3,153
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Encouraging student participation in mathematical activities in synchronous online tuition

ORCID Icon, &

References

  • Beyth-Marom, R., Saporta, K., & Caspi, A. (2005). Synchronous vs. asynchronous tutorials. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(3), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2005.10782436
  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (3rd ed.). Open University Press.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Butler, D., Cook, L., Haley-Mirnar, V., Halliwell, C., & MacBrayne, L. (2018). Achieving student centred facilitation in online synchronous tutorials. In 10th EDEN Research Workshop (pp. 76–82). [online]. Barcelona. http://www.eden-online.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/RW10_2018_Barcelona_Proceedings.pdf
  • Campbell, A., Gallen, A.-M., Jones, M. H., & Walshe, A. (2018). The perceptions of STEM tutors on the role of tutorials in distance learning. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1544488
  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
  • Hampel, R. (2006). Rethinking task design for the digital age: A framework for language teaching and learning in a synchronous online environment. ReCALL, 18(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344006000711
  • Kear, K., Chetwynd, F., Williams, J., & Donelan, H. (2012). Web conferencing for synchronous online tutorials: Perspectives of tutors using a new medium. Computers & Education, 58(3), 953–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.015
  • Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
  • Lowe, T., Mestel, B., & Williams, G. (2016). Perceptions of online tutorials for distance learning in mathematics and computing. Research in Learning Technology, 24(1), 30630. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.30630
  • Mason, J. H. (2002). Mathematics teaching practice. A guide for university and college lecturers. Horwood Publishing Limited.
  • McBrien, J. L., Cheng, R., & Jones, P. (2009). Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.605
  • Ng, K. C. (2007). Online technologies : Challenges and pedagogical. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(1), 1–15. https://doaj.org/article/b802d7657a77490690c3f6a2e530408b
  • NVivo. (2015). QSR International Pty Ltd.
  • Online surveys. (2018). Jisc.
  • Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1321–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002
  • Pan, -C.-C., & Sullivan, M. (2005). Promoting synchronous interaction in an eLearning environment. T.H.E. Journal, 33(2), 27–30. https://thejournal.com/articles/2005/09/01/promoting-synchronous-interaction-in-an--elearning-environment.aspx
  • Paoletti, T., Krubnik, V., Papadoulos, D., Olsen, J., Fukawa-Connelly, T., & Weber, K. (2018). Teacher questioning and invitations to participate in advanced mathematics lectures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9807-6.
  • Robinson, H., Phillips, A. S., Sheffield, A., & Moore, M. (2015). A rich environment for active learning (REAL). In J. Keengwe & J. J. Agamba (Eds.), Models for improving and optimizing online and blended learning in higher education (pp. 34–57). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6280-3.ch003
  • Rogoza, C. (2008). The influence of epistemological beliefs on learners’ perceptions of online learning: Perspectives on three levels. In J. Visser & M. Visser-Valfrey (Eds.), Learners in a changing learning landscape (pp. 91–108). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8299-3_5
  • Saw, K. G., Majid, O., Abdul Ghani, N., Atan, H., Idrus, R. M., Rahman, Z. A., & Tan, K. E. (2008). The videoconferencing learning environment: Technology, interaction and learning intersect. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 475–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00736.x
  • Tanner, J. D., Bryant, R., Thomas, C. D., Utts, J., Kohlenbach, U., Hill, R. R., Lauter, K. E., Walker, M., Davis, R. A., Su, F. E., Goins, E. Staley, J., Larson, M., Cook, P., & Kinch, D. (2016). Active learning in post-secondary mathematics education. CBMS. https://www.cbmsweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/active_learning_statement.pdf
  • Wang, S.-K., & Hsu, H.-Y. (2008). Use of the webinar tool (Elluminate) to support training: The effects of webinar-learning implementation from student-trainers’ perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(3), 175–194. http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/7.3.2.pdf
  • Williams, J. (2015). Mathematics education and the transition into higher education. In J. Williams, M. Grove, T. Croft, J. Kyle, & D. Lawson (Eds.), Transitions in undergraduate mathematics education (pp. 25–37). Higher Education Academy.