Marketized education: how regulatory failure undermined the Swedish school system

References

• Academedia. 2017. “Årsredovisning 2016/17.” [Financial Statement 2016/17.] Accessed April 17 2019. https://corporate.academedia.se/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/rsredovisning201617-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aftonbladet. 2007. “Skolorna slåss om gymnasieeleverna.” [Schools Fight over Secondary School Students.] Aftonbladet, October 24. Accessed 17 April 2019. http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/article11278805.ab
   Google Scholar
• Ahlin, Å. 2003. “Does School Competition Matter? Effects of a Large-Scale School Choice Reform on Student Performance.” Working Paper. Uppsala: Uppsala University. https://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:129247/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ask, B. 1990. “Tankeväckande om skolan.” [Thought-Provoking about School.] Svensk Tidskrift 6: 367.
   Google Scholar
• Ask, B. 1992. “Hård kvalitetskontroll på friskolor.” [Tough Quality Control of Independent Schools.] Svenska Dagbladet, April 5.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 1994. “What Is Policy? Text, Trajectories and Toolboxes.” Discourse 13 (2): 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2007. Education Plc: Understanding Private Sector Participation in Public Sector Education. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bertoni, M., G. Brunello, and L. Rocco. 2013. “When the Cat Is Near, the Mice Won‘t Play: The Effect of External Examiners in Italian Schools.” Journal of Public Economics 104 (August): 65–77. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, J., and J. Grogger. 2003. “The Impact of Grading Standards on Student Achievement, Educational Attainment, and Entry-Level Earnings.” Economics of Education Review 22 (4): 343–352. doi:10.1016/S0272-7757(02)00059-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björklund, A., P.-A. Edin, P. Fredriksson, and A. Krueger. 2004. Education, Equality and Efficiency – An Analysis of Swedish School Reforms during the 1990s. Uppsala: Institute for Labor Market Policy Evaluation (IFAU).
   Google Scholar
• Blomqvist, P. 2004. “The Choice Revolution: Privatization of Swedish Welfare Services in the 1990s.” Social Policy & Administration 38 (2): 139–155. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2004.00382.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhlmark, A., and M. Lindahl. 2015. “Independent Schools and Long-Run Educational Outcomes: Evidence from Sweden’s Large-Scale Voucher Reform.” Economica 82 (327): 508–551. doi:10.1111/ecca.2015.82.issue-327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnesrönning, H. 2004a. “Can Effective Teacher Behavior Be Identified?” Economics of Education Review 23 (3): 237–247. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2003.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnesrönning, H. 2004b. “Do the Teachers’ Grading Practices Affect Student Achievement?” Education Economics 12 (2): 151–167. doi:10.1080/0964529042000239168.
   Google Scholar
• Borcan, O., M. Lindahl, and A. Mitrut. 2014. “The Impact of an Unexpected Wage Cut on Corruption: Evidence from a ‘Xeroxed’ Exam.” Journal of Public Economics 120 (December): 32–47. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, S. 2016. The Moral Economy: Why Good Incentives are No Substitute for Good Citizens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, E., and M. V. Makris. 2018. “A Different Type of Charter School: In Prestige Charters, a Rise in Cachet Equals a Decline in Access.” Journal of Education Policy 33 (1): 85–117. doi:10.1080/02680939.2017.1341552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulle, N. 2011. “Comparing OECD Educational Models through the Prism of PISA.” Comparative Education 47 (4): 503–521. doi:10.1080/03050068.2011.555117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, B. 2018. The Case against Education: Why the Education System Is a Waste of Time and Money. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carnoy, M. 1998. “National Voucher Plans in Chile and Sweden: Did Privatization Reforms Make for Better Education?” Comparative Education Review 42 (3): 309–337. doi:10.1086/447510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for the Study of Public Policy. 1970. Educational Vouchers. Report Prepared for the U.S. Office of Economic Opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Center for the Study of Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Laegrid. 2007. Transcending New Public Management: The Transformation of Public Sector Reform. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Claassen, R. 2016. “Externalities as a Basis for Regulation: A Philosophical View.” Journal of Institutional Economics 12 (3): 541–563. doi:10.1017/S1744137415000491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denhardt, J. V., and R. B. Denhardt. 2015. The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. 4th ed. New York, NY & London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2018. How to Apply to Set up a Mainstream Free School. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• DeVos, B. 2018. “Prepared Remarks by U.S. Education Secretary Betsy DeVos to the American Enterprise Institute.” Accessed 4 March 2018. https://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/prepared-remarks-us-education-secretary-betsy-devos-american-enterprise-institute
   Google Scholar
• Dulleck, U., and R. Kerschbamer. 2006. “On Doctors, Mechanics, and Computer Specialists: The Economics of Credence Goods.” Journal of Economic Literature 44 (1): 5–42. doi:10.1257/002205106776162717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dynarski, M. 2016. On Negative Effects of Vouchers. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Ebenstein, L. 2014. “The Increasingly Libertarian Milton Friedman: An Ideological Profile.” Econ Journal Watch 11 (1): 81–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggertsson, T. 2005. Imperfect Institutions: Possibilities and Limits of Reform. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ekonomifakta. 2018. “Friskolor i Sverige.” [Independent Schools in Sweden.] Accessed 19 March 2018. https://www.ekonomifakta.se/Fakta/Valfarden-i-privat-regi/Skolan-i-privat-regi/Antal-friskolor-i-Sverige/
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2001. “Critical Discourse Analysis as a Method in Social Scientific Research.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 121–138. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Figlio, D., and M. Lucas. 2004. “Do High Grading Standards Affect Student Performance?” Journal of Public Economics 88 (9–10): 1815–1834. doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00039-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. R., and F. O. Andersson. 2016. “Determinants of Organizational Failure in the Milwaukee School Voucher Program.” Policy Studies Journal. doi:10.1111/psj.12164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsstedt, S. 2018. Tänk efter före! En ESO-rapport om samhällsekonomiska konsekvensanalyser. Rapport till Expertgruppen för studier i offentlig ekonomi 2018:5 [Think Before You Act!]. Stockholm: Ministry of Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, R. H. 2012. The Darwin Economy: Liberty, Competition, and the Common Good. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, P., and J. Vlachos. 2011. Reformer och resultat: kommer regeringens utbildningsreformer att ha någon betydelse? [Reforms and Results: Will the Government‘s Educational Reforms Have Any Significance?] Stockholm: Finanspolitiska rådet.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1955. “The Role of Government in Education.” In Economics and the Public Interest, edited by R. A. Solo, 123–144. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1962/2002. Capitalism and Freedom: Fortieth Anniversary Edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M., and R. Friedman. 1980. Free to Choose: A Personal Statement. London: Pelican.
   Google Scholar
• Gibton, D. 2016. Researching Education Policy, Public Policy, and Policymakers: Qualitative Methods and Ethical Issues. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Government Bill. 1990/91:115. Om vissa skollagsfrågor m m[Certain Issues in School Law]. Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Government Bill. 1990/91:18. Om ansvaret för skolan[The Responsibility for Schooling]. Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Government Bill. 1991/92:95. Om valfrihet och fristående skolor[Freedom of Choice and Independent Schools]. Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Government Bill. 1992/93:230. Valfrihet i skolan[Freedom of Choice in Schooling]. Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Government Bill. 1995/96:200. Fristående skolor m m[Independent Schools]. Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, J.-E., S. Sörlin, and J. Vlachos. 2016. Policyidéer för svensk skola[Policy Ideas for the Swedish School System]. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, L. R. 2012. What Did You Learn in School Today? How Ideas Mattered for Policy Changes in Danish and Swedish Schools 1990–2011. Aarhus: Politica.
   Google Scholar
• Haldén, E. 1997. Ett centralt ämbetsverk i omvandling – från Skolöverstyrelsen till Skolverket[A Central Agency in Change—From the Swedish National Board of Education to the Swedish National Agency for Education]. Stockholm: Stockholm Center for Organizational Research, SCORE.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., P. E. Peterson, and L. Woessman. 2012. Achievement Growth: International and U.S. State Trends in Student Performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Program on Education Policy and Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Harling, M. 2017. Välja vara: en studie om gymnasieval, mässor och kampen om framtiden[Choosing Subjects: A Study on Upper Secondary School Choice, School Fairs, and the Battle for the Future]. Linköping: Linköpings universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, O., A. Schleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1997. “The Proper Scope of Government: Theory and an Application to Prisons.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (4): 1127–1161. doi:10.1162/003355300555448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., and Y. Rubenstein. 2001. “The Importance of Noncognitive Skills: Lessons from the GED Testing Program.” The American Economic Review 91 (2): 145–149. doi:10.1257/aer.91.2.145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller Sahlgren, G. 2015a. “Invandringen och Sveriges resultatfall i PISA.” [Immigration and Sweden’s Decline in PISA.] IFN Policy Paper No. 71. Stockholm: Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN). https://www.ifn.se/publikationer/policy_papers/2015/71
   Google Scholar
• Heller Sahlgren, G. 2015b. Real Finnish Lessons: The True Story of an Education Superpower. London: Centre for Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Hellman, J. 1993. “En oåterkallelig skolreform.” [An Irreversible School Reform.] Svenska Dagbladet, June 8.
   Google Scholar
• Henrekson, M. 2017. Skolans problem: fallande kunskaper och flykten från läraryrket. [The Problem of School: Declining Knowledge and the Flight from the Teaching Profession.] In Kunskapssynen och pedagogiken: varför skolan slutade leverera och hur det kan åtgärdas[The View of Knowledge and the Pedagogy: Why the School System is Failing to Deliver and What Can Be Done About It], edited by M. Henrekson, 26–64. Stockholm: Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Henrekson, M., and J. Wennström. Forthcoming. “'Post-Truth' Schooling and Marketized Education: Explaining the Decline in Sweden's School Quality.“ Journal of Institutional Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Henrekson, M., and S.Jävervall. 2017. Educational Performance in Swedish Schools Is Plummeting – What are the Facts? Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, F. M. 2008. “The Supply Side of School Reform.” Phi Delta Kappan 90 (3): 211–217. doi:10.1177/003172170809000311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. 2006. “What Are Institutions?” Journal of Economic Issues 40 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. 2013. From Pleasure Machines to Moral Communities: An Evolutionary Economics without Homo Economicus. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmlund, H., J. Häggblom, E. Lindahl, S. Martinson, A. Sjögren, U. Vikman, and Ö. Björn. 2014. Decentralisering och fristående skolor: resultat och likvärdighet i svensk skola[Decentralization and Independent Schools: Results and Equality in Swedish Schools]. Uppsala: Institute for Labor Market Policy Evaluation (IFAU).
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., and G. Peters. 2004. “The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox?” Journal of Administration Research and Theory: J-PART 14 (3): 267–282. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hörnqvist, B. 2012. Utveckling av ungas kompetenser för framtiden: en översikt över internationella initiativ[Development of Young People‘s Competencies for the Future: A Survey of International Initiatives]. Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Jerrim, J. 2018. “A Digital Divide? Randomised Evidence on the Impact of Computer-Based Assessment in PISA.” CfEE Research Brief. London: Centre for Education Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Jordahl, H., and R. Öhrvall. 2013. “Nationella reformer och lokala initiativ.” [National Reforms and Local Initiatives.] In Välfärdstjänster i privat regi: framväxt och drivkrafter[Private Welfare: Origins and Incentives], edited by H. Jordahl, 33–87. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, W., M. E. Streit, and P. J. Boettke. 2013. Institutional Economics: Property, Competition, Policies. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Klitgaard, M. B. 2008. “School Vouchers and the New Politics of the Welfare State.” Governance 21 (4): 479–498. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00410.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komatsu, H., and J. Rappleye. 2017. “Did the Shift to Computer-Based Testing in PISA 2015 Affect Reading Scores? A View from East Asia.” Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 47 (4): 616–623. doi:10.1080/03057925.2017.1309864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornhall, P. 2013. Barnexperimentet: svensk skola i fritt fall[The Child Experiment: Swedish Schools in Free Fall]. Stockholm: Leopard förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner, S., and K. B. Christensen. 2014. “Analyses of Model Fit and Robustness. A New Look at the PISA Scaling Model Underlying Ranking of Countries according to Reading Literacy.” Psychometrika 79 (2): 210–231. doi:10.1007/s11336-013-9347-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Grand, J., and W. Bartlett. 1993. “The Theory of Quasi Markets.” In Quasi Markets and Social Policy, edited by J. Le Grand and W. Bartlett, 13–34. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Leavy, P. 2017. Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, H. M. 2002. “A Comprehensive Framework for Evalutating Educational Vouchers.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24 (3): 159–174. doi:10.3102/01623737024003159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, S. D., and B. A. Jacob. 2003. “Rotten Apples: An Investigation of the Prevalence and Predictors of Teacher Cheating.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (3): 843–877. doi:10.1162/00335530360698441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, L. 2014. Staten får inte abdikera – om kommunaliseringen av den svenska skolan. Betänkande av Utredningen om skolans kommunalisering. SOU 2014:5 [The State Cannot Abdicate – The Municipalization of Sweden‘s Schools. Official Report of the Swedish Government]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Lindbeck, A. 1995. “Hazardous Welfare-State Dynamics.” American Economic Review 85 (2): 9–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindbeck, A., and S. Nyberg. 2006. “Raising Children to Work Hard: Altruism, Work Norms, and Social Insurance.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 121 (4): 1473–1503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfbom, E., and P. Sonnerby. 2015. Utbildning för framtidens arbetsmarknad: Bilaga 5 till Långtidsutredningen 2015. SOU 1015:90[Education for the Future Labor Market]. Stockholm: Elanders Sverige AB.
   Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C. 2003. “Innovation in Education Markets: Theory and Evidence on the Impact of Competition and Choice in Charter Schools.” American Educational Research Journal 40 (2): 395–443. doi:10.3102/00028312040002395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, T . 2008. “Beyond the Free Market: The Structure of School Choice.” BYU Law Review 13 (2): 557–592.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. 2008. “Snowball Sampling.” In The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, edited by L. Given, 816–817. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., M. O. Martin, P. Foy, and A. Arora. 2012. TIMSS 2011 International Results in Mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, C. 2008. Real Education: Four Simple Truths for Bringing America‘s Schools Back to Reality. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neuding, P. 2017. “Skräpmat nytt sätt för friskolor att locka elever.” [Junk Food a New Way for Independent Schools to Attract Students.] Dagens Samhälle, June 26. Accessed 17 April 2019. https://www.dagenssamhalle.se/kronika/skrapmat-nytt-satt-friskolor-att-locka-elever-17745
   Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. 2014. How Markets Work and Fail, and What to Make of Them. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013a. OECD Skills Outlook 2013: First Results from the Survey of Adult Skills. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013b. PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do: Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (Volume I). Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015. Improving Schools in Sweden: An OECD Perspective. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, R. 2009. A Failure of Capitalism: The Crisis of ‘08 and the Descent into Depression. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rajan, R. 2010. Fault Lines: How Hidden Fractures Still Threaten the World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ratnapala, S. 2006. “Moral Capital and Commercial Society.” In The Challenge of Liberty: Classical Liberalism Today, edited by R. Higgs and C. P. Close, 97–119. Oakland, CA: Independent Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Reinfeldt, F. 2015. Halvvägs[Halfway]. Stockholm: Alberts Bonniers Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ringarp, J. 2011. Professionens problematik: Lärarkårens kommunalisering och välfärdsstatens förvandling[The Problem of the Profession: The Municipalization of the Teaching Profession and the Revamping of the Welfare State]. Stockholm: Makadam.
   Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, L. 2017. “From National Policy-Making to Global Edu-Business: Swedish Edu-Preneurs on the Move.” Journal of Education Policy 32 (2): 234–249. doi:10.1080/02680939.2016.1268725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandel, M. J. 2012. What Money Can‘t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Sandström, M., and F.Bergström. 2005. “School Vouchers in Practice: Competition Will Not Hurt You.” Journal of Public Economics 89 (2–3): 351–380. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. R., and M. Lipsky. 1993. Nonprofits for Hire: The Welfare State in the Age of Contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svenska Dagbladet. 1991. “Många vill jobba på Skolverket.” [Many Want to Work at the Swedish National Agency for Education.] August 16.
   Google Scholar
• Svenska Dagbladet. 1993a. “Makten till föräldrarna.” [Power to the Parents.] June 3.
   Google Scholar
• Svenska Dagbladet. 1993b. “Valfrihet skolministerns ledstjärna.” [Freedom of Choice Is the Minister‘s Lodestar.] April 8.
   Google Scholar
• Svenska Dagbladet. 1994a. “Bör bra skolor ge höga betyg?” [Should Good Schools Give High Grades?] January 18.
   Google Scholar
• Svenska Dagbladet. 1994b. “Profilering även i kommunal skola.” [Public Schools Should Also Have a “Profile”.] January24.
   Google Scholar
• Svenska Dagbladet. 2009. “Elever på friskolor får bättre datorer.” [Students at Independent Schools Have Superior Computers.] April 17. Accessed 19 March 2018. http://www.svd.se/elever-pa-friskolor-far-battre-datorer
   Google Scholar
• Svenska Dagbladet: Utbildning & Vetenskap. 1994. “Ut Med Katedern!” [Out with the Lectern!] February 23.
   Google Scholar
• Svenskt Kvalitetsindex. 2015. Samhällsservice 2015[Social Services 2015]. Stockholm: Svenskt Kvalitetsindex.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Law. 2010:800. Skollag [School Law]. Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. 1994. Läroplan för det obligatoriska skolväsendet, förekoleklassen och fritidshemmet Lpo 94[National Curriculum 1994]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. 1996. Grundskola för bildning[Primary School with Enlightenment]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. 2005. Nationella prov i gymnasieskolan – ett stöd för likvärdig betygsättning[Standardized Tests in Secondary School — Supporting Equal Grading]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. 2014a. “Nästan alla grundskoleelever fortsätter till gymnasieskolan.” [Almost All Primary School Students Go on to Secondary School.] Accessed 10 September 2018. https://www.skolverket.se/statistik-och-utvardering/nyhetsarkiv/nyheter-2014/nastan-alla-grundskoleelever-fortsatter-till-gymnasieskolan-1.223182
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. 2014b. “Varför deltar Sverige i internationella studier?” [Why Does Sweden Participate in International Studies?] Accessed September 10 2018. http://www.skolverket.se/statistik-och-utvardering/internationella-studier/varfor-deltar-sverige-i-internationella-studier-1.202314
   Google Scholar
• Toh, Y., D. Hung, P. Chua, H. Sujin, and A. Jamaludin. 2016. “Pedagogical Reforms within A Centralised-Decentralised System: A Singapore’s Perspective to Diffuse 21st Century Learning Innovations.” International Journal of Educational Management 30 (7): 1247–1267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyrefors Hinnerich, B., and J. Vlachos. 2013. “Systematiska skillnader mellan interna och externa bedömare av nationella prov – en uppföljningsrapport.” [Systematic Differences between Internal and External Graders of Standardized Tests.] In Olikheterna är för stora. Omrättning av nationella prov i grundskolan och gymnasieskolan, 2013: Resultatbilaga[The Differences are Too Great. Re-Grading of Standardized Tests in Primary and Secondary School], edited by Swedish Schools Inspectorate, 86–138. Stockholm: Skolinspektionen.
   Google Scholar
• Tyrefors Hinnerich, B., and J. Vlachos. 2017. “The Impact of Upper-Secondary Voucher School Attendance on Student Achievement: Swedish Evidence Using External and Internal Evaluations.” Labour Economics47 (August): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Verger, A., C. Fontdevila, and A. Zancajo. 2016. The Privatization of Education: A Political Economy of Global Education Reform. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vlachos, J. 2010. Betygets värde: en analys av hur konkurrens påverkar betygssättningen vid svenska skolor[The Value of the Grade: An Analysis of How Competition Affects Grading in Swedish Schools] Stockholm: Swedish Competition Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Vlachos, J. 2012. “Är vinst och konkurrens en bra modell för skolan?” [Is Profit and Competition a Good Model for Schools?] Ekonomisk debatt 40 (4): 16–30.
   Google Scholar
• Wennström, J. 2016. “A Left/Right Convergence on the New Public Management? The Unintended Power of Diverse Ideas.” Critical Review 28 (3–4): 380–403. doi:10.1080/08913811.2016.1234158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikström, C. 2005. “Grade Stability in a Criterion-Referenced Grading System: The Swedish Example.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 12 (2): 125–144.
   Google Scholar
• Wikström, C. 2006. “Education and Assessment in Sweden.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 13 (1): 113–128.
   Google Scholar
• Wikström, C., and M Wikström. 2005. “Grade Inflation and School Competition: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Swedish Upper Secondary Schools.” Economics of Education Review 24 (3): 309–322. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar