normative arguments, Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 12, pp. 123–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B. & Ruonavaara, H. (2010) Introduction to the special issue: Path dependence in housing, Housing, Theory and Society, 27, pp. 193–203.
   Google Scholar
• Burchardt, T. & Vizard, P. (2011) Operationalizing’ the capability approach as a basis for equality and human rights monitoring in twenty‐first‐century Britain, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12, pp. 91–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (1989) Editorial introduction: Vulnerability, coping and policy, IDS Bulletin, 20, pp. 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisholm, E., Howden-Chapman, P. & Fougere, G. (2018) Tenants’ responses to substandard housing: Hidden and invisible power and the failure of rental housing regulation, Housing, Theory and Society, 37, pp. 139–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapham, D. (2005) The Meaning of Housing: A Pathway Approach (Bristol: The Policy Press).
   Google Scholar
• Clapham, D. (2019) Remaking Housing Policy (Bristol: Taylor & Francis)
   Google Scholar
• Coates, D., Anand, P. & Norris, M. (2013) Housing and quality of life for migrant communities in Western Europe: A capability approach, Journal on Migration and Human Security, 1, pp. 163–209.
   Google Scholar
• Drydyk, J. (2008) Durable empowerment, Journal of Global Ethics, 4, pp. 231–245.
   Google Scholar
• Drydyk, J. (2012) A capability approach to justice as a virtue, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 15, pp. 23–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, S. S. (1976) Research directions in social geography: Housing opportunities and constraints, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1, pp. 10–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuis, A. & Thorns, D. C. (1998) Home, homeownership and the search for ontological security, The Sociological Review, 46, pp. 24–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurofound. (2015) Access to social benefits: Reducing non-take-up (Luxembourg: Publications Office of the EU).
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, S., Bengtsson, B. & Watts, B. (2014) Rights to housing: Reviewing the terrain and exploring a way forward, Housing, Theory and Society, 31, pp. 447–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foye, C. (2020) It’s about process: Who draws up the list of capabilities and how? Housing, Theory, and Society, 37, pp. 300–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foye, C. (2021) Ethically-speaking, what is the most reasonable way of evaluating housing outcomes? Housing, Theory and Society, 38, pp. 115–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (2003) Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, and participation, in: N. Fraser & A. Honneth (Eds) Redistribution or Recognition? A Political- Philosophical Exchange, pp.72–109 (London: Verso and Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).
   Google Scholar
• Frediani, A. A. (2009) Freedom in the urban arena: The World Bank, Turner and Sen, DPU Working Paper, no. 136.
   Google Scholar
• Gilabert, P. (2009) The feasibility of basic socioeconomic human rights: A conceptual exploration, The Philosophical Quarterly, 59, pp. 659–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen, L. (2004) Homeownership and social inequality in Norway, in: H. P. Blossfeld & K. Kurz (Eds) Home Ownership and Social Inequality in Comparative Perspective, pp. 166–186 (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Heylen, K. & Van den Broeck, K. (2016) Discrimination and selection in the belgian private rental market, Housing Studies, 31, pp. 223–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, J. (2010) Divergence in European Welfare and Housing Systems (Amsterdam: IOS Press).
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, S. S. (2006) From individual to collective capabilities: The capability approach as a conceptual framework for self-help, Journal of Human Development, 7, pp. 397–416.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, S. S. & Alkire, S. (2007) Agency and empowerment: A proposal for internationally comparable indicators, Oxford Development Studies, 35, pp. 379–403.
   Google Scholar
• Kemeny, J. (1995) From Public Housing to the Social Market: Rental Policy Strategies in Comparative Perspective (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Kimhur, B. (2020) How to apply the capability approach to housing policy? Concepts, Theories and Challenges, Housing, Theory and Society, 37(3), pp. 257–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, P. (2003) Housing as a freedom right, Housing Studies, 18, pp. 661–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, D. & Marcuse, P. (2016) Defence of Housing (London and NY: Verso).
   Google Scholar
• McCallum, S. & Papadopoulos, A. (2020) Capabilities and housing: Questions of application, Housing, Theory and Society, 37, pp. 289–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moroni, S. (2020) The Just City. Three background issues: Institutional justice and spatial justice, social justice and distributive justice, concept of justice and conception of justice, Planning Theory, 19, pp. 251–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, C. (2006) Asset-based approaches to poverty reduction in a globalized context, Global Economy and Development Working Paper, no.1.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, C. M. (2010) Housing, homelessness and capabilities, Housing, Theory and Society, 27, pp. 23–41.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, M. (2016) Varieties of home ownership: Ireland’s transition from a socialised to a marketised policy regime, Housing Studies, 31, pp. 81–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (1988) Nature, function and capability: Aristotle on political distribution, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, pp. 145–184.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2006) Frontiers of Justice (Massachusetts: The Belknap Press).
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2011) Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach (Massachusetts: Havard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (1992) Human functioning and social justice: In defense of Aristotelian Essentialism, Political Theory, 20, pp. 202–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxley, M. (1991) The aims and methods of comparative housing research, Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 8, pp. 67–77.
   Google Scholar
• Oxley, M. (2001) Meaning, science, context and confusion in comparative housing research, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16, pp. 89–106.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (2001) Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (Massachusetts: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Rex, J. & Moore, R. (1967) Race, Community, and Conflict: A Study of Sparkbrook (London: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Ronald, R. (2008) The ideology of home ownership: Homeowner societies and the role of housing (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Ruonavaara, H. (2012) Homeownership and Nordic housing policies in ‘retrenchment’, in: R. Ronald, M. Elsinga (Eds) Beyond Home Ownership: Housing, Welfare and Society (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Ruonavaara, H. (2020) Rethinking the concept of ‘housing regime’, Critical Housing Analysis, 7, pp. 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, P. (1990) A Nation of Home Owners (London: Unwin Hyman).
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1980) Equality of what? in: The Tanner Lecture on Human Values, pp. 197–220 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1985) Commodities and Capabilities (Amsterdam: North-Holland).
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1992) Inequality Reexamined (Massachusetts: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1993) Positional objectivity, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22, pp. 126–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999) Development as Freedom (New York: Knopf.)
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2009) The Idea of Justice (Massachusetts: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2012) Value and justice, Journal of Economic Methodology, 19, pp. 101–108.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, M. (2020) How housing systems are changing and why: A critique of Kemeny’s theory of housing regimes, Housing, Theory and Society, 37, pp. 521–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, H. (2019) Social justice in contemporary housing: Applying Rawls’ difference principle, Routledge Focus on Housing and Philosophy (London, New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• UN Human Rights Council. (2017) Report of the Special Rapporteur on Adequate Housing, UN General Assembly, No.A/HRC/34/51.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, J. & De-Shalit, A. (2007) Disadvantage (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar