Exploring international gender differences in mathematics self-concept

REFERENCES

• Ayalon, H., & Livneh, I. (2012). Educational standardization and gender differences in mathematics achievement: A comparative study. Social Science Research, 42, 432–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, D., & Jones, D. P. (1993). Creating gender equality: Cross-national gender stratification and mathematical performance. Sociology of Education, 66, 91–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really?Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracey, G. W. (2000). The TIMSS ‘final year’ study and report: A critique. Educational Researcher, 29, 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Buchmann, C., DiPrete, T., & McDaniel, A. (2008). Gender inequalities in education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 319–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrelli, J. (2008). Thirty-three years of women in S&E faculty positions. National Federation of Science, 3, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ceci, S., & Williams, W. (2009). The mathematics of sex: How biology and society conspire to limit talented women and girls. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2002). Equal but separate? A cross-national study of sex segregation in higher education. American Sociological Review, 67, 573–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009). Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 924–976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correll, S. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1691–1730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correll, S. (2004). Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. American Sociological Review, 69, 93–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPrete, T., & Eirich, G. (2006). Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: A review of theoretical and empirical developments. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 271–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. (1989). Bringing young women to math and science. In M.Crawford & M.Gentry (Eds.), Gender and thought (pp. 36–58). New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 103–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., & Uzzi, B. (2000). Athena unbound: The advancement of women in science and technology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felson, R. B., & Trudeau, L. (1991). Gender differences in mathematics performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 113–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F., Sonnert, G., & Nikiforova, I. (2011). Programs for undergraduate women in science and engineering: Issues, problems, and solutions. Gender and Society, 25, 589–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review, 69, 751–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiso, L., Monte, F., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Culture, gender and math. Science, 320, 1164–1165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackett, G. (1985). Role of mathematics self-efficacy in the choice of math-related majors of college women and men: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 47–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harnisch, D. L., Steinkamp, M. W., Tsai, S., & Walberg, H. J. (1986). Cross-national differences in mathematics attitude and achievement among seventeen-year-olds. International Journal of Educational Development, 6, 233–244.
   Google Scholar
• Legewie, J., & DiPrete, T. (2011, January). High school environments, STEM orientations, and the gender gap in science and engineering degrees. Paper presented the University of Wisconsin, Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, A. (2010). The shifting supply of men and women to occupations: Feminization in veterinary education. Social Forces, 88, 1969–1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, R., & Mistele, J. (2012). The differences in scores and self-efficacy by student gender in mathematics and science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Educations, 10, 1163–1190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luzzo, D. A., Hasper, P., Albert, K., Bibby, M., & Martinelli, E. (1999). Effects of self-efficacy-enchancing interventions on the math/science self-efficacy and career interests, goals, and actions of career undecided college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullis, I., Martin, M., Ruddock, J., O'Sullivan, C., Arora, A., & Erberber, E. (2005). TIMSS 2007 Assesment Frameworks. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center, International Study Center, Lynch School of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Miller, D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 193–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penner, A. (2008). Gender differences in extreme mathematical achievement: An international perspective on biological and social factors. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 138–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penner, A., & CadwalladerOlsker, T. (2012). Gender differences in mathematics and science achievement across the distribution: What international variation can tell us about the role of biology and society. In Ferdinand D.Rivera & HelenForgasz (Eds.), Towards equity in mathematics education: Gender, culture, and diversity (pp. 441–468). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. L. (2013). Examining the relationships among classroom climate, self-efficacy, and achievement in undergraduate mathematics: A multi-level analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 459–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riegle-Crumb, C. (2005). The Cross-national context of the gender gap in math and science. In L.Hedges & B.Schneider (Eds.), The social organization of schools (pp. 227–243). New York: Russell Sage Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riegle-Crumb, C., Moore, C., & Ramos-Wada, A. (2011). Who wants to have a career in science or math? Exploring adolescents' future aspirations by gender and race/ethnicity. Science Education, 95, 458–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofer, E., & Meyer, J. (2005). The worldwide expansion of higher education in the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 70, 898–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R., Hubner, J., & Stanton, G. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, C. (2009). National differences in gender-science sterotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 10593–10597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2005). Current population survey [online]. Retrieved April 28, 2012, from http://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-table11-2006.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Usher, E. (2009). Sources of middle school students' self-efficacy in mathematics: A qualitative investigation. American Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 275–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Osterlind, S., & Bergin, D. (2012). Building mathematics achievement models in four countries using TIMSS 2003. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 1215–1242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, K. (2007). Human development Report 2007/2008. New York: United Nations Development Programs.
   Google Scholar
• Zengin-Arslan, B. (2001). Women in engineering education in Turkey: Understanding the gendered distribution. International Jounal of Engineering Education, 18, 400–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar