Learner engagement, retention and success: why size matters in massive open online courses (MOOCs)

References

• Anderson, T. (2013). Promise and/or peril: MOOCs and open and distance education. Athabasca University. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.363.4943&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Armellini, A., & Aiyegbayo, O. (2010). Learning design and assessment with e‐tivities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 922–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchley, T., Wingenbach, G., & Akers, C. (2013). Comparison of course completion and student performance through online and traditional courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(4). doi:10.19173/irrodl.v14i4.1461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baessler, J., & Schwarzer, R. (1996). Evaluación de la autoeficacia: Adaptación española de la escala de Autoeficacia General [Evaluation of self-efficacy: Spanish adaptation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale]. Ansiedad Y Estrés, 2(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2002). Growing primacy of human agency in adaptation and change in the electronic era. European Psychologist, 7(1), 2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartimote-Aufflick, K., Bridgeman, A., Walker, R., Sharma, M., & Smith, L. (2015). The study, evaluation, and improvement of university student self-efficacy. Studies in Higher Education, 41(11), 1918–1942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clow, D. (2013, April). MOOCs and the funnel of participation. In LAK ’13. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp.185–189). New York, NY: ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2460296.2460332
   Google Scholar
• Coelho, J., Teixeira, A., Nicolau, P., Caeiro, S., & Rocio, V. (2015). iMOOC on climate change: Evaluation of a massive open online learning pilot experience. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6). doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, D., Mankoff, C., & Carbrey, J. (2015). Coursera’s introductory human physiology course: Factors that characterize successful completion of a MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2). doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i2.2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A. D., Reich, J., Nesterko, S. O., Seaton, D. T., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., & Chuang, I. (2014). HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses (HarvardX and MITx Working Paper No. 1). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2381263
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, C. (2016). The development of learner self-efficacy in MOOCs. In P. Kirby & G. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of Global Learn – Global Conference on Learning and Technology (pp. 517–522). Waynesville, N.C.: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014). MOOCs: Expectations and reality. Full report. Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education, Teachers College Columbia University. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED547237.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2015). NMC horizon report: 2015 higher education edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2015-nmc-horizon-report-HE-EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1). doi:10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, K. (2015a). Massive open online course completion rates revisited: Assessment, length and attrition. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3). doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, K. (2015b). MOOC completion rates: The data. Retrieved from http://www.katyjordan.com/MOOCproject.html
   Google Scholar
• Koller, D., Ng, A., & Chen, Z. (2013). Retention and intention in massive open online courses: In depth. EDUCAUSE Review Online. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/6/retention-and-intention-in-massive-open-online-courses-in-depth
   Google Scholar
• Komarraju, M., & Nadler, D. (2013). Self-efficacy and academic achievement: Why do implicit beliefs, goals, and effort regulation matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 67–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaught, C., & Lam, P. (2010). Using wordle as a supplementary research tool. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 630–643.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, D., Bollmann, A., Becker, S., & Sander, K. (2018). It’s the learning, stupid! Discussing the role of learning outcomes in MOOCs. Open Learning: the Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 33(3), 203–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padilla, J., Acosta, B., Gómez, J., Guevara, M., & González, A. (2006). Propiedades psicométricas de la versión española de la escala de autoeficacia general aplicada en México y España [Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the general self-efficacy scale applied in Mexico and Spain]. Revista Mexicana De Psicología, 23(2), 245–252.
   Google Scholar
• Padilla Rodriguez, B. C., & Armellini, A. (2017). Developing self-efficacy through a massive open online course on study skills. Open Praxis, 9(3), 335–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padilla Rodriguez, B. C., Bird, T., & Conole, G. (2015). Evaluation of massive open online courses (MOOCs): A case study. In T. Bastiaens & G. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of Global Learn 2015 (pp. 527–535). Berlin, Germany: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Padilla Rodriguez, B. C., Rocha Estrada, F. J., & Rodriguez Nieto, M. C. (2017). Razones para estudiar un curso en línea masivo y abierto (MOOC) de habilidades de estudio [Reasons to study a massive open online course (MOOC) of study skills]. In C. Delgado Kloos, C. Alario-Hoyos, & R. Hernández-Rizzardini (Eds.), Actas de la Jornada de MOOCs en Español en EMOOCs 2017 (EMOOCs-ES) (pp. 54–61). Madrid, Spain: CEUR-WS.org.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Sanagustín, M., Maldonado, J., & Morales, N. (2016). Status report on the adoption of MOOCs in higher education in Latin America and Europe. MOOC-Maker Project. Retrieved from http://www.mooc-maker.org/wp-content/files/WPD1.1_INGLES.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Perna, L. W., Ruby, A., Boruch, R. F., Wang, N., Scull, J., Ahmad, S., & Evans, C. (2014). Moving through MOOCs: Understanding the progression of users in massive open online courses. Educational Researcher, 43(9), 421–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, G. (2013). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, G., Gregory, J., Lokuge Dona, K., & Ross, B. (2015). Experiential online development for educators: The example of the Carpe Diem MOOC. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 542–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, G., Pechenkina, E., Chase, A.-M., & Ross, B. (2017). Designing massive open online courses to take account of participant motivations and expectations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1284–1294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25, 71–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharples, M., Adams, A., Ferguson, R., Gaved, M., McAndrew, P., Rienties, B., … Whitelock, D. (2014). Innovating Pedagogy 2014: Exploring new forms of teaching, learning and assessment, to guide educators and policy makers. United Kingdom: The Open University. Retrieved from http://www.open.ac.uk/iet/main/files/iet-web/file/ecms/web-content/Innovating_Pedagogy_2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Shier, R. (2004). Statistics: 2.2 The Wilcoxon signed rank sum test. Mathematics Learning Support Centre. Retrieved from http://www.statstutor.ac.uk/resources/uploaded/wilcoxonsignedranktest.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, G. (2013). Massive open online courses: Innovation in education? In R. McGreal, W. Kinuthia, S. Marshall, & T. McNamara (Eds.), Open educational resources: Innovation, research and practice (pp. 5–16). Vancouver, Canada: Commonwealth of Learning and Athabasca University.
   Google Scholar
• Sunar, A., White, S., Abdullah, N., & Davis, H. (2016). How learners’ interactions sustain engagement: A MOOC case study. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10((4)). doi:10.1109/TLT.2016.2633268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar