Who pays for standardised testing? A cost-benefit study of mandated testing in three Queensland secondary schools

References

• Abrams, Lisa M., and George F. Madaus. 2003. “The Lessons of High-stakes Testing.” Educational Leadership 61 (3): 31–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACARA (Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority). 2012. Report of 2012 NAPLAN Test Incidents. Sydney: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• ACARA (Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority). 2013a. National Assessment Program Literacy and Numeracy: Achievements in Reading, Writing, Language Conventions and Numeracy 2012. Sydney: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• ACARA (Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority). 2013b. National Assessment Program Literacy and Numeracy: National Protocols for Test Administration 2013. Sydney: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• ACARA (Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority). 2014a. “The Australian Curriculum V 6.0.” Education Services Australia. Last Modified February 18. Accessed June 14. http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au
   Google Scholar
• ACARA (Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority). 2014b. “My School.” Accessed March 7. http://www.myschool.edu.au/
   Google Scholar
• ACARA (Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority). 2014c. “NAP: National Assessment Program.” ACARA. Accessed June 14. http://www.nap.edu.au/
   Google Scholar
• ACARA (Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority). 2014d. National Assessment Program Literacy and Numeracy: Achievements in Reading, Writing, Language Conventions and Numeracy 2013. Sydney: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Senate. 2014. “Effectiveness of the National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy.” Parliament of Australia. Accessed April 4. http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/eet_ctte/naplan/submissions.htm
   Google Scholar
• Barrier-Ferreira, Julia. 2008. “Producing Commodities or Educating Children? Nurturing the Personal Growth of Students in the Face of Standardized Testing.” The Clearing House 81 (3): 138–140.10.3200/TCHS.81.3.138-140
   Google Scholar
• Boston, Ken. 2009. “League Tables.” Teacher: The National Education Magazine 205 (Oct.): 54.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, Bill, and Joanna Bragg. 2006. “A Curriculum without Foundation.” British Educational Research Journal 32 (4): 569–582.10.1080/01411920600775225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, Merilyn. 2014. “A Multiple Case Study of NAPLAN Numeracy Testing of Year 9 Students in Three Queensland Secondary Schools.” Doctor of Philosophy, Mongraph, Education, Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• COAG. 2008a. National Partnership Agreement on Literacy and Numeracy. Canberra ACT: Ministerial Council for Federal Financial Relations.
   Google Scholar
• COAG. 2008b. National Partnership Agreement on Low Socio-economic Status School Communities. Canberra ACT: Ministerial Council for Federal Financial Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Comber, Barbara, and Helen Nixon. 2009. “Teachers’ Work and Pedagogy in an Era of Accountability.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 30 (3): 333–345. doi:10.1080/01596300903037069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, Linda. 2007. “Race, Inequality and Educational Accountability: The Irony of ‘No Child Left Behind’.” Race, Ethnicity & Education 10 (3): 245–260. doi:10.1080/13613320701503207.
   Google Scholar
• DETE (Department of Education Training and Employment). 2012. United in Our Pursuit of Excellence: Agenda for Improvement 2012–2016. Brisbane: Queensland Government. Accessed February 2, 2014. http://education.qld.gov.au/corporate/about/pdfs/united-in-our-pursuit-of-excellence.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DETE (Department of Education Training and Employment). 2014a. “Great Results Guarantee.” Queensland Government. Accessed July 24. http://education.qld.gov.au/schools/grants/state/targeted/great-results.html
   Google Scholar
• DETE (Department of Education Training and Employment). 2014b. “Teaching and Learning Audits.” Queensland Government. Accessed March 30, 2015. http://education.qld.gov.au/nationalpartnerships/teach-learn-audits.html
   Google Scholar
• Dulfer, Nicky, John Polesel, and Suzanne Rice. 2012. “The Impacts of High Stakes Testing on Schools, Students and Their Families: An Educator’s Perspective.” In The Experience of Education. Sydney: Whitlam Institute, University of Western Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, Justine, and Peter Knapp. 2014. “Your School.” Weekend Australian, 1–15. Accessed June 21. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/in-depth/schools/interactive
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, William A., Lora Monfils, and Roberta Y. Schorr. 2004. “Test Preparation in New Jersey: Inquiry-oriented and Didactic Responses.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 11 (1): 67–88.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, Egon G., and Yvonna S Lincoln. 1994. “Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 105–117. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, Ian. 2014. “A Logic of Appropriation: Enacting National Testing (NAPLAN) in Australia.” Journal of Education Policy 29 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/02680939.2013.782425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Commons (UK) Children Schools and Families Committee. 2008. “The consequences of High-Stakes Uses of Testing.” In Testing and Assessment, edited by House of Commons, 41–66. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, Alfie. 2000. “Burnt at the High Stakes.” Journal of Teacher Education 51 (4): 315–327. doi:10.1177/0022487100051004007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, Bob, and Sam Sellar. 2013. “‘Catalyst Data’: Perverse Systemic Effects of Audit and Accountability in Australian Schooling.” Journal of Education Policy 28 (5): 634–656.10.1080/02680939.2012.758815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna, Catherine, and Cara Livingstone Turner. 2001. “The Impact of the MCAS: Teachers Talk about High-stakes Testing.” The English Journal 91 (1): 79.10.2307/821659
   Google Scholar
• Madaus, G. F. 1988. “The Influence of Testing on the Curriculum.” In Critical Issues in Curriculum: Eighty-Seventh Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, edited by N. Laurel Tanner, 83–121. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mertler, Craig A. 2011. “Teachers’ Perceptions of the Influence of No Child Left behind on Classroom Practices.” Current Issues in Education 13 (3): 2–34.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, Matthew B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miyasaka, J. R. 2000. “A Framework for Evaluating the Validity of Test Preparation Practices.” Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, William P. 1994. “Appropriate Test Preparation: Can We Reach a Consensus?” Educational Assessment 2 (1): 51–68.10.1207/s15326977ea0201_3
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, Linda. 2002. “The Human Face of the High-stakes Testing Story.” Phi Delta Kappan 83 (8): 595–600.10.1177/003172170208300807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan, Linda. 2008. “What’s Been Lost in the Bubbles.” Educational Leadership 66 (2): 52–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, Sharon Lynn, and David C. Berliner. 2007. Collateral Damage: How High-stakes Testing Corrupts America’s Schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Books.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, Onora. 2013. “Intelligent Accountability in Education.” Oxford Review of Education 39 (1): 4–16. doi:10.1080/03054985.2013.764761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. PISA 2012 Results in Focus: What 15-Year-Olds Know and What They Can Do with What They Know. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• QSA (Queensland Studies Authority). 2014. National Assessment Program Literacy and Numeracy: Handbook for Principals 2014. Brisbane: Queensland Government.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Parliament. 2009. “Question on Notice No. 1725.” Accessed December 11. https://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/documents/tableOffice/questionsAnswers/2009/1725-2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, Christina A. 2011. “Test-tampering Found Rampant in Atlanta System.” Education Week 30 (36): 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, Helen. 2009. Case Study Research in Practice. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sireci, Stephen G. 2005. “The Most Frequently Unasked Questions about Testing.” In Defending Standardised Testing, edited by Richard P. Phelps, 111–122. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Mary Lee. 1991. “Meanings of Test Preparation.” American Educational Research Journal 28 (3): 521–542.10.3102/00028312028003521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, Robert E. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stobart, Gordon. 2008. Testing Times: The Uses and Abuses of Assessment. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Greg, and Allen G. Harbaugh. 2013. “A Preliminary Analysis of Teacher Perceptions of the Effects of NAPLAN on Pedagogy and Curriculum.” The Australian Educational Researcher 40 (3): 299–314. doi:10.1007/s13384-013-0093-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toutkoushian, Robert K., and Taylor Curtis. 2005. “Effects of Socioeconomic Factors on Public High School Outcomes and Rankings.” The Journal of Educational Research 98 (5): 259–271.10.3200/JOER.98.5.259-271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, M. 2010. “Measurement, Sampling, and Equating Errors in Large-scale Assessments.” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 29 (4): 15–27.10.1111/emip.2010.29.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Wyn, Johanna, Malcolm Turnbull, and Lyndall Grimshaw. 2014. The Experience of Education: The Impacts of High Stakes Testing on School Students and Their Families. A Qualitative Study. Sydney: Whitlam Institute.
   Google Scholar