Selling ‘impact’: peer reviewer projections of what is needed and what counts in REF impact case studies. A retrospective analysis

References

• Bok, D. 2003. Universities in the Marketplace: The Commercialization of Higher Education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• British Council. 2014. “Massification of Higher Education in Large Academic Systems.” Accessed June 17 2015. www.britishcouncil.org/educaiton/ihe/knowledge-centre/national-policies/report-massification-higher-education
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. 2011. “Redefining the Public University: Global and National Contexts.” In A Manifesto for the Public University, edited by J. Holmwood, 12–41. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 2000. The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. 2nd ed. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C., and H. Eyring. 2011. The Innovative University: Changing the DNA of Higher Education from the inside out. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Collini, S. 2012. What are Universities for? London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Corbyn, Z. 2008. “Assessors Face ‘Drowning’ as They Endeavour to Read 2,363 Submissions.” Times Higher Education, April 17, 2008. Accessed 16 June 2015. www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/assessors-face-drowning-as-they-endeavour-to-read-2363-submissions/401502.article
   Google Scholar
• Corbyn, Z. 2009. “Research Councils Unveil Future Vision.” Times Higher Education, April 9.
   Google Scholar
• Deem, R., S. Hillyard, and M. Reed. 2007. Knowledge, Higher Education, and the New Managerialism: The Changing Management of UK Universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. 2002. “Networks of Innovation: Science, Technology and Development in the Triple Helix Era.” International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development 1 (1): 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. 2003.” Learning from Transition: The Triple Helix as Innovation System.” Paper presented at the Symposium on Knowledge Based Society: A Challenge for New EU and Accession Countries, Zagreb, Croatia, October 23.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., C. Li moges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. 2014. Neoliberalism’s War on Higher Educaiton. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hanney, S. R., A. Watt, T. H. Jones, and L. Metcalf. 2013. “Conducting Retrospective Impact Analysis to Inform a Medical Research Charity’s Funding Strategies: The Case of Asthma Uk.” Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology 9 (1): 17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havergal, C. 2015. “ABS Ranking Reveals ‘World Elite’ of Business Journals.” THE: Times Higher Education. 25 February 2015. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/abs-ranking-reveals-world-elite-of-business-journals/2018722.article.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, T. H., C. Donovan, and S. Hanney. 2012. “Tracing the Wider Impacts of Biomedical Research: A Literature Search to Develop a Novel Citation Categorisation Technique.” Scientometrics 93 (1): 125–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, R., S. Marginson, and R. Naidoo, eds. 2011. Handbook on Globalization and Higher Education. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kolsaker, A. 2013. “Relocating Professionalism in an English University.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 36 (2): 129–142.
   Google Scholar
• Kuber, J., and N. Sayers. 2010. Higher Education Futures: Key Themes for Leadership and Management. Series 2: 4.1. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ladyman, J. 2009. “Against Impact.” Oxford Magazine 294: 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, R. 2003. Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration. Final Report. London: HM Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. 2010. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leathwood, C., and B. Read. 2012. Final Report: Assessing the Impact of Developments in Research Policy for Research on Higher Education: An Exploratory Study. Society for Research into Higher Education. Accessed January 21 2013. http://www.srhe.ac.uk/downloads/Leathwood_Read_Final_Report_16_July_2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leitch, S. 2006. Prosperity for All in the Global Economy – World Class Skills. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Lester, R. K. 2005. Universities, Innovation, and the Competitiveness of Local Economies. MIT Industrial Performance Center, Working Paper 05-010. Cambridge: MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., and H. Etzkowitz. 1998. “The Triple Helix as a Model of Innovation Studies.” Science and Public Policy 25 (3): 195–203.
   Google Scholar
• Moriarty, P. 2011. “Science as a Public Good.” In A Manifesto for the Public University, edited by J. Holmwood, 56–73. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Neave, G. 2002. “Stakeholder Perspective Historically Explored.” In Higher Education in a Globalising World: International Trends and Mutual Observations, edited by J. Enders and O. Fulton, 17–37. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2001. Rethinking Science. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Olssen, M., and M. Peters. 2005. “Neoliberalism, Higher Education and the Knowledge Economy: From the Free Market to Knowledge Capitalism.” Journal of Education Policy 20 (3): 313–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palfreyman, D., and T. Tapper. 2014. Reshaping the University. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., and A. Tickell. 2002. “Neoliberalizing Space.” Antipode 34 (3): 380–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A. 2011. “The Future of Research Universities.” Prometheus 29 (4): 443–453.
   Google Scholar
• Russell Group. 2010. The Economic Impact of Research Conducted in Russell Group Universities. London: Russell Group.
   Google Scholar
• Russell Group. 2011. Russell Group Warns That REF Impact Weighting is Still Too High. Accessed December 14 2012. http://www.russellgroup.ac.uk/russell-group-latest-news/137-2011/4774-russell-group-warns-that-ref-impact-weighting-is-still-too-high/
   Google Scholar
• Sainsbury Report. 2007. The Race to the Top: A Review of Government’s Science and Innovation Policies. London: HMSO. Accessed December 14 2012. http://www.rsc.org/images/sainsbury_review051007_tcm18-103116.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shane, S. A. 2004. Academic Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., and L. A. Leslie. 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., and G. Rhoades. 2004. Academic Capitalism and the New Economy. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., and F. Webster, eds. 1997. The Postmodern University? Contested Visions of Higher Education in Society. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stehr, N. 2002. Knowledge and Economic Conduct. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• University and College Union. 2009. UCU Response to the REF Consultation. Accessed December 14 2012. http://www.ucu.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=4207
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, J. 2006. The Network Society. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, J. K. 2011. “The Idea of the University.” In The Assault on Universities: A Manifesto for Resistance, edited by M. Bailey and D. Freedman, 15–26. London: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Warry Report. 2006. Increasing the Economic Impact of the Research Councils. London: Research Council Economic Impact Group. Accessed December 15 2012. http://www.bis.gov.ukfiles/file32802.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R. 2012a. “Issues in the Articulation of ‘Impact’: The Response of UK Academics to ‘Impact’ as a New Measure of Research Assessment.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (2): 359–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R. 2012b. “From Engagement to Impact? Articulating the Public Value of Academic Research.” Tertiary Education and Management 18 (2): 115–130.
   Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R. 2015a. “Lost in the ‘Third Space’: The Impact of Public Engagement in Higher Education on Academic Identity, Research Practice and Career Progression.” European Journal of Higher Education 5 (3): 331–347.
   Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R. 2015b. “Public Intellectuals Vs. New Public Management: The Defeat of Public Engagement in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1034261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, F. 2006. Theories of the Information Society. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zemsky, R., W. F. Massy, and G. R. Wegner. 2005. Remaking the American University. Market-Smart and Mission-Centred. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ziman, J. 2000. Real Science: What It is, and What It Means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar