771
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

The contingent role of dependency in predicting the intention to adopt B2B e-commerce

, &

References

  • Ahmad, S. Z., Rahim, A., Bakar, A., & Mohamed, T. (2014). An empirical study of factors affecting e-commerce adoption among small- and medium-sized enterprises in a developing country: Evidence from Malaysia. Information Technology for Development, 1(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2014.899961
  • Aiken, L. S, West, S. G, & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. New York: Sage Publications.
  • Ali, M. (2010). The role of relationships in the adoption of Interorganisational Systems (IOS). 21st Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Brisbane.
  • Ali, M., Kurnia, S., & Johnston, R. B. (2008). A dyadic model of Interorganizational Systems (IOS) adoption maturity. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008) (pp. 9–9). doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2008.18
  • Ali, M., Kurnia, S., & Johnston, R. B. (2009, June). Investigating IOS adoption maturity using a dyadic approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 5, 43–60.
  • Ali, M., & Kurnia, S. (2010). Exploring Interorganisational Systems (IOS) adoption in Bahrain. 21st Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Brisbane.
  • Al-Omoush, K. S. (2017). The adoption drivers of web-based B2B systems: A comparison between durable and nondurable goods-producing industries. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 29(2), 67–81.
  • Al Omoush, K. S., Al-Qirem, R. M., & Al Hawatmah, Z. M. (2017). The degree of e-business entrepreneurship and long-term sustainability: An institutional perspective. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 16, 1–28.
  • Al-qirim, N. (2007). The adoption and diffusion of e-commerce in developing countries: The case of an NGO in Jordan. Information Technology for Development, 13(2), 107–131. doi: 10.1002/itdj.20053
  • Al-qirim, N. (2010). E-commerce innovations in Jordan: Theoretical model development and implications for small businesses e-commerce innovations in Jordan: Theoretical model development and implications for small businesses. Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) AMCIS 2010 Proceedings.
  • Alsaad, A., Mohamad, R., & Ismail, N. A. (2014). The moderating role of power exercise in B2B e-commerce adoption decision. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 515–523.
  • Alsaad, A., Mohamad, R., & Ismail, N. A. (2015). Perceived desirability and firm’s intention to adopt business to business e-commerce: A test of second-order construct. Advanced Science Letters, 21(6), 2028–2032. doi: 10.1166/asl.2015.6194
  • Alsaad, A., Mohamad, R., & Ismail, N. A. (2017). The moderating role of trust in business to business electronic commerce (B2B EC) adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 157–169. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.040
  • Alsaad, A., Mohamad, R., Taamneh, A., & Ismail, N. A. (2018). What drives global B2B e-commerce usage: An analysis of the effect of the complexity of trading system and competition pressure. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2018.1432853
  • Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2012). Creating value through business model innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(3), 41–49.
  • Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(August), 396–402.
  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 8–34. doi: 10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x
  • Becker, J.-M., Klein, K., & Wetzels, M. (2012). Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 359–394. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2012.10.001
  • Bendoly, E., Citurs, A., & Konsynski, B. (2007). Internal infrastructural impacts on RFID perceptions and commitment: Knowledge, operational procedures, and information-processing standards. Decision Sciences, 38(3), 423–449. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2007.00165.x
  • Bode, C., Wagner, S. M., Petersen, K. J., & Ellram, L. M. (2011). Understanding responses to supply chain disruptions: Insights from information processing and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 833–856.
  • Boonstra, A., & de Vries, J. (2005). Analyzing inter-organizational systems from a power and interest perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 25, 485–501. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2005.08.006
  • Boonstra, A., & de Vries, J. (2008). Managing stakeholders around inter-organizational systems: A diagnostic approach. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(3), 190–201. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2008.04.001
  • Cao, Q., Gan, Q., & Thompson, M. A. (2013). Organizational adoption of supply chain management system : A multi-theoretic investigation. Decision Support Systems, 55(3), 720–727.
  • Carter, M., Wright, R., Thatcher, J. B., & Klein, R. (2014). Understanding online customers’ ties to merchants: The moderating influence of trust on the relationship between switching costs and e-loyalty. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(2), 185–204. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2012.55
  • Casciaro, T., & Piskorski, M. J. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 167–199. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2005.50.2.167
  • Chan, F. T. S., & Chong, A. Y. (2012). A SEM–neural network approach for understanding determinants of interorganizational system standard adoption and performances. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 621–630. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.08.009
  • Chan, F. T. S., Yee-Loong Chong, A., & Zhou, L. (2012). An empirical investigation of factors affecting e-collaboration diffusion in SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 138(2), 329–344. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.04.004
  • Chatterjee, D., & Ravichandran T. (2013). Governance of interorganizational information systems: A resource dependence perspective. Information Systems Research, 24(2), 261–278.
  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling. In Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Chwelos, P., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (2001). Research report: Empirical test of an EDI adoption model. Information Systems Research, 12(3), 304–321. doi: 10.1287/isre.12.3.304.9708
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Associates.
  • Dong, S., Xu, S. X., & Zhu, K. X. (2009). Information technology in supply chains: The value of IT-enabled resources under competition. Information Systems Research, 20(1), 18–32. doi: 10.1287/isre.1080.0195
  • Drees, J. M., & Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. (2013). Synthesizing and Extending Resource Dependence Theory: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1666–1698. doi: 10.1177/0149206312471391
  • Elrehail, H., Emeagwali, O. L., Alsaad, A., & Alzghoul, A. (2018). The impact of transformational and authentic leadership on innovation in higher education: The contingent role of knowledge sharing. Telematics and Informatics, 35(1), 55–67. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.018
  • Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31–41.
  • Fichman, R. G., & Carroll, W. E. (2004). Going beyond the dominant paradigm for information technology innovation research: Emerging concepts. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5(8), 314–355.
  • Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1987), 484–503.
  • Fornell, V., & Larcker, C. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with observable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing, 18(1), 39–50.
  • Gamal Aboelmaged, M. (2010). Predicting e-procurement adoption in a developing country: An empirical integration of technology acceptance model and theory of planned behaviour. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(3), 392–414. doi: 10.1108/02635571011030042
  • Gefen, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(August), 1–79.
  • Gefen, D., Rigdon, E., & Straub, D. (2011). An update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), iii–xiv.
  • Gibbs, J. L., & Kraemer, K. L. (2004). A cross-country investigation of the determinants of scope of ecommerce use: An institutional approach. Electronic Markets, 14(2), 124–137.
  • Gorla, N., Chiravuri, A., & Chinta, R. (2015). Business-to-business e-commerce adoption: An empirical investigation of business factors. Information Systems Frontiers, 1–23. doi: 10.1007/s10796-015-9616-8
  • Grover, V., & Saeed, K. A. (2007). The impact of product, market, and relationship characteristics on interorganizational system integration in manufacturer – supplier dyads. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(4), 185–216. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222230409
  • Hair, J. F., Hult, J. G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. doi: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
  • Hallen, B. L., Katila, R., & Rosenberger, J. D. (2014). How do social defenses work? A resource dependence lens on technology ventures, venture capital investors, and corporate relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1078–1101. doi: 10.5465/amj.2012.0003
  • Hameed, M. A., & Counsell, S. (2014). Establishing relationships between innovation characteristics and it innovation adoption in organisations: A meta-analysis approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 18(1), 1450007. doi: 10.1142/S1363919614500078
  • Hameed, M. A., Counsell, S., & Swift, S. (2012). A meta-analysis of relationships between organizational characteristics and IT innovation adoption in organizations. Information & Management, 49(5), 218–232. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2012.05.002
  • Hart, P., & Saunders, C. (1997). Power and trust : critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange. Organization Science, 8(1), 23–42.
  • Hart, P., & Saunders, C. (1998). Emerging electronic partnerships: Antecedents and dimensions of EDI use from the supplier’s perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 87–111.
  • Hertwig, M. (2012, July). Institutional effects in the adoption of e-business-technology evidence from the German automotive supplier industry. Information and Organization, 22, 252–272. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2012.06.002
  • Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427. doi: 10.1177/0149206309343469
  • Hollenstein, H., & Woerter, M. (2008). Inter- and intra-firm diffusion of technology: The example of e-commerce. Research Policy, 37(3), 545–564. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.006
  • Hoque, R., & Boateng, R. (2017). Adoption of B2B e-commerce in developing countries : Evidence from Ready Made Garment (RMG) industry in Bangladesh. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(1), 55–74.
  • Hossain, M. A., & Quaddus, M. (2010). Impact of external environmental factors on RFID adoption in Australian livestock industry: An exploratory study. PACIS 2010 Proceedings (pp. 1735–1742).
  • Hsu, P., Kraemer, K. L., & Dunkle, D. (2006). Determinants of e-business use in U.S. firms. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(4), 9–45.
  • Huang, Q., Fang, K., & Liu, H. (2013). The moderating role of organizational culture in the relationship between power, trust, and ESCMS adoption intention. PACIS 2013 Proceedings. Paper 213.
  • Huang, X., Gattiker, T. F., & Schroeder, R. G. (2010). Do competitive priorities drive adoption of electronic commerce applications? Testing the contingency and institutional views. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(3), 57–69.
  • Huo, B., Zhao, X., & Zhou, H. (2014). The effects of competitive environment on supply chain information sharing and performance: An empirical study in China. Production and Operations Management, 23(4), 552–569. doi: 10.1111/poms.12044
  • Hwang, M. I., & Schmidt, F. L. (2011). Assessing moderating effect in meta-analysis: A re-analysis of top management support studies and suggestions for researchers. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(6), 693–702. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2011.12
  • Ifinedo, P. (2011). An empirical analysis of factors influencing internet/e-business technologies adoption by SMEs in Canada. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 10(4), 731–766. doi: 10.1142/S0219622011004543
  • Iskandar, B. Y., Kurokawa, S., & Leblanc, L. J. (2001a). Adoption of electronic data interchange : The role of buyer-supplier relationships. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(4), 505–517.
  • Iskandar, B. Y., Kurokawa, S., & Leblanc, L. J. (2001b). Business-to-business electronic commerce from first- and second-tier automotive suppliers’ perspectives : A preliminary analysis for hypotheses generation. Technovation, 21(1), 719–731.
  • Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J. W., & Lacity, M. C. (2006). A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research. Journal of Information Technology, 21(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000056
  • Jitpaiboon, T., Vonderembse, M., & Asree, S. (2010). The influence of top management support and Information Technology (IT) utilization on Supply Chain Integration (SCI). California Journal of Operations Management, 8(2), 1–19.
  • Ke, W. (2006). The effects of relational and institutional factors on electronic supply chain management adoption: Does organizational culture matter ? The Tenth Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2006) The (pp. 1205–1218).
  • Ke, W., Liu, H., Wei, K. K., Gu, J., & Chen, H. (2009). How do mediated and non-mediated power affect electronic supply chain management system adoption? The mediating effects of trust and institutional pressures. Decision Support Systems, 46(4), 839–851. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2008.11.008
  • Ke, W., & Wei, K. K. (2007). Factors affecting trading partners’ knowledge sharing: Using the lens of transaction cost economics and socio-political theories. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6(3), 297–308. doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2006.06.006
  • Khalifa, M., & Davison, M. (2006). SME adoption of IT: The case of electronic trading systems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(2), 275–284. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2006.872251
  • Kim, K. K., Park, S.-H., Ryoo, S. Y., & Park, S. K. (2010). Inter-organizational cooperation in buyer–supplier relationships: Both perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 63(8), 863–869. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.04.028
  • King, J. L., Gurbaxani, V., Kraemer, K. L., Mcfarlan, F. W., Raman, K. S., & Yap, C. S. (1994). Institutional factors in information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 5(2), 139–169.
  • Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Kshetri, N. (2007). Barriers to e-commerce and competitive business models in developing countries : A case study. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6, 443–452. doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2007.02.004
  • Kurnia, S., Karnali, R. J., & Rahim, M. M. (2015). A qualitative study of business-to-business electronic commerce adoption within the Indonesian grocery industry: A multi-theory perspective. Information and Management, 52(4), 518–536. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2015.03.003
  • Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007). Assimilation of institutional pressures role of top management the effect systems: And the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 59–87.
  • Lin, H. (2014). Understanding the determinants of electronic supply chain management system adoption: Using the technology – organization – environment framework. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 86(1), 80–92.
  • Liu, C., Sia, C.-L., & Wei, K.-K. (2008). Adopting organizational virtualization in B2B firms: An empirical study in Singapore. Information & Management, 45(7), 429–437. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2008.06.005
  • Lund, M. J. F., McGuire, S., & McGuire, S. (2005). Institutions and development: Electronic commerce and economic growth, 26(12), 1743–1763. doi: 10.1177/0170840605059149
  • Lyytinen, K., & Damsgaard, J. (2011). Inter-organizational information systems adoption – a configuration analysis approach. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(5), 496–509. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2010.71
  • Mithas, S., Jones, j. L., & Mitchell, W. (2008). Buyer intention to Use internet-enabled reverse auctions: The role of asset specificity, product specialization, and Non-contractibility. MIS Quarterly, 32(4), 705–724.
  • Mithas, S., & Rust, R. T. (2016). How information technology strategy and investments influence firm performance: Conjecture and empirical evidence. MIS Quarterly, 40(1), 223–245.
  • Mohtaramzadeh, M., Ramayah, T., & Jun-hwa, C. (2017). B2b e-commerce adoption in Iranian manufacturing companies : Analyzing the moderating role of organizational culture. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–19. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2017.1385212
  • Nagy, A. (2006). Collaboration and conflict in the electronic integration of supply networks. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10).
  • Oliveira, T., Martins, M. F., & Lisboa, U. N. D. (2011). Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 14(1), 110–121.
  • Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. F. (2010). Understanding e-business adoption across industries in European countries. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(9), 1337–1354. doi: 10.1108/02635571011087428
  • Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., & Espadanal, M. (2014). Assessing the determinants of cloud computing adoption: An analysis of the manufacturing and services sectors. Information & Management, 51(5), 497–510. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2014.03.006
  • Paré, D. J. (2003). Does this site deliver? B2B e-commerce services for developing countries. The Information Society, 19(2), 123–134.
  • Pfeffer, J. S., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations. A resource dependence perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
  • Picoto, W. N., Bélanger, F., & Palma-dos-Reis, A. (2014). An organizational perspective on m-business: Usage factors and value determination. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(5), 571–592. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2014.15
  • Premkumar, G., & Ramamurthy, K. (1995). The role of interorganizational and organizational factors on the decision mode for adoption of interorganizational systems. Decision Sciences, 26(3), 303–336.
  • Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K., & Nilakanta, S. (1994). Implementation of electronic data implementation an innovation interchange: Diffusion perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(2), 157–186.
  • Premkumar, G., & Roberts, M. (1999). Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses. Omega, 27(4), 467–484. doi: 10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00071-1
  • Quaddus, M., & Hofmeyer, G. (2007). An investigation into the factors influencing the adoption of B2B trading exchanges in small businesses. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(3), 202–215. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000671
  • Qureshi, S. (2011). Globalization in development: Do information and communication technologies really matter? Information Technology for Development, 17(4), 249–252. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2011.610142
  • Qureshi, S. (2013). Information and communication technologies in the midst of global change: How do we know when development takes place? Information Technology for Development, 19(3), 189–192. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2013.818827
  • Rahim, M., & Kurnia, S. (2014). Understanding e-procurement system benefits using organisational adoption motivation lens: A case study. PACIS 2014 Proceedings.
  • Rai, A., Brown, P., & Tang, X. (2009). Organizational assimilation of electronic procurement innovations. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(1), 257–296. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222260110
  • Ranganathan, C., Teo, T. S. H., & Dhaliwal, J. (2011). International journal of information management web-enabled supply chain management: Key antecedents and performance impacts. International Journal of Information Management, 31, 533–545. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.02.004
  • Ravichandran, T., Han, S., & Hasan, I. (2009). Effects of institutional pressures on information technology investments: An empirical investigation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 56(4), 677–691.
  • Reimers, K., Johnston, R. B., & Klein, S. (2010a, December). The difficulty of studying inter-organisational IS phenomena on large scales: Critical reflections on a research journey. Electronic Markets, 20, 229–240.
  • Reimers, K., Johnston, R. B., & Klein, S. (2010b). Toward a theory of IOIS variance. International Journal of Strategic Information Technology and Applications, 1(3), 36–56. doi: 10.4018/jsita.2010070104
  • Robey, D., Im, G., & Wareham, J. D. (2008). Theoretical foundations of empirical research on interorganizational systems: Assessing past contributions and guiding future directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(9), 497–518.
  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Sila, I. (2010). Do organisational and environmental factors moderate the effects of Internet-based interorganisational systems on firm performance? European Journal of Information Systems, 19(5), 581–600. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2010.28
  • Sila, I. (2013). Factors affecting the adoption of B2B e-commerce. Electronic Commerce Research, 13, 199–236. doi: 10.1007/s10660-013-9110-7
  • Sila, I. (2015). The state of empirical research on the adoption and diffusion of business-to-business e-commerce Ismail Sila. International Journal of Electronic Business, 12(3), 258–301.
  • Son, J., & Benbasat, I. (2007). Organizational buyers’ adoption and use of B2B electronic marketplaces: Efficiency- and legitimacy-oriented perspectives. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 55–99. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240102
  • Son, J., Narasimhan, S., & Riggins, F. J. (2008). Understanding the development of IOS-based trading partner relationships: A structural model with empirical validation. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 18(1), 37–41. doi: 10.1080/10919390701807095
  • Son, J.-Y., Narasimhan, S., & Riggins F. J. (2005). Effects of relational factors and channel climate on EDI usage in the customer-supplier relationship. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), 321–353.
  • Srivastava, S. C., Teo, T. S. H., & Subramanian, A. M. (2009). Rational versus institutional perspectives in organizational web sites. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24, 615–638.
  • Standing, C., Sims, I., & Love, P. (2009). IT non-conformity in institutional environments: E-marketplace adoption in the government sector. Information & Management, 46(2), 138–149. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2008.10.001
  • Subramani, M. (2004). How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships? MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 45–73.
  • Tarofder, A. K., Marthandan, G., Mohan, A., & Tarofder, P. (2013). Web technology in supply chain: An empirical investigation. Business Process Management Journal, 19(3), 431–458.
  • Teo, T. S. H., Lin, S., & Lai, K. (2009). Adopters and non-adopters of e-procurement in Singapore : An empirical study. Omega, 37(1), 972–987. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2008.11.001
  • Teo, T. S. H., & Pian, Y. (2003). A contingency perspective on Internet adoption and competitive advantage. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(2), 78–92. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000448
  • Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., & Benbasat, I. (2003). Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 19–49.
  • Thatcher, S. M. B., Foster, W., & Zhu, L. (2006). B2b e-commerce adoption decisions in Taiwan: The interaction of cultural and other institutional factors. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 5(2), 92–104. doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2005.10.005
  • Thong, J. Y. L. (1999). An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), 187–214.
  • Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  • Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption–implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-29(1), 28–45.
  • Tsai, M., Lai, K., & Hsu, W. (2013). A study of the institutional forces influencing the adoption intention of RFID by suppliers. Information & Management, 50, 59–65.
  • Ulstrup Hoejmose, S. U., Grosvold, J., & Millington, A. (2013). Socially responsible supply chains: Power asymmetries and joint dependence. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(3), 277–291. doi: 10.1108/SCM-01-2012-0033
  • Unsworth, K., Sawang, S., Murray, J., Norman, P., & Sorbello, T. (2012). Understanding innovation adoption: Effects of orientation, pressure and control on adoption intentions. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(1), 1250004. doi: 10.1142/S1363919611003593
  • Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2012). Adoption and impacts of interorganizational business process standards: Role of partnering synergy. Information Systems Research, 23(4), 1131–1157. doi: 10.1287/isre.1110.0404
  • Villa, E., Ruiz, L., Valencia, A., & Picón, E. (2018). Electronic commerce: Factors involved in its adoption from a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 13(1), 39–70. doi: 10.4067/S0718-18762018000100104
  • Walsham, G. (2017). ICT4D research: Reflections on history and future agenda. Information Technology for Development, 0(0), 1–24. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2016.1246406
  • Wetzels, M., Odekerken-schröder, G., & van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177–195.
  • Whipple, J. M., Wiedmer, R., & Boyer, K. K. (2015, April). A dyadic investigation of collaborative competence, social capital, and performance in buyer–supplier relationships. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51, 3–21.
  • Wong, C. Y., & Boon-itt, S. (2008). The influence of institutional norms and environmental uncertainty on supply chain integration in the Thai automotive industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 115(2), 400–410. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.05.012
  • Wright, R. T., Campbell, D. E., Thatcher, J. B., & Roberts, N. (2012, June). Operationalizing multidimensional constructs in structural equation modeling: Recommendations for IS research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 30, 367–412.
  • Wu, F., Mahajan, V., & Balasubramanian, S. (2003). An analysis of e-business adoption and its impact on business performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(4), 425–447. doi: 10.1177/0092070303255379
  • Wu, X., & Subramaniam, C. (2011). Understanding and predicting Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) Adoption in supply chains. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 21(4), 348–367. doi: 10.1080/10919392.2011.614203
  • Yao, Y., & Zhu, K. X. (2012). Do electronic linkages reduce the bullwhip effect? An empirical analysis of the U.S. Manufacturing Supply Chains. Information Systems Research, 23(3), 1042–1055.
  • Yoon, T. E., & George, J. F. (2013). Why aren’t organizations adopting virtual worlds? Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 772–790.
  • Zhang, C., & Dhaliwal, J. (2009). An investigation of resource-based and institutional theoretic factors in technology adoption for operations and supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 120(1), 252–269. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.07.023
  • Zheng, D., Chen, J., Huang, L., & Zhang, C. (2013). E-government adoption in public administration organizations: Integrating institutional theory perspective and resource-based view. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(2), 221–234. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2012.28
  • Zhu, K., & Kraemer, K. L. (2005). Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: Cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 61–84. doi: 10.1287/isre.1050.0045
  • Zhu, K., Kraemer, K., & Xu, S. (2003). Electronic business adoption by European firms: A cross-country assessment of the facilitators and inhibitors. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(4), 251–268. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000475
  • Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., & Xu, S. (2006). The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries : A technology diffusion perspective on e-business. Management Science, 52(10), 1557–1576. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0487
  • Zhu, L., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2010). National information ecology : A new institutional economics perspective on global e-commerce adoption. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 11(1), 53–72.
  • Zhu, L., Thatcher, S. M. B., & Thatcher, M. E. (2015). Institutional environment for business-to-business (B2B) e-commerce usage: Toward an understanding in the Chinese context. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 16(3–4), 127–154. doi: 10.1080/15228053.2014.987612

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.