Self–efficacy and student satisfaction in the context of blended learning courses

References

• Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Fearful expectations and avoidant actions as coeffects of perceived self-inefficacy.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2004). Swimming against the mainstream: The early years from chilly tributary to transformative mainstream. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42(6), 613–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2004.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, R., & Khasawneh, S. (2007). Self-efficacy and college students’ perceptions and use of online learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2004.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, N., & Guo, S. (2011). Structural equation modeling. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing online and blended learner's self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiyama, N. (2014). The development of blended learning management model in developing information literacy skills (BL-ILS model). International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(7), 483–489. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2015.v5.554
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. C., & Jones, K. T. (2007). Blended learning vs. traditional classroom settings: Assessing effectiveness and student perceptions in an MBA accounting course. Journal of Educators Online, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-013-1333-1
   Google Scholar
• Chen, P. S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1222–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cigdem, H., & Ozturk, M. (2016). Factors affecting students’ behavioral intention to use LMS at a Turkish post-secondary vocational school. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 276–295. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2253
   Google Scholar
• Coccoli, M., Guercio, A., Maresca, P., & Stanganelli, L. (2014). Smarter universities: A vision for the fast changing digital era. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 25(6), 1003–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2014.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compeau, D., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1520/E2368-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eom, S. B., & Estelami, H. (2012). Effects of LMS, self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning on LMS effectiveness in business education. Journal of International Education in Business, 5(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/18363261211281744
   Google Scholar
• Fincher, M. (2010). Adult student retention: A practical approach to retention improvement through learning enhancement. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 58(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377360903552154
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, R. D. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 11(1), 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, R. D., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education : Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gil, P. O., & García, F. A. (2012). Blended learning revisited: How it brought engagement and interaction into and beyond the classroom. In Virtual Learning Environments: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications (pp. 52–66). Chicago: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for likert-type scales.
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, C. N., Linder-VanBerschot, J. A., LaPointe, D. K., & Rao, L. (2010). Predictors of learner satisfaction and transfer of learning in a corporate online education program. American Journal of Distance Education, 24(4), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2010.522919
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2013). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Holley, D., & Oliver, M. (2010). Student engagement and blended learning: Portraits of risk. Computers & Education, 54(3), 693–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, P., Sullivan, J. R., & Guerra, N. S. (2007). A closer look at college students: Self-efficacy and goal orientation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18(3), 454–476. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2007-500
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, G. (2007). Using blended learning to increase learner support and improve retention. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(3), 349–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510701278690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun, L., & Ling, Z. (2011). Improving flexibility of teaching and learning with blended learning: A case study analysis, in: International Conference on Hybrid Learning. Springer, pp. 251–261.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D., McNaught, C., Chong, F. C. Y., Lam, P., & Cheng, K. F. (2010). Understanding the ways in which design features of educational websites impact upon student learning outcomes in blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1183–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klobas, J. E., & McGill, T. J. (2010). The role of involvement in learning management system success. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 22(2), 114–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-010-9032-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komarraju, M., & Nadler, D. (2013). Self-efficacy and academic achievement: Why do implicit beliefs, goals, and effort regulation matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINDIF.2013.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IHEDUC.2013.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusurkar, R. A., Ten Cate, T. J., van Asperen, M., & Croiset, G. (2011). Motivation as an independent and a dependent variable in medical education: A review of the literature. Medical Teacher, 33(5), e242–e262. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.558539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Internet self-efficacy and preferences toward constructivist internet-based learning environments: A study of pre-school teachers in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/jeductechsoci.11.1.226
   Google Scholar
• Liaw, -S.-S., Chen, G.-D., & Huang, H.-M. (2008). Users’ attitudes toward Web-based collaborative learning systems for knowledge management. Computers & Education, 50(3), 950–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2006.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaw, -S.-S., & Huang, H.-M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaw, -S.-S., & Huang, H.-M. (2016). Investigating learner attitudes toward e-books as learning tools: Based on the activity theory approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 625–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.915416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L. (2018). Student learning and engagement in a blended environment. 256–269. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-4206-3.ch010
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Q., Peng, W., Zhang, F., Hu, R., Li, Y., & Yan, W. (2016). The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, C. C. (2010). How student satisfaction factors affect perceived learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 47–54.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. (2010). Blended learning environments: Using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 729–740. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcombe, E. (2011). A work in progress: Refining the “blend” of face-to-face and online instruction, in: EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, pp. 3130–3133. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Okaz, A. A. (2015). Integrating blended learning in higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 600–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.086
   Google Scholar
• Owston, R., York, D., & Murtha, S. (2013b). Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozer, E. M., & Bandura, A. (1990). Mechanisms governing empowerment effects: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(3), 472–486. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.3.472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, L. H., & Ramalheira, D. C. (2017). Perceived employability of business graduates: The effect of academic performance and extracurricular activities. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 99, 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVB.2017.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon, J. (2013). Blended learning: An institutional approach for enhancing students’ learning experiences. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30057995
   Google Scholar
• Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2014.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putwain, D., Sander, P., & Larkin, D. (2013). Academic self-efficacy in study-related skills and behaviours: Relations with learning-related emotions and academic success. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 633–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02084.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puzziferro, M. (2008). Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640802039024
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, N. A. A., Hussein, N., & Aluwi, A. H. (2015). Satisfaction on blended learning in a public higher education institution: What factors matter? Procedia-social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 768–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.107
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, T. C. (2003). Storms clouds on the digital education horizon. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940850
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A., & Jordan, H. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.192
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). Development of academic self-efficacy the development of academic self-efficacy. Development of Achievement Motivation, 1–27. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50003-6
   Google Scholar
• Shen, D., Cho, M.-H., Tsai, C.-L., & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IHEDUC.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shook, C. L., Ketchen, D. J., Hult, G. T. M., & Kacmar, K. M. (2004). An assessment of the use of structural equation modeling in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 25(4), 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2004). Generalized latent variable modeling: Multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models (1st ed., pp. 512). Crc Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spiliotopoulos, V. (2011). Towards a technology- Enhanced university education. In A. Kitchenham (Ed.), Blended learning across disciplines: Models for implementation (pp. 306). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-479-0
   Google Scholar
• Stein, J., & Graham, C. R. (2014). Essentials for blended learning: A standards-based guide. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, B. B. (2012). Flip your classroom to increase active learning and student engagement. In: Proceedings from 28th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne, K. (2003). Blended learning: How to integrate online & traditional learning. Kogan Page Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, J. B., & Bentler, P. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling handbook of psychology (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop202023
   Google Scholar
• Vekiri, I., & Chronaki, A. (2008). Gender issues in technology use: Perceived social support, computer self-efficacy and value beliefs, and computer use beyond school. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1392–1404. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2008.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victoria López-Pérez, M., Pérez-López, M. C., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56(3), 818–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. (2014). Staying engaged: Knowledge and research needs in student engagement. Child Development Perspectives, 8(3), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woltering, V., Herrler, A., Spitzer, K., & Spreckelsen, C. (2009). Blended learning positively affects students’ satisfaction and the role of the tutor in the problem-based learning process: Results of a mixed-method evaluation. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14(5), 725–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-009-9154-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J.-H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T.-L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2009.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajacova, A., Lynch, S. M., & Espenshade, T. J. (2005). Self-efficacy, stress, and academic success in college. Research in Higher Education, 46(6), 677–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-4139-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar