Use of self-referential (ipsative) feedback to motivate and guide distance learners

References

• Askew, S., & Lodge, C. (2000). Gifts, ping-pong and loop-linking feedback and learning. In S. Askew (Ed.), Feedback for learning (pp. 1–18). London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., & Campbell, L. (2010). Generating dialogue in assessment feedback: Exploring the use of interactive coversheets. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 291–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self assessment. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Broadfoot, P. (1996). Education, assessment and society. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 3, 219–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Chetwyn, F., & Dobbyn, C. (2011). Assessment, feedback and marking guides in distance education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 26, 67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, B. R. (2007). Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students’ subsequent submission of assessable work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 571–582.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (2007). Assessment and emotion: The impact of being assessed. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment for higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 144–152). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (2006). Why assessment is changing. In C. Bryan & K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 11–22). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (2010). Does assessment in open learning support students? Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 25, 163–166.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2002). The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 53–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, G. (2007). Using blended learning to increase learner support and improve retention. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 351–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, G. (2011). Aiming for personal best: A case for introducing ipsative assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 353–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, G. (2014). Ipsative assessment: Motivation through marking progress. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, F. (2001). Providing effective support: Investigating feedback to distance language learners. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 16, 233–247.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanic, R., Clark, R., & Rimmershaw, R. (2000). What am I supposed to make of this? The messages conveyed to students by tutors’ written comments. In M. R. Lea & B. Stierer (Eds.), Student writing in higher education: New contexts. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D. (2007). Reconsidering open and distance learning in the developing world: Meeting students’ learning needs. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, A. (1993). Punishment by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, as, praise and other bribes. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2008). Feedback on assessment: Student’s perceptions of quality and effectiveness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 263–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, J. (2001). Exploiting online interactivity to enhance assignment development. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 16, 179–189.
   Google Scholar
• Molloy, E., Borrell-Carrio, F., & Epstein, R. (2013). The impact of emotions in feedback. In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well (pp. 50–71). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Molloy, E., & Boud, D. (2013). Changing conceptions of feedback. In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well (pp. 11–23). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C., & O’Reilly, M. (1999). Assessing open and distance learners. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 3, 501–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., & Milligan, C. (2006). Rethinking technology-supported assessment practices in relation to the seven principles of good feedback practice. In C. Bryan & K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 64–80). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, L. S. (2008). Action research in teaching and learning: A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Poulos, A., & Mahony, M. J. (2008). Effectiveness of feedback: The students’ perspective. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 143–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M., Carroll, J., O’Donovan, B., & Rust, C. (2011). If I was going there I wouldn’t start from here: A critical commentary on current assessment practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36, 479–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 277–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, R. D. (2005). Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 175–194.
   Google Scholar
• Sancho-Vinuesaa, T., Escudero-Viladomsa, N., & Masiàb, R. (2013). Continuous activity with immediate feedback: A good strategy to guarantee student engagement with the course. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 28, 51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, O. (2003). Student retention in online, open and distance learning. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, O. (2008). Motivating learners in open and distance learning: Do we need a new theory of learner support? Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 23, 159–170.
   Google Scholar
• Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, M. (2009). An investigation into written comments on assignments: Do students find them useable? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, 67–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar