Interaction preferences of distance learners in Turkey

References

• Abdi, H., & Valentin, D. (2007). Multiple correspondence analysis. Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics, 2(4), 651–657. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.449.3063&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In Terry Anderson (Ed), TheTheory and Practice of Online Learning (pp. 15–44). AU Press. https://eddl.tru.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/01_Anderson_2008-Theory_and_Practice_of_Online_Learning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anadolu Üniversitesi. (2008). Sayılarla Üniversitemiz: 2018–2019 Kasım 2018 Öğrenci sayıları [Anadolu University in Numbers: 2018–2019, student numbers on November 2018]. https://www.anadolu.edu.tr/universitemiz/sayilarla–universitemiz/ogrenci-sayilari/2018-2019/kasim–2018
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., & Garrison, D. R. (1998). Learning in a networked world: New roles and responsibilities. In C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education: Institutional responses for quality outcomes(pp.97–112). Atwood.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 4(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v4i2.149
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. (2006). Interaction in learning and teaching on the educational semantic web. In C. Juwah (Ed.), Interactions in online education: Implications for theory and practice (pp. 141–155). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Angeli, C., Valanides, N., & Bonk, C. J. (2003). Communication in a web‐based conferencing system: The quality of computer‐mediated interactions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berge, Z. L. (1999). Interaction in post-secondary web-based learning. Educational Technology, 39(1), 5–11. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44429005
   Google Scholar
• Billings, D. M., Connors, H. R., & Skiba, D. J. (2001). Benchmarking best practices in web-based nursing courses. Advances in Nursing Science, 23(3), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-200103000-00005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, E., Aoki, K., & Dlugosh, L. (2008). Predictors of learning satisfaction in Japanese online distance learners. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i3.525
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701602748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, B. R., & Walden, B. (1997). Interactions in distance education: A report from the other side. In Annual Adult Education Research Conference Proceedings (pp. 49–54). Oklahama State University.
   Google Scholar
• Byers, A. S. (2010). Examining learner-content interaction importance and efficacy in online, self-directed electronic professional development in science for elementary educators in grades three – six [ Doctoral Dissertation]. The Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
   Google Scholar
• Cifuentes, L., & Murphy, K. L. (2000). Promoting multicultural understanding and positive self-concept through a distance learning community: Cultural connections. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02313486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative (4th ed.). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dağhan, G., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2012). BÖTE Lisansüstü Öğrencilerinin Uzaktan Eğitime İlişkin Tercihlerinin Konjont Analizi Tekniğiyle İncelenmesi [Examination of Graduate Students’ Preferences about Distance Education through Conjoint Analysis Techniques]. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 13(2), 13–32. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/egeefd/issue/4903/67207
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, J. S. (1997). Why universities need technology strategies. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 29(4), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091389709602322
   Google Scholar
• Darabi, A., Liang, X., Suryavanshi, R., & Yurekli, H. (2013). Effectiveness of online discussion strategies: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(4), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2013.837651
   Google Scholar
• Dennen, V. P. (2005). From message posting to learning dialogs: Factors affecting learner participation in asynchronous discussion. Distance Education, 26(1), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081376
   Google Scholar
• Desai, M. S., Hart, J., & Richards, T. C. (2008). E-learning: Paradigm shift in education. Education, 129(2). 327-334.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234660497_E-Learning_Paradigm_Shift_in_Education
   Google Scholar
• Di Franco, G. (2016). Multiple correspondence analysis: One only or several techniques? Quality & Quantity, 50(3), 1299–1315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0206-0
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Introduction: What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friesen, N., & Kuskis, A. (2013). Modes of interaction. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 351–371). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gameel, B. G. (2017). Learner satisfaction with massive open online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(2), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2017.1300462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (1989). Understanding distance education: A framework for the future. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (1993). Quality and access in distance education. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 8–19). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hardre, P., Sullivan, D., & Crowson, H. M. (2009). Student characteristics and motivation in rural high schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 24(16), 1–19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234582670_Student_Characteristics_and_Motivation_in_Rural_High_Schools
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, D. C. A., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649409526853
   Google Scholar
• Hirumi, A. (2006). Analysing and designing e-learning interactions. In C. Juwah (Ed.), Interactions in online education: Implications for theory and practice (pp. 60–85). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (1991). Cultures and organization: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, B. (1983). Guided didactic conversation in distance education. In D. Sewart, D. Keegan, & B. Holmberg (Eds.), Distance education: International perspectives (pp. 114–122). Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, M., & Ting, E. (2000). A study of factors influencing students’ perceived learning in a web-based course environment. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6(4), 317–338. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255567518_A_Study_of_Factors_Influencing_Students'_Perceived_Learning_in_a_Web-Based_Course_Environment
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W. (1981). Student-student interaction: The neglected variable in education. Educational Researcher, 10(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X010001005
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (1985). Student-student interaction: Ignored but powerful. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(4), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718503600406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D., & Bayen, U. J. (1998). Teaching older adults to use computers: Recommendations based on cognitive aging research. Educational Gerontology, 24(7), 675–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/0360127980240705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Q., Ravid, G., & Rafaeli, S. (2002). An empirical exploration of mass interaction system dynamics: Individual information overload and Usenet discourse. In R. H. Sprague (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences HICSS 2002 (pp. 1050–1059). IEEE Computer Society. USA.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290252934603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, F., & Kwak, D. (2013). Online learning across ethnicity and age: A study on learning interaction participation, perception, and learning satisfaction. Computers & Education, 61, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelsey, K. D., & D’souza, A. (2004). Student motivation for learning at a distance: Does interaction matter. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 7(2), 1–10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228934252_Student_Motivation_for_Learning_at_a_Distance_Does_Interaction_Matter
   Google Scholar
• Kennepohl, D. (2007). Using home-laboratory kits to teach general chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1039/B7RP90008B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S., Associates. (1984). Andragogy in action. Applying modern principles of adult education. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kumtepe, A. T., Büyük, K., Güneş, İ., Öztürk, A., Tuna, G., Gümüş, S., & Atak, N. (2017). Kitlesel uzaktan eğitimde öğrenen-içerik etkileşimi: Anadolu Üniversitesi Açıköğretim Sistemi örneği [Learner-content interaction in mass distance education: The case of Anadolu University Open Education System]. AUAd, 3(2), 9–36. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/auad/issue/34117/378437
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16–39. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurucay, M., & Inan, F. A. (2017). Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course. Computers & Education, 115, 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latchem, C., Özkul, A. E., Aydin, C. H., & Mutlu, M. E. (2006). The open education system, Anadolu University, Turkey: E‐transformation in a mega‐university. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 21(3), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510600953203
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Identifying patterns of collaborative knowledge exploration in online asynchronous discussions. Instructional Science, 39(3), 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9131-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahesh, V., & McIsaac, M. S. (1999). Distance education: Learner-teacher interaction and time spent by teaching faculty. 21 Annual Proceedings, 259. USA.
   Google Scholar
• Markewitz, L. A. (2007). Student-Student Interaction in an Online Continuing Professional Development Course: Testing Anderson’s Equivalency Theorem [ Unpublished master’s thesis]. Athabasca University. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/58776517.pdf
   Google Scholar
• May, S. (1993). Collaborative learning: More is not necessarily better. American Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649309526832
   Google Scholar
• McHugh, M. L. (2013). The chi-square test of independence. Biochemia Medica, 23(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2013.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McInnerney, J. M., & Roberts, T. S. (2004). Online learning: Social interaction and the creation of a sense of community. Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), 73–81. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.7.3.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T. (2010). Empirical research on learners’ perceptions: Interaction equivalency theorem in blended learning. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. 1–9. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ911753
   Google Scholar
• Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T. (2011, August 3–5). The interaction equivalency theorem: Research potential and its application to teaching. [Paper presentation]. The 27th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning. Madison, WI, USA. https://www.academia.edu/2854948/The_Interaction_Equivalency_Theorem_Research_Potential_and_Its_Application_to_Teaching
   Google Scholar
• Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T. (2013). Interaction equivalency in an OER, MOOCS and informal learning Era. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2013(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.5334/2013-09
   Google Scholar
• Moller, L. (1998). Designing communities of learners for asynchronous distance education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(4), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
   Google Scholar
• Mutlu, M. E., Erorta, Ö. Ö., Kara, E., & Aydın, S. (2005). Açıköğretim Fakültesi Polis Meslek Eğitimi Önlisans Programında e-Öğrenme Hizmetlerinin Başarıya Etkisi [Effect of e-learning services on success in Open Education Faculty of Police Vocational Education Associate Degree Programme]. In Proceedings of 2nd Symposium on Police Information. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi.
   Google Scholar
• Northrup, P. (2009). Online learners’ preferences for interaction. In M. Simonson, T. L. Hudgins, & A. Orellana (Eds.), The perfect online course: Best practices for designing and teaching (pp. 463–473). IAP.
   Google Scholar
• Oyarzun, B., Stefaniak, J., Bol, L., & Morrison, G. R. (2018). Effects of learner-to-learner interactions on social presence, achievement and satisfaction. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(1), 154–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9157-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öztürk, A., Kara, Y., Özkeskin, E. E., & Uça Güneş, E. P. (2017). Açık ve uzaktan öğrenenlerin öğrenme yönetim sistemi ve öğrenme malzemelerine ilişkin memnuniyet durumları [Satisfaction of open and distance learners about learning management system and learning materials]. AUAd, 3(4), 81–107. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/auad/issue/34247/378486
   Google Scholar
• Pawan, F., Paulus, T. M., Yalcin, S., & Chang, C. F. (2003). Online learning: Patterns of engagement and interaction among in-service teachers. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 119–140. http://doi.org/10.125/25217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quadir, B., Yang, J. C., & Chen, N. S. (2019). The effects of interaction types on learning outcomes in a blog-based interactive learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1652835
   Google Scholar
• Rhode, J. F. (2009). Interaction equivalency in self-paced online learning environments: An exploration of learner preferences. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i1.603
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00130-6
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P., & Barnum, K. T. (2003). On-line course effectiveness: An analysis of student interactions and perceptions of learning. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 18(1), 57–73. http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/121
   Google Scholar
• Sabry, K., & Baldwin, L. (2003). Web‐based learning interaction and learning styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, J. H., & Huett, J. B. (2006). Importance of learner-learner interaction in distance education. Information Systems Education Journal, 4(46), 3–10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228849911_Importance_of_learner-learner_interaction_in_distance_education
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, N., Khreisat, L., & Sharma, K. (2009). Learner-interface interaction for technology-enhanced active learning. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(3), 1–7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234679565_Learner-Interface_Interaction_for_Technology-Enhanced_Active_Learning
   Google Scholar
• Soo, K. S., & Bonk, C. J. (1998, June 20–25). Interaction: What does it mean in online distance education? Proceedings of the 98 World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia and World Conference on Educational Telecommunications. AACE. Freibourg, Germany. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED428724.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Speece, M. (2012). Learning style, culture and delivery mode in online distance education. US-China Education Review,2(1), 1–12. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED530681.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stepich, D. A., & Ertmer, P. A. (2003). Building community as a critical element of online course design. Educational Technology, 5(43), 33–43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234745227_Building_Community_as_a_Critical_Element_of_Online_Course_Design
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, L. A. (2000, April 24–28). Vicarious interaction: A learning theory for computer-mediated communications [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. AERA. New Orleans, LA, USA. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED441817.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791010220208
   Google Scholar
• Taghizadeh, M., & Hajhosseini, F. (2020). Investigating a blended learning environment: Contribution of Attitude, interaction, and quality of teaching to satisfaction of graduate students of TEFL. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(3). 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00531-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. C. (2001). Fifth generation distance education. Instructional Science and Technology, 4(1), 1–14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26392299_FIFTH_GENERATION_DISTANCE_EDUCATION
   Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_2
   Google Scholar
• Ugoni, A., & Walker, B. F. (1995). The Chi square test: An introduction. COMSIG Review, 4(3), 61–64. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2050386/
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vrasidas, C., & McIsaac, M. S. (1999). Factors influencing interaction in an online course. American Journal of Distance Education, 13(3), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649909527033
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, E. D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649409526852
   Google Scholar
• Yılmaz, E. O., & Aktuğ, S. (2011). Uzaktan eğitimde çevrimiçi ders veren öğretim elemanlarının uzaktan eğitimde etkileşim ve iletişim üzerine görüşleri [The Opinions of Online Distance Course Education Instructors on the Interaction and Communication in Distance Education]. M. Akgül vd.(Ed.), Akademik Bilişim, 501–512. INETD.
   Google Scholar
• Yükseltürk, E. (2010). An investigation of factors affecting student participation level in an online discussion forum. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 9(2), 24–32. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ897999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D. (2005). Interactive multimedia-based e-learning: A study of effectiveness. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_3
   Google Scholar