Scientometric Study of the Progress and Development of e-Government Research During the Period 2000–2012

References

• Andersen, T. B., Bentzen, J. S., Dalgaard, C.-J. L., & Selaya, P. (2011). Does the internet reduce corruption? Evidence from U.S. States and across countries. World Bank Economic Review, 25(3), 387–417. doi: 10.1093/wber/lhr025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, S., & Heywood, P. M. (2009). The politics of perception: Use and abuse of transparency international's approach to measuring corruption. Political Studies, 57(4), 746–767. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00758.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins, S. E. (1988). Subject trends in library and information science research 1975–1984. Library Trends, 36(4), 633–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, M. T. (1992). Do physicists use case studies? thoughts on public administration research. Public Administration Review, 52(1), 47–55. doi: 10.2307/976545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannister, F. & Connolly, R. (2012). Forward to the past: Lessons for the future of e-government from the story so far. Information Polity, 17(3–4), 211–226.
   Google Scholar
• Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Hansen, D. (2012). The impact of policies on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 30–40. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham, R. D., & Bowen, W. M. (1994). Mainstream public administration over time: A topical content analysis of public administration review. Public Administration Review, 54(2), 204–208. doi: 10.2307/976531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuer, A. (2008). The problematic relation between direct democracy and accountability in Latin America: Evidence from the Bolivian case. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 27(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9856.2007.00254.x
   Google Scholar
• Burns, A., Burgess, J., Highfield, T., Kirchhoff, L., & Nicolai, T. (2011). Mapping the Australian networked public sphere. Social Science Computer Review, 29(3), 277–287. doi: 10.1177/0894439310382507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caba, C., Rodríguez, M. P., & López, A. M. (2008). E-government process and incentives for online public financial information. Online Information Review, 32(3), 379–400. doi: 10.1108/14684520810889682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caba Pérez, M. C., Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., & López Hernández, A. M. (2010). Transparency and e-government in developing countries. The case of Latin-American municipalities. Included in Citizens and e-Government: Evaluating Policy and Management, Hershey, PA: IGI Global (included in Book Citation Index) (pp. 158–183).
   Google Scholar
• Calista, D. J., & Melitski, J. (2007). E-government and e-governance: Converging constructs of public sector information and communications technologies. Public Administration Quarterly, 31(1), 87–120.
   Google Scholar
• Cejudo, G. M. (2008). Explaining change in the Mexican public sector: The limits of New Public Management. International Review of Administrative Science, 74(1), 111–127. doi: 10.1177/0020852307085737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2006). Internet politics: States, citizens and new communication technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2011). Explaining the failure of an online citizen engagement initiative: The role of internal institutional variables. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 8(1), 21–40. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2010.507999
   Google Scholar
• Chan, H. S., & Chow, K. W. (2007). Public management policy and practice in western China: Metapolicy, tacit knowledge, and implications for management innovation transfer. American Review of Public Administration, 37(4), 479–497. doi: 10.1177/0275074006297552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Che, Y. N., Che, H. M., Huang, W., & Ching, R. K. H. (2005). E-government strategies in developed and developing countries: An implementation framework and case study. Journal of Global Information Management, 14(1), 23–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Y. H., & Choi, B.-D. (2004). E-government to combat corruption: The case of Seoul metropolitan government. International Journal of Public Administration, 27(10), 719–735. doi: 10.1081/PAD-200029114
   Google Scholar
• Cocosila, M., Serenko, A., & Turel, O. (2011). Exploring the management information systems discipline: A scientometric study of ICIS, PACIS, and ASAC. Scientometrics, 87(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0331-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordella, A., & Bonina, C. M. (2012). A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 512–520. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordella, A., & Iannacci, F. (2010). Information systems in the public sector: The e-government enactment framework. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(1), 52–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2010.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrêa, I., & Claussen, M. V. (2011). Políticas de transparencia en la administración pública brasileña. Revista CLAD. Reforma y Democracia, 51, 129–152.
   Google Scholar
• Coursey, D., & Norris, D. F. (2008). Models of e-government: Are they correct? An empirical assessment. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 523–536. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00888.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, S. S. (2010). Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 377–383. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, S. S., Pardo, T. A., & Cresswell, A. M. (2004). Designing electronic government information access programs: A holistic approach. Government Information Quarterly, 21(1), 3–23. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2003.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delemaza, G., & Ochsenius, C. (2010). Redes de participación institucional y gobernanza democrática local. El caso de los presupuestos participativos en Chile. Revista CLAD. Reforma y Democracia, 46, 215–246.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New Public Management is dead – long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mui057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., Klijn, E. H., & Steijn, B. (2011). Managers in governance networks: How to reach good outcomes? International Public Management Journal, 14(4), 420–444. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2011.656055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkut, E. (2002). Measuring Canadian business school research output and impact. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 19(2), 97–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1936-4490.2002.tb00674.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. P., & Watson, S. S. (1994). An assessment of public administration journals: The perspective of editors and editorial board members. Public Administration Review, 54(5), 474–482. doi: 10.2307/976433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, D. (2000). QSR Nvivo. NUDIST Vivo. Reference Guide. Malaysia. QSR International Pty. Ltd. Melbourne Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Ganapati, S., & Reddick, C. G. (2012). Open e-government in U.S. state governments: Survey evidence from Chief Information Officers. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 115–122. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178(60), 471–479. doi: 10.1126/science.178.4060.471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-García, J. R., & Martinez-Moyano, I. J. (2007). Understanding the evolution of e-government: The influence of systems of rules on public sector dynamics. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 266–290. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2006.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grönlund, A. (2010). Ten years of e-government: The end of history and a new beginning. EGOV, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6228, 13–24. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-14799-9_2
   Google Scholar
• Grönlund, A., & Anderson, A. (2006, September 4–8). E-Gov research quality improvements since 2003: More rigor, but research (perhaps) redefined. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference, EGOV 2006, Kraków, Poland, (Vol. 4084, pp.1–12). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, P. W., & Sommerfeld, J. T. (1998). Relationship between growth in gross domestic product (GDP) and growth in the chemical engineering literature in five different countries. Scientometrics, 42(3), 299–311. doi: 10.1007/BF02458373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeks, R., & Bailur, S. (2007). Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly, 24(1), 243–265. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2006.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeks, R., & Stanforth, C. (2007). Understanding e-government project trajectories from an actor-network perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 165–177. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsapple, C. W. (2008). The pulse of multiparticipant systems. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 18(4), 333–343. doi: 10.1080/10919390802453617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsburgh, S., Goldfinch, S., & Gauld, R. (2011). Is public trust in government associated with trust in e-government? Social Science Computer Review, 29(2), 232–241. doi: 10.1177/0894439310368130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H.-H., & Hsu, J. S.-C. (2005). An evaluation of publication productivity in information systems: 1999 to 2003. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15, 555–564.
   Google Scholar
• International Statistical Institute. (2012). ISI Developing Countries (in 2012). Retrieved July 8, 2013, from http://www.isi-web.org/component/content/article/5-root/root/577-developing2012
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, P. T. (2005). Deliberative democracy and the conceptual foundations of electronic government. Government Information Quarterly, 22(4), 702–719. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2006.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, P. T. (2007). Information policy, information access, and democratic participation: The national and international implications of the Bush administration's information politics. Government Information Quarterly, 24(4), 840–859. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2007.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, P. T., & Bertot, J. C. (2010). Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 371–376. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joia, L. A. (2008). Developing government to government enterprises in Brazil: A heuristic model drawn from multiple case studies. International Journal of Information Management, 24(2), 147–166. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2003.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julnes, P., & Johnson, D. (2011). Strengthening efforts to engage the Hispanic community in citizen-driven governance: An assessment of efforts in Utah. Public Administration Review, 71(2), 221–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02333.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justice, J. B., Melitski, J., & Smith, D. L. (2006). E-government as an instrument of fiscal accountability and responsiveness: Do the best practitioners employ the best practices? American Review of Public Administration, 36, 301–322. doi: 10.1177/0275074005283797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketzler, R., & Zimmerman, K. F. (2013). A citation-analysis of economic research institutes. Scientometrics, 95(3), 1095–1112. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0850-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Kim, H. J., & Heejin, L. (2009). An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations: What different countries get for their research spending. Nature, 430(6997), 311–316. doi: 10.1038/430311a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., Edelenbos, J., & Steijn, B. (2010). Trust in governance networks: Its impacts on outcomes. Administration and Society, 42(2), 193–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lan, Z., & Anders, K. K. (2000). A paradigmatic view of contemporary public administration research: An empirical test. Administration and Society, 32(2), 138–165. doi: 10.1177/00953990022019380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, L.-C., Lin, P.-H., Chuang, Y.-W., & Lee, Y.-Y. (2011). Research output and economic productivity: A Ganger causality test. Scientometrics, 89(2), 465–478. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0476-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legge, J. S. Jr., & Devore, J. (1987). Measuring productivity in U.S. public administration and public affairs programs 1981–1985. Administration and Society, 19(2), 147–156. doi: 10.1177/009539978701900201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M. (2011). Online government advisory service innovation through intelligent support systems. Information and Management, 48, 27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2010.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfstedt, U. (2005). E-government – assessment of current research and some proposals for future direction. International Journal of Public Information Systems, 1(1), 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Gil-García, J. R. (2011). Using institutional theory and dynamic similation to understand complex e-government phenomena. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 329–345. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna-Reyes, L. F., Gil-García, J. R., & Cruz, C. B. (2007). Collaborative digital government in Mexico: Some lessons from federal Web-based interorganizational information integration initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 24(4), 808–826. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2007.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L., Chung, J., & Thorson, S. (2005). E-government in China: Bringing economic development through administrative reform. Government Information Quarterly, 22, 20–37. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2004.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madaglia, R. (2012). eParticipation research. Moving characterization forward (2006–2011). Government Information Quarterly, 29, 346–360. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manoharan, A. (2012). A study of the determinants of county e-government in the United States. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 159–178. doi: 10.1177/0275074012437876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, M. R. (1995). Size of municipalities, efficiency, and citizens’ participation: A cross-European perspective. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 13, 441–458. doi: 10.1068/c130441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, T. A. (2003). The public need to know: Emergencies, government organizations, and public information policies. Government Information Quarterly, 20(3), 233–258. doi: 10.1016/S0740-624X(03)00039-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCurdy, H. E., & Cleary, R. E. (1984). A call for appropriate methods. Public Administration Review, 44(6), 49–55. doi: 10.2307/975661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medoff, M. (2003). Collaboration and the quality of economics research. Labour Economics, 10(5), 597–608. doi: 10.1016/S0927-5371(03)00072-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, A. J., Curtin, D., & Hillebrandt, M. (2012). Open government: Connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Science, 78(1), 10–29. doi: 10.1177/0020852311429533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J., Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Brandsma, G. J. (2012). Communities of public services support citizens engage in social learning in peer-to-peer networks. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 21–29. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2011.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J., & Thaens, M. (2010). Alignment 2.0: Strategic use of new internet technologies in government. Government Information Quarterly, 27(2), 113–121. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, H. (2011). Mapping the Norwegian blogosphere: Methodological challenges in internationalizing internet research. Social Science Computer Review, 29(3), 313–326. doi: 10.1177/0894439310382511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, M. J., & Norris, D. F. (2005). Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level. Information Systems Journal, 15, 43–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00185.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. Q. (2010). Governance, policy innovation, and local economic development in North Carolina. Policy Studies Journal, 38(4), 679–702. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00379.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarra, D. D. (2010). The architecture of Global ICT Programs: A case study of e-governance in Jordan. Information Technology for Development, 16(2), 128–140. doi: 10.1080/02681101003741681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neufeld, D., Fang, Y., & Huff, S. (2007). The IS identity crisis. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 19, 447–464.
   Google Scholar
• Nord, J. H., & Nord, G. D. (1995). MIS research: Journal status and analysis. Information and Management, 29(1), 29–42. doi: 10.1016/0378-7206(95)00010-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practices of public governance. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., & Brown, L. (2011). Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK: The word that would be king? Public Administration, 89(4), 1335–1350.
   Google Scholar
• Patsopoulos, N. A., Analatos, A. A., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2006). Origin and funding of the most frequently cited papers in medicine: Database analysis. BMJ, 332(7549), 1061–1064. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38768.420139.80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, K. (2004). Business and society and business ethics journals: A citation and impact analysis. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 35(2), 103–117. doi: 10.3138/jsp.35.2.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peres, W., & Hilbert, M. (Eds.). (2010). Information societies in Latin America and the Caribbean: Development of technologies and technologies for development. Santiago de Chile: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC Books).
   Google Scholar
• Pick, J. B., Garcia-Murillo, M., & Navarrete, C. J. (2007). Information technology research in Latin America: Editorial introduction to the special issue. Information Technology for Development, 13(3), 207–216. doi: 10.1002/itdj.20070
   Google Scholar
• Pieterson, W., & Ebbers, W. (2008). The use of service channels by citizens in the Netherlands: Implications for multi-channel management. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(1), 95–110. doi: 10.1177/0020852307085736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2007). Are ICTs improving transparency and accountability in the EU regional and local governments? An empirical study. Public Administration, 85(2), 449–472. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00654.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2009). E-government evolution in EU local government: A comparative perspective. Online Information Review, 33(6), 1137–1168. doi: 10.1108/14684520911011052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2010). Is e-government promoting convergence towards more accountable local governments? International Public Management Journal, 13(4), 350–380. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2010.524834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plümber, T., & Radaelli, C. M. (2004). Publish or perish? Publications and citations of Italian political scientists in international political science journals, 1990–2002. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(6), 1112–1127. doi: 10.1080/1350176042000298138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddick, C. G. (2009). The adoption of centralized customer service systems: A survey of local governments. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 219–226. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2008.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddick, C. G. (2011). Customer relationship management (CRM) technology and organizational change: Evidence for the bureaucratic and e-government paradigms. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 346–353. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddick, C. G., & Turner, M. (2012). Channel choice and public service delivery in Canada: Comparing e-government to traditional service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2011.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, M. P., Alcaide, L., & López, A. M. (2010). Trends of e-government research. Contextualization and research opportunities. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 10, 87–111. doi: 10.4192/1577-8517-v10_4
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, M. P., Caba, C., & López, A. M. (2006). Cultural contexts and governmental digital reporting. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 72(2), 269–290. doi: 10.1177/0020852306064614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, M. P., Caba, C., & López, A. M. (2007). E-government and public financial reporting. The case of Spanish regional government. American Review of Public Administration, 37(2), 142–177. doi: 10.1177/0275074006293193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., Alcaide Muñoz, L., & López Hernández, A. M. (2012). Studying e-government: Research methodologies, data compilation techniques and future outlook. Academia, Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 51, 79–95.
   Google Scholar
• Rossel, M. C. (2010). Tercer sector y prestación de servicios sociales públicos: la “caja negra” de la participación ciudadana en la gestión pública y su impacto en los regímenes de bienestar corporativos. Revista CLAD. Reforma y Democracia, 47, 191–236.
   Google Scholar
• Seng, W. M., Jackson, S., & Philip, G. (2010). Cultural issues in developing e-government in Malaysia. Behaviour & Information Technology, 29(4), 423–432. doi: 10.1080/01449290903300931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2009). A citation-based ranking of the top business ethics scholarly journals. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 4(4), 390–399. doi: 10.1504/IJBGE.2009.023790
   Google Scholar
• Serenko, A., Bontis, N., Booker, L., Sadeddin, K., & Hardie, T. (2010). A scientometric analysis of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic literature (1994–2008). Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1), 3–23. doi: 10.1108/13673271011015534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serenko, A., & Jiao, C. (2012). Investigating information systems research in Canada. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 29(1), 3–24. doi: 10.1002/cjas.214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano, C., Rueda, M., & Portillo, P. (2009). Factors influencing e-disclosure in local public administration. Environment and planning C: Government and Policy, 27(2), 355–378. doi: 10.1068/c07116r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharifi, M., & Manian, A. (2010). The study of the success indicators for pre-implementation activities of Iran's e-government development projects. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 63–69. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2009.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim, D. C., & Eom, T. H. (2008). E-government and anti-corruption: Empirical analysis of international data. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(1), 298–316. doi: 10.1080/01900690701590553
   Google Scholar
• Siau, K., & Long, Y. (2006). Using social development lenses to understand e-government development. Journal of Global Information Management, 14, 47–62. doi: 10.4018/jgim.2006010103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidorova, A., Evangelopoulos, N., Valacich, J. S., & Ramakrishnan, T. (2008). Uncovering the intellectual core of the information systems discipline. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 467–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub, D. (2006). The value of scientometric studies: An introduction to a debate on IS as a reference discipline. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(5), 241–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Tatenhove, J., Edelenbos, J., & Klok, P. J. (2010). Power and interactive policy-making: A comparative study of power and influence in 8 interactive projects in the Netherlands. Public Administration, 88(3), 609–626. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01829.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2003). World public sector report 2003. E-government at the crossroads. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2012). United nations e-government survey 2012. E-government for the people. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2009). Improving digital skills for the use of online public information and services. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 33–340. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2008.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varela, D. (2013). The contribution of ISI indexing to a paper's citations: results of a natural experiment. European Political Science, 12(2), 245–253. doi: 10.1057/eps.2012.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velicu, B. C. (2012). Creating a citizen centric administration through eGovernment in Romania. Romanian Journal of Political Science, 12(2), 103–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinkler, P. (2008). Correlation between the structure of scientific research, scientometric indicators and GDP in EU and non-EU countries. Scientometrics, 74, 237–254. doi: 10.1007/s11192-008-0215-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltman, L., Yan, E., & Van Eck, N. J. (2011). A recursive field-normalized bibliometric performance indicator: An application to the field of library and information science. Scientometrics, 89(1), 301–314. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0449-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 13–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerakkody, V., Janssen, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2011). Transformational change and business process reengineering (BPR): Lessons from the British and Dutch public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 320–328. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welp, Y. (2008). América Latina en la era del gobierno electrónico. Análisis de la introducción de nuevas tecnologías para la mejora de la democracia y el gobierno. Revista CLAD Reforma y Democracia, 41, 42–57.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, S. (2005). Internet policy and diffusion in China, Malaysia and Singapore. Journal of Information Science, 31(3), 238–250. doi: 10.1177/0165551505052472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, E., & Zhu, Q. (2009). Hyperlink analysis for government websites of Chinese provincial capitals. Scientometrics, 76(2), 315–326. doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-1923-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646–665. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2007.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research. Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar