Leaders’ intensified job demands: Their multi-level associations with leader-follower relationships and follower well-being

References

• Ahtiainen, L. (2015). Employee unionization in Finland in 2013. Ministry of Employment and the Economy publications 52.
   Google Scholar
• Authors. (2020). Reference anonymized for review process.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD-R approach. Annual Review of Organisational Psychology and Organisational Behaviour, 1(1), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235
   Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among US managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesley, N. (2014). Information and communication technology use, work intensification and employee strain and stress. Work, Employment and Society, 28(4), 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017013500112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, D. V., Fleenor, J. W., Atwater, L. E., Sturm, R. E., & McKee, R. A. (2014). Advances in leader and leadership development: A review of 25 years of research and theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N. E. D., & Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 7–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01201.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Spiegelaere, S., Van Gyes, G., & Van Hootegem, G. (2016). Not all autonomy is the same. Different dimensions of job autonomy and their relation to work engagement & innovative work behavior. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 26(4), 515–527. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715–1759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311415280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. M., Bauer, T. N., Erdogan, B., & Truxillo, D. M. (2019). Daily perceptions of relationship quality with leaders: Implications for follower well-being. Work & Stress, 33(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2018.1445670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldt, T., Rantanen, J., Hyvönen, K., Mäkikangas, A., Huhtala, M., Pihlajasaari, P., & Kinnunen, U. (2014). The 9-item Bergen Burnout Inventory: Factorial validity across organizations and measurements of longitudinal data. Industrial Health, 52(2), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2013-0059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, F. (2015). Is work intensification extra stress? Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedkin, N. E., & Johnsen, E. C. (1990). Social influence and opinions. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 15(3–4), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1990.9990069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827–844. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Morales, M. G., Peiró, J. M., Rodríguez, I., & Bliese, P. D. (2012). Perceived collective burnout: A multilevel explanation of burnout. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 25(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2010.542808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gooty, J., Connelly, S., Griffith, J., & Gupta, A. (2010). Leadership, affect and emotions: A state of the science review. Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 979–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, F. (2004). Work intensification, discretion, and the decline in well-being at work. Eastern Economic Journal, 30(4), 615–625.
   Google Scholar
• Gregersen, S., Vincent-Höper, S., & Nienhaus, A. (2016). Job-related resources, leader-member exchange and well-being-a longitudinal study. Work and Stress, 30(4), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2016.1249440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizations. In L. L. Cummings, & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 369–406). JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C., Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. (2005). Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 472–491. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.17293355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinojosa, A. S., Gardner, W. L., Walker, H. J., Cogliser, C., & Gullifor, D. (2017). A review of cognitive dissonance theory in management research: Opportunities for further development. Journal of Management, 43(1), 170–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316668236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höge, T. (2011). Perceived flexibility requirements at work and the entreployee-work-orientation: Concept and measurement. Psychology of Everyday Activity, 4(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inceoglu, I., Thomas, G., Chu, C., Plans, D., & Gerbasi, A. (2018). Leadership behavior and employee well-being: An integrated review and a future research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korunka, C., Kubicek, B., Paškvan, M., & Ulferts, H. (2015). Changes in work intensification and intensified learning: Challenge or hindrance demands? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(7), 786–800. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-02-2013-0065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubicek, B., Paškvan, M., & Bunner, J. (2017). The bright and dark sides of job autonomy. In C. Korunka, & B. Kubicek (Eds.), Job demands in a changing world of work (pp. 45–63). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54678-0_4
   Google Scholar
• Kubicek, B., Paškvan, M., & Korunka, C. (2015). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing job demands arising from accelerated change: The intensification of job demands scale (IDS). European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(6), 898–913. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.979160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwiek, M., & Antonowicz, D. (2015). The changing paths in academic careers in European universities: Minor steps and major milestones. In T. Fumasoli, G. Goastellec, & B. M. Kehm (Eds.), Academic work and careers in Europe: Trends, challenges, perspectives (pp. 41–68). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• LePine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & LePine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor-hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 764–775. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauno, S., Feldt, T., Minkkinen, J., Huhtala, M., Auvinen, E., & Kubicek, B. (2020). Gender differences in work intensification and its effect on mental health: results from a large-scale study in Finland [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere.
   Google Scholar
• Mauno, S., Kubicek, B., Feldt, T., & Minkkinen, J. (2019). Intensified job demands and job performance: Does SOC strategy use make a difference? Employee Relations, 41(4), 694–707. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-04-2018-0094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauno, S., Minkkinen, J., Tsupari, H., Huhtala, M., & Feldt, T. (2019). Do older employees suffer more from work intensification and other intensified job demands? Evidence from upper white-collar workers. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.60
   Google Scholar
• Mazzola, J. J., & Disselhorst, R. (2019). Should we be “challenging” employees? A critical review and meta-analysis of the challenge-hindrance model of stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(8), 949–961. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClean, S. T., Barnes, C. M., Courtright, S. H., & Johnson, R. E. (2019). Resetting the clock on dynamic leader behaviors: A conceptual integration and agenda for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 13(2), 479–508. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, C., Schaufeli, W., Struyve, C., Vandecandelaere, M., Gielen, S., & Kyndt, E. (2020). Burnout contagion’ among teachers: A social network approach. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(2), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkkinen, J., Kinnunen, U., & Mauno, S.. (2021). Does psychological detachment from work protect employees under high intensified job demands? Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.97
   Google Scholar
• Montano, D., Reeske, A., Franke, F., & Hüffmeier, J. (2017). Leadership, followers’ mental health and job performance in organizations: A comprehensive meta-analysis from an occupational health perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(3), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998/2017). Statistical analysis with latent variables. User’s guide. Muthén & Muthén. (Original work published 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Nikolova, I., Schaufeli, W., & Notelaers, G. (2019). Engaging leader – Engaged employees? A cross-lagged study on employee engagement. European Management Journal, 37(6), 772–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paškvan, M., Kubicek, B., Prem, R., & Korunka, C. (2016). Cognitive appraisal of work intensification. International Journal of Stress Management, 23(2), 124–146. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pongratz, H. J., & Voß, G. G. (2003). From employee to ‘entreployee’: Towards a ‘self-entrepreneurial’ work force? Concepts and Transformation, 8(3), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1075/cat.8.3.04pon
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. (2003). Social acceleration: Ethical and political consequences of a desynchronized high–speed society. Constellations, 10(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00309
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmela-Aro, K., Rantanen, J., Hyvönen, K., Tilleman, K., & Feldt, T. (2011). Bergen burnout inventory: reliability and validity among finnish and estonian managers. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 84(6), 635–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-010-0594-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Engaging leadership in the job demands-resources model. Career Development International, 20(5), 446–463. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-02-2015-0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
   Google Scholar
• Searle, B. J., & Auton, J. C. (2015). The merits of measuring challenge and hindrance appraisals. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 28(2), 121–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2014.931378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seppälä, P., Mauno, S., Feldt, T., Hakanen, J., Kinnunen, U., Tolvanen, A., & Schaufeli, W. (2009). The construct validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Multisample and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(4), 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9100-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherf, E. N., Venkataramani, V., & Gajendran, R. S. (2019). Too busy to be fair? The effect of workload and rewards on managers’ justice rule adherence. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 469–502. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.1061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuck, B., & Herd, A. M. (2012). Employee engagement and leadership: Exploring the convergence of two frameworks and implications for leadership development in HRD. Human Resource Development Review, 11(2), 156–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484312438211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skakon, J., Nielsen, K., Borg, V., & Guzman, J. (2010). Are leader's well-being, behaviors and style associated with the affective well-being of their employees? A systematic review of three decades of research. Work & Stress, 24(2), 107–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2010.495262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, M., Vincent-Höper, S., & Gregersen, S. (2020). Why busy leaders may have exhausted followers: A multilevel perspective on supportive leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(6), 829–845. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-11-2019-0477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng, Q., McElroy, J. C., Morrow, P. C., & Liu, R. (2010). The relationship between career growth and organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(3), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukl, G., Gordon, A., & Taber, T. (2002). A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half century of behavior research. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190200900102
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Zyphur, M. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: Problems and solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 695–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108327450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar