Publication Cover
Work & Stress
An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations
Volume 34, 2020 - Issue 3
6,333
Views
76
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The drivers of work engagement: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal evidence

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 259-278 | Received 02 May 2019, Accepted 25 Oct 2019, Published online: 05 Nov 2019

References

  • Adachi, P., & Willoughby, T. (2015). Interpreting effect sizes when controlling for stability effects in longitudinal autoregressive models: Implications for psychological science. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 116–128. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2014.963549
  • Airila, A., Hakanen, J. J., Schaufeli, W. B., Luukkonen, R., Punakallio, A., & Lusa, S. (2014). Are job and personal resources associated with work ability 10 years later? The mediating role of work engagement. Work & Stress, 28, 87–105. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2013.872208
  • Ângelo, R. P., & Chambel, M. J. (2015). The reciprocal relationship between work characteristics and employee burnout and engagement: A longitudinal study of firefighters. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 31, 106–114. doi: 10.1002/smi.2532
  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. doi: 10.1108/02683940710733115
  • Bal, P. M., & de Lange, A. H. (2015). From flexibility human resource management to employee engagement and perceived job performance across the lifespan: A multisample study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88, 126–154. doi: 10.1111/joop.12082
  • Bickerton, G. R., Miner, M. H., Dowson, M., & Griffin, B. (2014). Spiritual resources and work engagement among religious workers: A three-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 370–391. doi: 10.1111/joop.12052
  • Biggs, A., Brough, P., & Barbour, J. P. (2014). Enhancing work-related attitudes and work engagement: A quasi-experimental study of the impact of an organizational intervention. International Journal of Stress Management, 21, 43–68. doi: 10.1037/a0034508
  • Caligiuri, P., Mencin, A., & Jiang, K. (2013). Win–win–win: The influence of company-sponsored volunteerism programs on employees, NGOs, and business units. Personnel Psychology, 66, 825–860. doi: 10.1111/peps.12019
  • Cheung, M. W.-L. (2014). metaSEM: An R package for meta-analysis using structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1521) 1–7.
  • Cheung, M. W. L, & Chan, W. (2005). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach. Psychological Methods, 10, 40–64. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.40
  • Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
  • Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 834–848. doi: 10.1037/a0019364
  • Day, A., & Nielsen, K. (2017). What does our organization do to help Our well-being? Creating healthy workplaces and workers. In N. Chmiel, F. Fraccaroli, & M. Sverke (Eds.), An Introduction to work and organizational psychology: An international perspective (pp. 295–314). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Demerouti, E., Nachreiner, F., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499–512. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
  • Dormann, C., & Griffin, M. A. (2015). Optimal time lags in panel studies. Psychological Methods, 20, 489–505. doi: 10.1037/met0000041
  • Dormann, C., Zapf, D., & Perels, F. (2010). Quer- und Längsschnittstudien in der Arbeitspsychologie [Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in industrial psychology]. In U. Kleinbeck, & K-H Schmidt (Eds.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Themenbereich D, Praxisgebiete, Serie III, Wirtschafts-, Organisations- und Arbeitspsychologie, Band 1. Arbeitspsychologie (pp. 923–1001). Göttingen: Hogrefe Publishing.
  • Frins, W., van Ruysseveldt, J., van Dam, K., & van den Bossche, S. N. J. (2016). Older employees’ desired retirement age: A JD-R perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31, 34–49. doi: 10.1108/JMP-05-2013-0133
  • Gallego-Pace, M. E. (2017). Leadership and employee outcomes: Mediating effects of job resources and employee engagement (dissertation). New York: Hofstra University.
  • Hakanen, J. J., Peeters, M. C. W., & Perhoniemi, R. (2011). Enrichment processes and gain spirals at work and at home: A 3-year cross-lagged panel study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, 8–30. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.2010.02014.x
  • Hakanen, J. J., Peeters, M. C. W., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2017). Different types of employee well-being across time and their relationships with job crafting. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23, 289–301. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000081
  • Hakanen, J. J., Perhoniemi, R., & Toppinen-Tanner, S. (2008). Positive gain spirals at work: From job resources to work engagement, personal initiative and work-unit innovativeness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 78–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.003
  • Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2010). A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources and consequences. In A. B. Bakker, & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 102–117). New York: Psychology Press.
  • Heinrichs, K., Angerer, P., Li, J., Loerbroks, A., Weigl, M., & Müller, A. (2019). Changes in the association between job decision latitude and work engagement at different levels of work experience: A 10-year longitudinal study. Work & Stress. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02678373.2019.1577310
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Hu, Q., Schaufeli, W. B., & Taris, T. W. (2017). How are changes in exposure to job demands and job resources related to burnout and engagement? A longitudinal study among chinese nurses and police officers. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 33(5), 631–644. doi: 10.1002/smi.2750
  • Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
  • Jak, S. (2015). Heterogeneity. In S. Jak (Ed.), Meta-analytic structural equation modelling (pp. 25–31). Cham, CH: Springer.
  • Jak, S., & Cheung, M. W. L. (2018). Accounting for missing correlation coefficients in fixed-effects MASEM. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2017.1375886
  • Kinnunen, U., & Feldt, T. (2013). Job characteristics, recovery experiences and occupational well-being: Testing cross-lagged relationships across 1 year. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 29, 369–382. doi: 10.1002/smi.2483
  • Knight, C., Patterson, M., & Dawson, J. (2019). Work engagement interventions can be effective: A systematic review. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28, 348–372. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2019.1588887
  • Landis, R. S. (2013). Successfully combining meta-analysis and structural equation modeling: Recommendations and strategies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28, 251–261. doi: 10.1007/s10869-013-9285-x
  • Leiter, M. P., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Work engagement: Introduction. In A. B. Bakker, & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 1–9). New York: Psychology Press.
  • Lesener, T., Gusy, B., & Wolter, C. (2019). The job demands-resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Work & Stress, 33, 76–103. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2018.1529065
  • Lichtenthaler, P. W., & Fischbach, A. (2018). A meta-analysis on promotion- and prevention-focused job crafting. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30, 1–21.
  • Luchman, J. N., & González-Morales, G. M. (2013). Demands, control, and support: A meta-analytic review of work characteristics interrelationships. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18, 37–52. doi: 10.1037/a0030541
  • Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x
  • Martinussen, M., Adolfsen, F., Lauritzen, C., & Richardsen, A. M. (2012). Improving interprofessional collaboration in a community setting: Relationships with burnout, engagement and service quality. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26, 219–225. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2011.647125
  • Massei, F., & Zappalà, S. (2009). Work characteristics and quality of working life: Effects on employees’ engagement and innovation propensity [in Italian]. Risorsa Uomo: Rivista di Psicologia del Lavoro e dell’Organizzazione, 15, 415–429.
  • Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., Mäkikangas, A., & Feldt, T. (2010). Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: A qualitative review and directions for future research. In S. L. Albrecht (Ed.), New horizons in management. Handbook of employee engagement: Perspectives, issues, research and practice (pp. 111–138). Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.
  • Millear, P. M. R., & Liossis, P. L. (2010). Longitudinal modelling of the influence of individual differences and the workplace on wellbeing and work engagement. In R. E. Hicks (Ed.), Personality and individual differences: Current directions (pp. 189–199). Bowen Hills, Australia: Australian Academic Press.
  • Nakamura, S., & Otsuka, Y. (2013). Job resources enhance work engagement through positive affect and meaningful work among Japanese employees. In F. Sarracino (Ed.), Psychology of emotions, motivations and actions. The happiness compass: Theories, actions and perspectives for well-being (pp. 141–151). Nova: Hauppauge.
  • Nielsen, K., Nielsen, M. B., Ogbonnaya, C., Känsälä, M., Saari, E., & Isaksson, K. (2017). Workplace resources to improve both employee well-being and performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Work & Stress, 31, 101–120. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2017.1304463
  • Nielsen, K., Yarker, J., Munir, F., & Bültmann, U. (2018). IGLOO: An integrated framework for sustainable return to work in workers with common mental disorders. Work & Stress, 32, 400–417. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2018.1438536
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  • Reis, D., Hoppe, A., & Schröder, A. (2015). Reciprocal relationships between resources, work and study engagement, and mental health: Evidence for gain cycles. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 59–75. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2013.834891
  • Saks, A. M., & Gruman, J. A. (2014). What do we really know about employee engagement? Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25, 155–182. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.21187
  • Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W. B., Xanthopoulou, D., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). The gain spiral of resources and work engagement: Sustaining a positive worklife. In A. B. Bakker, & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential Theory and research (pp. 118–131). New York: Psychology Press.
  • Santiago, R. (2018). Gender differences in resource allocation through developmental work assignments (dissertation). New York: Hofstra University.
  • Schaufeli, W. B. (2017). Applying the job demands-resources model. Organizational Dynamics, 46, 120–132. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.04.008
  • Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Defining and measuring work engagement: Bringing clarity to the concept. In A. B. Bakker, & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 10–24). New York: Psychology Press.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A Two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92. doi: 10.1023/A:1015630930326
  • Schaufeli, W. B., & Taris, T. W. (2014). A critical review of the job demands-resources model: Implications for improving work and health. In G. F. Bauer, & O. Hämmig (Eds.), Bridging occupational, organizational and public health: A transdisciplinary approach (pp. 43–68). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
  • Schelvis, R. M. C., Wiezer, N. M., van der Beek, A. J., Twisk, J. W. R., Bohlmeijer, E. T., & Oude Hengel, K. M. (2017). The effect of an organizational level participatory intervention in secondary vocational education on work-related health outcomes: Results of a controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 17(1), 141. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4057-6
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-Fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74.
  • Taris, T. W., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2016). The job demands-resources model. In S. Clarke, T. M. Probst, F. W. Guldenmund, & J. Passmore (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of occupational safety and workplace health (pp. 157–180). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Vogt, K., Hakanen, J. J., Jenny, G. J., & Bauer, G. F. (2015). Sense of coherence and the motivational process of the job-demands–resources model. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21, 194–207. doi: 10.1037/a0039899
  • Weigl, M., Hornung, S., Parker, S. K., Petru, R., Glaser, J., & Angerer, P. (2010). Work engagement accumulation of task, social, personal resources: A three-wave structural equation model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 140–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2010.03.002
  • Wirtz, M., & Caspar, F. (2002). Interrater agreement and interrater reliability. Methods on analysis and improvement of the reliability of assessments by categorial systems and rating scales [in German]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
  • Young, H. R., Glerum, D. R., Wang, W., & Joseph, D. L. (2018). Who are the most engaged at work? A meta-analysis of personality and employee engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 1–17.
  • Zapf, D. (1989). Self and expert observation in psychological job analysis. Methodological problems in the measurement of stressors at work [in German]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.