445
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

‘Gaming’ in the English primary school: ‘do whatever you need to do to make your data look good’

Received 13 Sep 2022, Accepted 23 May 2024, Published online: 30 May 2024

References

  • Amrein-Beardsley, A. 2014. Rethinking Value-Added Models in Education: Critical Perspectives on Tests and Assessment-Based Accountability. New York: Routledge.
  • Astle, J. 2017. The Ideal School Exhibition. Accessed February 27, 2023. https://www.thersa.org/discover/publications-and-articles/reports/the-ideal-school-exhibition.
  • Baird, J., D. Andrich, T. Hopfenbeck, and G. Stobart. 2017. “Assessment and Learning: Fields Apart?” Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice 24 (3): 317–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1319337.
  • Ball, S. J. 2003. “The Teacher’s Soul and the Terrors of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 18 (2): 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043065.
  • Bazeley, P. 2009. “Analysing Qualitative Data: More Than ‘Identifying Themes’.” Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research 2 (2): 6–22.
  • BERA. 2018. Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. London: BERA. Accessed February 27, 2023. https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018.
  • Bew, L. P. 2011. Independent Review of KS2 Testing, Assessment and Accountability. London: TSO.
  • Biesta, G. 2009. “Good Education in an Age of Measurement: On the Need to Reconnect with the Question of Purpose in Education.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21 (1): 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9064-9.
  • Bradbury, A. 2018. “The Impact of the Phonics Screening Check on Grouping by Ability: A ‘Necessary Evil’ Amid the Policy Storm.” British Educational Research Journal 44 (4): 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3449.
  • Bradbury, A. 2019. “Datafied at Four: The Role of Data in the ‘Schoolification’of Early Childhood Education in England.” Learning, Media and Technology 44 (1): 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1511577.
  • Bradbury, A., A. Braun, and L. Quick. 2021. “Intervention Culture, Grouping and Triage: High-Stakes Tests and Practices of Division in English Primary Schools.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 42 (2): 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2021.1878873.
  • Bradbury, A., and G. Roberts-Holmes. 2017. “Creating an Ofsted Story: The Role of Early Years Assessment Data in Schools’ Narratives of Progress.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 38 (7): 943–955. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2016.1202748.
  • Brady, J., and E. Wilson. 2021. “Teacher Wellbeing in England: Teacher Responses to School-Level Initiatives.” Cambridge Journal of Education 51 (1): 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2020.1775789.
  • Brathwaite, J. 2017. “Neo-Liberal Education Reform and the Perpetuation of Inequality.” Critical Sociology 43 (3): 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920516649418.
  • Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  • Braun, A., and M. Maguire. 2020. “Doing without Believing–Enacting Policy in the English Primary School.” Critical Studies in Education 61 (4): 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2018.1500384.
  • Braun, A., M. Maguire, and S. J. Ball. 2010. “Policy Enactments in the UK Secondary School: Examining Policy, Practice and School Positioning.” Journal of Education Policy 25 (4): 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680931003698544.
  • Brill, F., H. Grayson, L. Kuhn, and S. O’Donnell. 2018. What Impact Does Accountability Have on Curriculum, Standards and Engagement in Education? A Literature Review. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
  • Carter, J. 2020. “The Assessment Has Become the Curriculum: Teachers’ Views on the Phonics Screening Check in England.” British Educational Research Journal 46 (3): 593–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3598.
  • Coldwell, M., and B. Willis. 2017. “Tests as Boundary Signifiers: Level 6 Tests and the Primary Secondary Divide.” The Curriculum Journal 28 (4): 578–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2017.1330220.
  • Dann, R. 2016. “Understanding and Enhancing Pupils’ Learning Progress in Schools in Deprived Communities.” Education 44 (1): 19–31. 3-13 https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.1122319.
  • Department for Education. 2010. “The Importance of Teaching: The Schools White Paper 2010.” Accessed February 27, 2023. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-importance-of-teaching-the-schools-white-paper-2010.
  • Department for Education. 2022. “Levelling Up the United Kingdom White Paper.” Accessed February 27, 2023. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1052708/Levelling_up_the_UK_white_paper.pdf.
  • Department for Education. 2024. Workload Reduction Taskforce. Accessed March 25, 2024. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65a10648e8f5ec000d1f8c2f/Workload_reducation_taskforce_-_initial_recommendations.pdf.
  • Done, E., and H. Knowler. 2020. “A Tension Between Rationalities: “Off-rolling” As Gaming and the Implications for Head Teachers and the Inclusion Agenda.” Educational Review 74 (7): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2020.1806785.
  • Earle, S. 2019. Assessment in the Primary Classroom: Principles and Practice. London: Learning Matters.
  • Ferrer-Esteban, G., and M. Pagès. 2023. “Teachers Gaming the System: Exploring Opportunistic Behaviours in a Low-Stakes Accountability System.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 36 (1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-023-09424-3.
  • Fuller, K. 2019. “That Would Be My Red Line”: An Analysis of Headteachers’ Resistance of Neoliberal Education Reforms.” Educational Review 71 (1): 31–50. Doi https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1522042.
  • Gewirtz, S., M. Maguire, E. Neumann, and E. Towers. 2019. “What’s Wrong with ‘Deliverology’? Performance Measurement, Accountability and Quality Improvement in English Secondary Education.” Journal of Education Policy 36 (4): 504–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1706103.
  • Gore, J., B. Rickards, and L. Fray. 2022. “From Performative to Professional Accountability: Re-Imagining ‘The Field of Judgment’ Through Teacher Professional Development.” Journal of Education Policy 38 (3): 452–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2022.2080274.
  • Hall, R., and M. Pulsford. 2019. “Neoliberalism and Primary Education: Impacts of Neoliberal Policy on the Lived Experiences of Primary School Communities.” Power & Education 11 (3): 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757743819877344.
  • Hatfield, J. L., and T. E. T. Soløst. 2024. “Assessing the Assessment: Exploring Norwegian Primary Education teachers’ Perceptions of National Accountability Testing.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2024.2308883.
  • HOC [House of Commons Education Committee]. 2017. Primary Assessment. Accessed February 27, 2023. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmeduc/682/682.pdf.
  • Hofflinger, A., and P. von Hippel. 2018. “The Response to High-Stakes Testing in Chile: Did Schools Improve Learning or Merely Inflate Test Scores?” Available at SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2906552. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2906552.
  • Hutchings, M. 2021. “Accountability, Social Justice and Educational Research.” In Educational Research for Social Justice: Evidence and Practice from the UK, edited by A. Ross, 45–78. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Ingram, J., C. Elliott, A. Morin, C. Randhawa, and C. Brown. 2018. “Playing the System: Incentives to ‘Game’ and Educational Ethics in School Examination Entry Policies in England.” Oxford Review of Education 44 (5): 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2018.1496906.
  • Jerrim, J. 2021. “National Tests and the Wellbeing of Primary School Pupils: New Evidence from the UK.” Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice 28 (5–6): 507–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1929829.
  • Koretz, D. 2018. Moving Beyond the Failure of Test-Based Accountability. American Educator 41 (4): 22–26.
  • Levatino, A., L. Parcerisa, and A. Verger. 2024. “Understanding the Stakes: The Influence of Accountability Policy Options on teachers’ Responses.” Educational Policy 38 (1): 31–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048221142048.
  • Lewis, S., and I. Hardy. 2015. “Funding, Reputation and Targets: The Discursive Logics of High-Stakes Testing.” Cambridge Journal of Education 45 (2): 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2014.936826.
  • Lewis, S., and J. Holloway. 2019. “Datafying the Teaching ‘Profession’: Remaking the Professional Teacher in the Image of Data.” Cambridge Journal of Education 49 (1): 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2018.1441373.
  • Lingard, B., W. Martino, and G. Rezai-Rashti. 2013. “Testing Regimes, Accountabilities and Education Policy: Commensurate Global and National Developments.” Journal of Education Policy 28 (5): 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.820042.
  • Mann, S. 2016. The Research Interview. Reflective Practice and Reflexivity in Research Processes. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • McIntosh, J. 2015. Final Report of the Commission on Assessment without Levels, September 2015. Accessed February 27, 2023. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/483058/Commission_on_ Assessment_Without_Levels_-_report.pdf.
  • Mizrahi, S., and Y. Minchuk. 2021. “Performance Management, Gaming and Regulatory Monitoring: A Theoretical Model and Applications.” Public Management Review 25 (6): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2007668.
  • Munoz Chereau, B., and M. Ehren. 2021. Inspection Across the UK: How the Four Nations Intend to Contribute to School Improvement. London: Edge Foundation.
  • Murray, J., and R. Passy. 2014. “Primary Teacher Education in England: 40 Years on.” Journal of Education for Teaching 40 (5): 492–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2014.956542.
  • NEU (National Education Union). 2024. More Than a Score. Accessed March 27, 2024. https://www.morethanascore.org.uk/evidence/.
  • Page, D. 2015. “The Visibility and Invisibility of Performance Management in Schools.” British Educational Research Journal 41 (6): 1031–1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3185.
  • Page, D. 2018. “Conspicuous Practice: Self-Surveillance and Commodification in English Education.” International Studies in Sociology of Education 27 (4): 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2017.1351309.
  • Patton, M. 2015. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. 4th edition ed. London: SAGE.
  • Perryman, J., A. Bradbury, G. Calvert, and K. Kilian. 2023. “Beyond Ofsted: An Inquiry into the Future of School Inspections.” Accessed March 23, 2024. https://beyondofsted.org.uk/.
  • Perryman, J., and G. Calvert. 2020. “What Motivates People to Teach, and Why Do They Leave? Accountability, Performativity and Teacher Retention.” British Journal of Educational Studies 68 (1): 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2019.1589417.
  • Pratt, N. 2016a. “Neoliberalism and the (Internal) Marketisation of Primary School Assessment in England.” British Educational Research Journal 42 (5): 890–905. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3233.
  • Pratt, N. 2016b. “Playing the Levelling Field: Teachers’ Management of Assessment in English Primary Schools.” Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice 25 (5): 504–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1264924.
  • Pratt, N., and J. Alderton. 2019. “Producing Assessment Truths: A Foucauldian Analysis of Teachers’ Reorganisation of Levels in English Primary Schools.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 40 (5): 581–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2018.1561245.
  • Prior, L., J. Jerrim, D. Thomson, and G. Leckie. 2021. “A Review and Evaluation of Secondary School Accountability in England: Statistical Strengths, Weaknesses and Challenges for ‘Progress 8’raised by COVID‐19.” Review of Education 9 (3). https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3299.
  • Proudfoot, K. 2021. “Panopticism, Teacher Surveillance and the ‘Unseen’.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 42 (5–6): 812–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2021.1914549.
  • Roberts, N. 2022. Assessment and Testing in Primary Education. (England). Research Briefing. Accessed February 27, 2023. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7980/CBP-7980.pdf.
  • Roberts-Holmes, G. 2015. “The ‘Datafication’ of Early Years Pedagogy: ‘If the Teaching Is Good the Data Should Be Good and if there’s Bad Teaching There Is Bad Data’.” Journal of Education Policy 30 (3): 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2014.924561.
  • Sahlberg, P. 2016. “The Global Educational Reform Movement and Its Impact on Schooling.” In The Handbook of Global Education Policy, edited by Karen Mundy, Andy Green, Bob Lingard, and Antoni Verger, 128–144. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118468005.
  • Skerritt, C. 2022. “Are These the Accountable Teacher Subjects Citizens Want?” Education Policy Analysis Archives 30:103–103. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.30.7278.
  • Skerritt, C. 2023. “School Autonomy and the Surveillance of Teachers.” International Journal of Leadership in Education 26 (4): 553–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1823486.
  • Souto-Otero, M., and R. Beneito-Montagut. 2016. “From Governing Through Data to Governmentality Through Data: Artefacts, Strategies and the Digital Turn.” European Educational Research Journal 15 (1): 14–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904115617768.
  • STA (Standards and Testing Agency). 2022. Key Stage 1 and 2: Maladministration Investigation Procedures March 2022. Accessed February 27, 2023. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1062035/Key_stage_1_and_2_maladministration_investigation_procedures.pdf.
  • Stevenson, H. 2017. “The ‘Datafication’ of Teaching: Can Teachers Speak Back to the Numbers?” Peabody Journal of Education 92 (4): 537–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2017.1349492.
  • Sturrock, S. 2018. “Primary School Teachers’ Experience of Policy Reform in the Second Decade of 21st Century England.” Doctoral dissertation, University of Brighton. Accessed February 27, 2023. https://research.brighton.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/primary-school-teachers-experience-of-policy-reform-in-the-second.
  • Sturrock, S. 2021. “Primary Teachers’ Experiences of Neo-Liberal Education Reform in England: ‘Nothing Is Ever Good Enough’.” Research Papers in Education 37 (6): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2021.1941213.
  • Swann, M., A. Peacock, S. Hart, and M. J. Drummond. 2012. Creating Learning without Limits. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Taylor, L. A. 2023. “‘If I Was Better at Managing All this’: The Role of Neoliberal Logic in Framing One teacher’s Narratives About Accountability.” Teaching and Teacher Education 121:103944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103944.
  • Thompson, G., and I. Cook. 2014. “Manipulating the Data: Teaching and NAPLAN in the Control Society.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 35 (1): 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2012.739472.
  • Thompson, G., N. Mockler, and A. Hogan. 2022. “Making Work Private: Autonomy, Intensification and Accountability.” European Educational Research Journal 21 (1): 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904121996134.
  • Torrance, H. 2017. “Blaming the Victim: Assessment, Examinations, and the Responsibilisation of Students and Teachers in Neo-Liberal Governance.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 38 (1): 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1104854.
  • Tracy, S. J. 2010. “Qualitative Quality: Eight ‘Big-tent’ Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 16 (10): 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121.
  • Verger, A., L. Parcerisa, and C. Fontdevila. 2019. “The Growth and Spread of Large-Scale Assessments and Test-Based Accountabilities: A Political Sociology of Global Education Reforms.” Educational Review 71 (1): 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1522045.
  • Verger, A., M. Prieto, M. Pagès, and P. Villamor. 2020. “Common Standards, Different Stakes: A Comparative and Multi-Scalar Analysis of Accountability Reforms in the Spanish Education Context.” European Educational Research Journal 19 (2): 142–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118785556.
  • Williams-Brown, Z., and M. Jopling. 2021. “Measuring a Plant doesn’t Help it to Grow: Teachers’ Perspectives on the Standards Agenda in England.” Education 49 (2): 227–240. 3-13 https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2020.1717573.
  • Wyse, D., A. Bradbury, and R. Trollope. 2022. Assessment for Children’s Learning: A New Future for Primary Education. Accessed March 23, 2024. https://www.icape.org.uk/.
  • Yan, Z., and G. T. Brown. 2021. “Assessment for Learning in the Hong Kong Assessment Reform: A Case of Policy Borrowing.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 68:68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100985.