How challenging? Barriers for teachers in institutional implementation of blended learning

References

• Al Zumor, A. W. Q., Al Refaai, I. K., Eddin, E. A. B., & Al-Rahman, F. H. A. (2013). EFL students’ perceptions of a blended learning environment: Advantages, limitations and suggestions for improvement. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n10p95
   Google Scholar
• Ali, R. (2019). Is blending the solution? A systematic literature review on the key drivers of blended learning in higher education. The Maldives National Journal of Research, 7(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.62338/6atv9m37
   Google Scholar
• Ali, R. (2022). Implementation of blended learning in higher education: A Case study of adoption and diffusion [ Doctoral thesis]. University of Wollongong.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony Jnr, B. (2021). An exploratory study on academic staff perception towards blended learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3107–3133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10705-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony Jnr, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Phon, D. N. A. L. E., Abdullah, A., & Ming, G. L. (2020). Blended learning adoption and implementation in higher education: A theoretical and systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(2), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09477-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antwi-Boampong, A. (2020). Towards a faculty blended learning adoption model for higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 1639–1662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10019-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. J. (2019). Maximising motivators for technology-enhanced learning for further education teachers: Moving beyond the early adopters in a time of austerity. Research in Learning Technology, 27(0), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v27.2032
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. G. (2016). Blended instructional practice: A review of the empirical literature on instructors’ adoption and use of online tools in face-to-face teaching. Internet & Higher Education, 31, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, T., Sainter, P., & Saunders, G. (2013). Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies: Implications for models of technology adoption. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 25(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9066-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, S., Chen, S., & Chang, J. (2021). Examining the multiplicative relationships between teachers’ competence, value and pedagogical beliefs about technology integration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 734–750. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, B. W., Jiang, J., & Tang, Y. (2020). The effect of blended learning platform and engagement on students’ satisfaction — the case from the tourism management teaching. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 27, 100272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, M. S., & Lodge, J. M. (2015). Academic workload: The silent barrier to the implementation of technology-enhanced learning strategies in higher education. Distance Education, 36(2), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1055056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamdi, T., & Abu Qudais, M. (2018). Optimising the blended learning environment: The Arab Open University experience. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 33(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2017.1414587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameed, M. A., & Arachchilage, N. A. G. (2021). The role of self-efficacy on the adoption of information systems security innovations: A meta-analysis assessment. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 25(5), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-021-01560-1
   Google Scholar
• Herman, C., Gracia, R., MacNiven, L., Clark, B., & Doyle, G. (2019). Using a blended learning approach to support women returning to STEM. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 34(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1554475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovdhaugen, E. (2015). Working while studying: The impact of term-time employment on dropout rates. Journal of Education & Work, 28(6), 631–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, S. K. (2013). Risk-aversion: Understanding teachers’ resistance to technology integration. Technology, Pedagogy & Education, 22(3), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.802995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, M. M., & Nat, M. (2019). Blended learning motivation model for instructors in higher education institutions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0145-2
   Google Scholar
• Jesus, A., Gomes, M. J., & Cruz, A. (2017). Blended versus face-to-face: Comparing student performance in a therapeutics class. IET Software, 11(3), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-sen.2016.0190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, K., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sari, A. R., Khlaif, Z., Zhu, M., Nadir, H., & Gok, F. (2019). Teachers’ self-efficacy matters: Exploring the integration of mobile computing device in middle schools. Tech Trends, 63(6), 682–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00402-5
   Google Scholar
• Lai, M., Lam, K. M., & Lim, C. P. (2016). Design principles for the blend in blended learning: A collective case study. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(6), 716–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1183611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemon, N., & Garvis, S. (2016). Pre-service teacher self-efficacy in digital technology. Teachers & Teaching Theory & Practice, 22(3), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1058594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., & Wang, W. (2022). Effect of blended learning on student performance in K‐12 settings: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), 1254–1272. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Q., Geertshuis, S., & Grainger, R. (2020). Understanding academics’ adoption of learning technologies: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, 103857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S.-H. (2011). Factors related to pedagogical beliefs of teachers and technology integration. Computers and Education, 56(4), 1012–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, J., Hughes, T., & Logan, B. (2016). Overworked? An observation of the relationship between student employment and academic performance. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 18(3), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115622777
   Google Scholar
• The Maldives National University. (2013). Strategic Plan 2013 – 2017.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, W. A., Perini, E., Rohlf, V., Toukhsati, S., Conduit, R., & Sanson, G. (2013). A blended learning lecture delivery model for large and diverse undergraduate cohorts. Computers & Education, 64, 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirete, A. B., Maquilón, J. J., Mirete, L., & Rodríguez, R. A. (2020). Digital competence and university teachers’ conceptions about teaching. A structural causal model. Sustainability, 12(12), 4842. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napier, N. P., Dekhane, S., & Smith, S. (2011). Transitioning to blended learning: Understanding student and faculty perceptions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks JALN, 15(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v15i1.188
   Google Scholar
• Ocak, M. A. (2011). Why are faculty members not teaching blended courses? Insights from faculty members. Computers & Education, 56(3), 689–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olelewe, C. J., & Agomuo, E. E. (2016). Effects of B-learning and F2F learning environments on students’ achievement in QBASIC programming. Computers & Education, 103, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owston, R., York, D., & Murtha, S. (2013). Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philipsen, B., Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., Vanslambrouck, S., & Zhu, C. (2019). Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: A systematic meta-aggregative review. Educational Technology Research & Development, 67(5), 1145–1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09645-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, W. W., & Graham, C. R. (2016). Institutional drivers and barriers to faculty adoption of blended learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 748–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posey, L., & Pintz, C. (2017). Transitioning a bachelor of science in nursing program to blended learning: Successes, challenges & outcomes. Nurse Education in Practice, 26, 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2016.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prifti, R. (2020). Self–efficacy and student satisfaction in the context of blended learning courses. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 37(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1755642
   Google Scholar
• Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, P. (2014). Categories for barriers to adoption of instructional technologies. Education and Information Technologies, 19(2), 383–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9222-z
   Google Scholar
• Reid, P. (2017). Supporting instructors in overcoming self-efficacy and background barriers to adoption. Education and Information Technologies, 22(1), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9449-6
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, R., Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., & Siddiq, F. (2021). Profiling teachers’ readiness for online teaching and learning in higher education: Who’s ready? Computers in Human Behavior, 118, 106675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taimalu, M., & Luik, P. (2019). The impact of beliefs and knowledge on the integration of technology among teacher educators: A path analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 79, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thai, N. T. T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2020). Face‐to‐face, blended, flipped, or online learning environment? Impact on learning performance and student cognitions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research & Development, 65(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truitt, A. A., & Ku, H. (2018). A case study of third grade students’ perceptions of the station rotation blended learning model in the United States. Educational Media International, 55(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1484042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villani, D., Morganti, L., Carissoli, C., Gatti, E., Bonanomi, A., Cacciamani, S., Confalonieri, E., & Riva, G. (2018). Students’ acceptance of tablet PCs in Italian high schools: Profiles and differences. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., & Huang, C. (2018). Pedagogical, social and technical designs of a blended synchronous learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watty, K., McKay, J., & Ngo, L. (2016). Innovators or inhibitors? Accounting faculty resistance to new educational technologies in higher education. Journal of Accounting Education, 36, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2016.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Webster, A., & Gardner, J. (2019). Aligning technology and institutional readiness: The adoption of innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(10), 1229–1241. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1601694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingo, N. P., Ivankova, N. V., & Moss, J. A. (2017). Faculty perceptions about teaching online: Exploring the literature using the technology acceptance model as an organizing framework. Online Learning, 21(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i1.761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, L., Tatnall, A., & Burgess, S. (2014). A framework for investigating blended learning effectiveness. Education & Training, 56(2/3), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-04-2013-0049
   Google Scholar
• Xu, D., Glick, D., Rodriguez, F., Cung, B., Li, Q., & Warschauer, M. (2020). Does blended instruction enhance English language learning in developing countries? Evidence from Mexico. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2012). Applications of case study research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Zainab, B., Bhatti, M. A., & Alshagawi, M. (2017). Factors affecting e-training adoption: An examination of perceived cost, computer self-efficacy and the technology acceptance model. Behaviour and Information Technology, 36(12), 1261–1273. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2017.1380703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040004807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y., Au, W., & Yates, G. (2016). University students’ self-control and self-regulated learning in a blended course. The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar