ICT4D evaluation: its foci, challenges, gaps, limitations, and possible approaches for improvement

References

• Baduza, G., & Khene, C. (2015). A comprehensive approach to scalability assessment of ICTD projects: An ICT4RED case development. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development – ICTD 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Brydon-Miller, M. (2013). Connected Communities: An international perspective (Podcast Transcript). https://ahrc.ukri.org/documents/transcripts/connected-communities-an-international-perspective/
   Google Scholar
• Burrell, J., & Toyama, K. (2009). What constitutes good ICTD research? Information Technologies and International Development, 5(3), 82–94.
   Google Scholar
• Chetwynd, E., & Chetwynd, F. J. (2007). Mid-Term Evaluation Kosovo Media Assistance Program (KMAP).
   Google Scholar
• Chetwynd, F., Gjurgjeala, J., & Smith, D. (2008). Kosovo Media Assistance Program.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. D., Leviton, L. C., & Shadish, W. R. (1985). Program evaluation. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, 3rd ed. (pp. 699–777). Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Dearden, A., & Tucker, W. D. (2016). Moving ICTD research beyond bungee jumping: Practical case studies and recommendations. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 35(3), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2016.2593267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, L., Sterling, S. R., & Bennett, J. K. (2013). Considering failure: Eight years of ITID research. Information Technologies & International Development, 9(2), 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, S., Sinha, C., & Smith, M. L. (2013). Innovations in evaluating ICT4D research. In L. Elder, H. Emdon, R. Fuchs, & B. Petrazzini (Eds.), Connecting ICTs to development: The IDRC experience (pp. 241–266). Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, R. (2013). The changing field of ICTD: Growth and maturation of the field, 2000-2010. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 58(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2013.tb00408.x
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, R., & Pather, S. (2012). ICT evaluation: Are we asking the right questions?. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 50(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2012.tb00355.x
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. W. (2016). How ICT4D research fails the poor. Information Technology for Development, 22(1), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2015.1018115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2002). Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success, and local improvisations. The Information Society, 18(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240290075039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2008). ICT4D 2.0: The next phase of applying ICT for international development. Computer, 41(6), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2008.192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2010). An ICT4D journal ranking table. Information Technologies & International Development, 6(4), 71–75.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2018). Information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R., & Molla, A. (2009). Impact Assessment of ICT-for-Development Projects: A Compendium of Approaches (No. 36; Development Informatics Working Paper Series).
   Google Scholar
• Kivunike, F. N., Ekenberg, L., Danielson, M., & Tusubira, F. F. (2014). Towards a structured approach for evaluating the ICT contribution to development. International Journal on Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions (ICTer), 7(1). http://doi.org/10.4038/icter.v7i1.7152
   Google Scholar
• Kivunike, F. N., Ekenberg, L., Danielson, M., & Tusubira, F. F. (2015). Using a structured approach to evaluate ICT4D: Healthcare delivery in Uganda. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 66(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2015.tb00478.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleine, D. (2011). The capability approach and the ‘medium of choice’: Steps towards conceptualising information and communication technologies for development. Ethics and Information Technology, 13, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9251-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleine, D. (2013). Technologies of choice? ICTs, development, and the capabilities approach. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lennie, J., Tacchi, J., Wilmore, M., & Koirala, B. (2015). A holistic, learning-centred approach to building evaluation capacity in development organizations. Evaluation, 21(3), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389015590219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, D., Method, F., Rockman, C., Cressman, G. M., & Daly, J. (2008). Overview and Recommendations to the Jordan Education Initiative (Synthesis Report).
   Google Scholar
• Light, D., & Rockman, C. (2008). An Evolving Partnership for Change: Stakeholders’ Reflections on the Jordan Education Initiative (Report: Task 2).
   Google Scholar
• Marathe, M., Chandra, P., Kameswaran, V., Kano, T., & Ahmed, S. I. (2016). In search of missing pieces: A re-examination of trends in ICTD research. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development - ICTD 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Method, F. (2008). Cost Assessment of Technology Support for e-Learning in Jordan (Report: Task 4).
   Google Scholar
• Mthoko, H., & Khene, C. (2015). Assessing outcome and impact: Towards a comprehensive evaluation approach in ICT4D. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development - ICTD 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Mthoko, H., & Khene, C. (2018). Building theory in ICT4D evaluation: A comprehensive approach to assessing outcome and impact. Information Technology for Development, 24(1), 138–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1315359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nederveen Pieterse, J. (2010). Development theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2015). The DAC Network on Development Evaluation: Evaluation evidence for better policies. http://www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation/EVALNET-flyer-2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016). Evaluation Systems in Development Co-operation: 2016 Review.
   Google Scholar
• Pade-Khene, C., & Sewry, D. (2011). Towards a comprehensive evaluation framework for ICT for development evaluation – An analysis of evaluation frameworks. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Management and Evaluation: ICIME 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pade-Khene, C., & Sewry, D. (2012). The rural ICT comprehensive evaluation framework: Implementing the first domain, the baseline study process. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 51(8), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2012.tb00365.x
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, V., & Gupta, S. (2018). A comprehensive four-stage framework for evaluation of Information Communication Technologies for Development interventions. Information Technology for Development, 24(3), 511–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1371108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patra, R., Pal, J., & Nedevschi, S. (2009). ICTD state of the union: Where have we reached and where are we headed. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development – ICTD 2009, 357–366.
   Google Scholar
• Preskill, H., & Boyle, S. (2008). A multidisciplinary model of evaluation capacity building. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(4), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214008324182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi, S. (2017). The forgotten awaken: ICT’s evolving role in the roots of mass discontent. Information Technology for Development, 23(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1293963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter, B. (2017). Theory and methodology of exploratory social science research. International Journal of Science and Research Methodology, 5(4), 129–150.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2000). Development as freedom. Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Leviton, L. C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Souter, D. (2008). ICD and impact assessment: Investigation report. In BCO impact assessment study: The final report (pp. 154–182). Building Communication Opportunities (BCO) Alliance.
   Google Scholar
• Sumner, A., & Tribe, M. (2008). International development studies: Theories and methods in research and practice. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Thapa, D., & Saebø, Ø. (2014). Exploring the link between ICT and development in the context of developing countries: A literature review. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 64(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2014.tb00454.x
   Google Scholar
• Thapa, D., Sein, M. K., & Sæbø, Ø. (2012). Building collective capabilities through ICT in a mountain region of Nepal: Where social capital leads to collective action. Information Technology for Development, 18(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2011.643205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uys, C. S. (2015). Framework for evaluating information technology benefits in local communities [Doctoral dissertation]. Cape Peninsula University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. (2010). A contribution to current debates in impact evaluation. Evaluation, 16(2), 153–164. doi:10.1177/1356389010361562
   Google Scholar
• Yim, M. (2019). Information and communication technology for development (ICT4D) evaluation: Examining its foci, gaps, challenges, and associations with other areas to strengthen the field’s conceptual underpinnings [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Washington.
   Google Scholar