One model to rule them all, one model to bind them? A critique of the use of accessibility-related models in post-secondary education

References

• Advance HE. (2018, September). Equality and higher education: Students statistical report 2018. Resource document. Author. Retrieved from https://www.ecu.ac.uk/publications/equality-higher-education-statistical-report-2018/
   Google Scholar
• Boticario, J. G., Rodriguez-Ascaso, A., Santos, O. C., Raffenne, E., Montandon, L., Roldán, D., & Buendía, F. (2012). Accessible lifelong learning at higher education: Outcomes and lessons learned at two different pilot sites in the EU4ALL Project. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 18(1), 62–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgstahler, S. (2002). Distance learning: Universal design, universal access. Educational Technology Review, 10(1). Retrieved from http://www.aace.org/pubs/etr/issue2/burgstahler.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Burgstahler, S. (2015). Universal design in higher education: From principles to practice (pp. 31–64). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burgstahler, S. (2017, March 14–15). How models and frameworks have informed my work. Presentation at first Ed-ICT Symposium, Seattle. Retrieved from http://ed-ict.com/workshops/seattle/programme/
   Google Scholar
• Center for Universal Design. (1997). The principles of universal design. Retrieved from http://www.ncsu.edu/www/ncsu/design/sod5/cud/about_ud/udprinciplestext.htm
   Google Scholar
• Douce, C., & Porch, W. (2009July 6). Evaluating accessible adaptable e-learning. In Towards User Modeling and Adaptive Systems for All (TUMAS-A 2009): Modeling and Evaluation of Accessible Intelligent Learning Systems, Brighton, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Douce, C., Porch, W., & Cooper, M. (2010, October 7–8). Adapting e-learning and learning services for people with disabilities. In 1st International AEGIS Conference: Access for All in the Desktop, Web and Mobile Field: an End-User and Developer Perspective, Seville, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Fichten, C. S., Asuncion, J., & Scapin, R. (2014). Digital technology, learning, and postsecondary students with disabilities: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 27, 369–379.
   Google Scholar
• Fichten, C. S., Olenik-Shemesh, D., Asuncion, J., Jorgensen, M., & Colwell, C. (2020). Higher education, information and communication technologies and students with disabilities: An overview of the current situation. In J. Seale (Ed.), Improving accessible digital practices in higher education: Challenges and new practices for inclusion. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Fougeyrollas, P., Cloutier, R., Bergeron, H., Côté, J., & Saint-Michel, G. (1998). Classification québécoise. Processus de production du handicap. Québec: Réseau international sur le processus de production du handicap.
   Google Scholar
• Gkatzidou, V., & Pearson, E. (2009). A Transformation, Augmentation, Substitution Service (TASS) to meet the needs and preferences of the individual learner. IEEE International Conference of Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Riga, Latvia
   Google Scholar
• Hadley, W. M. (2011). College students with disabilities: A student developmental perspective. New Directions for Higher Education, 54, 77–81.
   Google Scholar
• Havel, A., Fichten, C., King, L., & Jorgensen, M. (2017, March 14–15). The road to ICTs is paved with good intentions. Presentation at first Ed-ICT Symposium, Seattle. Retrieved from http://ed-ict.com/workshops/seattle/programme/
   Google Scholar
• Hockings, C. (2010). Inclusive learning and teaching in higher education: A synthesis of research. York: HEA.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, M., Fichten, C. S., Nguyen, M. N., Budd, J., Barile, M., Asuncion, J., … Jorgensen, M. B. A. (2015). Employment realities of recent junior/community college and university graduates and premature leavers with disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Community, and Rehabilitation, 14(1). Retrieved from http://www.ijdcr.ca/VOL14_01/articles/jorgenson.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Judge, S., & Floyd, K. (2011). Making web enhanced learning accessible for all students. In T. Bastiaens & M. Ebner (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications 2011 (pp. 3477–3483). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/38357
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, B., Nevile, L., Draffan, E., & Fanou, S. (2008, May). One world, one web … but great diversity. Paper presented at the 2008 international cross-disciplinary workshop on Web accessibility (W4A), Beijing, China. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1368044.1368078
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, B., Phipps, L., & Swift, E. (2004). Developing a holistic approach for e-learning accessibility. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 30(3). Retrieved from http://www.cjlt.ca/content/vol30.3/kelly.html
   Google Scholar
• Kimmons, R. (2017). Open to all? Nationwide evaluation of high-priority web accessibility considerations among higher education web-sites. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(3), 434–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouroupetroglou, G., Pino, A., & Kacorr, H. (2011, February). A model of accessibility services provision for students with disabilities in higher education. In Proceedings of the international conference universal learning design (pp. 23–33). Brno. Retrieved from http://access.uoa.gr/Unit%20Publicity%20Files/Kouroupetroglou_Brno_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leung, P., Owens, J., Lamb, G., Smith, K., Shaw, J., & Hauff, R. (1999). Assistive technology: Meeting the technology needs of students with disabilities in post-secondary education. Retrieved from http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/highered/eippubs/eip99-6/eip99_6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Linder, K. E., Fontaine-Rainen, D. L., & Behling, K. (2015). Whose job is it? Key challenges and future directions for online accessibility in US institutions of higher education. Open Learning: the Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 30(1), 21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, J., Pender, M., & Welch, M. (2016). Education pays 2016: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society. The College Board. Retrieved from https://trends.collegeboard.org/sites/default/files/education-pays-2016-full-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McAndrew, P., Farrow, R., & Cooper, M. (2012). Adapting online learning resources for all: Planning for professionalism in accessibility. Research in Learning Technology, 20(4), 186–199.
   Google Scholar
• Mears, W., & Clough, H. (2015). Online library accessibility support: A case study within the Open University library. Open Learning: the Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 30(1), 73–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montandon, L., Arjona, M., & Weiermair, C. (2010, September). How to promote the adoption of an open framework to make lifelong learning accessible to all? In Strategies and Business Models for Lifelong Learning/Networking Conference (pp. 272–290). Zermatt, Switzerland: EADTU.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopolous, G., Pearson, E., & Green, S. (2012). A provisional framework for supporting academics in accessible and inclusive e-materials development. In Proceedings of the 24th Australian computer-human interaction conference (pp. 459–468). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262203038_A_provisional_framework_for_supporting_academics_in_accessible_and_inclusive_e-materials_development
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, G., Pearson, E., & Green, S. (2011, December). Tutor Accessibility Support Kit (TASK): A suite of staff development resources for inclusive online learning design. Paper presented at ASCILITE 2011, Hobart. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org/conferences/hobart11/downloads/papers/Papadopoulos-full.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Permvattana, R., Armstrong, H., & Murray, I. (2013). E-learning for the VI: A holistic perspective. International Journal of Cyber Society and Education, 6(1), 15–30. Retrieved from http://www.academic-pub.org/ojs/index.php/IJCSE/article/viewFile/1029/229
   Google Scholar
• Rao, K., Edelen-Smith, P., & Wailehua, C.-U. (2015). Universal design for online courses: Applying principles to pedagogy. Open Learning: the Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 30(1), 35–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. D., Satlykgylyjova, M., & Park, H. (2015). Universal design for learning in postsecondary education: A literature review of empirically based articles. In S. Burgstahler (Ed.), Universal design in higher education: From principles to practice (pp. 65–80). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, D. G., & Zervas, P. (2011). Supporting accessible technology-enhanced training: The eAccess2Learn framework. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 4(4), 353–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seale, J. (2006). E-learning and disability in higher education: Accessibility theory and practice (1st ed.). Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seale, J. (2014). E-learning and disability in higher education: Accessibility theory and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seale, J. (2017a). From the voice of a ‘socratic gadfly’: A call for more academic activism in the researching of disability in postsecondary education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(1), 153–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seale, J. (2017b, March). What models, approaches or frameworks exist in the field of disability, ICT and post-secondary education; are they successful in transforming the support and delivery of ICT for disabled students or do we need new ones? Presentation at first Ed-ICT Symposium, Seattle, WA. Retrieved from http://ed-ict.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Seale_Ed_ICT_paper_03032017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Seale, J., Burgstahler, S., & Fisseler, B. (2019). Tackling the inaccessibility of websites in post-secondary education: A critique of current research in the field. In S. Harper & Y. Yesilada (Eds.), Web accessibility: A foundation for research (2nd ed., pp. 263–279). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, R., Pearson, V. K., Warren, J. P., & Forbes, T. (2015). Institutional change for improving accessibility in the design and delivery of distance learning – The role of faculty accessibility specialists at The Open University. Open Learning: the Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 30(1), 6–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Story, M. F., Mueller, J. L., & Mace, R. L. (1998). The universal design file: Designing for people of all ages and abilities. Raleigh: Center for Universal Design, North Carolina State University. Retrieved from http://design-dev.ncsu.edu/openjournal/index.php/redlab/article/viewFile/102/56
   Google Scholar
• University of Washington. (2017). Symposium one: Effective models, frameworks ad approaches. Proceedings from the Ed-ICT international network. Retrieved from http://ed-ict.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Symposium-Effective_models_frameworks_and_approaches_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zeff, R. (2007). Universal design across the curriculum. New Directions for Higher Education, 137, 27–44.
   Google Scholar