The role of learners’ motivation in MOOC completion

References

• Alario-Hoyos, C., Estévez-Ayres, I., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Kloos, C. D., & Fernández-Panadero, C. (2017). Understanding learners’ motivation and learning strategies in MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barak, M., Watted, A., & Haick, H. (2016). Motivation to learn in massive open online courses: Examining aspects of language and social engagement. Computers & Education, 94, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belanger, Y., & Thornton, J. (2013). Bioelectricity: A quantitative approach Duke University’s first MOOC. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/6216.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, R. I., Hung, Y. H., & Lin, C. F. (2015). Survey of learning experiences and influence of learning style preferences on user intentions regarding MOOCs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 528–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, K. C., & Jang, S. J. (2010). Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 741–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., Woods, D., & Emanuel, E. (2013). The MOOC phenomenon: Who takes massive open online courses and why? Retrieved from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2350964
   Google Scholar
• De Barba, P. G., Kennedy, G. E., & Ainley, M. D. (2016). The role of students’ motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of self-determination research. University of Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Q., Cun, X., & Ren, J. (2019). The role of perceived teacher suppport, motivation, learning strategy in studying on SPOC. 3rd international conference on culture, education and economic development of modern society (ICCESE 2019), 01–03 March, Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Moscow, Russia. 310, 1360–1363.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, D., Mankoff, C., & Carbrey, J. (2015). Coursera’s introductory human physiology course: Factors that characterize successful completion of a MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2), 46–68. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i2.2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R., & Clow, D. (2015). Examining engagement: analysing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses (MOOCs). The 5th International learning analytics and knowledge Conference (LAK15), 16–20 March 2015, ACM, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R., Bell, E., King, C., O’Mara, C., McInerney, F., Robinson, A., & Vickers, J. (2015). Relationship between participants’ level of education and engagement in their completion of the understanding dementia massive open online course. BMC Medical Education, 15(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0344-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, M. D., & Cornell, D. G. (1998). The influence of intrinsic motivation and self-concept on academic achievement in second-and third-grade students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21(2), 179–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329802100204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grolnick, W. S., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1991). Inner resources for school achievement: Motivational mediators of children’s perceptions of their parents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 508. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.4.508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halasek, K., McCorkle, B., Selfe, C. L., DeWitt, S. L., Delagrange, S., Michaels, J., & Clinnin, K. (2014). A MOOC with a view: How MOOCs encourage us to reexamine pedagogical doxa. Krause S.D., Lowe C. (Eds.), Invasion of the MOOCs: The promises and perils of massive open online courses, Parlor Press, Anderson, South Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. D., & Reich, J. (2015). Democratizing education? Examining access and usage patterns in massive open online courses. Science, 350(6265), 1245–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab3782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, C. (2012). Factors associated with student persistence in an online program of study: A review of the literature. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11(1), 19–42. Retrieved from http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/11.1.2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, H. C. K., Wang, C. V., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2019). Reexamining the impact of self-determination theory on learning outcomes in the online learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), 2159–2174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09863-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2012). Longitudinal test of self-determination theory’s motivation mediation model in a naturally occurring classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1175–1188. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil, M., & Ebner, M. (2017). Driving student motivation in MOOCs through a conceptual activity-motivation framework. Zeitschrift Für Hochschulentwicklung, 12(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.3217/zfhe-12-01/06
   Google Scholar
• Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 170-179.
   Google Scholar
• Kizilcec, R. F., & Schneider, E. (2015). Motivation as a lens to understand online learners: Toward data-driven design with the OLEI scale. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 22(2), . https://doi.org/10.1145/2699735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi-Liu, Liao, C. M. (2019). Research on the SPOC online course of higher education. 5th International Conference on Economics and Management (ICEM 2019), June 22-23, Chengdu, China, 255-259.
   Google Scholar
• Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macleod, H., Haywood, J., Woodgate, A., & Alkhatnai, M. (2015). Emerging patterns in MOOCs: Learners, course designs and directions. TechTrends, 59(1), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0821-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magen-Nagar, N., & Cohen, L. (2017). Learning strategies as a mediator for motivation and a sense of achievement among students who study in MOOCs. Education and Information Technologies, 22(3), 1271–1290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9492-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloshonok, N., & Terentev, E. (2016). The impact of visual design and response formats on data quality in a web survey of MOOC students. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 506–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2017). Why study on a MOOC? The motives of students and professionals. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.3033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J. J. V. (1992). Interrelationships and predictive efficacy for indices of intrinsic, extrinsic, and self-assessed motivation for learning. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 25(3), 149–155. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1992-41578-001
   Google Scholar
• Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017). Mobile-based assessment: Integrating acceptance and motivational factors into a combined model of self-determination theory and technology acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, S. R., & Whitcomb, M. E. (2005). Non-response in student surveys: The role of demographics, engagement and personality. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1597-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford, A. W., Coningham, B., & Horn, L. (2015). MOOCs: Not just for college students—How organizations can use MOOCs for professional development. Employment Relations Today, 41(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/ert.21469
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2002). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 183–203). University of Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandeen, C. (2013). Integrating MOOCs into traditional higher education: The emerging “MOOC 3.0” era. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 45(6), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2013.842103
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, L., Manturuk, K., Simpkins, I., Goldwasser, M., & Whitfield, K. E. (2015). Fulfilling the promise: Do MOOCs reach the educationally underserved? Educational Media International, 52(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2015.1053288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenova, T., Vilkova, K., & Shcheglova, I. (2018). The MOOC market: Prospects for Russia. Voprosy Obrazovaniya/Educational Studies Moscow, 2(2), 173–195. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2018-2-173-197
   Google Scholar
• Semenova, T. V., & Rudakova, L. M. (2016). Barriers to taking massive open online courses (MOOCs). Russian Education & Society, 58(3), 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/10609393.2016.1242992
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, K. M., Osin, E. N., Gordeeva, T. O., Suchkov, D. D., & Sychev, O. A. (2017). Evaluating the dimensionality of self-determination theory’s relative autonomy continuum. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(9), 1215–1238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217711915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stich, A. E., & Reeves, T. D. (2017). Massive open online courses and underserved students in the United States. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinnerton, B. J., Morris, N. P., Hotchkiss, S., & Pickering, J. D. (2017). The integration of an anatomy massive open online course (MOOC) into a medical anatomy curriculum. Anatomical Sciences Education, 10(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallerand, R. J., & Bissonnette, R. (1992). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior: A prospective study. Journal of Personality, 60(3), 599–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00922.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanthournout, G., Gijbels, D., Coertjens, L., Donche, V., & Van Petegem, P. (2012). Students’ persistence and academic success in a first-year professional bachelor program: The influence of students’ learning strategies and academic motivation. Education Research International, 1(1), 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/152747.
   Google Scholar
• Watted, A., & Barak, M. (2018). Motivating factors of MOOC completers: Comparing between university-affiliated students and general participants. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 767. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, Y., Li, H., Kornhaber, M. L., Suen, H. K., Pursel, B., & Goins, D. D. (2015). Examining the relations among student motivation, engagement, and retention in a MOOC: A structural equation modeling approach. Global Education Review, 2(3), 23–33. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1074099
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Q. (2014). Students motivation in asynchronous online discussions with MOOC mode. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(5), 325–330. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-5-13
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and disruptive innovation: Implications for higher education. eLearning Papers, In-depth, 33(2), 1–7. Retrieved fromhttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.422.5536&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, S., Rosson, M. B., Shih, P. C., & Carroll, J. M. (2015). Understanding student motivation, behaviors and perceptions in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW '15), Vancouver BC, Canada, 1882–1895.
   Google Scholar
• Zhenghao, C., Alcorn, B., Christensen, G., Eriksson, N., Koller, D., & Emanuel, E. (2015). Who’s benefiting from MOOCs, and why. Harvard Business Review, 25,2–8. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/09/whos-benefiting-from-moocs-and-why
   Google Scholar