Online Dutch L2 learning in adult education: educators’ and providers’ viewpoints on needs, advantages and disadvantages

References

• Appana, S. (2008). A review of benefits and limitations of online learning in the context of the student, the instructor, and the tenured faculty. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(1), 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bartley, S. J., & Golek, J. H. (2004). Evaluating the cost effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction. Educational technology and Society, 7(4), 167–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, M., & MacDougall, K. (2013). Adapting online learning for Canada’s northern public health workforce. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 72(1), 21345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berben, M., Drijkoningen, J., Frijns, C., Houben, A., Van Den Branden, K. (2012). De NT2-docent: Man/vrouw met missie? Lesgevers aan het woord over vernieuwingen in het NT2-onderwijs [The Dutch L2 tutor: Man/woman with a mission? Teachers talk about innovations in Dutch L2 education]. Research commissioned by Ministry of education, Flemish government. Leuven: Centrum Taal en Onderwijs.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74, 379–439.10.3102/00346543074003379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, R. J. (2009). The use of technology for second language distance learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 822–835.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00975.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, R. J. (2013). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casanovas, I. (2011). The impact of communicating institutional strategies on teachers attitude about adopting online education. 6th International Conference on e-Learning-ICEL 2011, 8: 62–71. British Columbia, Canada: Kelowna.
   Google Scholar
• DePryck, K., Zhu, C., Van Laer, H., Kupriyanova-Ashina, V., & Cools, W. (2013, October 31). Deelnemen aan het volwassenenonderwijs in Vlaanderen vanuit de ervaring van de cursist [Taking part in adult education in Flanders from the experience of the student]. Research project report, Ministry of education, Flemish government.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, C., & Long, M. H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 7(3), 50–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallardo, M., Heiser, S., & McLaughlin, X. A. (2015). Modern languages and Specific Learning Difficulties (SpLD): Implications of teaching adult learners with dyslexia in distance learning. Open Learning, 30(1), 53–72.10.1080/02680513.2015.1031647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskell, A., & Mills, R. (2014). The quality and reputation of open, distance and e-learning: What are the challenges? Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(3), 190–205.10.1080/02680513.2014.993603
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R., & Dziuban, C. (2008). Blended learning environments. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Van Merriënboer & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 269–276). New York, NY: Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Güven, M. (2014). Distance learning as an effective tool for medical interpreting training in Turkey. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and eLearning, 29(2), 116–130.10.1080/02680513.2014.964196
   Google Scholar
• Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2012). The use of videoconferencing to support multimodal interaction in an online language classroom. ReCALL, 24(2), 116–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannay, M., & Newvine, T. (2006). Perceptions of distance learning: A comparison of online and traditional learning. Merlot Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, T., & Banister, S. (2007). Face-to-face versus online coursework: A comparison of costs and learning outcomes. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(4), 318–326.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkinss, J. (2010). Distance language learners’ perceptions of assessed, student-led speaking tasks via a synchronous audiographic conferencing tool. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 235–258.10.1080/17501229.2010.513446
   Google Scholar
• Koutsoupidou, T. (2014). Online distance learning and music training: Benefits, drawbacks and challenges. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(3), 243–255.10.1080/02680513.2015.1011112
   Google Scholar
• Lomicka, L. (2006). Understanding the other: Intercultural exchange and CMC. In Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching, CALICO Monograph Series 5 (pp. 211–236). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, M. W., Sommer, B., Acredolo, C., & Matthews, H. R. (2005). What are the relevant costs of online education? In J. E. Groccia & J. E. Miller (Eds.), On becoming a productive university: Strategies for reducing costs and increasing quality in higher education (pp. 196–204). Bolton, MA: Anker.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, D., & Wolff, A. B. (2000). El espanol… a distancia!: [Spanish… At a distance!] Developing a technology-based distance education intermediate Spanish course. Journal of General Education, 49(1), 44–52.10.1353/jge.2000.0007
   Google Scholar
• Rubio, F. (2015). Assessment of oral proficiency in online language courses: Beyond reinventing the wheel. The Modern Language Journal, 99(2), 405–408.10.1111/modl.12234_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Serrano, L. (2008). Initiation by fire: Training teachers for distance learning. In S. Goertler & P. Winke, Opening doors through distance language education: Principles, perspectives, and practices. CALICO Monograph Series (Vol. 7, pp. 153–174). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
   Google Scholar
• Sauro, S. (2009). Strategic use of modality during synchronous CMC. CALICO Journal, 27(1), 101–117.10.11139/cj.27.1
   Google Scholar
• Sauro, S. (2011). SCMC for SLA: A research synthesis. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 369–391.10.11139/cj.28.2
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. I. (2009). On viewing learners as spiritual beings: Implications for language educators. Celea News, 1(1), 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Spyns, P., & Odijk, J. (2013). Essential speech and language technology for Dutch. Results by the STEVIN programme: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-30910-6
   Google Scholar
• Sun, S. Y. H. (2014). Learner perspectives on fully online language learning. Distance Education, 35(1), 18–42.10.1080/01587919.2014.891428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50, 1183–1202.10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, S. (2013). Private turns: A student’s off-screen behaviors during synchronous online Japanese instruction. CALICO Journal, 30(3), 371–392.10.11139/cj.30.3
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. (2002). Pros and cons of online learning – a faculty perspective. Journal of European Industrial Training, 26(1), 24–37.10.1108/03090590210415876
   Google Scholar
• Van Avermaet, P., & Gysen, S. (2006). From needs to tasks: Language learning needs in a task-based perspective. In K. Van den Branden (Ed.), Task-based language education (pp. 17–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511667282
   Google Scholar
• Walz, J. (1998). Meeting standards for foreign language learning with World Wide Web activities. Foreign Language Annals, 31(1), 103–114.10.1111/flan.1998.31.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, C. (2003). Language learning in distance education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511667312
   Google Scholar
• http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=822&langId=en
   Google Scholar
• https://www.vlaanderen.be/nl/publicaties/detail/beleidsnota-2014-2019-integratie-en-inburgering
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., & Cheng, Y. (2012). Quality assurance in e-learning: PDPP evaluation model and its application. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13, 66–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar