References
- Brandl, K. (2005). Are you ready to “Moodle”? Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 16–23.
- Brown, C., Snodgrass, T., Kemper, S. J., Herman, R., & Covington, M. A. (2008). Automatic measurement of propositional idea density from part-of-speech tagging. Behavior Research Methods, 40(2), 540–545.
- Bruer, J. (1993). The mind’s journey from novice to expert. Washington, DC: American educator.
- Chin, S. J. (2009). Investigating the summary writing performance of university students in Taiwan. 26th conference of English teaching and learning in the R.O.C (pp. 285–301). Retrieved from https://www.lttc.ntu.edu.tw/TLResource/Investigating_Summary-Writing_Performance.pdf
- Choo, T. O. L., Eng, T. K., & Ahmad, N. (2011). Effects of reciprocal teaching strategies on reading comprehension. The Reading Matrix, 11(2), 140–149.
- Chou, I. C. (2016). Helping students learn in EMI courses using reciprocal teaching: A case study of a Taiwan university. Asian Education Studies, 1(2), 37–43.
- Cole, J., & Foster, H. (2007). Using Moodle: Teaching with the popular open source course management system (2nd ed.). London, UK: O’Reilly Media, Inc.
- Cooch, M. (2009). Moodle 1.9 for teaching 7–14 year olds: Beginner’s guide. Birmingham, UK: Packt Publishing Ltd.
- Cotterall, S. (1990). Reciprocal teaching: A problem-solving approach to reading. Guidelines, 12(2), 30–39.
- Dashwood, A., & Mangubhai, F. (1996). ESL students and strategy training in reading comprehension - Decoding the implications for second language learning and teaching. Paper presented at the ACTA ATESOL (NT) National Conference and 7th TESOL in teacher education conference, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
- De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46(1), 6–28.
- DeFrancesco, C., & Perkins, K. (2012). An analysis of the proposition density, sentence and clause types, and non-finite verbal usage in two college textbooks. In M. S. Plakhotnik, S. M. Nielsen, & D. M. Pane (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th annual college of education & GSN research conference (pp. 20–25). Miami: Florida International University.
- Eskandari, M., & Soleimani, H. (2016). The effect of collaborative discovery learning using MOODLE on the learning of conditional sentences by Iranian EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(1), 153–163.
- Foo, J. (2002). Developing reciprocal teaching in a reading class. In G. Tinker Sachs (Ed.), Action research in English language teaching (pp. 133–169). Hong Kong: Department of English and Communication, City University of Hong Kong.
- Fung, I. Y. Y. (1999). L1-assisted reciprocal teaching for ESL students (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). University of Auckland, Auckland, NZ.
- Fung, I. Y. Y., Wilkinson, I. A. G., & Moore, D. W. (2003). L1-assisted reciprocal teaching to improve ESL students’ comprehension of English expository text. Learning and Instruction, 13(1), 1–31.
- Greenway, C. (2002). The process, pitfalls and benefits of implementing a reciprocal teaching intervention to improve the reading comprehension of a group of year 6 pupils. Educational Psychology in Practice, 18(2), 113–137.
- Gruenbaum, E. A. (2012). Common literacy struggles with college students: Using the reciprocal teaching technique. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 42(2), 110–116.
- Hashey, J. M., & Connors, D. J. (2003). Learn from our journey: Reciprocal teaching action research. Reading Teacher, 57(3), 224–233.
- Jay, T. B. (2003). The psychology of language. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
- Kargiban, Z. A., & Kaffash, H. R. (2011). The effect of e-learning on foreign language students using the student’s attitude. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 10(3), 398–402.
- Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (1996). Reciprocal teaching of reading comprehension strategies for students with learning disabilities who use English as a second language. Elementary School Journal, 96(3), 275–293.
- Layton, M. R. (2007). Impact of e-learning modules on English communication skills among Thai pharmacy students. Retrieved from http://www.iadisportal.org/digital-library/mdownload/impact-of-e-learning-modules-on-english-communication-skills-among-thai-pharmacystudents
- Limongelli, C., Sciarrone, F., & Vaste, G. (2011). Personalized e-learning in Moodle: The Moodle_LS system. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 7(1), 49–58.
- Madnani, N., Burstein, J., Sabatini, J., & O’Reilly, T. (2013). Automated scoring of a summary writing task designed to measure reading comprehension. Proceedings of the Eighth workshop on innovative use of natural language processing for building educational applications (pp. 163–168), Atlanta, GA.
- Mayfield, L., Gavalda, M., Ward, W., & Waibel, A. (1995). Concept-based speech translation. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP-95) (pp. 97–100), Detroit, MI.
- Mehrabi, J., & Abtahi, M. (2012). Teaching with Moodle in higher education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1320–1324.
- Meyer, K. (2010). “Diving into reading”: Revisiting reciprocal teaching in the middle years. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 18(1), 41–52.
- Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.
- Park, Y. (2010). Korean EFL college students reading strategy use to comprehend authentic expository/technical texts in English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas, Kansas.
- Pena-Shaff, J. B., & Nicholls, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers & Education, 42(3), 243–265.
- Petrovic, N., Jeremic, V., Cirovic, M., Radojicic, Z., & Milenkovic, N. (2014). Facebook versus Moodle in practice. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(2), 117–125.
- Sanchez, R. A., & Hueros, A. D. (2010). Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1632–1640.
- Takala, M. (2006). The effects of reciprocal teaching on reading comprehension in mainstream and special (SLI) education. Scandinavian Journal of Education Research, 50(5), 559–576.
- Taylor, L. (2013). Testing reading through summary: Investigating summary completion tasks for assessing reading comprehension ability. Studies in Language Testing 39. Cambridge, UK: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.
- Wallace, R., Pearman, C., Hail, C., & Hurst, B. (2007). Writing for comprehension. Reading Horizons, 48(1), 41–56.
- Wu, W. S. (2008). The application of Moodle on an EFL collegiate writing environment. Journal of Education and Foreign Languages and Literature, 7(1), 45–56.
- Yang, Y. F. (2010). Developing a reciprocal teaching/learning system for college remedial reading instruction. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1193–1201.
- Yang, Y. F., & Lin, C. L. (2010). Internet perceptions, online participation and language learning in Moodle forums: A case study on nursing students in Taiwan. Social and Behavioral Science, 2(2), 2647–2651.
- Yang, Y. T., Gamble, J., Hung, Y. W., & Lin, T. Y. (2013). An online adaptive learning environment for critical thinking-infused English literacy instruction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 723–747.
- Yu, G. (2003). Reading for summarization as reading comprehension test method: Promises and problems. Language Testing Update, 32, 44–47.