Practices of boundary-work in the collaboration between principals and private sponsors in England’s academy schools

References

• Abbott, A. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Academies Commission. 2013. Unleashing Greatness: Getting the Best from an Academised System. London: Pearson Think Tank / RSA.
   Google Scholar
• Adonis, A. 2012. Education, Education, Education: Reforming England’s Schools. London: Biteback Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., and P. T. Knight. 1999. Interviewing for Social Scientists. London: Sage.10.4135/9781849209335
   Google Scholar
• Atwood, G. E., and R. D. Stolorow. 1984. Structures of Subjectivity: Explorations in Psychoanalytic Phenomenology. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2007). Education Plc: Understanding Private Sector Participation in Public Sector Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., and C. Junemann. 2012. Networks, New Governance and Education. Bristol: Policy.10.1332/policypress/9781847429803.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S., M. Maguire, and I. Goodson, eds. 2012. Education, Capitalism and the Global Crisis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., and P. Duguid. 2001. “Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective.” Organization Science 12 (2): 198–213. doi:10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, C. 2013. “Academy Federations, Chains, and Teaching Schools in England: Reflections on Leadership, Policy, and Practice.” Journal of School Choice 7 (3): 334–352. doi:10.1080/15582159.2013.808936.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, C., and M. Salokangas. 2012. “Independent State-funded Schools: Some Reflections on Recent Developments.” School Leadership & Management 32 (5): 473–486. doi:10.1080/13632434.2012.731329.
   Google Scholar
• Chitty, C. 2009. Education Policy in Britain. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Courtney, S. J. 2015. “Mapping School Types in England.” Oxford Review of Education 41 (6): 799–818. doi:10.1080/03054985.2015.1121141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DfE (Department for Education). 2010. The Importance of Teaching. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• DfE (Department for Education). 2015a. “Open Academies and Academy Projects in Development.” https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/open-academies-and-academy-projects-in-development
   Google Scholar
• DfE (Department for Education). 2015b. “Press Release: Up to 1,000 failing Schools to Be Transformed under New Measures.” 3 June. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/up-to-1000-failing-schools-to-be-transformed-under-new-measures
   Google Scholar
• DfE (Department for Education). 2015c. “Timelines for Schools to Covert to Academies.” https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/timelines-for-schools-to-convert-to-academies
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R. 2000. “Modernizing Managerialism in Education.” In New Managerialism New Welfare?, edited by J. Clarke, S. Gewirtz and E. McLaughlin, 202–221. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R., S. Griggs, and A. Boaz. 2011. “The Practice of Policy Making.” Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 7 (2): 127–136. doi:10.1332/174426411X579180.
   Google Scholar
• Garraway, J. 2010. “Knowledge Boundaries and Boundary-crossing in the Design of Work-Responsive University Curricula.” Teaching in Higher Education 15 (2): 211–222. doi:10.1080/13562511003620035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. 1983. “Boundary-work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48 (6): 781–795.10.2307/2095325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. 1995. “Boundaries of Science.” In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen and T. Pinch, 393–443. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, H. M., and R. McGinity. 2014. “The Politics of the Academies Programme: Natality and Pluralism in Education Policy-making.” Research Papers in Education 29 (3): 300–314. doi:10.1080/02671522.2014.885730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatcher, R. 2006. “Privatization and Sponsorship: The Re‐agenting of the School System in England.” Journal of Education Policy 21 (5): 599–619. doi:10.1080/02680930600866199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 1993. “Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work.” In The Performance Measurement, Management, and Appraisal Sourcebook, edited by D. G. Shaw, C. E. Schneier, R. W. Beatty and L. S. Baird, 66–79. Amherst, MA: Human Resource Development Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kauko, J., and M. Salokangas. 2015. “The Evaluation and Steering of English Academy Schools through Inspection and Examinations: National Visions and Local Practices.” British Educational Research Journal 41 (6): 1108–1124. doi:10.1002/berj.3184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kislov, R. 2014. “Boundary Discontinuity in a Constellation of Interconnected Practices.” Public Administration 92 (2): 307–323. doi:10.1111/padm.12065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, M., and V. Molnár. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28: 167–195.10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, N. 2015. “Collaboration in Healthcare through Boundary Work and Boundary Objects.” Qualitative Sociology Review 11 (3): 60–82.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. 2001. Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Nickolai, D. H., S. G. Hoffman, and M. N. Trautner. 2012. “Can a Knowledge Sanctuary Also Be an Economic Engine? The Marketization of Higher Education as Institutional Boundary Work.” Sociology Compass 6 (3): 205–218. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00449.x.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., T. Bovaird, S. Martin, M. Tricker, and P. Waterston. 1995. “Performance Management and Accountability in Complex Public Programmes.” Financial Accountability & Management 11 (1): 19–37. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.1995.tb00394.x.
   Google Scholar
• Papanastasiou, N. 2015. “Scalecraft: Policy and Practice in England’s Academy Schools.” PhD Thesis. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, S., K. Mundy, A. Verger, and F. Menashy, eds. 2012. Public–Private Partnerships in Education: New Actors and Modes of Governance in a Globalizing World. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Salokangas, M., and C. Chapman. 2014. “Exploring Governance in Two Chains of Academy Schools: A Comparative Case Study.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 42 (3): 372–386. doi:10.1177/1741143214521588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simkins, T. 2015. “School Restructuring in England: New School Configurations and New Challenges.” Management in Education 29 (1): 4–8. doi:10.1177/0892020614559235.
   Google Scholar
• Simkins, T., J. Coldron, M. Crawford, and S. Jones. 2015. “Emerging Local Schooling Landscapes: The Role of the Local Authority.” School Leadership & Management 35 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1080/13632434.2014.962501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, M., L. Lundahl, and R. Serpieri. 2013. “Introduction. The Governing of Education in Europe: Commercial Actors, Partnerships and Strategies.” European Educational Research Journal 12 (4): 416–424. doi:10.2304/eerj.2013.12.4.416.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P., and I. Abbott. 2014. “Local Responses to National Policy the Contrasting Experiences of Two Midlands Cities to the Academies Act 2010.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 42 (3): 341–354. doi:10.1177/1741143214521593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. 1994. “Case Study.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 236–247. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.” Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H., and P. Wood. 2014. “Markets, Managerialism and Teachers’ Work: The Invisible Hand of High Stakes Testing in England.” International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives 12 (2): 42–61. Accessed March 23, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 1993. “Working Relations of Technology Production and Use.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2 (1–2): 21–39. doi:10.1007/BF00749282.
   Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., M. Hisschemöller, and H. Eijsackers. 2007. “Ecological Indicators: Between the Two Fires of Science and Policy.” Ecological Indicators 7 (2): 215–228. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuolanto, P. 2013. “Boundary-Work and the Vulnerability of Academic Status: The Case of Finnish Nursing Science.” PhD Thesis. University of Tampere, Tampere.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. 2011. Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 2000. “Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems.” Organization 7 (2): 225–246. doi:10.1177/135050840072002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, L., and J. Harrow, eds. 1992. Rediscovering Public Services Management. London: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, A. 2015. “Professionalizing School Governance: The Disciplinary Effects of School Autonomy and Inspection on the Changing Role of School Governors.” Journal of Education Policy 30 (2): 182–200. doi:10.1080/02680939.2014.941414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P. 2012. Collaboration in Public Policy and Practice. Bristol: Policy Press. http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/distributed/C/bo13317200.html. Accessed 2 February 2016
   Google Scholar
• Woods, P. A., G. J. Woods, and H. Gunter. 2007. “Academy Schools and Entrepreneurialism in Education.” Journal of Education Policy 22 (2): 237–259. doi:10.1080/02680930601158984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar