3,357
Views
51
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The surveillance of teachers and the simulation of teaching

Pages 1-13 | Received 13 Jul 2015, Accepted 30 Jun 2016, Published online: 15 Jul 2016

References

  • Ball, S. J. 2000. “Performativities and Fabrications in the Education Economy: Towards the Performative Society?” The Australian Educational Researcher 27 (2): 1–23.10.1007/BF03219719
  • Ball, S. 2003. “The Teacher’s Soul and the Terrors of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 18 (2): 215–228.10.1080/0268093022000043065
  • Barker, J. R. 1993. “Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams.” Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (3): 408–437.10.2307/2393374
  • Baudrillard, J. 1994. Simulacra and Simulation. Michigan: University of Michigan.
  • Bauman, Z. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Bauman, Z., and D. Lyon. 2013. Liquid Surveillance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. 17 vol. New York: Sage.
  • Bogard, W. 1996. The simulation of surveillance: Hypercontrol in telematics societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bogard, W. 2014. “Simulation and Post-Panopticism.” In Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies, edited by Kirstie Ball, Kevin Haggerty, and David Lyon, 30–37, Oxon: Routledge.
  • Bushnell, M. 2003. “Teachers in the Schoolhouse Panopticon: Complicity and Resistance.” Education and Urban Society 35 (3): 251–272.10.1177/0013124503035003001
  • Claim your College. 2015. “Claim your College: The Profession’s New College of TEACHING. A proposal for Start-up Support”. Accessed June 18. http://www.claimyourcollege.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/College-of-teaching-expression-of-interest.pdf.
  • Courtney, S. J. 2014. “Post-Panopticism and School Inspection in England.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 9 (4): 623–642. doi:10.1080/01425692.2014.965806.
  • Crozier, G. 1999. “Parental Involvement: Who Wants It?” International Studies in Sociology of Education 9 (3): 219–238.10.1080/09620219900200045
  • Davies, B., and P. Bansel. 2007. “Neoliberalism and Education.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 20 (3): 247–259.10.1080/09518390701281751
  • DfE 2011 “Teachers’ Standards.” Department for Education. Accessed June 16. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/301107/Teachers__Standards.pdf.
  • DfEE. 2000. Performance Management in Schools: Performance Management Framework. London: Department for Education and Employment.
  • Gabriel, Y. 2005. “Glass Cages and Glass Palaces: Images of Organization in Image-Conscious Time.” Organization 12 (1): 9–27.10.1177/1350508405048574
  • Gabriel, Y. 2008. “Spectacles of Resistance and Resistance of Spectacles.” Management Communication Quarterly 21 (3): 310–326.10.1177/0893318907309931
  • Genosko, G., and S. Thompson. 2009. “Tense Theory: The Temporalities of Surveillance.” In Theorizing Surveillance, edited by David Lyon, 123–138. Cullompton: Willan.
  • Haggerty, K., and R. Ericson. 2000. “The Surveillant Assemblage.” British Journal of Sociology 51 (4): 605–622.
  • Hassrick, E. M., and B. Schneider. 2009. “Parent Surveillance in Schools: A Question of Social Class.” American Journal of Education 115 (2): 195–225.10.1086/595665
  • Jackson, A. and Burch, J. 2015. “School Direct, A Policy for Initial Teacher Training in England: Plotting a Principled Pedagogical Path Through a Changing Landscape.” Professional Development in Education, 1–16. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19415257.2015.1052090.
  • Keddie, A., M. Mills, and D. Pendergast. 2011. “Fabricating an Identity in Neo-Liberal Times: Performing Schooling as ‘Number One’.” Oxford Review of Education 37 (1): 75–92.10.1080/03054985.2010.538528
  • Kirk, G. 2000. “The General Teaching Council for England.” School Leadership and Management 20 (2): 235–246.
  • Kroener, I., and D. Neyland. 2014. “New Technologies, Security and Surveillance.” In Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies, edited by Kirstie Ball, Kevin Haggerty, and David Lyon, 141–148. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Lakes, R., and P. Carter. 2011. “Neoliberalism and Education: An Introduction.” Educational Studies 47 (2): 107–110.10.1080/00131946.2011.556387
  • Lee, V., and D. Ready. 2007. Schools Within Schools: Possibilities and Pitfalls of High School Reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Lepowska, D. 2014. “A Poor Ofsted Report Could Lead to Headteachers Being ‘Disappeared’.” The Guardian. Accessed January 21 2015. http://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/mar/11/heads-poor-ofsted-report-dismissal-shortages.
  • Lyon, D. 2003. “Surveillance as Social Sorting.” In Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Digital Discrimination, edited by David Lyon, 13–30. London: Routledge.
  • Lyon, D. 2006. “The Search for Surveillance Theories.” In Theorizing Surveillance, edited by David Lyon, 3–20. London: Routledge.
  • Lyon, D., K. Haggerty, and K. Ball. 2014. “Introducing Surveillance Studies.” In Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies, edited by Kirstie Ball, Kevin Haggerty and David Lyon, 1–12. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Mahony, P., and I. Hextall. 2001. “Performing and Conforming.” In The Performing School: Managing Teaching and Learning in a Performance Culture, edited by Denis Gleeson and Chris Husbands, 174–191. London: Routledge Falmer.
  • Mathiesen, T. 1997. “The Viewer Society: Michel Foucault's `Panopticon' Revisited.” Theoretical Criminology 1 (2): 215–234.10.1177/1362480697001002003
  • Ofsted. 2014. School Inspection – Clarification for Schools. Accessed June 16 2015. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ofsted-inspections-clarification-for-schools.
  • Ofsted. 2015. School Inspection Handbook. Accessed June 16 2015. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/391531/School_inspection_handbook.pdf.
  • Page, D. 2013. “The Abolition of the General Teaching Council for England and the FUTURE of Teacher Discipline.” Journal of Education Policy 28 (2): 231–246.10.1080/02680939.2012.711859
  • Page, D. 2015. “The Visibility and Invisibility of Performance Management in Schools.” British Educational Research Journal 41 (6): 1031–1049. doi:10.1002/berj.3185.
  • Perryman, J. 2009. “Inspection and the Fabrication of Professional and Performative Processes.” Journal of Education Policy 24 (5): 611–631.10.1080/02680930903125129
  • Piro, J. 2008. “Foucault and the Architecture of Surveillance: Creating Regimes of Power in Schools, Shrines, and Society.” Educational Studies 44 (1): 30–46.10.1080/00131940802225036
  • Rule, J. 2007. “Social Control and Modern social Structure.” In The Surveillance Studies Reader, edited by Sean Hier and Josh Greenberg, 19–27. Berkshire: Open University Press.
  • Sachs, J. 2004 “Watching Yourself and Others: Touch, Personal Space and Risk of Harm in the Classroom”. Paper presented at the AARE ASnnual Conference, Melbourne, 2004.
  • Selwyn, N. 2000. “The National Grid for Learning: Panacea or Panopticon?” British Journal of Sociology of Education 21 (2): 243–255.10.1080/713655340
  • Shakeshaft, C. 2013. “Know the Warning Signs of Educator Sexual Misconduct.” Phi Delta Kappan 94 (5): 8–13.10.1177/003172171309400503
  • Swinglehurst, D., J. Russell, and T. Greenhalgh. 2008. “Peer Observation of Teaching in the Online Environment: An Action Research Approach.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 24 (5): 383–393.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00274.x
  • Smith, G. J. D. 2014. “Surveillance Work(ers).” In Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies, edited by Kirstie Ball, Kevin Haggerty and David Lyon, 107–116. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Taylor Webb, P. 2007 “Accounting for Teacher Knowledge: Reterritorializations as Epistemic Suicide”. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(2): 279–295.
  • Webb, P. T., F. M. Briscoe, and M. P. Mussman. 2009. “Preparing Teachers for the Neoliberal Panopticon.” Educational Foundations 23 (1): 3–18.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.