Consumer housing choices among residents living in wooden multi-storey buildings

References

• Aguilar, F. X., Roos, A., Haapala, A., Lähtinen, K., Kniivilä, M. & Hoen, H. F. (2023) Dweller preferences for wood as a load-bearing material in residential buildings, Journal of Forest Economics, 38, pp. 77–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, E., Naumanen, P., Ruonavaara, H. & Turner, B. (2007) Housing, socio-economic security and risks. A qualitative comparison of household attitudes in Finland and Sweden, European Journal of Housing Policy, 7, pp. 151–172.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, R. L., H. (2004) Socio‐cultural sustainability of housing: A conceptual exploration, Housing, Theory and Society, 21, pp. 65–76.
   Google Scholar
• Churkina, G., Organschi, A., Reyer, C. P. O., Ruff, A., Vinke, K., Liu, Z., Reck, B. K., Graedel, T. E. & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2020) Buildings as a global carbon sink, Nature Sustainability, 3, pp. 269–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collen, H. & Hoekstra, J. (2001) Values as determinants of preferences for housing attributes, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16, pp. 285–306.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 3rd ed. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Floor, H. & Van Kempen, R. (1997) Analysing housing preferences with decision plan nets, Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 14, pp. 27–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzini, F. (2022) Wooden multistory construction, as perceived by Finland’s municipal civil servants overseeing land use planning, Dissertationes Forestales, 2022, pp. 84.
   Google Scholar
• Geng, A. X., Yang, H. Q., Chen, J. X. & Hong, Y. X. (2017) Review of carbon storage function of harvested wood products and the potential of wood substitution in greenhouse gas mitigation, Forest Policy and Economics, 85, pp. 192–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibler, K. & Nelson, S. (2003) Consumer behavior applications to real estate education, Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, 6, pp. 63–83.
   Google Scholar
• Gibler, K. M. & Tyvimaa, T. (2014) The potential for consumer segmentation in the Finnish housing market, Journal of Consumer Affairs, 48, pp. 351–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, S. & Rubik, F. (2009) Consumer attitudes towards timber as a construction material and towards timber frame houses–selected findings of a representative survey among the German population, Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, pp. 303–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosselin, A., Blanchet, P., Lehoux, N. & Cimon, Y. (2016) Main motivations and barriers for using wood in multi-story and non-residential construction projects, BioResources, 12, pp. 546–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gram‐Hanssen, K. & Bech‐Danielsen, C. (2004) House, home and identity from a consumption perspective, Housing Theory and Society, 21, pp. 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Gustavsson, L., Joelsson, A. & Sathre, R. (2010) Life cycle primary energy use and carbon emission of an eight-storey wood-framed apartment building, Energy and Buildings, 42, pp. 230–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagbert, P. & Femenías, P. (2016) Sustainable homes, or simply energy-efficient buildings? Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 31, pp. 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harju, C. & Lähtinen, K. (2021) Perceptions of wooden interior product quality – insights on sustainability views among Finnish consumers, Silva Fennica, 55, pp. 10605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harju, C. & Lähtinen, K. (2022) Consumers’ consciousness for sustainable consumption and their perceptions of wooden building product quality, Forest Products Journal, 72, pp. 155–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasu, E. (2018) Housing decision-making process explained by third agers, Finland: ‘we didn’t want this, but we chose it’, Housing Studies, 33, pp. 837–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høibø, O., Hansen, E. & Nybakk, E. (2015) Building material preferences with a focus on wood in urban housing: Durability and environmental impacts, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 45, pp. 1617–1627.
   Google Scholar
• Hurmekoski, E., Jonsson, R. & Nord, T. (2015) Context, drivers, and future potential for wood-frame multi-story construction in Europe, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 99, pp. 181–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, S. J. T. (2011) The Measurement and Analysis of Housing Preference and Choice (Dordrecht: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, S. J. T. (2014) Different values, different housing? Can underlying value orientations predict residential preference and choice?, Housing, Theory and Society, 31, pp. 254–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, O., Lindberg, S., Roos, A., Hugosson, M. & Lindström, M. (2008) Consumer perceptions and preferences on solid wood, wood-based panels, and composites: a repertory grid study, Wood and Fiber Science, 40, pp. 663–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jussila, J. & Lähtinen, K. (2020) Effects of institutional practices on delays in construction views of Finnish homebuilder families, Housing Studies, 35, pp. 1167–1193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jussila, J., Nagy, E., Lähtinen, K., Hurmekoski, E., Häyrinen, L., Mark-Herbert, C., Roos, A., Toivonen, R. & Toppinen, A. (2022) Wooden multi-storey construction market development – Systematic literature review within a global scope with insights on the Nordic region, Silva Fennica, 56, pp. 10609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karjalainen, M. & Ilgın, H. E. (2022) Residents’ experience in timber apartment buildings in Finland, Journal of Green Building, 17, pp. 187–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kates, W. R., Parris, T. M. & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005) What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice, Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 47, pp. 8–21.
   Google Scholar
• Kauko, T. (2006) Expressions of housing consumer preferences: Proposition for a research agenda, Housing, Theory and Society, 23, pp. 92–108.
   Google Scholar
• Kersloot, J. & Kauko, T. (2004) Measurement of housing preferences – A comparison of research activity in The Netherlands and Finland, Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research, 1, pp. 144–163.
   Google Scholar
• Kylkilahti, E., Autio, M., Harvio, V., Holmberg, U. & Toppinen, A. (2022) Co-developing sustainability – A consumer-inclusive approach to wooden housing business in Finland, Housing Studies, pp. 1–20. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2022.2114592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larasatie, P., Guerrero, J. E., Conroy, K., Hall, T. E., Hansen, E. & Needham, M. D. (2018) What does the public believe about tall wood buildings? An exploratory study in the US pacific northwest, Journal of Forestry, 116, pp. 429–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavagna, M., Baldassarri, C., Campioli, A., Giorgi, S., Dalla Valle, A., Castellani, V. & Sala, S. (2018) Benchmarks for environmental impact of housing in Europe: Definition of archetypes and LCA of the residential building stock, Building and Environment, 145, pp. 260–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarevic, D., Kautto, P. & Antikainen, R. (2020) Finland’s wood-frame multi-storey construction innovation system: Analysing motors of creative destruction, Forest Policy and Economics, 110, pp. 101861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, D. S., & Lee, C. K. C. (2004) The influence of family members on housing purchase decisions, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 22(4), pp. 320–338.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, D. S., Murphy, L. & Lee, C. K. C. (2008) Influences and emotions: Exploring family decision-making processes when buying a house, Housing Studies, 23, pp. 271–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima, L., Trindade, E., Alencar, L., Alencar, M. & Silva, L. (2021) Sustainability in the construction industry: A systematic review of the literature, Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, pp. 125730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblad, F. (2019) Living quality in wooden multi-family houses, Pro Ligno, 15, pp. 434–441.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblad, F. & Gustavsson, Å. (2020) A comparison between architects’ and residents’ perceived living quality in wooden multifamily houses in Sweden, Forest Products Journal, 70, pp. 462–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, D., Dent, P., & Kauko, T. (Eds.). (2017) Value in a Changing Built Environment (New York: John Wiley & Sons).
   Google Scholar
• Lähtinen, K., Harju, C. & Toppinen, A. (2019) Consumers’ perceptions on the properties of wood affecting their willingness to live in and prejudices against houses made of timber, Wood Material Science & Engineering, 14, pp. 325–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lähtinen, K., Häyrinen, L., Roos, A., Toppinen, A., Aguilar Cabezas, F. X., Thorsen, B. J., Hujala, T., Nyrud, A. Q. & Hoen, H. F. (2021) Consumer housing values and prejudices against living in wooden homes in the Nordic region, Silva Fennica, 55, pp. 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lähtinen, K., Häyrinen, L., Jussila, J., Harju, C., Toppinen, R. & Toivonen, R. (2023) Branding wooden multi-storey construction – Real-estate agents as gatekeepers for enhancing consumer value in housing, Journal of Forest Economics, 38, pp. 37–76.
   Google Scholar
• Marinova, S., Deetman, S., van der Voet, E. & Daioglou, V. (2020) Global construction materials database and stock analysis of residential buildings between 1970–2050, Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, pp. 119146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark-Herbert, C., Kvennefeldt, E. & Roos, A. (2019) Communicating added value in wooden multistorey construction, in: G. Concu (Ed) Timber Buildings and Sustainability, pp. 55–68 (London: IntechOpen).
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, A. & Gibb, K. (2011) Uncertainty, expectations and behavioural aspects of housing market choices, Housing, Theory and Society, 28, pp. 215–235.
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, C. H. (1996) Housing choice: Assumptions and approaches, Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 11, pp. 209–232.
   Google Scholar
• Pelli, P. & Lähtinen, K. (2020) Servitization and bioeconomy transitions: Insights of prefabricated wooden elements supply networks, Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, pp. 118711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltomaa, J., Mela, H. & Hildén, M. (2020) Housing managers as middle actors implementing sustainable housing policies in Finland, Building Research & Information, 48, pp. 53–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramage, M. H., Burridge, H., Busse-Wicher, M., Fereday, G., Reynolds, T., Shah, D. U., Wu, G., Yu, L., Fleming, P., Densley-Tingley, D., Allwood, J., Dupree, P., Linden, P. F. & Scherman, O. (2017) The wood from the trees: The use of timber in construction, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, pp. 333–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos, A., Hoen, H.-F., Aguilar, F. X., Haapala, A., Hurmekoski, E., Jussila, J., Lähtinen, K., Mark-Herbert, C., Nord, T., Toivonen, R. & Toppinen, A. (2022) Impact of prospective residents’ dwelling requirements on preferences for house construction materials, Wood Material Science & Engineering, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1080/17480272.2022.2126947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos, A., Hurmekoski, E., Häyrinen, L., Jussila, J., Lähtinen, K., Mark-Herbert, C., Nagy, E., Toivonen, R. & Toppinen, A. (2023) Beliefs on environmental impact of wood construction, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 38, pp. 49–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salama, A. M. & Sengupta, U. (2011) Changing paradigms in affordable housing, quality, and lifestyle theories (editorial), Open House International, 36, pp. 4–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmi, A., Jussila, J. & Hämäläinen, M. (2022) The role of municipalities in transformation towards more sustainable construction: the case of wood construction in Finland, Construction Management and Economics, 40, pp. 934–954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathre, R. & Gustavsson, L. (2009) Using wood products to mitigate climate change: External costs and structural change, Applied Energy, 86, pp. 251–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingston, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H. & Jinks, C. (2018) Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization, Quality & Quantity, 52, pp. 1893–1907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauerte, T. (2010) Consumer perceptions on wooden multistory houses: Segmenting international markets, in: Proceedings of the International Convention of Society of Wood Science and Technology and United Nations Economic Commission for Europe-Timber Committee, Geneva, Switzerland, (pp. 11–14).
   Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. (2012) Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice (Los Angeles: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M. & Scott, A. J. (2008) Rethinking human capital, creativity and urban growth, Journal of Economic Geography, 9, pp. 147–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toivonen, R., Vihemäki, H. & Toppinen, A. (2021) Policy narratives on wooden multi-storey construction and implications for technology innovation system governance, Forest Policy and Economics, 125, pp. 102409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban, F. (2012) Social reform, state control, and the origins of mass housing, in: F. Urban (Ed.) Tower and Slab: Histories of Global Mass Housing, pp. 7–18 (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Toppinen, A., Aaltio, A., Lahtinen, K., Jussila, J. & Toivonen, R. (2022) It all depends on the project – A business ecosystem in residential wooden multistory construction in Finland, Frontiers in Built Environment, 8, pp. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Vasanen, A. (2012) Beyond stated and revealed preferences: The relationship between residential preferences and housing choices in the urban region of Turku, Finland, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 27, pp. 301–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehola, A., Hurmekoski, E., Lähtinen, K., Ruokamo, E., Roos, A., Toivonen, R. & Toppinen, A. (2022) Citizen beliefs concerning wood as a construction material under extreme weather events, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 52, pp. 1266–1279.
   Google Scholar
• Vihemäki, H., Ludvig, A., Toivonen, R. Toppinen, A. & Weiss, G. (2019) Institutional and policy frameworks shaping the Wooden Multi-Storey Construction markets: A comparative case study on Austria and Finland, Wood material science & engineering, 14(5), pp. 312–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viholainen, N., Kylkilahti, E., Autio, M. & Toppinen, A. (2020) A home made of wood: Consumer experiences of wooden building materials, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 44, pp. 542–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, G., Rietkerk, M. & Kooger, R. (2020) The hassle factor as a psychological barrier to a green home, Journal of Consumer Policy, 43, pp. 345–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waugh, W. L. & Waugh, W. L. (2015) Managing man-made hazards and disasters, in: Living with Hazards – Dealing with Disasters. An Introduction to Emergency Management, pp. 107–141 (Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group).
   Google Scholar
• Wong, G. K. M. (2002) A conceptual model of the household’s housing decision-making process: The economic perspective, Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 14, pp. 217–234.
   Google Scholar