Teaching and learning with technology in higher education: blended and distance education needs ‘joined-up thinking’ rather than technological determinism

References

• Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11, 71–80.10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asunka, S. (2013). The viability of e-textbooks in developing countries: Ghanaian university students’ perceptions. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 28, 36–50.10.1080/02680513.2013.796285
   Google Scholar
• Balacheff, N., Ludvigsen, S., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A., & Barnes, S. (Eds.). (2009). Technology-enhanced learning: Principles and products. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Baran, E., Correia, A.-P., & Thompson, A. (2011). Transforming online teaching practice: Critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers. Distance Education, 32, 321–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrie, S. (2006). Understanding what we mean by the generic attributes of graduates. Higher Education, 51, 215–241.10.1007/s10734-004-6384-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckett, J. (2013, March 14). Online learning: Will technology transform higher education? Stanford Engineering. Retrieved January 7, 2015, from http://engineering.stanford.edu/news/online-learning-will-technology-transform-higher-education
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 775–786.10.1111/bjet.2008.39.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, R., & Brack, C. (2009). Developing the scholarship of teaching: What is the role of e-teaching and learning? Teaching in Higher Education, 14, 71–80.10.1080/13562510802602590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackmore, P., & Blackwell, R. (2006). Strategic leadership in academic development. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 373–387.10.1080/03075070600680893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blin, F., & Munro, M. (2008). Why hasn’t technology disrupted academics’ teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Computers and Education, 50, 475–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. (2007). A handbook for deterring plagiarism in higher education (2nd ed.). Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford Brookes University.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, M. (2011). ‘Transforming the learner’ versus ‘passing the exam’: Understanding the gap between academic and student definitions of quality. Quality in Higher Education, 17, 3–17.10.1080/13538322.2011.554634
   Google Scholar
• Coates, H., James, R., & Baldwin, G. (2005). A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning. Tertiary Education and Management, 11, 19–36.10.1080/13583883.2005.9967137
   Google Scholar
• Cranfield University. (n.d.). University learning and teaching strategy 2012–2015. Retrieved January 16, 2015, from http://www.cranfield.ac.uk/about/governance/policies-and-regulations/
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, L.-O. (2005). Learning conceptions and outcomes. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning: Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (3rd ed., pp. 23–38). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment. Retrieved November 14, 2014, from http://www.docs.hss.ed.ac.uk/iad/Learning_teaching/Academic_teaching/Resources/Experience_of_learning/EoLChapter2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dalgarno, B., Bishop, A. G., Adlong, W., & Bedgood Jr., D. R. (2009). Effectiveness of a virtual laboratory as a preparatory resource for distance education chemistry students. Computers & Education, 53, 853–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Retrieved November 14, 2014, from http://sirjohn.ca/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/MOOCs-Best.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, V. L. B. (2014). Massive online obsessive compulsion: What are they saying out there about the latest phenomenon in higher education? The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15, 268–281.
   Google Scholar
• Downing, K., Lam, T.-F., Kwong, T., Downing, W.-K., & Chan, S.-W. (2007). Creating interaction in online learning: A case study. ALT-J, 15, 201–215.10.1080/09687760701673592
   Google Scholar
• Elgort, I., Smith, A. G., & Toland, J. (2008). Is wiki an effective platform for group course work? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 195–210. Retrieved January 7, 2015, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet24/elgort.html
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Eynon, R. (2008). The use of the world wide web in learning and teaching in higher education: Reality and rhetoric. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45, 15–23.10.1080/14703290701757401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, P. S. (Ed.). (2001). Technology enhanced learning: Opportunities for change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, D. K., Mitchell, D., & Thompson, S. J. (2009). Podcasting by synchronising PowerPoint and voice: What are the pedagogical benefits? Computers & Education, 53, 532–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati, S. (2008). Technology-enhanced learning in developing nations: A review. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9. Retrieved January 8, 2015, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/477/1012
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L., & Knight, P. T. (1996). Transforming higher education. Buckingham: The Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helsper, E., & Eynon, R. (2009). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36, 503–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschheim, R. (2005). The internet-based education bandwagon. Communications of the ACM, 48, 97–101.10.1145/1070838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockings, C. (2005). Removing the barriers? A study of the conditions affecting teaching innovation. Teaching in Higher Education, 10, 313–326.10.1080/13562510500122149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelfs, A., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2013). The use of digital technologies across the adult life span in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 338–351.10.1111/bjet.2013.44.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or digital natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers & Education, 54, 722–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D. (2009). Nurturing generic capabilities through a teaching and learning environment which provides practise in their use. Higher Education, 57, 37–55.10.1007/s10734-008-9131-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D., & Kwan, K.-P. (2000). Lecturers’ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28, 469–490.10.1023/A:1026569608656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, G., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K.-L. (2008). First year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 108–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keppell, M., Suddaby, G., & Hard, N. (2011). Good practice report: Technology-enhanced learning and teaching. An Australian Learning and Teaching Council Report. Retrieved January 8, 2015, from http://www.olt.gov.au/resource-good-practice-report-technology-enhanced-learning-and-teaching-2011
   Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2005). Learners and learning in the twenty‐first century: What do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses? Studies in Higher Education, 30, 257–274.10.1080/03075070500095689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2012). The influence upon design of differing conceptions of teaching and learning with technology. In A. D. Olofsson & J. O. Lindberg (Eds.), Informed design of educational technologies in higher education (pp. 1–20). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-61350-080-4
   Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2013). Missing: Evidence of a scholarly approach to teaching and learning with technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 327–337.10.1080/13562517.2013.773419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39, 6–36.10.1080/17439884.2013.770404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, P., Tait, J., & Yorke, M. (2006). The professional learning of teachers in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 319–339.10.1080/03075070600680786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, P. T., & Trowler, P. R. (2000). Department-level cultures and the improvement of learning and teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 25, 69–83.10.1080/030750700116028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning. A guide for learners and teachers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S. (1990). The adult learner. A neglected species (4th ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf.
   Google Scholar
• Kreber, C., & Kanuka, H. (2006). The scholarship of teaching and learning and the online classroom. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 32, 109–131.
   Google Scholar
• Laurillard, D. (2006). Modelling benefits-oriented costs for technology enhanced learning. Higher Education, 54, 21–39.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M. R., & Jones, S. (2011). Digital literacies in higher education: Exploring textual and technological practice. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 377–393.10.1080/03075071003664021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A., & Ashwin, P. (2006). How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 285–298.10.1080/03075070600680539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, R., & Carroll, J. (2006). Plagiarism – A complex issue requiring a holistic institutional approach. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 233–245.10.1080/02602930500262536
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, L., & Brown, S. (n.d.) Assessing students: Cheating and plagiarism. York: Higher Education Academy. Retrieved November 14, 2014, from http://jisctechdis.ac.uk/assets/Documents/resources/database/id430_cheating_and_plagiarism.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mills, R., & Tait, A. (Eds.). (1999). The convergence of distance and conventional education: Patterns of flexibility for the individual learner. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, G. (2005). New lecturers’ constructions of learning, teaching and research in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 611–625.10.1080/03075070500249328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, D. F. (1998). Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. First Monday, 3. Retrieved January 12, 2015, from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/569/490
   Google Scholar
• Norton, L., Richardson, J. T. E., Hartley, J., Newstead, S., & Mayes, J. (2005). Teachers’ beliefs and intentions concerning teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 50, 537–571.10.1007/s10734-004-6363-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L. (Eds.). (2005). Educating the net generation [ An educause e-book]. Retrieved November 14, 2014, from www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., & Conole, G. (2003). Evidence‐based practice and e‐learning in higher education: Can we and should we? Research Papers in Education, 18, 385–397.10.1080/0267152032000176873
   Google Scholar
• Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. M. (2006). Learning about university teaching: Reflections on a research study investigating influences for change. Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 319–335.10.1080/13562510600680756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, On the Horizon, 9. Retrieved November 14, 2014, from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Price, L., & Kirkwood, A. (2008). Technology in the United Kingdom’s higher education context. In S. Scott & K. C. Dixon. (Eds.), The globalised university: Trends and challenges in teaching and learning (pp. 83–113). Perth: Black Swan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, L., & Kirkwood, A. (2011). Enhancing professional learning and teaching through technology: A synthesis of evidence-based practice among teachers in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E. (2000). Researching student learning: Approaches to studying in campus-based and distance education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Säljö, R. (1979). Learning about learning. Higher Education, 8, 443–451.10.1007/BF01680533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers. Higher Education, 24, 93–111.10.1007/BF00138620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (2001). Revisiting academics’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41, 299–325.10.1023/A:1004130031247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6, 342–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2007). The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: A critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 83–94.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00204.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. R., & Marx, L. (Eds.). (1994). Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, A., & O’Donnell, A. (2009). The contribution of a virtual biology laboratory to college students’ learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 405–419.10.1080/14703290903301735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swansea University. (2012). Learning, teaching and assessment strategy 2011/12 to 2013/14. Retrieved January 16, 2015, from http://www.swansea.ac.uk/registry/staff-information/
   Google Scholar
• Tay, L. Y., & Lim, C. P. (2013). Creating holistic technology-enhanced learning experiences. Rotterdam: Sense.10.1007/978-94-6209-086-6
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. (2014, June 28). The digital degree. The Economist. Retrieved January 7, 2015, from http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21605899-staid-higher-education-business-about-experience-welcome-earthquake-digital
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Changing approaches to teaching: A relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 21, 275–284.10.1080/03075079612331381211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UCISA. (2014). 2014 Survey of technology enhanced learning for higher education in the UK. Retrieved January 8, 2015, from http://www.ucisa.ac.uk/tel
   Google Scholar
• UK Cabinet Office. (2014). Government Digital Inclusion Strategy. Retrieved January 7, 2015, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-digital-inclusion-strategy/government-digital-inclusion-strategy
   Google Scholar
• University of Liverpool. (2013). Technology enhanced learning strategy for the university of Liverpool. Retrieved January 11, 2015, from http://www.liv.ac.uk/media/livacuk/tqsd/TEL_strategy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Waldrop, M. M. (2013, March). Massive open online courses, aka MOOCs, transform higher education and science. Scientific American, March. Retrieved January 7, 2015, from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/massive-open-online-courses-transform-higher-education-and-science/
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion, rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar