692
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Learning outcomes based assessment in distance higher education. A case study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Addison Wesley Longman.
  • Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890
  • Ballesteros, B., Gil-Jaurena, I., & Mata Benito, P. (2010). Hacia dónde se dirige la innovación metodológica en la UNED. Una contribución al debate [Where is methodological innovation at UNED headed to? A contribution to the debate]. In P. Ávila (Ed.), CREAD: Educación a distancia: Actores y experiencias [CREAD: Distance education: Actors and experiences] (pp. 459–476). CREAD/ILCE/UTPL.
  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
  • Brown, G., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (1997). Assessing student learning in higher education. Routledge.
  • Brunton, J., Brown, M., Costello, E., & Walsh, E. (2016). Designing and developing a programme-focused assessment strategy: A case study. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 31(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2016.1187593
  • Chaudhary, S., & Dey, N. (2013). Assessment in open and distance learning system (ODL): A challenge. Open Praxis, 5(3), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.3.65
  • Conrad, D., & Openo, J. (2018). Assessment strategies for online learning: Engagement and authenticity. AU Press. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781771992329.01
  • Domínguez, D., Álvarez, J. F., & Gil-Jaurena, I. (2016). Analítica del aprendizaje y big data: Heurísticas y marcos interpretativos [Big Data and learning analytics: Heuristics and interpretive frameworks]. DILEMATA. International Journal of Applied Ethics, 22, 87–103. Retrieved from https://www.dilemata.net/revista/index.php/dilemata/article/view/412000042
  • European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2015). The European higher education area in 2015: Bologna process implementation report. Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/sites/eacea-site/files/european_higher_education_area_bologna_process_implementation_report.pdf
  • European Higher Education Area and Bologna Process. (2018, June 10). Bologna Process Secretariat. Retrieved from http://www.ehea.info/
  • Evans, J., Jordan, S., & Wolfenden, F. (2016). Developing academics’ assessment practices in open, distance and e-learning: An institutional change agenda. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 31(2), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2016.1195547
  • Falcão, R. (2013, May). ALOA: A model for aligning learning outcomes and assessment. Paper presented at the 45th EUCEN Conference: Transferring knowledge in a globalised world: A ULL responsibility, University of Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved from https://www.unige.ch/formcont/files/5714/3921/7163/Falcao-CS-FINAL.pdf
  • Gil-Jaurena, I., Aguado, T., Malik, B., & Cucalón, P. (2015). E-assessment in a Master online course. A case study. INTED2015 Proceedings (pp. 3661–3667), Madrid, Spain.
  • Gil-Jaurena, I., & Kucina, S. (2016). Aligning learning outcomes and assessment methods: A web tool for e-learning courses. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(17), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0016-z
  • Gil-Jaurena, I., & Pérez, G. (2013). Evaluación formativa en la educación superior a distancia. El caso de la asignatura Intervención sociocomunitaria: Fundamentos y contextos de la UNED [Formative assessment in distance higher education. The case of the Socio-community intervention: Foundations and contexts course at the UNED]. In S. Castillo (Ed.), Reflexiones, Análisis y Propuestas sobre la Formación del Profesorado de Educación Secundaria, Volumen II [Reflections, analysis and proposals on the training of secondary education teachers, Volume II] (pp. 261–264). UNED.
  • Gregory, V. L. (2013). Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes in Distance Education. In A. Sigal (Ed.), Advancing library education: Technological innovation and instructional design (pp. 172–182). Information Science Reference.
  • Hills, L., & Hughes, J. (2016). Assessment worlds colliding? Negotiating between discourses of assessment on an online open course. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 31(2), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2016.1194747
  • Iowa State University (2015). Revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning. Retrieved July 18, 2018, from http://www.celt.iastate.edu/teaching/effective-teaching-practices/revised-blooms-taxonomy
  • Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2008). Assessment and student learning: A fundamental relationship and the role of information and communication technologies. Open Learning, 23(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510701815160
  • Nipper, S. (1989). Third generation distance learning and computer conferencing. In R. Mason & A. Kaye (Eds.), Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education (pp. 63–73). Permagon.
  • Shear, L., Means, B., Gallagher, L., House, A., & Langworthy, M. (2009). ITL Research design. SRI International. Retrieved from https://www.sri.com/work/publications/itl-research-design-document
  • Soeiro, A., Lőssenko, J., Kucina, S., & Gil-Jaurena, I. (2014). Time to assess learning outcomes in e-learning (TALOE): E-assessment practices. In Book of abstracts EDEN 2014 annual conference. E-learning at work and the workplace, Zagreb (Croatia), 11–13 June 2014 (p. 74). Budapest: EDEN.
  • Structural Reforms Working Group (2014). Report by the structural reforms working group to the Bologna Follow Up Group (BFUG). Retrieved from http://www.ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/2015_Yerevan/72/1/Final_Report_of_the_Structural_Reforms_WG_613721.pdf Structural Reforms Working Group.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.