Correlates of self-paced classes engagement policy & course contents’ views by learners at HBMSU, United Arab Emirates

References

• Abdulazeez, H. (2019, December 8). Promoting personalized learning design: The role of online pedagogical intervention. Proceedings of the 2019 Eden annual conference (pp. 72–84). Bruges, Belgium, 16–19 June 2019. Retrieved from http://www.eden-online.org/online/bruges/download/Annual_2019_Bruges_Proceedings.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carlen, U., & Jobring, O. (2005). The rationale of online learning communities. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 1(3), 272–295.
   Google Scholar
• Credé, M., Roch, S. G., & Kieszczynka, U. M. (2010). Class attendance in college: A meta-analytic review of the relationship of class attendance with grades and student characteristics. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 272–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVore, S., Marshman, E., & Singh, C. (2017). The challenge of engaging all students via self-paced interactive e-learning tutorials for introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13, 010127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19. doi:10.24059/olj.v19i4.561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47, 109–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding, J. M. (2011). The role of attendance in lecture classes: You can lead a horse to water. Teaching of Psychology, 38(1), 40–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(3), 184–191.
   Google Scholar
• Huggard, E. (2016). Exploring student definitions of engagement: A reflexive approach to designing learning activities. Spark: UAL Creative Teaching and Learning Journal, 1. Retreived from https://sparkjournal.arts.ac.uk/index.php/spark/article/view/2/13
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. D. (2008). Student engagement - creating a culture of academic achievement. International Center for Leadership in Education. Retrieved from http://www.cesdp.nmhu.edu/prof-learning/docs/Teaching%20and%20Learning/Student%20Engagement/Strengthen%20Student%20Engagement%20white%20paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 758–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartal, O., Popovic, G., Morrissey, S., & Holifield, L. (2017). Students’ productive struggle through mathematical modeling. Illinois Mathematics Teacher, 64. Retrieved from http://journal.ictm.org/index.php/imt/article/view/116
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Song, J. D., & Hong, A. J. (2019). Exploring factors, and indicators for measuring students’ sustainable engagement in e-learning. Sustainability, 11, 985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeMahieu, P. G., Nordstrum, L. E., & Gale, D. (2017). Positive deviance: Learning from positive anomalies. Quality Assurance in Education, 25(1), 109–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M., Kang, J., Cao, M., Lim, M., Ko, Y., Myers, R., & Weiss, A. S. (2014). Understanding MOOCs as an emerging online learning tool: Perspectives from the students. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(3), 147–159.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, D., Tan, L., & Edwards, D. (2017). Development of an online engagement scale. Final Report. Australian Council for Educational Research. Retrieved from https://www.qilt.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/learner-engagement-scale-review-final-report.pdf?sfvrsn=5996e33c_2
   Google Scholar
• Onah, D. F. O., Sinclair, J., & Boyatt, R. (2014). Dropout rates of massive open online courses: Behavioural patterns. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (pp. 5825–5834), Barcelona, 7–9 July 2014. Retrieved from https://library.iated.org/view/ONAH2014DRO
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, F. T. (2012). A study of the effect of appreciative inquiry on student-course engagement and attendance in the community college (Dissertations), 826. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/826
   Google Scholar
• Singhal, A. (2013). Transforming education from the inside out: Positive deviance to enhance learning and student retention. In R. Heirnstra & P. Carre (Eds.), A feast of learning: international perspective on adult education and change (pp. 141–159). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. G. (2010). E-learning technologies: A comparative study of adult learners enrolled on blended and online campuses engaging in a virtual classroom (Doctoral dissertation), Capella University. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/115478/
   Google Scholar
• Sternin, M. (2018). Learning from the hopeful: Positive pathways to education in Lebanon. Positive Deviance Collaborative. Retrieved from https://positivedeviance.org/case-allstudies/2018/7/16/learning-from-the-hopeful-positive-pathways-to-education-in-lebanon
   Google Scholar