The misdirection of public policy: comparing and combining standardised effect sizes

References

• Abrami, P. C., R. M. Bernard, E. Borokhovski, A. Wade, M. A. Surkes, R. Tamim, and D. Zhang. 2008. “Instructional Interventions Affecting Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions: A Stage 1 Meta-analysis.” Review of Educational Research 78 (4): 1102–1134.10.3102/0034654308326084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, D. C., C. R. Crowell, M. Doman, and G. S. Howard. 1988. “Performance Posting, Goal Setting, and Activity-contingent Praise as Applied to a University Hockey Team.” Journal of Applied Psychology 73 (1): 87–95.10.1037/0021-9010.73.1.87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. M., C. Shinn, M. T. Fullilove, S. C. Scrimshaw, J. E. Fielding, J. Normand, and V. G. Carande-Kulis. 2003. “The Effectiveness of Early Childhood Development Programs: A Systematic Review.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 24 (3): 32–46.10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00655-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkin, R. M., and D. W. Schumann. 1984. “Effects of Corrective Testing: An Extension.” Journal of Educational Psychology 76 (5): 835–843.10.1037/0022-0663.76.5.835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, J. D., and K. A. Austin. 1974. “Homework Grading Procedures in Junior High Mathematics Classes.” School Science and Mathematics 74 (4): 269–272.10.1111/ssm.1974.74.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Bangert-Drowns, R. L., C.-L. C. Kulik, J. A. Kulik, and M. Morgan. 1991. “The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-like Events.” Review of Educational Research 61 (2): 213–238.10.3102/00346543061002213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, C. F., W. L. Wiitala, and F. D. Richard. 2003. “Meta-analysis of Raw Mean Differences.” Psychological Methods 8 (4): 406–418.10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., L. V. Hedges, J. P. T. Higgins, and H. R. Rothstein. 2009. Introduction to Meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley.10.1002/9780470743386
   Google Scholar
• Butler, R. 1987. “Task-involving and Ego-involving Properties of Evaluation: Effects of Different Feedback Conditions on Motivational Perceptions, Interest, and Performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology 79 (4): 474–482.10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camilli, G., S. Vargas, S. Ryan, and W. Barnett. 2010. “Meta-analysis of the Effects of Early Education Interventions on Cognitive and Social Development.” Teachers College Record 112 (3): 579–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardelle-Elawar, M. 1992. “Effects of Teaching Metacognitive Skills to Students with Low Mathematics Ability.” Teaching and Teacher Education 8 (2): 109–121.10.1016/0742-051X(92)90002-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N., and J. Hardie. 2012. Evidence-based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199841608.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Carver, R. P. 1978. “The Case Against Statistical Significance Testing.” Harvard Educational Review 48 (3): 378–399.10.17763/haer.48.3.t490261645281841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C.-Y., and J. P. Barufaldi. 1999. “The Use of a Problem-solving-based Instructional Model in Initiating Change in Students’ Achievement and Alternative Frameworks.” International Journal of Science Education 21 (4): 373–388.10.1080/095006999290606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1962. “The Statistical Power of Abnormal-social Psychological Research: A Review.” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 65 (3): 145–153.10.1037/h0045186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, H., J. C. Robinson, and E. A. Patall. 2006. “Does Homework Improve Academic Achievement? A Synthesis of Research, 1987–2003.” Review of Educational Research 76 (1): 1–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N., N. Cartwright, B. Virk, and S. Mascarenhas-Keyes. 2015. Making the Most of the Evidence: Evidence-based Policy in the Classroom (CHESS Working Paper 2015-03). Durham: Durham University.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P. 1999. “What is Evidence-based Education?” British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (2): 108–121.10.1111/1467-8527.00106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2016. Educational Excellence Everywhere. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Dossett, D. L., G. P. Latham, and T. R. Mitchell. 1979. “Effects of Assigned versus Participatively Set Goals, Knowledge of Results, and Individual Differences on Employee Behavior When Goal Difficulty is Held Constant.” Journal of Applied Psychology 64 (3): 291–298.10.1037/0021-9010.64.3.291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbaum, B., S. Vaughn, M. T. Hughes, and S. W. Moody. 2000. “How Effective are One-to-one Tutoring Programs in Reading for Elementary Students at Risk for Reading Failure? A Meta-analysis of the Intervention Research.” Journal of Educational Psychology 92 (4): 605–619.10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J. 1984. “Meta-analysis: An Abuse of Research Integration.” The Journal of Special Education 18: 41–59.10.1177/002246698401800106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitz‐Gibbon, C. 1984. “Meta-analysis: An Explication.” British Educational Research Journal 10 (2): 135–144.10.1080/0141192840100202
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., D. Fuchs, C. L. Hamlett, and R. M. Allinder. 1991. “The Contribution of Skills Analysis to Curriculum-based Measurement in Spelling.” Exceptional Children 57 (5): 443–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., M. Hebert, and K. R. Harris. 2015. “Formative Assessment and Writing: A Meta-analysis.” The Elementary School Journal 115 (4): 523–547.10.1086/681947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R. F., and D. E. Allison. 1971. “An Experimental Study of the Relationship of Homework to Pupil Success in Computation with Fractions.” School Science and Mathematics 71 (4): 339–346.10.1111/ssm.1971.71.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2009. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-analyses Relating to Achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, S., E. Hall, V. Baumfield, and D. Moseley. 2005. A Meta-analysis of the Impact of the Implementation of Thinking Skills Approaches on Pupils. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, S., M. Katsipataki, D. Kokotsaki, R. Coe, L. E. Major, and R. Coleman. 2013. The Sutton Trust – Education Endowment Foundation Teaching and Learning Toolkit: Technical Appendix. London: Education Endowment Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hornblum, J. N., and W. F. Overton. 1976. “Area and Volume Conservation Among the Elderly: Assessment and Training.” Developmental Psychology 12 (1): 68–74.10.1037/0012-1649.12.1.68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Commons Education Committee. 2014. Underachievement in Education by White Working Class Children. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Kingston, N., and B. Nash. 2011. “Formative Assessment: A Meta-analysis and a Call for Research.” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 30 (4): 28–37.10.1111/emip.2011.30.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., and A. DeNisi. 1996. “The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, a Meta-analysis, and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory.” Psychological Bulletin 119 (2): 254–284.10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacher, M. B. 1983. “Effects of Feedback, Instruction, and Initial Performance upon Training and Persistence of Verbal Rehearsal.” The Journal of General Psychology 108 (1): 43–54.10.1080/00221309.1983.9711477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, J. A. 1978. “Locus of Control, Task Expectancies, and Children’s Performance Following Failure.” The Journal of Educational Research 71 (4): 207–210.10.1080/00220671.1978.10885072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., and X. Ma. 2010. “A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Computer Technology on School Students’ Mathematics Learning.” Educational Psychology Review 22 (3): 215–243.10.1007/s10648-010-9125-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., and S. M. Hurley. 2009. “Design Sensitivity.” Chap. 2 in The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, edited by L. Bickman and D. J. Rog, 44–76. London: Sage.10.4135/9781483348858
   Google Scholar
• Lumbelli, L., G. Paoletti, and T. Frausin. 1999. “Improving the Ability to Detect Comprehension Problems: From Revising to Writing.” Learning and Instruction 9 (2): 143–166.10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00041-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J. 1998. A Theory-based Meta-analysis of Research on Instruction. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, E., P. C. Abrami, C. A. Wade, O. Aslan, and L. Deault. 2010. “Improving Literacy and Metacognition with Electronic Portfolios: Teaching and Learning with ePEARL.” Computers and Education 55 (1): 84–91.10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, J. A., and L. H. Epstein. 1981. “Improving Oral Hygiene with Videotape Modeling.” Behavior Modification 5 (3): 360–371.10.1177/014544558153005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neenan, D. M., and D. K. Routh. 1986. “Response Cost, Reinforcement, and Children’s Porteus Maze Qualitative Performance.” Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 14 (3): 469–480.10.1007/BF00915439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, G., A. Westhues, and J. MacLeod. 2003. “A Meta-analysis of Longitudinal Research on Preschool Prevention Programs for Children.” Prevention and Treatment 6 (1): 1–67.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. 2000. “Null Hypothesis Significance Testing: A Review of an Old and Continuing Controversy.” Psychological Methods 5 (2): 241–301.10.1037/1082-989X.5.2.241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oladunni, M. O. 1998. “An Experimental Study on the Effectiveness of Metacognitive and Heuristic Problem Solving Techniques on Computational Performance of Students in Mathematics.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 29 (6): 867–874.10.1080/0020739980290608
   Google Scholar
• Paschal, R. A., T. Weinstein, and H. J. Walberg. 1984. “The Effects of Homework on Learning: A Quantitative Synthesis.” The Journal of Educational Research 78 (2): 97–104.10.1080/00220671.1984.10885581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prater, D., and A. Bermudez. 1993. “Using Peer Response Groups with Limited English Proficient Writers.” Bilingual Research Journal 17 (1–2): 99–116.10.1080/15235882.1993.10162650
   Google Scholar
• Pring, R. 2004. The Philosophy of Education. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J., C. Rolheiser, and A. Hogaboam-Gray. 1999. “Effects of Self-evaluation Training on Narrative Writing.” Assessing Writing 6 (1): 107–132.10.1016/S1075-2935(99)00003-3
   Google Scholar
• Sammons, P., K. Sylva, E. Melhuish, I. Siraj, B. Taggart, K. Toth, and R. Smees. 2014. Influences on Students’ GCSE Attainment and Progress at Age 16. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, J. M. 1970. “Research in Homework as the Motivating Factor in Reading Achievement.” Journal of Reading Behavior 3 (3): 51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. 2011. “Beneath the Skin: Statistics, Trust, and Status.” Educational Theory 61 (6): 633–645.10.1111/edth.2011.61.issue-6
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike, R. 1949. Personal Selection. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wade-Stein, D., and E. Kintsch. 2004. “Summary Street: Interactive Computer Support for Writing.” Cognition and Instruction 22 (3): 333–362.10.1207/s1532690xci2203_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserstein, R. L., and N. A. Lazar. 2016. “The ASA’s Statement on p-values: Context, Process, and Purpose.” The American Statistician 70 (2): 129–133.10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar