‘Because then you could never ever get a job!’: children’s constructions of NAPLAN as high-stakes

References

• ACARA. 2011a. My School [Web Page]. ACARA. [cited April 23, 2011]. Accessed http://www.myschool.edu.au/
   Google Scholar
• ACARA. 2011b. National Assessment Program: Statements of Learning. ACARA. [cited June 22, 2013]. Accessed http://www.nap.edu.au/naplan/statements-of-learning.html
   Google Scholar
• ACARA. 2012a. Fact Sheet: Using MySchool to Support School and Student Improvement. ACARA. Accessed http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/Fact_Sheet_-_Using_My_School_to_support_school_and_student_improvement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ACARA. 2012b. National Assessment Program Literacy and Numeracy: National Protocols for Test Administration 2012 [Web Page]. ACARA. Accessed http://www.nap.edu.au/verve/_resources/National_Protocols_for_Test_Administration_270112.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ACARA. 2013. My School: Fact Sheet. ACARA. February 2013 [cited September 12, 2013]. Accessed http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/Fact_Sheet_-_About_My_School.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ACARA. 2014. ACARA Rejects Conclusions of the Whitlam Report 2014 [cited October 20, 2014]. Accessed http://www.acara.edu.au/20140519_the_whitlam_report.html
   Google Scholar
• Albers, P. 2009. “Reading Students’ Visual Texts Created in English Language Arts Classrooms.” Language Arts Journal of Michigan 25 (1): 6–16.
   Google Scholar
• Albers, P. 2012. “Visual Discourse Analysis: What’s Critical About Pictures, Anyway?” In Reclaiming Reading: Teachers, Students and Researchers Regaining Spaces for Thinking and Action, edited by R. J. Meyer and K. Whitmore, 187–204. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. 2010. Children, Their World, Their Education: Final Report and Recommendations of the Cambridge Primary Review. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Athanasou, J. 2010. NAPLAN and MySchool Survey. Sydney: University of Technology, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Au, Wayne. 2009. “Social Studies, Social Justice: W(h)ither the Social Studies in High-stakes Testing?” Teacher Education Quarterly 36 (1): 43–58.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Senate. 2010. Senate Inquiry in the Administration and Reporting of NAPLAN Testing. Canberra: Parliament of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. 2003. “The Teacher’s Soul and the Terrors of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 18 (2): 215–228. doi:10.1080/0268093022000043065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barksdale-Ladd, M., and K. Thomas. 2000. “What’s at Stake in High-stakes Testing: Teachers and Parents Speak out.” Journal of Teacher Education 51 (5): 384–397. doi:10.1177/0022487100051005006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnor, C. 2010. What My School Really Says About Our Schools. Hawthorne: Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Callow, Jon, and Australia Primary English Teaching Association. 2013. The Shape of Text to Come. Newtown: Primary English Teaching Association Australia (PETAA).
   Google Scholar
• Comber, B., and P. Cormack. 2010. Education Policy Mediation: The World of Policy-makers, Principals and Parents with Mandated Literacy Assessment. Paper presented at the XVII World Congress of Sociology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Comber, B., and H. Nixon. 2009. “Teachers’ Work and Pedagogy in an Era of Accountability.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 30 (3): 333–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruddas, L. 2007. “Engaged Voices – Dialogic Interaction and the Construction of Shared Social Meanings.” Educational Action Research 15 (3): 479–488.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2010. The Flat World and Education: How America’s Commitment to Equity Will Determine Our Future. New York: Teachers’ College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dutro, Elizabeth, and Makenzie Selland. 2012. “‘I like to Read, but I Know I’m Not Good at It’: Children’s Perspectives on High-stakes Testing in a High-poverty School.” Curriculum Inquiry 42 (3): 340–367. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00597.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. 2002. “What Can Education Learn from the Arts About the Practice of Education?” Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 18: 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, S. 2006. “How Latino Students Negotiate the Demands of High Stakes Testing.” Dissertation, Mary Lou Fulton College of Education, Arizona State University, Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. 2005. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, Carl A. 2004. “Oppression, Privilege, and High-stakes Testing.” Multicultural Perspectives 6 (1): 3–11. doi:10.1207/S15327892mcp0601_2.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, I., and C. Boyle. 2011. “My School? Critiquing the Abstraction and Quantification of Education.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 39 (3): 211–222.10.1080/1359866X.2011.588312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayik, R. 2012. “Identity Representations in Visual Texts.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 35 (3): 293–309.10.1080/1743727X.2012.717435
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., and T. Van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. 2011. “Policy as Numbers: Ac/counting for Educational Research.” The Australian Educational Researcher 38 (4): 355–382.10.1007/s13384-011-0041-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., S. Creagh, and G. Vass. 2012. “Education Policy as Numbers: Data Categories and Two Australian Cases of Misrecognition.” Journal of Education Policy 27 (3): 315–333.10.1080/02680939.2011.605476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madge, Nicola, Keith Hawton, Elaine M. McMahon, Paul Corcoran, Diego De Leo, Erik Jan de Wilde, Sandor Fekete, Kees van Heeringen, Mette Ystgaard, and Ella Arensman. 2011. “Psychological Characteristics, Stressful Life Events and Deliberate Self-harm: Findings from the Child & Adolescent Self-harm in Europe (CASE) Study.” European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 20 (10): 499–508.10.1007/s00787-011-0210-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannion, G. 2007. “Going Spatial, Going Relational: Why ‘Listening to Children’ and Children’s Participation Needs Reframing.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 28 (3): 405–420.
   Google Scholar
• Masson, J. 2004. “The Legal Context.” In Doing Research with Children and Young People, edited by S. Fraser, V. Lewis, S. Ding, M. Kellett, and C. Robinson, 43–58. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McGaw, B. 2012. NAPLAN Myths: It’s Not a High-stakes Test. The Conversation.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C., L. Theron, J. Stuart, A. Smith, and Z. Campbell. 2011. “Drawings as Research Method.” In Picturing Research, edited by L. Theron, C. Mitchell, A. Smith, and J. Stuart, 19–36. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.10.1007/978-94-6091-596-3
   Google Scholar
• Mockler, N. 2013. “Reporting the ‘Education Revolution’: MySchool.Edu.Au in the Print Media.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 34 (1): 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, S. L., and D. C. Berliner. 2007. Collateral Damage: How High-stakes Testing Corrupts America’s Schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G. 2000. “Trojan Horse in the School Yard: The Hidden Threats in High-stakes Testing.” Issues in Education 6 (1–2):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., T. A. Lawton, J. C. Turner, and T. L. Roth. 1991. “A Developmental Perspective on Standardized Achievement Testing.” Educational Researcher 20 (5): 12–20.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reissman, C. 2008. Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, S., L. Barblett, and K. Robinson. 2016. “Investigating the Impact of NAPLAN on Student, Parent and Teacher Emotional Distress in Independent Schools.” A Publication of the Australian Association for Research in Education 43 (3): 327–343. doi:10.1007/s13384-016-0203-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segool, N. K., J. S. Carlson, A. N. Goforth, N. von der Embse, and J. A. Barterian. 2013. “Heightened Test Anxiety Among Young Children: Elementary School Students’ Anxious Responses to High-stakes Testing.” Psychology in the Schools 50 (5): 489–499. doi:10.1002/pits.21689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, C. 2015. Cutting and Self-harm, Health and Medical Issues Today. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. 2002. “Assessment Crisis: The Absence of Assessment for Learning.” Phi Delta Kappan 83 (10): 758–765.10.1177/003172170208301010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stobart, G. 2008. Testing Times: The Uses and Abuses of Assessment. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Greg, and Ian Cook. 2014. “Manipulating the Data: Teaching and NAPLAN in the Control Society.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 35 (1): 129–142. doi:10.1080/01596306.2012.739472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, G., and A. Harbaugh. 2013. “A Preliminary Analysis of Teacher Perceptions of the Effects of NAPLAN on Pedagogy and Curriculum.” The Australian Educational Researcher 40 (3): 299–314.10.1007/s13384-013-0093-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorkildsen, T. A. 1999. “The Way Tests Teach: Children’s Theories of How Much Testing is Fair in School.” In Values, Culture and Education, edited by M. Leicester, C. Modgil, and S. Modgil, 61–79. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Triplett, C., and M. Barksdale. 2005. “Third Through Sixth Graders’ Perceptions of High-stakes Testing.” Journal of Literacy Research 37 (2): 237–260.10.1207/s15548430jlr3702_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, Len, and Angela Thomas. 2014. English Teaching and New Literacies Pedagogy: Interpreting and Authoring Digital Multimedia Narratives. Vol. 61. New York: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-1-4539-1311-6
   Google Scholar
• Wheelock, A., D. Bebell, and W. Haney. 2000. What Can Drawings Tell Us About High-stakes Testing in Massachusetts? Teachers College Record. http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?contentid=10634.
   Google Scholar
• Wyn, J., M. Turnbull, and L. Grimshaw. 2014. The Experience of Education: The Impacts of High-stakes Testing on School Students and Their Families. A Qualitative Study. Melbourne: The Whitlam Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar