‘I like the idea but…’: the gap in participation in a virtual community of practice for analysing physical education

References

• Barab, S., Makinster, J. G., & Scheckler, R. (2004). designing system dualities. Characterizing an online professional development community. In S. Barab, R. Kling, & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 53–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511805080
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., Barnett, M., & Squire, K. (2002). Developing an empirical account of a community of practice: Characterizing the essential tensions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(4), 489–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1990). Communities of learning and thinking, or a context by any other name. Contributions to Human Development, 21, 108–126.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. (1970). The political system. In R. Naroll & R. Cohen (Eds.), A handbook of method in cultural anthropology (pp. 861–883). New York: Natural History Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Del Val Martín, P. (2013). Multiscopic, análisis de una Comunidad de Práctica Virtual en Educación Física. Trabajo Fin de Master. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.
   Google Scholar
• Fombrun, C. J. (2003). Atribuciones de poder a través de una red social. In F. R. Santos (Ed.), Análisis de redes sociales. Orígenes, teorías y aplicaciones (pp. 399–416). Madrid: CIS.
   Google Scholar
• Fraguas, G. P. (2013). La comunidad de práctica virtual como herramienta en la formación inicial y continua del profesorado. Dissertation for degree in Primary Education. Valladolid: University of Valladolid. Available from http://91.109.245.159/~x/.txt/en/20/http/uvadoc.uva.es/bitstream/10324/4025/1/TFG-G=2520406.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1991). Studies in ethnomethodology. New Jersey, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• González, M. V. (2013) La comunidad de práctica virtual y su relación con la formación inicial y permanente del profesorado. Dissertation for degree in Primary Education. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid. Available from https://uvadoc.uva.es/bitstream/10324/4034/1/TFG-G413.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, V. A., & Casey, A. (2015). Innovation with change: Developing a community of practice to help teachers move beyond the ‘honeymoon’ of pedagogical renovation. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 20(2), 186–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodyear, V. A., Casey, A., & Kirk, D. (2014). Tweet me, message me, like me: Using social media to facilitate pedagogical change within an emerging community of practice. Sport, Education and Society, 19(7), 927–943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, B. (2004). Informal learning in an online community of practice. Journal of Distance Education/Revue De L’enseignement À Distance, 19(1), 20–35.
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, C., Hermans, M. B., Sanchez, D., Richmond, C., Bohley, M., & Tuttle, R. (2009). A theoretical framework for building online communities of practice with social networking tools. Educational Media International, 46(1), 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, S., & McKeown, J. (2011) Online practice & offline roles: A cultural view of teachers’ low engagement in online communities. AERA 2011 Paper proposal [Online]. Available at http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1686&context=edupapers (Accessed 19 July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Kaulback, B., & Bergtholdt, D. (2008). Holding the virtual space. In C. Kimble, P. M. Hildreth, & B. Isabelle (Eds.), Communities of practice: Creating learning environments for educators (pp. 25–43). Greenwich: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Kerno, S. J., Jr. (2008). Limitations of communities of practice. A consideration of unresolved issues and difficulties in the approach. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(1), 69–78.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, M., & Fusco, J. (2008). Designing for growth: Enabling communities of practice to develop and extend their work online. In C. Kimble, P. M. Hildreth, & B. Isabelle (Eds.), Communities of practice: Creating learning environments for educators (pp. 1–23). Greenwich: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, K. W., Pratt, K., Anderson, M., & Stigter, J. (2006) Literature review and synthesis: Online communities of practice. Research Division, Ministry of Education, New Zealand [Online]. Available at http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/curriculum/5795 (Accessed 19 July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Lampe, C., & Johnston, E. (2005) Follow the (slash) dot: Effects of feedback on new members in an online community. Group ’05 Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work. 11–20. New York: ACM. DOI: 10.1145/1099203.1099206
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, P., Polak, P., McCoy, S., & Galletta, D. (2008). Sharing knowledge: How managerial prompting, group identification, and social value orientation affect knowledge-sharing behavior. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 51(2), 60–65.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, T., Parker, J., Eberhardt, J., Koehler, M., & Lundeberg, M. (2013). Virtual professional learning communities: Teachers’ perceptions of virtual versus face-to-face professional development. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 267–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonnecke, B. (2000) Lurking in email-based discussion lists, unpublished PhD dissertation, London: South Bank University.
   Google Scholar
• Nonnecke, B., Andrews, D., & Preece, J. (2006). Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes and behavior. Electronic Commerce Research, 6(1), 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Orhum, E., & Hopple, J. (2010) Factors influencing knowledge sharing in an electronic community of practice. In: Marketing and Management Sciences: Proceedings of the International Conference on ICMMS 2008. P. S. Damianos & N. Konstantopoulos (eds.): 46–49. London: Imperial College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (2012). The ambiguity of leadership. In M. C. Brown (Ed.), Organization & Governance in Higher Education (5th ed., pp. 205–212). Boston: Pearson Learning Solutions.
   Google Scholar
• Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Preece, J. (2004). Etiquette, empathy and trust in communities of practice: Stepping-stones to social capital. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 10(3), 294–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preece, J., Nonnecke, B., & Andrews, D. (2004). The top five reasons for lurking: Improving community experiences for everyone. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(2), 201–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riverin, S., & Stacey, E. (2008). Sustaining an online community of practice: A case study. Journal of Distance Education/Revue De L’enseignement À Distance, 22(2), 43–58.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. (2006). Limits to communities of practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 623–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar, C., Wohn, D. Y., & Lampe, C. (2012) Predicting length of membership in online community ‘everything2ʹ using feedback. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion, 207–210. New York: ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2141512.2141579
   Google Scholar
• Schutz, A. (2003). El ciudadano bien informado. Ensayo sobre la distribución social del conocimiento”. Escritos II: Estudios sobre teoría social (pp. 120–132). Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1998). Investigación con estudio de casos. Madrid: Morata.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research. Studying how things work. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquía.
   Google Scholar
• Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29, 35–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar