2,343
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Guest Editorial

Developing academics’ assessment practices in open, distance and e-learning: an institutional change agenda

, &

References

  • Amundsen, C., & Wilson, M. (2012). Are we asking the right questions? A conceptual review of the educational development literature in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 82, 90–126. doi:10.3102/0034654312438409
  • Ball, S. J. (2012). Performativity, commodification and commitment: An i-spy guide to the neoliberal university. British Journal of Educational Studies, 60, 17–28. doi:10.1080/00071005.2011.650940
  • Biggs, J. (2001). The reflective institution: Assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41, 221–238. doi:10.1023/A:1004181331049
  • Boud, D. (1995). Assessment and learning: Contradictory or complementary? In P. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 35–48). London: Kogan Page.
  • Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22, 151–167. doi:10.1080/713695728
  • Boud, D., & Brew, A. (2013). Reconceptualising academic work as professional practice: Implications for academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 18, 208–221. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2012.67177
  • Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer learning and assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, 413–426. doi:10.1080/0260293990240405
  • Boud, D., & Hager, P. (2012). Re-thinking continuing professional development through changing metaphors and location in professional practice. Studies in Continuing Education, 34, 17–30. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2011.608656
  • Cashmore, A., Cane, C., & Cane, R. (2013). Rebalancing promotion in the HE sector: Is teaching excellence being rewarded? York: Higher Education Academy.
  • Checkland, P., & Scholes, P. (1990). Soft systems methodology in practice. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Cleaver, E., Lintern, M., & McLinden, M. (2014). Teaching and learning in higher education: Disciplinary approaches to educational enquiry. London: Sage.
  • Collini, S. (2011). From Robbins to McKinsey. London Review of Books, 33, 9–14.
  • Cook, S. D., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10, 381–400. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.4.381
  • Deem, R. (1998). New managerialism and higher education: The management of performances and cultures in universities in the United Kingdom. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 8, 47–70. doi:10.1080/0962021980020014
  • Dysthe, O. (2008). The challenges of assessment in a new learning culture. In A. Haynes & L. McDowell (Eds.), Balancing dilemmas in assessment and learning in contemporary education (pp. 15–28). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Evans, C., Muijs, D., & Tomlinson, M. (2015). Engaged student learning. High-impact strategies to enhance student achievement. York: Higher Education Academy.
  • Ferman, T. (2002). Academic professional development practice: What lecturers find valuable. International Journal for Academic Development, 7, 146–158. doi:10.1080/1360144032000071305
  • Ferrell, G. (2012). A view of the assessment and feedback landscape: Baseline analysis of policy and practice from the JISC assessment & feedback programme. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearning/Assessment/JISCAFBaselineReportMay2012.pdf
  • Fung, D., & Gordon, C. (2016). Rewarding educators and education leaders in research intensive universities. York: Higher Education Academy.
  • Gibbs, G. (2013). Reflections on the changing nature of educational development. International Journal for Academic Development, 18, 4–14. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2013.751691
  • Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 198–217). London: Sage.10.4135/9781849200387
  • Holroyd, C. (2000). Are assessors professional? Student assessment and the professionalism of academics. Active Learning in Higher Education, 1, 28–44. doi:10.1177/1469787400001001003
  • Hughes, J., McKenna, C., with Kneale, P., Winter, J., Turner, R., Spowart, L., & Muneer, R. (2016). Evaluating teaching development in higher education. Toward impact assessment: Literature review (pp. 1–24). York: Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/evaluating_teaching_development_in_he_-_literature_review1.pdf
  • Jones, A. (2011). Seeing the messiness of academic practice: Exploring the work of academics through narrative. International Journal for Academic Development, 16, 109–118. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2011.568282
  • Knight, P., & Trowler, P. (2000). Department-level cultures and the improvement of learning and teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 25, 69–83. doi:10.1080/030750700116028
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1990). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Loads, D., & Campbell, F. (2015). Fresh thinking about academic development: Authentic, transformative, disruptive? International Journal for Academic Development, 20, 355–369. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2015.1083866
  • McDowell, L. (2012). Programme focused assessment: A short guide. Retrieved from http://www.pass.brad.ac.uk/
  • Mutch, A. (2002). Thinking strategically about assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 163–174. doi:10.1080/02602930220128733
  • Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback in mass higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 501–517. doi:10.1080/02602931003786559
  • Nicol, D. (2012). Transformational change in teaching and learning: Recasting the educational discourse. Retrieved from http://www.reap.ac.uk/Portals/101/Documents/PEERToolkit/VIEWPOINTS%20EVALUATION_Final_dn.pdf
  • Nicol, D., & Draper, S. (2009). A blueprint for transformational organisational change in higher education: REAP as a case study. In T. Mayes, D. Morrison, H. Meller, P. Bullen, & M. M. Oliver (Eds.), Transforming higher education through technology-enhanced learning (pp. 191–207). York: Higher Education Academy.
  • OU. (2014, November). New models of assessment and tuition project report SEP/SG/1411/02 17. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
  • Power, M. (1999). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198296034.001.0001
  • QAA. (2015, December). Higher education review: The Open University. Retrieved from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/reviews-and-reports/provider?UKPRN=10007773#.VyqMAUdSoed
  • Quinlan, K. M. (2014). Leadership of teaching for student learning in higher education: What is needed? Higher Education Research and Development, 33, 32–45. doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.864609
  • Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2009). Significant conversations and significant networks – Exploring the backstage of the teaching arena. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 547–559. doi:10.1080/03075070802597200
  • Snyder, B. R. (1971). The hidden curriculum. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Strickland, K. (2015). Editorial. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 3(2), 1–2. doi:10.14297/jpaap.v3i2.187
  • Trowler, P., Fanghanel, J., & Wareham, T. (2005). Freeing the chi of change: The higher education academy and enhancing teaching and learning in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 427–444. doi:10.1080/03075070500160111
  • UN. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development (A / RES/ 70/1). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
  • Waring, M., & Evans, C. (2015). Understanding pedagogy: Developing a critical approach to teaching and learning. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803932
  • Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Learning in a landscape or practice: A framework. In E. Wenger-Trayner, M. Fenton-O’Creevy, S. Hutchinson Kubiak, & B. Wenger-Trayner (Eds.), Learning in landscapes of practice: Boundaries, identity and knowledgeability in practice-based learning (pp. 13–30). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45, 477–501. doi:10.1023/A:1023967026413

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.