The impact of high-stakes testing on curriculum and pedagogy: a teacher perspective from Australia

References

• Abrams, L. M. 2004. Teachers’ Views on High-stakes Testing: Implications for the Classroom. Phoenix, AZ: Policy Brief: Education Policy Studies Laboratory, Arizona State University College of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. J. 2010. Children, Their World, Their Education: Final Report of the Cambridge Primary Review. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. 2009. “Using NAPLAN Items to Develop Students’ Thinking Skills and Build Confidence.” Australian Mathematics Teacher 65 (4): 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Angus, L. 2012. “Teaching within and against the Circle of Privilege: Reforming Teachers, Reforming Schools.” Journal of Education Policy 27 (2): 231–251.10.1080/02680939.2011.598240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armrein, A., and D. Berliner. 2002. High Stakes Testing, Uncertainty and Student Learning. Education Policy Analysis Archives 10 (18). Accessed September 1, 2011. http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n18/
   Google Scholar
• Athanasou, J. 2010. NAPLAN and MySchool Survey. Canberra: Australian Capital Territory, Independent Education Union of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Au, W. 2008a. “Between Education and the Economy: High‐stakes Testing and the Contradictory Location of the New Middle Class.” Journal of Education Policy 23 (5): 501–513.10.1080/02680930802148941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, W. 2008b. “Devising Inequality: A Bernsteinian Analysis of High‐stakes Testing and Social Reproduction in Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 29 (6): 639–651.10.1080/01425690802423312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACE (Australian College of Educators). 2010. Submission to the Inquiry into the Administration and Reporting of NAPLAN Testing, Senate References Committee on Education. Canberra: Employment & Workplace Relations.
   Google Scholar
• ACARA (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority). 2010. NAPLAN Frequently Asked Questions. Accessed December 12, 2011. http://www.naplan.edu.au/faqs/napfaq.html
   Google Scholar
• ACARA (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority). 2011a. Home Page. Accessed November 4, 2011. http://www.acara.edu.au/default.asp
   Google Scholar
• ACARA(Australian Curriculum, Assessment Reporting Authority). 2011b. National Report on Schooling in Australia 2009. Sydney: ACARA. http://www.acara.edu.au/reporting/national_report_on_schooling/national_report_on_schooling.html
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2008. The Education Debate. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Catterall, J., R. Chapleau, and J. Iwanaga. 1999. Involvement in the Arts and Human Development: General Involvement and Intensive Involvement in Music and Theater Arts. The Imagination Project at UCLA Graduate School of Education and Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles, CA. http://www.aep-arts.org/highlights/coc-release.html.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., A. Shore, K. Rhoades, L. Abrams, J. Miao, and J. Li. 2003. Perceived Effects of State-mandated Testing Programs on Teaching and Learning: Findings from Interviews with Educators in Low-, Medium-, and High-stakes States. National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy, Boston College. http://www.bc.edu/research/nbetpp/statements/nbr1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, J. 2010. “Ranking by NAPLAN Results Rates a Fail.” The Age, February 3. Accessed September 13, 2011. http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/ranking-by-naplan-results-rates-a-fail-20100202-nay4.html
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, L. 2004. “Teaching for the Test: How and Why Test Preparation is Appropriate.” In Defending Standardized Testing, edited by R. P. Phelps, 159–174. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, W., and T. Sanzo. 2002. “Is High-stakes Testing Harming Lower Socio-economic Schools?” National Association of Secondary School Principals NASSP Bulletin 86 (631): 62–75.
   Google Scholar
• David, J. 2011. “What Students Need to Learn: High-stakes Testing Narrows the Curriculum.” Educational Leadership 68 (6): 78–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulfer, N., J. Polesel, and S. Rice. 2012. The Experience of Education: The Impacts of High Stakes Testing on School Students and their Families – An Educator’s Perspective. Sydney: The Whitlam Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R. 2009. Curriculum and Assessment: A Narrative Approach. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. 1994. Changing Teachers, Changing Times: Teachers’ Work and Culture in the Post-modern Age. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Hout, M., and S. W. Elliott. 2011. Incentives and Test-Based Accountability in Education. Washington, DC: National Research Council, The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, K., M. Eisenhart, and D. Betebenner. 2001. “School Choice Crucible: A Case Study of Boulder Valley.” Phi Delta Kappan 83 (2): 137–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D., B. Johnson, S. Farenga, and D. Ness. 2008. Stop High Stakes Testing: An Appeal to America’s Conscience. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D. 2007. “The Unintended Outcomes of High-stakes Testing.” Journal of Applied School Psychology 23 (2): 65–86.10.1300/J370v23n02_05
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., B. D. Jones, and T. Y. Hargrove. 2003. The Unintended Consequences of High-Stakes Testing. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Klenowski, V. 2010. “Are Australian Assessment Reforms Fit for the Purpose? Lessons from Home and Abroad.” Queensland Union of Teachers Professional Magazine, November 10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Klenowski, V. 2011. “Assessment for Learning in the Accountability Era: Queensland, Australia.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 37 (1): 78–83.10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. 2010. “Policy Borrowing, Policy Learning: Testing Times in Australian Schooling.” Critical Studies in Education 51 (2): 129–147.10.1080/17508481003731026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipman, P. 2011. The New Political Economy of Urban Education: Neoliberalism, Race, and the Right to the City. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lobascher, S. 2011. “What are the Potential Impacts of High-stakes Testing on Literacy Education in Australia?” Australian Journal of Language & Literacy 34 (2): 9–19.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, P., J. Kos, M. Walker, and J. Hong. 2008. Staff in Australian Schools. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Madaus, G., M. Russell, and J. Higgins. 2009. The Paradoxes of High Stakes Testing; How They Affect Students, Their Teachers, Principals, Schools and Society. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Marchant, G. J. 2004. “What is at Stake with High Stakes Testing? A Discussion of Issues and Research.” Ohio Journal of Science 104 (2): 2–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, G. N. 2009. A Shared Challenge: Improving Literacy, Numeracy and Science Learning in Queensland Primary Schools. Accessed September 27, 2010. http://education.qld.gov.au/mastersreview/pdfs/final-report-masters.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mockler, N. 2013. “Reporting the ‘Education Revolution’: MySchool.edu.au in the Print Media.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 34 (1): 1–16.10.1080/01596306.2012.698860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. 1966. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Accessed October 24, 2011. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/cescr.htm#art13
   Google Scholar
• Pedulla, J., L. Abrams, G. Madaus, M. Russell, M. Ramos, and J. Miao. 2003. Perceived Effects of State-mandated Testing Programs on Teaching and Learning: Findings from a National Survey of Teachers. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, R. P. 2006. “Characteristics of an Effective Student Testing System.” Educational Horizons 85 (1): 19–29.
   Google Scholar
• QSA (Queensland Studies Authority). 2009. “Student Assessment Regimes: Getting the Balance Right for Australia” Draft Discussion Paper. Accessed September 27, 2010. http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/downloads/publications/qsa_paper_assess_balance_aust.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D. 2010. The Death and Life of the Great American School System. How Testing and Choice are Undermining Education. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Reay, D., and D. Wiliam. 1999. “‘I’ ll be a Nothing’: Structure, Agency and the Construction of Identity Through Assessment.” British Educational Research Journal 25 (3): 343–354.10.1080/0141192990250305
   Google Scholar
• Renter, D. S., C. Scott, N. Kober, N. Chudowsky, V. Chudowsky, S. Joftus, and D. Zabala. 2006. From the Capital to the Classroom: Year 4 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Sabol, R. 2010. No Child Left Behind: A Study of its Impact on Art Education. Lafayette, IN: Purdue University, Indiana National Art Education Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Santiago, P., G. Donaldson, J. Herman, and C. Shrewbridge. 2011. OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Australia. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Senate References Committee on Education, Employment & Workplace Relations. 2010. Inquiry into the Administration and Reporting of NAPLAN Testing. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Sloane, F., and A. Kelly. 2003. “Issues in High-Stakes Testing Programs.” Theory into Practice 42 (1): 12–17.10.1207/s15430421tip4201_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, G. 2012. Effects of NAPLAN Executive Summary. Murdoch: Murdoch University.
   Google Scholar