An exploration of spillover effects: evidence from threat-induced education reform

References

• Adler, E. S., and J. Wilkerson. 2017. “Congressional Bills Project: (1947–2014).” National Science Foundation. http://www.congressionalbills.org/
   Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny. 1986. “The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., and B. D. Jones. 2015. The Politics of Information: Problem Definition and the Course of Public Policy in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. 2009. “Writing the World: Disciplinary History and Beyond.” International Affairs 85 (1): 3–22. doi:10.1111/inta.2009.85.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, S. 2003. Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, S. 2014. Polarized We Govern? Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, A., M. Maguire, and S. J. Ball. 2010. “Policy Enactments in the UK Secondary School: Examining Policy, Practice and School Positioning.” Journal of Education Policy 25 (4): 547–560. doi:10.1080/02680931003698544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C. G., F. M. Hess, D. K. Lautzenheiser, and I. Owen. 2011. “State Education Agencies as Agents of Change: What It Will Take for the States to Step up on Education Reform.” Washington, D.C.: Center for American Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2018. “Unadjusted Unemployment Rate.” https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU04000000?periods=Annual+Data&periods_option=specific_periods&years_option=all_years
   Google Scholar
• Clowse, B. B. 1982. “Brainpower for the Cold War: The Sputnik Crisis and National Defense Education Act of 1958.” The Journal of American History 69 (3): 770–771. doi:10.2307/1903244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Vogel, L., and M. Michael. 2009. “New Approaches to Understanding Federal Involvement in Education.” In Handbook of Education Policy Research, edited by Gary Sykes, Barbara Schneider, David N. Plank,  735–748. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, G. 2007. “See Government Grow: Education Politics from Johnson to Reagan, Kan.” University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Debray, E. H. 2006. Politics, Ideology, and Education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defense. 2017. “Personnel, Workforce Reports & Publications.” https://www.dmdc.osd.mil/appj/dwp/dwp_reports.jsp
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1972. “Up and down with Ecology: The Issue-Attention Cycle.” The Public Interest 28: 38–50.
   Google Scholar
• Dudziak, M. L. 2011. Cold War Civil Rights: Race and the Image of American Democracy. NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geys, B. 2010. “Wars, Presidents, and PopularityThe Political Cost(s) of War Re-Examined.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74 (2): 357–374. doi:10.1093/poq/nfq001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellevik, O. 2009. “Linear versus Logistic Regression When the Dependent Variable Is a Dichotomy.” Quality & Quantity 43 (1): 59–74. doi:10.1007/s11135-007-9077-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henig, J. R. 2013. The End of Exceptionalism in American Education: The Changing Politics of School Reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, F. M. 2008. When Education Research Matters. Education Outlook, No. 1. Washington, D.C.:American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Heymann, M., and J. Martin‐Nielsen. 2013. “Introduction: Perspectives on Cold War Science in Small European States.” Centaurus 55 (3): 221–242. doi:10.1111/1600-0498.12026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, S., and C. L. Bosk. 1988. “The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model.” American Journal of Sociology 94 (1): 53–78. doi:10.1086/228951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, W. G., and A. Magazinnik. 2017. “Presidential Prescriptions for State Policy: Obama’s Race to the Top Initiative.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 36 (3): 502–531. doi:10.1002/pam.21986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. 1998. “Predictable and Unpredictable Policy Windows: Institutional and Exogenous Correlates of Canadian Federal Agenda-Setting.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 31 (3): 495–524. doi:10.1017/S0008423900009100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D., and F. R. Baumgartner. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Update Edition, with an Epilogue on Health Care. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Kirst, M., and F. Wirt. 2009. The Political Dynamics of American Education - 4th. 4th ed. Richmond, CA: McCutchan Pub Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Krige, J. 2008. American Hegemony and the Postwar Reconstruction of Science in Europe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. 2001. “Paige Predicts Education Accord.” Dallas Morning News, November 1.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, S. W. 1993. “The Cold War and American Science: The Military-Industrial-Academic Complex at MIT and Stanford.” New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipman, P. 2013. “Economic Crisis, Accountability, and the State’s Coercive Assault on Public Education in the USA.” Journal of Education Policy 28 (5): 557–573. doi:10.1080/02680939.2012.758816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Xinsheng, Eric Lindquist, and Arnold Vedlitz. 2016. “Explaining Media and Congressional Attention to Global Climate Change, 1969-2005: An Empirical Test of Agenda-Setting Theory.” Political Research Quarterly, 64 (2): 405–419.
   Google Scholar
• Loss, C. P. 2012. Between Citizens and the State: The Politics of American Higher Education in the 20th Century. NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manna, P. 2006. School’s In: Federalism and the National Education Agenda. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manna, P. 2010. Collision Course: Federal Education Policy Meets State and Local Realities. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, D. R. 2011. Partisan Balance: Why Political Parties Don’t Kill the US Constitutional System. NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGuinn, P. J. 2006. No Child Left behind and the Transformation of Federal Education Policy, 1965–2005. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, J. 2015. The Allure of Order: High Hopes, Dashed Expectations, and the Troubled Quest to Remake American Schooling. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mettler, S. 2016. “The Policyscape and the Challenges of Contemporary Politics to Policy Maintenance.” Perspectives on Politics 14 (2): 369–390. doi:10.1017/S1537592716000074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy, S., and R. Lakshminarayana. 2006. “Mental Health Consequences of War: A Brief Review of Research Findings.” World Psychiatry 5 (1): 25–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, N., and J. G. Cibulka. 2014. “Religious Faith and Policy in Public Education: A Political and Historical Analysis of the Christian Right in American Schooling.” In Handbook of Education Politics and Policy, edited by B. S. Cooper, J. G. Cibulka, and L. D. Fusarelli, 267–283. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• NCES. 1972. “Statistics of State School Systems.” Washington, D.C. https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/000907427
   Google Scholar
• NCES. 1995. “Table 154. Revenues for Public Elementary and Secondary Schools, by Source of Funds: 1919–20 to 1992–93.” Washington, D.C. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d95/dtab154.asp
   Google Scholar
• NCES. 2004. “Table 129. SAT Score Averages of College-Bound Seniors, by Sex: 1966–67 to 2003–04.” Washington, D.C. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d04/tables/dt04_129.asp
   Google Scholar
• NCES. 2015. “Table 235.10. Revenues for Public Elementary and Secondary Schools, by Source of Funds: Selected Years, 1919–20 through 2012–13.” Washington, D.C. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d15/tables/dt15_235.10.asp?current=yes
   Google Scholar
• NCES. 2017. “Table 235.10. Revenues for Public Elementary and Secondary Schools, by Source of Funds: Selected Years, 1919–20 through 2014–15.” Washington, D.C. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d17/tables/dt17_235.10.asp?current=yes
   Google Scholar
• NEA Archives. 2018. Estimates of School Statistics. Washington, D.C.: George Washington University. https://library.gwu.edu/scrc/collections/nea
   Google Scholar
• New York Times. 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/
   Google Scholar
• Orren, K., and S. Skowronek. 2004. The Search for American Political Development. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–267. doi:10.2307/2586011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Policy Agendas Project. 2015a. “Gallup’s Most Important Problem.” University of Texas at Austin. http://www.comparativeagendas.net/us
   Google Scholar
• Policy Agendas Project. 2015b. “Hearings.” University of Texas at Austin. http://www.comparativeagendas.net/us
   Google Scholar
• Policy Agendas Project. 2015c. “New York Times Index Data Codebook.” University of Texas at Austin. https://www.comparativeagendas.net/us
   Google Scholar
• Policy Agendas Project. 2015d. “State of the Union.” University of Texas at Austin. http://www.comparativeagendas.net/us
   Google Scholar
• Policy Agendas Project. 2015e. “Topics Codebook.” University of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Polikoff, M. S., A. J. McEachin, S. L. Wrabel, and M. Duque. 2014. “The Waive of the Future? School Accountability in the Waiver Era.” Educational Researcher 43 (1): 45–54. doi:10.3102/0013189X13517137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, K., and H. Rosenthal. 2016. “NOMINATE Ideology Data.” voteview.com
   Google Scholar
• Press, CQ. 2017. “Congressional Quarterly Almanac.” Washington, D.C. https://library.cqpress.com/cqalmanac/.
   Google Scholar
• Radin, B. A., and W. D. Hawley. 1988. The Politics of Federal Reorganization: Creating the US Department of Education. Oxford, England: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Robelen, E. W. 2001. “Amid Crisis, Outlook for ESEA Overhaul Unclear - Education Week.” Education Week, September 26.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelsohn, D., and D. Vinik. 2015. “No Child Left Behind: The Oral History.” The Agenda, September 23. https://www.politico.com/agenda/story/2015/09/no-child-left-behind-education-law-history-000241
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T. 1995. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, G. B. 2015. “Education as Recovery: Neoliberalism, School Reform, and the Politics of Crisis.” Journal of Education Policy 30 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1080/02680939.2014.904930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stimson, J. 2016a. “Education Policy Mood.” policyagendas.org.
   Google Scholar
• Stimson, J. 2016b. “Public Policy Mood, Annual 1952–2016.” University of North Carolina. http://stimson.web.unc.edu/data/
   Google Scholar
• The College Board. 2018. “Equivalence Tables.” https://research.collegeboard.org/programs/sat/data/equivalence
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, N. C. 1975. “Education in National Politics.” https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED109781
   Google Scholar
• Torreon, B. S. 2017. Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad, 1798–2017. Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42738.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tyack, D., and L. Cuban. 1995. Tinkering Toward Utopia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2017. “Real Gross Domestic Product.” FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDPC1
   Google Scholar
• UCDP/PRIO. 2016. “Armed Conflict Dataset.” http://ucdp.uu.se/downloads/
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. L. 1977. “Setting the Agenda in the US Senate: A Theory of Problem Selection.” British Journal of Political Science 7 (4): 423–445. doi:10.1017/S0007123400001101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, P. 1990. “Agenda, Power and Text: The Formulation of Policy in School Councils.” Journal of Education Policy 5 (4): 315–331. doi:10.1080/0268093900050402.
   Google Scholar
• Wirtz, W., and H. Howe. 1977. “On Further Examination: Report of the Advisory Panel on the Scholastic Aptitute Test Score Decline.” Princeton, NJ: College Board.
   Google Scholar