Measuring ‘progress’: performativity as both driver and constraint in school innovation

References

• Ball, S. J. 2003. “The Teacher’s Soul and the Terrors of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 18 (2): 215–228.10.1080/0268093022000043065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., and A. Olmedo. 2013. “Care of the Self, Resistance and Subjectivity under Neoliberal Governmentalities.” Critical Studies in Education 54 (1): 85–96.10.1080/17508487.2013.740678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K., and M. Cole. 2002. “Cultural Historical Activity Theory and the Expansion of Opportunities for Learning after School.” In Learning for Life in the 21st Century, edited by G. Wells and G. Claxton, 225–238. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470753545
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, H. 2008. Vygotsky and Research. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DfES (Department for Education and Skills). 2004. Building Schools for the Future: A New Approach to Capital Investment. Annesley: DfES. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/7614/1/DfES%200218%20200MIG467.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 1987. Learning by Expanding: An Activity – Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. http://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Paper/Engestrom/expanding/toc.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 1999. “Activity Theory and Individual and Social Transformation”. In Perspectives on Activity Theory. Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives, edited by Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, and R. -L. Punmäki, 19–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812774
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 2001. “Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an Activity Theoretical Reconceptualization.” Journal of Education and Work 14 (1): 133–156.10.1080/13639080020028747
   Google Scholar
• Exley, S., and S. J. Ball. 2013. “Neo-liberalism and English Education.” In Neoliberal Education Reforms: A Critical Analysis, edited by D. Turner and H. Yolcu, 13–31. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gewirtz, S., S. J. Ball, and R. Bowe. 1995. Markets, Choice and Equity in Education. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, C., K. August, R. Brooks, D. Hancock, D. Hargreaves, N. Pearce, J. Roberts, J. Rose, and D. Wise. 2006. 2020 Vision: Report of the Teaching and Learning by 2020 Review Group. Annesley: DfES.
   Google Scholar
• Hamdan, N., P. McKnight, K. McKnight, and K. M. Arfstrom. 2013. A Review of Flipped Learning. Flipped Learning Network, Pearson, and George Mason University. http://www.flippedlearning.org/cms/lib07/VA01923112/Centricity/Domain/41/LitReview_FlippedLearning.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, D. 2004. Personalising Learning. London: SSAT.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, D. 2006. Deep Experience 1. London: SSAT.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, D. 2007. System Redesign 1. London: SSAT.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, D. 2007. “Personalisation: The Emerging 'Revised' Code of Education?” Oxford Review of Education 33 (5): 629–642.10.1080/03054980701476311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., S. Adams Becker, V. Estrada, and A. Freeman. 2014. NMC Horizon Report: 2014 K-12 Edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Keddie, A. 2013. “Thriving amid the Performative Demands of the Contemporary Audit Culture: A Matter of School Context.” Journal of Education Policy 28 (6): 750–766.10.1080/02680939.2013.768706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutti, K. 1996. “Activity Theory as a Potential Framework for Human–Computer Interaction Research.” In Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human–Computer Interaction, edited by B. A. Nardi, 17–44. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leadbeater, C. 2006 “The Future of Public Services: Personalised Learning.” In Schooling for Tomorrow: Personalising Education, 101–114. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Leadbeater, C. 2008. What’s Next? 21 Ideas for 21st Century Learning. London: The Innovation Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Lumby, J. 2009. “Performativity and Identity: Mechanisms of Exclusion.” Journal of Education Policy 24 (3): 353–369.10.1080/02680930802669284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, M., S. J. Ball, and A. Braun. 2013. “What Ever Happened to…? ‘Personalised Learning’ as a Case of Policy Dissipation.” Journal of Education Policy 28 (3): 322–338.10.1080/02680939.2012.724714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahony, P., I. Hextall, and M. Richardson. 2011. “‘Building Schools for the Future’: Reflections on a New Social Architecture.” Journal of Education Policy 26 (3): 341–360.10.1080/02680939.2010.513741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mausethagen, S. 2013. “A Research Review of the Impact of Accountability Policies on Teachers’ Workplace Relations.” Educational Research Review 9: 16–33.10.1016/j.edurev.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, B., N. Heywood, D. Sachdev, and S. Faraday. 2008. Independent Learning: Literature Review. Annesley: Department for Children Schools and Families. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/222277/DCSF-RR051.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Miliband, D. 2006. “Choice and Voice in Personalised Learning.” In Schooling for Tomorrow: Personalising Education, 21–30. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Mørch, A. I., K. A. Nygård, and S. R. Ludvigsen. 2010. “Adaptation and Generalisation in Software Product Development.” In Activity Theory in Practice: Promoting Learning across Boundaries and Agencies, edited by H. Daniels, A. Edwards, Y. Engeström and S. R. Ludvigsen, 184–206. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2013. Innovative Learning Environments. Paris: OECD. doi:10.1787/9789264203488-en.
   Google Scholar
• Perryman, J. 2006. “Panoptic Performativity and School Inspection Regimes: Disciplinary Mechanisms and Life under Special Measures.” Journal of Education Policy 21 (2): 147–161.10.1080/02680930500500138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piattoeva, N. 2015. “Elastic Numbers: National Examinations Data as a Technology of Government.” Journal of Education Policy 30 (3): 316–334.10.1080/02680939.2014.937830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QCA (Qualifications and Curriculum Authority). 2007. The New Secondary Curriculum: What Has Changed and Why. London: QCA. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/6564/.
   Google Scholar
• Ranson, S. 2008. “Re-constituting Education Governance for Cosmopolitan Society.” In Transforming Learning in Schools and Communities, edited by B. Lingard, J. Nixon and S. Ranson, 184–208. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Riddell, R. 2013. “Changing Policy Levers under the Neoliberal State: Realising Coalition Policy on Education and Social Mobility.” Journal of Education Policy 28 (6): 847–863.10.1080/02680939.2013.812247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troman, G. 2008. “Primary Teacher Identity, Commitment and Career in Performative School Cultures.” British Educational Research Journal 34 (5): 619–633.10.1080/01411920802223925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitty, G. 2010. “Revisiting School Knowledge: Some Sociological Perspectives on New School Curricula.” European Journal of Education 45 (1): 28–45.10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01422.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar