Facilitating open online discussions: speech acts inspiring and hindering deep conversations

References

• Ahn, J., Butler, B. S., Alam, A., & Webster, S. A. (2013). Learner participation and engagement in open online courses: Insights from the peer 2 peer university. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 160–171 https://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/ahn_0613.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J. C. C., Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2009). Asynchronous online discussion thread development: Examining growth patterns and peer-facilitation techniques: Influence of peer facilitation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(5), 438–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00321.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2010). Examining facilitators’ habits of mind in an asynchronous online discussion environment: A two cases study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormier, D. (2014). Rhizo14: The MOOC that community built. International Journal for Innovation and Quality in Learning, 3 , 107–110.
   Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans). University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duvall, M., Matranga, A., & Silverman, J. (2020). Designing for and facilitating knowledge-building discourse in online courses. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(7/8), 487–501. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabaree, L., Presicce, C., Murai, Y., & Tsur, M. (2018). Designing for multiple pathways in online learning experiences. In J. H. Kalir (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2018 Connected Learning Summit (pp. 391–396). ETC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Hara, N., & Kling, R. (1999). Students’ frustrations with a web-based distance education course. First Monday, 4(12). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v4i12.710
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C., & Gruzd, A. (2018, May 14-16). Learning in the wild: Exploring the practice of learning in open, online forums [Paper presentation]. Eleventh International Conference on Networked Learning, Zagreb, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2008). Attracting student participation in asynchronous online discussions: A case study of peer facilitation. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1111–1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014). MOOCs: Expectations and reality (Full Report). Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Ikpeze, C. (2007). Small group collaboration in peer-led electronic discourse: An analysis of group dynamics and interactions involving preservice and inservice teachers. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education, 15(3), 383–407.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., Horst, H. A., Lange, P. G., Mahendran, D., Martinez, K. Z., Pascoe, C. J., Perkel, D., Robinson, L., Sims, C., & Tripp, L. (2013). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Ito, M., & Boyd, D. (2015). Participatory culture in a networked era: A conversation on youth, learning, commerce, and politics. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, A. C. (2003). The sequential analysis of group interaction and critical thinking in online. The American Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1701_3
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, A. (2005). A guide to analyzing message–response sequences and group interaction patterns in computer‐mediated communication. Distance Education, 26(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500291470
   Google Scholar
• Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290252934603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowes, S., Lin, P., & Wang, Y. (2007). Studying the effectiveness of the discussion forum in online professional development courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(3), 181–210.
   Google Scholar
• Mackness, J., & Bell, F. (2015). Rhizo14: A rhizomatic learning cMOOC in sunlight and in shade. Open Praxis, 7(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.7.1.173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2003). Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 40(3), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00129-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. K., & Tam, M. (1999). Unravelling the complexities of distance education student attrition. Distance Education, 20(1), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791990200108
   Google Scholar
• Poole, D. M. (2000). Student participation in a discussion-oriented online course: A case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2000.10782307
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, M. (2017a). Learning creative learning. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://lcl.media.mit.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, M. (2017b). Lifelong kindergarten: Cultivating creativity through projects, passion, peers, and play. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, P., Resnick, M., & Rusk, N. (2014). Learning creative learning: How we tinkered with MOOCs. Peer 2 Peer University. http://reports.p2pu.org/learning-creative-learning/
   Google Scholar
• Sethi, S., McConachie, K., DeTaf, C., & Schmidt, P. (2014). Unhangout. Unhangout. https://unhangout.media.mit.edu
   Google Scholar
• Stepich, D. A., & Ertmer, P. A. (2003). Building community as a critical element of online course design. Educational Technology, 43(5), 33–43.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K., Day, S., Bogle, L., & Van Prooyen, T. (2014). AMP: A tool for characterizing the pedagogical approaches of MOOCs. E-Mentor, 2(54), 75–85.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education, Communication & Information, 2(1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463631022000005016
   Google Scholar
• Xie, K. U. I., Debacker, T. K., & Ferguson, C. (2006). Extending the traditional classroom through online discussion: The role of student motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.2190/7BAK-EGAH-3MH1-K7C6
   Google Scholar