Examining interactive whiteboard-based instruction on the academic self-efficacy, academic press and achievement of college studentsFootnote^*

* This paper is a revised and expanded version of a paper entitled ‘Interactive whiteboard-based instruction versus Lecture-based instruction: A study on college students’ academic self-efficacy and academic press’ presented at 2017 International Conference on Blended Learning (ICBL), Hong Kong SAR, China, 27–29 July 2017.

References

• Afari, E., Ward, G., & Khine, M. S. (2012). Global self-esteem and self-efficacy correlates: Relation of academic achievement and self-esteem among Emirati students. International Education Studies, 5(2), 49–57. doi:10.5539/ies.v5n2p49
   Google Scholar
• Akbas, O., & Pektas, H. M. (2011). The effects of using an interactive whiteboard on the academic achievement of university students. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 12(2). Retrieved February 14, 2018, from http://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/download/v12_issue2_files/akbas.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Akgun, S., & Ciarrochi, J. (2003). Learned Resourcefulness Moderates the Relationship Between Academic Stress and Academic Performance. Educational Psychology, 23(3), 287–294. doi:10.1080/0144341032000060129
   Google Scholar
• Albaaly, E., & Higgins, S. (2012). The impact of interactive whiteboard technology on medical students’ achievement in ESL essay writing: An early study in Egypt. The Language Learning Journal, 40(2), 207–222. doi:10.1080/09571736.2010.543953
   Google Scholar
• Amiri, R., & Sharifi, M. (2014). The influence of using interactive whiteboard on writings of EFL students regarding adverbs. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 242–250. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.413
   Google Scholar
• Balkis, M. (2011). Academic efficacy as a mediator and moderator variable in the relationship between academic procrastination and academic achievement. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/~rlewis1/articles/1977-Bandura-Self-efficacy.pdf (accessed 14 February 2018).10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, J. B. (2014). Investigating the structure and process of academic emphasis on student achievement: A multi-level analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). College Station, TX: Texas A&M University.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 610–620. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (Becta). (2004). Getting the most from your interactive whiteboard: A guide for secondary schools. Retrieved February 14, 2018, from http://39lu337z51l1zjr1i1ntpio4.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/getting_most_whiteboard_secondary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Buhs, E. S. (2005). Peer rejection, negative peer treatment, and school adjustment: Self-concept and classroom engagement as mediating processes. Journal of School Psychology, 43(5), 407–424. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2005.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castagnaro, A. V. (2012). Evaluating sixth graders’ self-efficacy in response to the use of educational technology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Claremont: Claremont Graduate University. doi:10.5642/cguetd/69
   Google Scholar
• Dhindsa, H. S., & Emran, S. H. (2006). Use of the interactive white board in constructivist teaching for higher student achievement. In S. M. Stewart, J. E. Olearski, & D. Thompson (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference for Middle East Teachers of Science, Mathematics and Computing (METSMaC 2006) (pp. 175–188). Abu Dhabi: METSMaC.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, R. (1979). Some schools work and more can. Social Policy, 9, 28–32.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, S. M., & MacDonald, S. (2007). Using past performance, proxy efficacy, and academic self-efficacy to predict college performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 2518–2531. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00268.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2005). The interactive whiteboard: A literature survey. Technology Pedagogy & Education, 14(2), 155–170. doi:10.1080/14759390500200199
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, R. D., Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). Academic emphasis of urban elementary schools and student achievement in reading and mathematics: A multilevel analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 683–702. doi:10.1177/00131610021969164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1986). School effects. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). (pp. 570–602). New York, NY: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gore, P. A. (2006). Academic self-efficacy as a predictor of college outcomes: Two incremental validity studies. Journal of Career Assessment, 14(1), 92–115. doi:10.1177/1069072705281367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes, D., & Warschauer, M. (2008). Learning with laptops: A multi-method case study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38, 305–332.10.2190/EC.38.3.d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(12), 1417–1432. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, I., & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students’ perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 102–117. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00118.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkness, J. A., & Schoua-Glusberg, A. (1998). Questionnaires in translation. In J. A. Harkness (Ed.), Cross-cultural survey equivalence (pp. 87–126). Mannheim: Open Access Repository. Retrieved February 14, 2018, from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-49733-1
   Google Scholar
• Hill, P. (2013). Examination Systems: Asia-Pacific Secondary Education System Review Series No. 1. Bangkok: UNESCO. Retrieved February 14, 2018, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001878/187826e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63–84. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Woolfolk-Hoy, A. (2006). Academic optimism of schools: A force for student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 425–446.10.3102/00028312043003425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. S., Liu, R. X., & Kaplan, H. B. (2005). School related stress in early adolescence and academic performance three years later: The conditional influence of self expectations. Social Psychology of Education, 8, 3–17. doi:10.1007/s11218-004-3129-5
   Google Scholar
• Katwibun, H. (2014). Using an interactive whiteboard in vocabulary teaching. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 674–678. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.278
   Google Scholar
• Kaya, D., & Bozdag, H. C. (2016). Resources of mathematics self-efficacy and perception of science self-efficacy as predictors of academic achievement. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 18(4), 438–451. doi:10.13187/ejced.2016.18.438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennewell, S., & Higgins, S. (2007). Introduction to IWBs. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 207–212. doi:10.1080/17439880701511024
   Google Scholar
• Kershner, R., Mercer, N., Warwick, P., & Kleine Staarman, J. K. (2010). Can the interactive whiteboard support young children’s collaborative communication and thinking in classroom science activities? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(4), 359–383. doi:10.1007/s11412-010-9096-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalkhali, V., & Aryanpour, H. R. (2013). Comparing the academic self-efficacy in students with entity and incremental intelligence theory. Education Science and Psychology, 23(1), 10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 33(3), 10–17. doi:10.1080/00091380109601795
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakou, A., & Higgins, S. (2016). Systematic review of the studies examining the impact of the interactive whiteboard on teaching and learning: What we do learn and what we do not. Preschool and Primary Education, 4(2), 254–275. doi:10.12681/ppej.9873
   Google Scholar
• Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1999). Social support and achievement for young adolescents in Chicago: The role of school academic press. American Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 907–945.10.3102/00028312036004907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1936). The dynamic theory of personality. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Achievement goal theory and affect: An asymmetrical bidirectional model. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 69–78. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3702_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjoribanks, K. (2017). Families and their learning environments: An empirical analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2010). Using interactive whiteboards to orchestrate classroom dialogue. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 195–209. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2010.491230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, M. J., & Midgley, C. (2002). Beyond motivation: Middle school students' perceptions of press for understanding in math. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(3), 373–391. doi:10.1006/ceps.2001.1101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., ... Urdan, T. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Retrieved February 14, 2018, from http://www.hci.sg/admin/uwa/MEd7_8633/PALS_2000_V13Word97.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(1), 30–38. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.38.1.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulyadi, S., Rahardjo, W., & Basuki, A. M. H. (2016). The role of parent-child relationship, self-esteem, academic self-efficacy to academic stress. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 603–608. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.063
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, K. K. (2009). SMARTer music teaching: Interactive whiteboard use in music classrooms. General Music Today, 22(2), 3–11. doi:10.1177/1048371308324104
   Google Scholar
• Pace, C. R., & Stern, G. C. (1958). An approach to the measurement of psychological characteristics of college environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 49, 269–277.10.1037/h0047828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, M. (1997). What makes schools effective? A comparison of the relationships of communitarian climate and academic climate to mathematics achievement and attendance during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 34(4), 633–662.10.3102/00028312034004633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirmohamed, S., Debowska, A., & Boduszek, D. (2017). Gender differences in the correlates of academic achievement among university students. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 9(2), 313–324. doi:10.1108/JARHE-03-2016-0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purkey, S. C., & Smith, M. S. (1983). Effective schools: A review. The Elementary School Journal, 83, 427–452.10.1086/461325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. (1995). Critiquing pygmalion: A 25-year perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(6), 171–172.10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovira, T., Edo, S., & Fernandez-Castro, J. (2010). How does cognitive appraisal lead to perceived stress in academic examinations? Studia Psychologica, 52, 179–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sari, U., & Güven, G. B. (2013). The effect of interactive whiteboard supported inquiry-based learning on achievement and motivation in physics and views of prospective teachers toward the instruction. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 7(2), 110–143. doi:10.12973/nefmed204
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, R. (2007). Active learning with interactive whiteboards: A literature review and a case study for college freshmen. Communications in Information Literacy, 1(2), 64–73. Retrieved February 14, 2018, from http://www.gram.edu/sacs/qep/chapter%206/6_11SchroederACTIVE.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Y. H., Yang, Z. K., Yang, H. H., & Liu, S. Y. (2012a). Study on the research hotspots of interactive whiteboards in education. In X. Yu, R. Lienhart, Z.-J. Zha, Y. Liu, & S. Satoh (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Internet Multimedia Computing and Service (pp. 209–212). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/2382336.2382396
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Y. H., Yang, Z. K., Yang, H. H., & Liu, S. Y. (2012a). The impact of interactive whiteboards on education. In X. Yu, R. Lienhart, Z.-J. Zha, Y. Liu, & S. Satoh (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Internet Multimedia Computing and Service (pp. 213–218). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/2382336.2382397
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Y. H., Yang, H., Wu, D., & Zhu, S.  (2015). Interactive whiteboard-based instruction versus lecture-based instruction: A study on students’ learning achievement. In H. H. Yang, Q. Liu, X. Yu, L. Chen, S. Wang, J. Cheng, & C.-C. Tsai (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of Educational Innovation Through Technology (pp. 231–235). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society. doi:10.1109/EITT.2015.56
   Google Scholar
• Shouse, R. C. (1996). Academic press and sense of community: Conflict, congruence, and implications for student achievement. Social Psychology of Education, 1(1), 47–68. doi:10.1007/BF02333405
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91–101. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00117.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struthers, C. W., Perry, R. P., & Menec, V. H. (2000). An examination of the relationship among academic stress, coping, motivation, and performance in college. Research in Higher Education, 41(5), 581–592. Retrieved February 14, 2018, from http://is.muni.cz/el/1421/jaro2008/PSB_01/um/Struthers.pdf.10.1023/A:1007094931292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhr, K. A., Hernandez, D. A., Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2010). Laptops and fourth-grade literacy: Assisting the jump over the fourth-grade slump. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(5), 1–45. Retrieved February 14, 2018, from https://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/jtla/article/view/1610/1459
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K., Kratcoski, A., Schenker, J., & van’t Hooft, M. (2010). Interactive whiteboards and student achievement. In T. Michael & E. C. Schmid (Eds.), Interactive whiteboards for education: Theory, research and practice (pp. 131–143). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-61520-715-2
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, F. R., & Human-Vogel, S. (2016). Academic commitment and self-efficacy as predictors of academic achievement in additional materials science. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(6), 1298–1310. doi:10.1080/07294360.2016.1144574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. (2011). Learning in the cloud: How (and why) to transform schools with digital media. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. J., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2014). The effect of emotion regulation strategies on physiological and self-report measures of anxiety during a stress-inducing academic task. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 14(1), 1–15. Retrieved February 14, 2018, from http://www.ijpsy.com/volumen14/num1/370/the-effect-of-emotion-regulation-strategies-EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yeşilyurt, E., Ulaş, A. H., & Akan, D. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy, academic self-efficacy, and computer self-efficacy as predictors of attitude toward applying computer-supported education. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 591–601. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y. X., & Yuan, X. C. (2012). Using interactive whiteboard in classroom teaching at junior middle schools: Students’ perception and performance. Journal of Distance Education in China, 2012(10), 81–85. doi:10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2012.10.009
   Google Scholar