A Study of Local Government Website Inclusiveness: The Gap Between E-government Concept and Practice

References

• Agarwal, R., & Venkatesh, V. (2002). Assessing a firms’ web presence: A heuristic evaluation procedure for the measurement of usability. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 168–186. doi: 10.1287/isre.13.2.168.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alshawi, S., & Alalwany, H. (2009). E-government evaluation: Citizen's perspective in developing countries. Information Technology for Development, 15(3), 193–208. doi: 10.1002/itdj.20125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. (2006). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. New York, NY: Hyperion.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, P., & Chau, P. Y. K. (2004). An evaluative framework for analyzing e-government convergence capability in developing countries. Electronic Government, 1(1), 29–49. doi: 10.1504/EG.2004.004135
   Google Scholar
• Becker, S. A. (2005). E-government usability for older adults. Communications of the ACM, 48(2), 102–104. doi: 10.1145/1042091.1042127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednarz, A. (2002, July 8). Getting plugged in to e-government. Network World. Retrieved from http://www.nwfusion.com/supp/government2002/authentication.html
   Google Scholar
• Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. (2009). The impact of the digital divide on e-government use. Communications of the ACM, 52(4), 132–135. doi: 10.1145/1498765.1498801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berntzen, L., & Olsen, M. G. (2009). Benchmarking e-government: A comparative review of three international benchmarking studies. In Y. Takahashi (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 third international conference on digital society (pp. 77–82). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Burd-Sharps, S., Lewis, K., & Martins, E. B. (2009). A portrait of Mississippi: Mississippi human development report 2009. Retrieved from http://measureofamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/a_portrait_of_mississippi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Castelnovo, W. (2009). Supporting innovation in small local government organizations. In J. Ljungberg & K. Grundén (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd European conference on information management and evaluation (pp. 99–106). Reading: Academic Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Castelnovo, W., & Simonetta, M. (2008). A public value evaluation of e-government policies. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 11(2), 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A., & May, C. (2003). Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the Internet: “E-Government” in the United States, Britain and the European Union. Governance, 16(2), 271–300. doi: 10.1111/1468-0491.00216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, L., & Liao, C. (2009). The influence of digital standardization on administrative efficiency in e-government: A view of standards development organizations. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 26(4), 455–468. doi: 10.1002/sres.946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, M. D., & Fairlie, R. W. (2004). The determinants of the global digital divide: A cross-country analysis of computer and Internet penetration. Santa Cruz, CA: Department of Economics, UCSC. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/76×9876q
   Google Scholar
• Colesca, S. E. (2009). Understanding trust in e-government. Economics of Engineering Decisions, 3(3), 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). (2009). Multi-criteria analysis: A manual. Department of Communities and Local Government. Retrieved from www.communities.gov.uk
   Google Scholar
• Drobne, S., & Lisec, A. (2009). Combination and ordered weighted averaging. Informatica, 33(4), 459–474.
   Google Scholar
• Edmiston, K. D. (2003). State and local e-government: Prospects and challenges. American Review of Public Administration, 33(1), 20–45. doi: 10.1177/0275074002250255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No 107–347, 116 Stat. 2899 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2004). eGovernment research in Europe. European Commission. Retrieved from http://europa.eu.int/
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, A. C. B., Maciel, C., & Pinto, F. B. (2005). A quality inspection method to evaluate e-government sites. In M. A. Wimmer, R. Traunmuller, A. Gronlund, & K. V. Anderson (Eds.), Electronic government (pp. 198–209). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, G., & Chau, D. (2004). Developing a generic framework for e-government. Journal of Global Information Management, 13(1), 1–30. doi: 10.4018/jgim.2005010101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grönlund, Å., & Horan, T. A. (2004). Introducing e-GOV: History, definitions, and issues. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15(39), 713–729.
   Google Scholar
• Hiller, J., & Bélanger, F. (2001). Privacy strategies for electronic government. In M. A. Abramson & G. E. Means (Eds.), E-government 2001 (pp. 162–198). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A. T.-K. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434–444. doi: 10.1111/0033-3352.00197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C. J., & Chao, M.-H. (2001). Managing WWW in public administration: Uses and misuses. Government Information Quarterly, 18(4), 357–373. doi: 10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00085-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvasny, L., & Keil, M. (2006). The challenges of redressing the digital divide: A tale of two US cities. Information Systems Journal, 16(1), 23–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2006.00207.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C. S., & Pires, G. (2010). Testing of a model evaluating e-government portal acceptance and satisfaction. Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 13(1), 35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136. doi: 10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. M., Tan, X., & Trimi, S. (2005). Current practices of leading e-government countries. Communications of the ACM, 48(10), 99–104. doi: 10.1145/1089107.1089112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. In R. H. Sprague (Ed.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 85–102). University of Michigan, IEEE Computer Society Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marchionini, G., Samet, H., & Brandt, L. (2003). Digital government. Communications of the ACM, 46(1), 25–27. doi: 10.1145/602421.602440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misuraca, G. C. (2009). e-Government 2015: Exploring m-government scenarios between ICT-driven experiments and citizen-centric implications. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21(3), 407–424. doi: 10.1080/09537320902750871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433. doi: 10.1111/0033-3352.00196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. V., & Mithas, S. (2009). Does e-government measure up to e-business? Comparing end user perceptions of U.S. Federal Government and e-business web sites. Public Administration Review, 69(4), 740–752. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02021.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasi, G., & Frosini, F. (2010). Vision and practice of e-government: An empirical study. Financial Accountability & Management, 26(1), 85–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2009.00492.x
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2003). The e-government imperative. Paris: OECD E-gov Studies. ISBN 92-64-10117-9.
   Google Scholar
• Oyedele, A., & Koong, K. S. (2006). Framework for evaluating global e-government websites. In M. Rao (Ed.), Decision Sciences Institute Southwest Region 2006 SWDSI proceedings 37th annual conference (pp. 465–472). Oklahoma City, OK. Retrieved from http://swdsi.org/swdsi06/Proceedings06/Papers/MIS14.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, J. W. (2002). Web site usability, design, and performance metrics. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 151–167. doi: 10.1287/isre.13.2.151.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2010). Is e-government leading to more accountable and transparent governments? An overall view. Financial Accountability & Management, 26(1), 3–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2009.00488.x
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, W., & Drechsler, M. (2003). Deliberative multi-criteria evaluation: A case study of recreation and T\tourism options in Victoria Australia. European Society for Ecological Economics, Frontiers 2 Conference. Tenerife, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, H., Chai, S., Herath, T., & Park, I. (2006). Repeated use of e-gov web sites: A satisfaction and confidentiality perspective. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2(3), 1–22. doi: 10.4018/jegr.2006070101
   Google Scholar
• Reddick, C. G. (2004). Empirical models of e-government growth in local government. e-Service Journal, 3(2), 59–74. doi: 10.2979/ESJ.2004.3.2.59
   Google Scholar
• Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Pub. L. No. 93-112, 87 Stat. 355 (1973).
   Google Scholar
• Roy, J. (2006). E-government in Canada: Transformation for the digital age. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. K. (2006). “E” the people: Do U.S. municipal government web sites support public involvement? Public Administration Review, 66(3), 341–353. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00593.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stowers, G. N. L. (2002). The state of federal websites: The pursuit of excellence. San Francisco, CA: Public Administration Program.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, T. (2002). Evaluating environmental decision support tools. Brookhaven National Laboratory. Retrieved from http://www.bnl.gov/isd/documents/30163.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sung, Y., Liu, S., Liao, H., Liu, C., & Yuan, C. (2009). Service quality between e-government users and administrators. I-Ways the Journal of E-Government Policy and Regulation, 32(4), 241–248.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, C. W., & Benbasat, I. (2009). IT mediated customer services in e-government: A citizen's perspective. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24(15), 175–198.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, C. W., & Pan, S. L. (2003). Managing e-transformation in public sector: An e-government study of inland revenue authority of Singapore (IRAS). European Journal of Information Systems, 12(4), 269–281. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T., Srivastava, S., & Jiang, L. (2008). Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99–131. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222250303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, K. M., McClure, C. R., & Jaeger, P. T. (2003). Evaluating federal websites: Improving e-government for the people. In J. F. George (Ed.), Computers in society: Privacy ethics & the internet (pp. 400–412). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• United Health Foundation. (2012). America's health rankings: A call to action for individuals and their communities. Retrieved from http://cdnfiles.americashealthrankings.org/SiteFiles/Reports/Americas-Health-Rankings-2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United States. (2006). Research-based web design & usability guidelines. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Bretschneider, S., & Gant, J. (2005). Evaluating web-based e-government services with a citizen-centric approach. Proceedings of 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Big Island, Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, R. T., & Mundy, B. (2001). A strategic perspective of electronic democracy. Communications of the ACM, 44(1), 27–30. doi: 10.1145/357489.357499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, E., & Wong, W. (2001). Global information technology pressure and government accountability: The mediating effect of the domestic context on website openness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(4), 509–538. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2007). E-government. Retrieved from http://web.worldbank.org/
   Google Scholar