The effects of friendship and antipathy networks on adolescent attitude similarity

References

• Abecassis, M., & Hartup, W. W. (1999). The Hatfields and the McCoys: Prevalence and significance of mutual antipathies among preadolescents and adolescents (Unpublished manuscript). Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baldassarri, D., & Bearman, P. (2007). Dynamics of political polarization. American Sociological Review, 72, 784–811. doi:10.1177/000312240707200507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, C., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2013). Competition, envy, or snobbism? How popularity and friendships shape antipathy networks of adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 586–595. doi:10.1111/jora.12048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, C., Rodkin, P. C., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2011). Antipathetic relationships among adolescents: Exploring prevalence, gender differences, and stability in the United States and Chile. Anales de Psicología, 27, 783–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, L. R., & Stiller, J. (2014). Reciprocal peer dislike and psychosocial adjustment in childhood. Social Development, 23, 556–572. doi:10.1111/sode.12063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, B. (2008). The big sort: Why the clustering of like-minded America is tearing us apart. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Card, N. A. (2010). Antipathetic relationships in child and adolescent development: A meta-analytic review and recommendations for an emerging area of study. Developmental Psychology, 46, 516–529. doi:10.1037/a0017199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Card, N. A., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2003). Parent-child relationships and enmity with peers: The role of avoidant and preoccupied attachment. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2003, 23–37. doi:10.1002/cd.87.
   Google Scholar
• Card, N. A., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2007). Victimization within mutually antipathetic peer relationships. Social Development, 16, 479–496. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00394.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Card, N. A., Isaacs, J., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2000). The hazards of developing enemies: Relations with peer victimization. Paper presented at the the 108th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1961). The adolescent society. New York, NY: Free Press of Glencoe.
   Google Scholar
• Corsaro, W. A., & Eder, D. (1990). Children's peer cultures. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 197–220. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.001213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. H. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80, 97–125. doi:10.1037/h0033951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Değirmencioğlu, S. M., Urberg, K. A., Tolson, J. M., & Richard, P. (1998). Adolescent friendship networks: Continuity and change over the school year. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 44, 313–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot, J., & Steg, L. (2007). General beliefs and the theory of planned behavior: The role of environmental concerns in the TPB. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1817–1836. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00239.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Klepper, M., Sleebos, E., Van de Bunt, G., & Agneessens, F. (2010). Similarity in friendship networks: Selection or influence? The effect of constraining contexts and non-visible individual attributes. Social Networks, 32, 82–90. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2009.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, J. K., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Borch, C. (2013). Popularity and adolescent friendship networks: Selection and influence dynamics. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1242–1252. doi:10.1037/a0030098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engels, R. C. M. E., Vitaro, F., Blokland, E. D. E., de Kemp, R., & Scholte, R. H. J. (2004). Influence and selection processes in friendships and adolescent smoking behaviour: The role of parental smoking. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 531–544. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.06.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erath, S. A., Pettit, G. S., Dodge, K. A., & Bates, J. E. (2009). Who dislikes whom, and for whom does it matter: Predicting aggression in middle childhood. Social Development, 18, 577–596. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00497.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fararo, T. J., & Sunshine, M. (1964). A study of a biased friendship net. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, L. A., & Bauman, K. E. (1988). Influence and selection in the friend-adolescent relationship: Findings from studies of adolescent smoking and drinking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 289–314. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb00018.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, J. R. P. J. (1956). A formal theory of social power. Psychological Review, 63, 181–194. doi:10.1037/h0046123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedkin, N. E. (2001). Norm formation in social influence networks. Social Networks, 23, 167–189. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(01)00036-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedkin, N. E., & Johnsen, E. C. (1990). Social influence and opinions. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 15, 193–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel, S., Mason, W., & Watts, D. J. (2010). Real and perceived attitude agreement in social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 611–621. doi:10.1037/a0020697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güroğlu, Berna, Haselager, G. J. T., Lieshout, C. F. M. van, & Scholte, R. H. J. (2009). Antagonists in mutual antipathies: A person-oriented approach. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19, 35–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, C. C. (1991). A social averaging theorem for group decision making. In N. H. Anderson (Ed.), Contributions to information integration theory (Vol. 2, pp. 1–40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Harary, F. (1959). A criterion for unanimity in French's theory of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 168–182). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hartup, W. W., & Abecassis, M. (2002). Friends and enemies. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of childhood social development (pp. 285–306). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Haynie, D. L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter? American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1013–1057. doi:10.1086/320298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschi, T. ([1969] 2002). Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huitsing, G., Van Duijn, M. A. J., Snijders, T. A. B., Wang, P., Sainio, M., Salmivalli, C., & Veenstra, R. (2012). Univariate and multivariate models of positive and negative networks: Liking, disliking, and bully-victim relationships. Social Networks, 34, 645–657. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2012.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingery, J. N., & Erdley, C. A. (2007). Peer experience as predictors of adjustment across the middle school transition. Education and Treatment of Children, 30, 73–88. doi:10.1353/etc.2007.0007.
   Google Scholar
• Knecht, A., Snijders, T. A. B., Baerveldt, C., Steglich, C. E. G., & Raub, W. (2010). Friendship and delinquency: Selection and influence processes in early adolescence. Social Development, 19, 494–514. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00564.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29(1), 1–27. doi:10.1007/BF02289565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupersmidt, J. B., Griesler, P. C., De Rosier, M. E., Patterson, C. J., & Davis, P. W. (1995). Childhood aggression and peer relations in the context of family and neighborhood factors. Child Development, 66, 360–375. doi:10.2307/1131583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In M. Berger, T. Abel, & C. H. Page (Eds.), Freedom and control in modern society (pp. 18–66). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, K., & Wagner, C. (1981). Rational consensus in science and society. London: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercken, L., Candel, M., Willems, P., & De vries, H. (2007). Disentangling social selection and social influence effects on adolescent smoking: The importance of reciprocity in friendships. Addiction, 102, 1483–1492. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01905.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercken, L., Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C., Vartiainen, E., & De vries, H. (2010). Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior. Social Networks, 32, 72–81. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercken, L., Steglich, C., Sinclair, P., Holliday, J., & Moore, L. (2012). A longitudinal social network analysis of peer influence, peer selection, and smoking behavior among adolescents in British schools. Health Psychology, 31, 450–459. doi:10.1037/a0026876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J., Lincoln, J. R., & Olson, J. (1981). Rationality and equity in professional networks: Gender and race as factors in the stratification of interorganizational systems. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 308–335. doi:10.1086/227460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mundt, M. P., Mercken, L., & Zakletskaia, L. (2012). Peer selection and influence effects on adolescent alcohol use: A stochastic actor-based model. BMC Pediatrics, 12, 115. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-12-115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nangle, D. W., Erdley, C. A., Zeff, K. R., Stanchfield, L. L., & Gold, J. A. (2004). Opposites do not attract: Social status and behavioral-style concordances and discordances among children and the peers who like or dislike them. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 425–434. doi:10.1023/B:JACP.0000030295.43586.32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padgett, J. F., & Ansell, C. K. (1993). Robust action and the rise of the medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1259–1319. doi:10.1086/230190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, J. G., & Gamm, B. K. (2003). Describing the dark side of preadolescents' peer experiences: Four questions (and data) on preadolescents' enemies. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2003, 55–72. doi:10.1002/cd.89.
   Google Scholar
• Peets, K., Hodges, E. V. E., & Salmivalli, C. (2008). Affect-congruent social-cognitive evaluations and behaviors. Child Development, 79, 170–185. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01118.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers, D. A., & Xie, Y. (2008). Statistical methods for categorical data analysis. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, G. E., & Cohen, R. (1997). Children's evaluations of provocation between peers. Aggressive Behavior, 23, 417–431. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1997)23:6 < 417:AID-AB2>3.0.CO;2-D.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewell, W. H., Haller, A. O., & Portes, A. (1969). The educational and early occupational attainment process. American Sociological Review, 34, 82–92. doi:10.2307/2092789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York, NY: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C., & Schweinberger, M. (2007). Modeling the coevolution of networks and behavior. In K. V. Montfort, J. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related sciences (pp. 41–71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Steglich, C., Snijders, T. A. B., & Pearson, M. (2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology, 40, 329–393. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01225.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of criminology. Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott.
   Google Scholar
• Wiseman, J. P., & Duck, S. (1995). Having enemies and managing enemies: A very challenging relationship. In S. Duck & J. T. Wood (Eds.), Understanding relationship processes, Vol. 5: Confronting relationship challenges (pp. 43–72). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Witkow, M. R., Bellmore, A. D., Nishina, A., Juvonen, J., & Graham, S. (2005). Mutual antipathies during early adolescence: More than just rejection. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 209–218. doi:10.1177/01650250444000513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar