2,153
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Evaluative relationships: teacher accountability and professional culture

ORCID Icon
Pages 623-647 | Received 23 Mar 2018, Accepted 06 Jan 2019, Published online: 22 Jan 2019

References

  • AERA (American Educational Research Association). 2015. “AERA Statement on Use of Value-Added Models (VAM) for the Evaluation of Educators and Educator Preparation Programs.” Educational Researcher 44 (8): 448–452. doi:10.3102/0013189X15618385.
  • Allaire, Y., and M. E. Firsirotu. 1984. “Theories of Organizational Culture.” Organization Studies 5 (3): 193–226. doi:10.1177/017084068400500301.
  • Amrein-Beardsley, A., and J. Holloway. 2017. “Value-Added Models (VAMs) for Teacher Evaluation and Accountability: Commonsense Assumptions.” Educational Policy: 1–27.
  • Anderson, G., and M. I. Cohen. 2015. “Redesigning the Identities of Teachers and Leaders: A Framework for Studying New Professionalism and Educator Resistance.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 23: 85. doi:10.14507/epaa.v23.2086.
  • Avalos-Bevan, B. 2018. “Teacher Evaluation in Chile: Highlights and Complexities in 13 Years of Experience.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 24 (3): 297–311. doi:10.1080/13540602.2017.1388228.
  • Baker, B. D., J. Oluwole, and P. C. Green. 2013. “The Legal Consequences of Mandating High Stakes Decisions Based on Low Quality Information: Teacher Evaluation in the Race-To-The-Top Era.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 21: 5.
  • Balch, R., and C. Koedel. 2014. “Anticipating and Incorporating Stakeholder Feedback When Developing Value-Added Models.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 22: 97.
  • Ball, S. J. 2003. “The Teacher’s Soul and the Terrors of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 18 (2): 215–228. doi:10.1080/0268093022000043065.
  • Ball, S. J. 2016. “Neoliberal Education? Confronting the Slouching Beast.” Policy Futures in Education 14 (8): 1046–1059. doi:10.1177/1478210316664259.
  • Ball, S. J., M. Maguire, A. Braun, and K. Hoskins. 2011. “Policy Subjects and Policy Actors in Schools: Some Necessary but Insufficient Analyses.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 32 (4): 611–624.
  • Berliner, D. C. 2006. “Our Impoverished View of Educational Research.” Teachers College Record 108 (6): 949–995. doi:10.1111/tcre.2006.
  • Berliner, D. C. 2013. “Problems with Value-Added Evaluations of Teachers? Let Me Count the Ways!” The Teacher Educator 48 (4): 235–243. doi:10.1080/08878730.2013.827496.
  • Braun, A., M. Maguire, and S. J. Ball. 2010. “Policy Enactments in the UK Secondary School: Examining Policy, Practice and School Positioning.” Journal of Education Policy 25 (4): 547–560. doi:10.1080/02680931003698544.
  • Braun, H. 2015. “The Value in Value Added Depends on the Ecology.” Educational Researcher 44 (2): 127–131. doi:10.3102/0013189X15576341.
  • Buchanan, R. 2015. “Teacher Identity and Agency in an Era of Accountability.” Teachers and Teaching 21 (6): 700–719. doi:10.1080/13540602.2015.1044329.
  • Chetty, R., J. N. Friedman, and J. E. Rockoff. 2011. The Long-Term Impacts of Teachers: Teacher Value-Added and Student Outcomes in Adulthood. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Coburn, C. E. 2004. “Beyond Decoupling: Rethinking the Relationship between the Institutional Environment and the Classroom.” Sociology of Education 77 (3): 211–244. doi:10.1177/003804070407700302.
  • Coburn, C. E. 2005. “Shaping Teacher Sensemaking: School Leaders and the Enactment of Reading Policy.” Educational Policy 19 (3): 476–509. doi:10.1177/0895904805276143.
  • Coburn, C. E. 2006. “Framing the Problem of Reading Instruction: Using Frame Analysis to Uncover the Microprocesses of Policy Implementation.” American Educational Research Journal 43 (3): 343–379.
  • Cohen, J., E. M. McCabe, N. M. Michelli, and T. Pickeral. 2009. “School Climate: Research, Policy, Practice, and Teacher Education.” Teachers College Record 111 (1): 180–213.
  • Collins, C. 2014. “Houston, We Have a Problem: Teachers Find No Value in the SAS Education Value-Added Assessment System (EVAAS®).” Education Policy Analysis Archives 22: 98.
  • Conley, S., and N. S. Glasman. 2008. “Fear, the School Organization, and Teacher Evaluation.” Educational Policy 22 (1): 63–85. doi:10.1177/0895904807311297.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. 2000. “Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Review of State Policy Evidence.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 8: 1. doi:10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000.
  • DeMitchell, T. A., T. A. DeMitchell, and D. Gagnon. 2012. “Teacher Effectiveness and Value-Added Modeling: Building a Pathway to Educational Malpractice?” Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal 2: 257–301.
  • Echávarri, J., and C. Peraza. 2017. “Modernizing Schools in Mexico: The Rise of Teacher Assessment and School-Based Management Policies.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 25: 90. doi:10.14507/epaa.25.2771.
  • Englund, H., and M. Frostenson. 2017. “Managing Performance Evaluation Uncertainties in Schools: When Teachers Become Struggling Performers.” European Educational Research Journal 16 (6): 885–906. doi:10.1177/1474904117693243.
  • Evetts, J. 2011. “A New Professionalism? Challenges and Opportunities.” Current Sociology 59 (4): 406–422. doi:10.1177/0011392111402585.
  • Flores, M. A. 2018. “Teacher Evaluation in Portugal: Persisting Challenges and Perceived Effects.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 24 (3): 223–245. doi:10.1080/13540602.2018.1425677.
  • Flores, M. A., and M. L. Derrington. 2017. “School Principals’ Views of Teacher Evaluation Policy: Lessons Learned from Two Empirical Studies.” International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice 20 (4): 416–431. doi:10.1080/13603124.2015.1094144.
  • Foucault, M. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège De France 1978–1979, edited by M. Senellart, translated by G. Burchell. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
  • Goodrick, E., and T. Reay. 2011. “Constellations of Institutional Logics: Changes in the Professional Work of Pharmacists.” Work and Occupations 38 (3): 372–416. doi:10.1177/0730888411406824.
  • Hallett, T., and M. J. Ventresca. 2006. “Inhabited Institutions: Social Interactions and Organizational Forms in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy.” Theory and Society 35 (2): 213–236. doi:10.1007/s11186-006-900`.
  • Hanushek, E. A. 2011. “The Economic Value of Higher Teacher Quality.” Economics of Education Review 30 (3): 466–479. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.12.006.
  • Hewitt, K. K. 2015. “Educator Evaluation Policy that Incorporates EVAAS Value-Added Measures: Undermined Intentions and Exacerbated Inequities.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 23: 76. doi:10.14507/epaa.v23.1968.
  • Holloway, J., and J. Brass. 2017. “Making Accountable Teachers: The Terrors and Pleasures of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 33 (3): 361–382. doi:10.1080/02680939.2017.1372636.
  • Holloway-Libell, J., and C. Collins. 2014. “VAM-Based Teacher Evaluation Policies: Ideological Foundations, Policy Mechanisms, and Implications.” InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies 10: 1.
  • Betebenner, D., H. Braun, S. Corcoran, L. Darling-Hammond, J. Friedman, D. Goldhaber, and A. Ho., et al. 2012. Learning from Recent Advances in Measuring Teaching Effectiveness. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
  • Hallgren, K., S. James-Burdumy, and I. Perez-Johnson. 2014. State Requirements for Teacher Evaluation Policies Promoted by Race to the Top. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences.
  • Jennings, J. M., and J. L. Bearak. 2014. “‘Teaching to the Test’ in the NCLB Era: How Test Predictability Affects Our Understanding of Student Performance.” Educational Researcher 42 (8): 381–389. doi:10.3102/0013189X14554449.
  • Johnson, S. M. 2015. “Will VAMS Reinforce the Walls of the Egg-Crate School?” Educational Researcher 44 (2): 117–126. doi:10.3102/0013189X15573351.
  • Kainz, K., and Y. Y. Pan. 2014. “Segregated School Effects on First Grade Reading Gains: Using Propensity Score Matching to Disentangle Effects for African-American, Latino, and European-American Students.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 29 (4): 531–537. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.06.005.
  • Klenowski, V. 2012. “Raising the Stakes: The Challenges for Teacher Assessment.” Australian Educational Research 39: 173–192. doi:10.1007/s13384-012-0057-9.
  • Kraft, M. A., and J. P. Papay. 2014. “Can Professional Environments in Schools Promote Teacher Development? Explaining Heterogeneity in Returns to Teaching Experience.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 36 (4): 476–500. doi:10.3102/0162373713519496.
  • La Londe, P. G. 2017. “A Failed Marriage between Standardization and Incentivism: Divergent Perspectives on the Aims of Performance-Based Compensation in Shanghai, China.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 25: 88. doi:10.14507/epaa.25.2891.
  • Leonardatos, H., and K. Zahedi. 2014. “Accountability and ‘Racing to the Top’ in New York State: A Report from the Frontlines.” Teachers College Record 116 (9): 1–23.
  • Loewus, L. H. 2017. “Gates End Investment in Teacher Evaluation: What that Means for the Field.” Education Week, October 23.
  • Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Murphy, J., P. Hallinger, and R. H. Heck. 2013. “Leading via Teacher Evaluation: The Case of the Missing Clothes?” Educational Researcher 42 (6): 349–354. doi:10.3102/0013189X13499625.
  • Nieto, S. M. 2003. “What Keeps Teachers Going?” Educational Leadership 60 (8): 14–18.
  • Owens, A., S. F. Reardon, and C. Jencks. 2016. “Income Segregation between Schools and School Districts.” American Educational Research Journal 53 (4): 1159–1197. doi:10.3102/0002831216652722.
  • Reddy, L. A., C. M. Dudek, S. Peters, A. Alperin, R. J. Kettler, and A. Kurz. 2018. “Teachers’ and School Administrators’ Attitudes and Beliefs of Teacher Evaluation: A Preliminary Investigation of High Poverty School Districts.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability 30 (1): 47–70.
  • Riordan, J., N. Lacireno-Paquet, K. Shakman, C. Bocala, and Q. Chang. 2015. Redesigning Teacher Evaluation: Lessons from a Pilot Implementation. Washington, DC: Department of Education.
  • Rodgers, C. R., and K. H. Scott. 2008. “The Development of the Personal Self and Professional Identity in Learning to Teach.” In Handbook of Research on Teacher Education: Enduring Questions in Changing Contexts, edited by M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D.J. McIntyre, and K.E. Demers, 732–756. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Sachs, J. 2001. “Teacher Professional Identity: Competing Discourses, Competing Outcomes.” Journal of Education Policy 16 (2): 149–161. doi:10.1080/02680930116819.
  • Sawchuk, S. 2015. “Teacher Evaluation Heads to the Courts.” Education Week, October 6.
  • Sawchuk, S. 2016. “ESSA Loosens Reins on Teacher Evaluations, Qualifications.“ Education Week, January 5.
  • Schwarz, G. E. 2015. “CAEP Advanced Standards and the Future of Graduate Programs: The False Sense of Techne.” Teacher Education Quarterly 42: 105–117.
  • Spillane, J. P. 2006. Standards Deviation: How Schools Misunderstand Education Policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Stoll, L., R. Bolam, A. McMahon, M. Wallace, and S. Thomas. 2006. “Professional Learning Communities: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Educational Change 7 (4): 221–258. doi:10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8.
  • Straubhaar, R. 2017. “The ‘Power’ of Value-Added Thinking: Exploring the Implementation of High-Stakes Teacher Accountability Policies in Rio De Janeiro.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 25: 91. doi:10.14507/epaa.25.3034.
  • Superfine, B. M. 2013. Equality in Education Law and Policy: 1954–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tatto, M. T. 2006. “Education Reform and the Global Regulation of Teachers’ Education, Development and Work: A Cross-Cultural Analysis.” International Journal of Educational Research 45 (4–5): 231–241. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2007.02.003.
  • Thornton, P. H., and W. Ocasio. 2008. “Institutional Logics.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, and K. Sahlin-Andersson, 99–129. London: Sage.
  • Verger, A., and M. Curran. 2014. “New Public Management as a Global Education Policy: Its Adoption and Re-Contextualization in a Southern European Setting.” Critical Studies in Education 55 (3): 253–271. doi:10.1080/17508487.2014.913531.
  • Warren, A. N., and N. A. Ward. 2018. “‘This Is My New Normal’: Teachers’ Accounts of Evaluation Policy at Local School Board Meetings.” Journal of Education Policy 33 (6): 840–860. doi:10.1080/02680939.2017.1390164.
  • Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.