Teacher evaluation reform implementation and labor relations

References

• Anzia, Sarah F., and Terry M. Moe. 2014. “Collective Bargaining, Transfer Rights, and Disadvantaged Schools.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 36 (1): 83–111.10.3102/0162373713500524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bascia, Nina. 1997. “Teacher Unions and Teacher Professionalism in the US: Reconsidering a Familiar Dichotomy.” In Fundamental Change: International Handbook of Teachers and Teaching, edited by Bruce J. Biddle, Thomas L. Good, and Ivor Goodson, 225–245. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Bidwell, Charles E. 2001. “Analyzing Schools as Organizations: Long-term Permanence and Short-term Change.” Sociology of Education 74: 100–114.10.2307/2673256
   Google Scholar
• Blyton, Paul, Ali Dastmalchian, and Raymond Adamson. 1987. “Developing the Concept of Industrial Relations Climate.” Journal of Industrial Relations 29 (2): 207–216.10.1177/002218568702900205
   Google Scholar
• Brown Center on Education Policy at Brookings. 2011. Passing Muster: Evaluating Teacher Evaluation Systems. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, Cynthia E., and Jennifer L. Russell. 2008. “District Policy and Teachers’ Social Networks.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 30 (3): 203–235.10.3102/0162373708321829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Vogel, Lora, Li Feng, and La’Tara Osborne-Lampkin. 2013. “Seniority Provisions in Collective Bargaining Agreements and the ‘Teacher Quality Gap’.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 35 (3): 324–343.10.3102/0162373713482765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowen, Joshua M., and Jacob Fowles. 2013. “Same Contract, Different Day? An Analysis of Teacher Bargaining Agreements in Louisville Since 1979.” Teachers College Record 115 (5): 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, Linda, Audrey Amrein-Beardsley, Edward Haertel, and Jesse Rothstein. 2012. “Evaluating Teacher Evaluation.” Phi Delta Kappan 93 (6): 8–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dastmalchian, Ali, Paul Blyton, and Raymond Adamson. 1989. “Industrial Relations Climate: Testing a Construct.” Journal of Occupational Psychology 62 (1): 21–32.10.1111/joop.1989.62.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, Paul, and Walter Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Education Week. 2013. “NCLB Waivers: A State-by-state Breakdown.” http://www.edweek.org/ew/section/infographics/nclbwaivers.html.
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, William A. 1989. “Using Reform: Conceptualizing District Initiative.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 11 (2): 151–164.10.3102/01623737011002151
   Google Scholar
• Glazerman, Steven, Eric Isenberg, Sarah Dolfin, Martha Bleeker, Amy Johnson, Mary Grider, Matthew Jacobus, and Melanie Ali. 2010. Impacts of Comprehensive Teacher Induction: Final Results from a Randomized Controlled Study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, Eric A. 2011. “The Economic Value of Higher Teacher Quality.” Economics of Education Review 30 (3): 466–479.10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, Eric, and Steven Rivkin. 2010. “Generalizations about Using Value-added Measures about Teacher Quality.” American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 100 (2): 267–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, Douglas N. 2011. Value-added Measures in Education: What Every Educator Needs to Know. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Douglas N., and Tim R. Sass. 2011. “Teacher Training, Teacher Quality and Student Achievement.” Journal of Public Economics 95 (7–8): 798–812.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, Meredith I., and Thomas C. Hatch. 2004. “Crafting Coherence: How Schools Strategically Manage Multiple, External Demands.” Educational Researcher 33 (8): 16–30.10.3102/0013189X033008016
   Google Scholar
• Hoy, Wayne, and Cecil Miskel. 2013. Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice. 9th ed. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ingle, W. Kyle, P. Christian Willis, and James Fritz. 2014. “Collective Bargaining Agreement Provisions in the Wake of Ohio Teacher Evaluation System Legislation.” Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Education Finance and Policy. San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Susan Moore, and Susan M. Kardos. 2000. “Reforming Bargaining and Its Promise for School Improvement.” In Conflicting Missions? Teachers Unions and Educational Reform, edited by Tom Loveless, 7–46. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koppich, Julia. 2005. “Addressing Teacher Quality Through Induction, Professional Compensation and Evaluation: The Effects of Labor-Management Relations.” Educational Policy 19 (1): 90–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koski, William S., and Eileen L. Horng. 2007. “Facilitating the Teacher Quality Gap? Collective Bargaining Agreements, Teacher Hiring and Transfer Rules, and Teacher Assignment Among Schools in California.” Education Finance and Policy 2 (3): 262–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litwin, George, and R. A. Stringer. 1968. Motivation and Organizational Climate. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, Michael, and Marc Ventresca. 2003. “The New Structuralism in Organizational Theory.” Organization 10 (3): 457–480.10.1177/13505084030103007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malin, Martin H. 2012. “Papers from the Associations of the American Law Schools 2012 Annual Meeting Section of Labor Relations and Employment Law: Sifting Through the Wreckage of the Tsunami That Hit Public Sector Collective Bargaining.” Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal 16: 533–629.
   Google Scholar
• March, James. 1994. Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, Daniel F., Tim R. Sass, J. R. Lockwood, and Kata Mihaly. 2009. “The Intertemporal Variability of Teacher Effect Estimates.” Education Finance and Policy 4 (4): 572–606.10.1162/edfp.2009.4.4.572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J., and B. Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology83 (2): 340–363.10.1086/ajs.1977.83.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mich. Comp. Laws § 38.81. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mich. Comp. Laws § 380.1249. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mich. Comp. Laws § 380.1249(2)(a)(i). 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mich. Comp. Laws § 380.1250. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Mich. Comp. Laws § 380.1250(2). 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Mich. Comp. Laws § 423.215(3). 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness. 2013. Building an Improvement Focused System of Educator Evaluation in Michigan: Final Recommendations. http://www.mcede.org/reports.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Joseph, Philip Hallinger, and Ronald H. Heck. 2013. “Leading via Teacher Evaluation the Case of the Missing Clothes?” Educational Researcher 42 (6): 349–354.10.3102/0013189X13499625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, Barbara, Spyros Konstantopoulos, and Larry V. Hedges. 2004. “How Large are Teacher Effects?” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 26 (3): 237–257.10.3102/01623737026003237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penuel, William R., Margaret Riel, Aasha Joshi, Leslie Pearlman, Chong M. Kim, and Kenneth A. Frank. 2010. “The Alignment of the Informal and Formal Organizational Supports for Reform: Implications for Improving Teaching in Schools.” Educational Administration Quarterly 46 (1): 57–95.10.1177/1094670509353180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogodzinski, Ben, and Nathan Jones. 2014. “Exploring Novice Teachers’ Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Teacher Unionism.” Educational Policy 28 (4): 491–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, Walter W., and Jeannette A. Colyvas. 2007. “Microfoundations of Institutional Theory.” In Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by Royston Greenwood, Christine Oliver, Kerstin Sahlin, and Roy Suddaby, 276–298. New York: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rutledge, Stacey A., Douglas N. Harris, and William K. Ingle. 2010. “How Principals ‘Bridge and Buffer’ the New Demands of Teacher Quality and Accountability: A Mixed‐methods Analysis of Teacher Hiring.” American Journal of Education 116 (2): 211–242.10.1086/649436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schochet, Peter Z., and Hanley S. Chiang. 2010. Error Rates in Measuring Teacher and School Performance Based on Student Test Score Gains ( NCEE 2010–4004). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. Richard. 1992. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. Richard, and John W. Meyer. 1991. “The Organization of Societal Sectors: Propositions and Early Evidence.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by Walter Powell and Paul DiMaggio, 108–140. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spalding, Audrey. 2014. Roadblocks to Reform: A Review of Union Contracts in Michigan Schools. Midland, MI: Mackinac Center for Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, James P. 1996. “School Districts Matter: Local Educational Authorities and State Instructional Policy.” Educational Policy 10 (1): 63–87.10.1177/0895904896010001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, James P., Brian J. Reiser, and Todd Reimer. 2002. “Policy Implementation and Cognition: Reframing and Refocusing Implementation Research.” Review of Educational Research 72 (3): 387–431.10.3102/00346543072003387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strunk, Katharine O., and Jason A. Grissom. 2010. “Do Strong Unions Shape District Policies? Collective Bargaining, Teacher Contract Restrictiveness, and the Political Power of Teachers’ Unions.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 32 (3): 389–406.10.3102/0162373710376665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagiuri, Renato. 1968. “The Concept of Organizational Climate.” In Organizational Climate, edited by Renato Tagiuri and George Litwin, 11–32. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Economic Policy Institute. 2010. Problems with the Use of Student Test Scores to Evaluate Teachers. EPI Briefing Paper #278. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• The Education Trust-Midwest. 2012. Good for Teachers, Good for Students. Royal Oak, MI: The Education Trust-Midwest.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, James D. 1967. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Umpstead, Regina, Ben Pogodzinski, and Douglas Lund. 2013. “An Analysis of State Teacher Evaluation Laws Enacted in Response to the Federal Race to the Top Initiative.” West’s Education Law Reporter 286 (2): 795–823.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, Karl E. 1976. “Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (1): 1–19.10.2307/2391875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisberg, Daniel, Susan Sexton, Jennifer Mulhern, and David Keeling. 2009. The Widget Effect: Our National Failure to Acknowledge and Act on Differences in Teacher Effectiveness. New York: The New Teacher Project.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, Marcus A., and Joshua M. Cowen. 2013. “Who Would Stay, Who Would Be Dismissed? An Empirical Consideration of Value-added Teacher Retention Policies.” Educational Researcher 42 (6): 330–337.10.3102/0013189X13496145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar